Roy de Winter
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Roy de Winter has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Niki van Stein
LIACS, Leiden University
6 shared publications - Thomas Bäck
Leiden University
6 shared publications - Anna V. Kononova
LIACS, Leiden University
2 shared publications Bas Milatz
2 shared publications- Julian Blank
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA
2 shared publications - Austin A. Kana
Department of Maritime and Transport Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 July 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 31-32
Hot off the Press: Parallel Multi-Objective Optimization for Expensive and Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints
This paper presents the Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints Self-Adapting Multi-Objective Constraint Optimization algorithm using Radial Basis Function Approximations (IOC-SAMO-COBRA). This algorithm is introduced to address constraint multi-objective optimization problems that involve a mix of computationally expensive and inexpensive evaluation functions. The IOC-SAMO-COBRA algorithm iteratively learns the expensive functions with radial basis function surrogates, while the inexpensive functions are directly used in the search for promising solutions. Two benefits of using the inexpensive functions directly include: (1) The inexpensive functions do not introduce approximation errors like surrogates do. (2) Time can be saved as there is no need to fit and interpolate surrogate models for the inexpensive functions. Results on 22 test functions indicate that exploiting the inexpensive functions can be beneficial as this results in better Pareto front approximations compared to using surrogates for both expensive and inexpensive functions. This paper serves as an extended abstract for the Hot-off-the-Press track at GECCO 2024, building upon the paper Parallel Multi-Objective Optimization for Expensive and Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints by de Winter et al, published in Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Volume 86 (2024) [4].
- 14 July 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 31-32
Open AccessHot off the Press: Parallel Multi-Objective Optimization for Expensive and Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints
This paper presents the Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints Self-Adapting Multi-Objective Constraint Optimization algorithm using Radial Basis Function Approximations (IOC-SAMO-COBRA). This algorithm is introduced to address constraint multi-objective optimization problems that involve a mix of computationally expensive and inexpensive evaluation functions. The IOC-SAMO-COBRA algorithm iteratively learns the expensive functions with radial basis function surrogates, while the inexpensive functions are directly used in the search for promising solutions. Two benefits of using the inexpensive functions directly include: (1) The inexpensive functions do not introduce approximation errors like surrogates do. (2) Time can be saved as there is no need to fit and interpolate surrogate models for the inexpensive functions. Results on 22 test functions indicate that exploiting the inexpensive functions can be beneficial as this results in better Pareto front approximations compared to using surrogates for both expensive and inexpensive functions. This paper serves as an extended abstract for the Hot-off-the-Press track at GECCO 2024, building upon the paper Parallel Multi-Objective Optimization for Expensive and Inexpensive Objectives and Constraints by de Winter et al, published in Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Volume 86 (2024) [4].
- Open Access
- 14 July 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1715-1723
Modular Optimization Framework for Mixed Expensive and Inexpensive Real-World Problems
A modular optimization framework is proposed that can deal with different problem characteristics encountered in real-world design problems. The common denominator of problems considered in this work is the computationally demanding objective function used to evaluate the designs, while some of the constraint functions can be inexpensive. The framework uses radial basis functions as surrogates for the computationally expensive objectives while inexpensive functions can directly be used for searching promising solutions on the surrogates. The framework is adjustable for the number of continuous design parameters, the number of constraints, the number of solutions that can be evaluated in parallel, and different strategies can be selected on how to deal with the computationally inexpensive functions. We propose guidelines on how to set up the modular framework depending on the problem characteristics one has to deal with. To verify the working of the optimization framework, two different real-world ship design optimization problems have been optimized with different characteristics such as the number of constraints and how expensive they are. The results show that it is beneficial to directly exploit the inexpensive functions when possible and that parameterization of the problem is the most important step of the process.
- 14 July 2024
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1715-1723
Open AccessModular Optimization Framework for Mixed Expensive and Inexpensive Real-World Problems
A modular optimization framework is proposed that can deal with different problem characteristics encountered in real-world design problems. The common denominator of problems considered in this work is the computationally demanding objective function used to evaluate the designs, while some of the constraint functions can be inexpensive. The framework uses radial basis functions as surrogates for the computationally expensive objectives while inexpensive functions can directly be used for searching promising solutions on the surrogates. The framework is adjustable for the number of continuous design parameters, the number of constraints, the number of solutions that can be evaluated in parallel, and different strategies can be selected on how to deal with the computationally inexpensive functions. We propose guidelines on how to set up the modular framework depending on the problem characteristics one has to deal with. To verify the working of the optimization framework, two different real-world ship design optimization problems have been optimized with different characteristics such as the number of constraints and how expensive they are. The results show that it is beneficial to directly exploit the inexpensive functions when possible and that parameterization of the problem is the most important step of the process.
- Open Access
- 16 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
- Vol. 86
Parallel multi-objective optimization for expensive and inexpensive objectives and constraints
- 16 February 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
- Vol. 86
Open AccessParallel multi-objective optimization for expensive and inexpensive objectives and constraints
- Open Access
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 15
Parameter space exploration for the probabilistic damage stability method for dry cargo ships
- 7 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
- Vol. 15
Open AccessParameter space exploration for the probabilistic damage stability method for dry cargo ships
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 June 2023
- Published by MIT Press in Evolutionary Computation
- Vol. 31 (2) , 81-122
Evolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization—Thirty Years Later
Thirty years, 1993–2023, is a huge time frame in science. We address some major developments in the field of evolutionary algorithms, with applications in parameter optimization, over these 30 years. These include the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and some fast-growing fields such as multimodal optimization, surrogate-assisted optimization, multiobjective optimization, and automated algorithm design. Moreover, we also discuss particle swarm optimization and differential evolution, which did not exist 30 years ago, either. One of the key arguments made in the paper is that we need fewer algorithms, not more, which, however, is the current trend through continuously claiming paradigms from nature that are suggested to be useful as new optimization algorithms. Moreover, we argue that we need proper benchmarking procedures to sort out whether a newly proposed algorithm is useful or not. We also briefly discuss automated algorithm design approaches, including configurable algorithm design frameworks, as the proposed next step toward designing optimization algorithms automatically, rather than by hand.
