Tomokazu Suzuki
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Tomokazu Suzuki has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Erika Sugiyama
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics School of Pharmacy Showa University Tokyo Japan
1 shared publicationHidenori Suzuki
Department of Pharmacy Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Takanawa Hospital Tokyo Japan
1 shared publicationHitoshi Sato
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics School of Pharmacy Showa University Tokyo Japan
1 shared publicationKenji Nozawa
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics School of Pharmacy Showa University Tokyo Japan
1 shared publicationKyoka Takahashi
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics School of Pharmacy Showa University Tokyo Japan
1 shared publicationMasataka Tajima
Division of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Department of Pharmacology Toxicology and Therapeutics School of Pharmacy Showa University Tokyo Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 25