- 1 June 2023
- Published by MIT Press in Evolutionary Computation
- Vol. 31 (2) , 81-122
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessEvolutionary Algorithms for Parameter Optimization—Thirty Years Later
Thirty years, 1993–2023, is a huge time frame in science. We address some major developments in the field of evolutionary algorithms, with applications in parameter optimization, over these 30 years. These include the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy and some fast-growing fields such as multimodal optimization, surrogate-assisted optimization, multiobjective optimization, and automated algorithm design. Moreover, we also discuss particle swarm optimization and differential evolution, which did not exist 30 years ago, either. One of the key arguments made in the paper is that we need fewer algorithms, not more, which, however, is the current trend through continuously claiming paradigms from nature that are suggested to be useful as new optimization algorithms. Moreover, we argue that we need proper benchmarking procedures to sort out whether a newly proposed algorithm is useful or not. We also briefly discuss automated algorithm design approaches, including configurable algorithm design frameworks, as the proposed next step toward designing optimization algorithms automatically, rather than by hand.
- Open Access
Multi-surrogate Assisted Efficient Global Optimization for Discrete Problems
Decades of progress in simulation-based surrogate-assisted optimization and unprecedented growth in computational power have enabled researchers and practitioners to optimize previously intractable complex engineering problems. This paper investigates the possible benefit of a concurrent utilization of multiple simulation-based surrogate models to solve complex discrete optimization problems. To fulfill this, the so-called Self-Adaptive Multi-surrogate Assisted Efficient Global Optimization algorithm (SAMA-DiEGO), which features a two-stage online model management strategy, is proposed and further benchmarked on fifteen binary-encoded combinatorial and fifteen ordinal problems against several state-of-the-art non-surrogate or single surrogate assisted optimization algorithms. Our findings indicate that SAMA-DiEGO can rapidly converge to better solutions on a majority of the test problems, which shows the feasibility and advantage of using multiple surrogate models in optimizing discrete problems.
Open AccessMulti-surrogate Assisted Efficient Global Optimization for Discrete Problems
Decades of progress in simulation-based surrogate-assisted optimization and unprecedented growth in computational power have enabled researchers and practitioners to optimize previously intractable complex engineering problems. This paper investigates the possible benefit of a concurrent utilization of multiple simulation-based surrogate models to solve complex discrete optimization problems. To fulfill this, the so-called Self-Adaptive Multi-surrogate Assisted Efficient Global Optimization algorithm (SAMA-DiEGO), which features a two-stage online model management strategy, is proposed and further benchmarked on fifteen binary-encoded combinatorial and fifteen ordinal problems against several state-of-the-art non-surrogate or single surrogate assisted optimization algorithms. Our findings indicate that SAMA-DiEGO can rapidly converge to better solutions on a majority of the test problems, which shows the feasibility and advantage of using multiple surrogate models in optimizing discrete problems.
- Open Access
- 8 April 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Memetic Computing
- Vol. 14 (2) , 151-164
Constrained Multi-Objective Optimization with a Limited Budget of Function Evaluations
This paper proposes the Self-Adaptive algorithm for Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization by using Radial Basis Function Approximations, SAMO-COBRA. This algorithm automatically determines the best Radial Basis Function-fit as surrogates for the objectives as well as the constraints, to find new feasible Pareto-optimal solutions. SAMO-COBRA is compared to a wide set of other state-of-the-art algorithms (IC-SA-NSGA-II, SA-NSGA-II, NSGA-II, NSGA-III, CEGO, SMES-RBF) on 18 constrained multi-objective problems. In the first experiment, SAMO-COBRA outperforms the other algorithms in terms of achieved Hypervolume (HV) after being given a fixed small evaluation budget on the majority of test functions. In the second experiment, SAMO-COBRA outperforms the majority of competitors in terms of required function evaluations to achieve $$95\%$$ of the maximum achievable Hypervolume. In addition to academic test functions, SAMO-COBRA has been applied on a real-world ship design optimization problem with three objectives, two complex constraints, and five decision variables.- 8 April 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Memetic Computing
- Vol. 14 (2) , 151-164
Open AccessConstrained Multi-Objective Optimization with a Limited Budget of Function Evaluations
This paper proposes the Self-Adaptive algorithm for Multi-Objective Constrained Optimization by using Radial Basis Function Approximations, SAMO-COBRA. This algorithm automatically determines the best Radial Basis Function-fit as surrogates for the objectives as well as the constraints, to find new feasible Pareto-optimal solutions. SAMO-COBRA is compared to a wide set of other state-of-the-art algorithms (IC-SA-NSGA-II, SA-NSGA-II, NSGA-II, NSGA-III, CEGO, SMES-RBF) on 18 constrained multi-objective problems. In the first experiment, SAMO-COBRA outperforms the other algorithms in terms of achieved Hypervolume (HV) after being given a fixed small evaluation budget on the majority of test functions. In the second experiment, SAMO-COBRA outperforms the majority of competitors in terms of required function evaluations to achieve $$95\%$$ of the maximum achievable Hypervolume. In addition to academic test functions, SAMO-COBRA has been applied on a real-world ship design optimization problem with three objectives, two complex constraints, and five decision variables. - 24 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 270-282
SAMO-COBRA: A Fast Surrogate Assisted Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm
- 24 March 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 270-282
SAMO-COBRA: A Fast Surrogate Assisted Constrained Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm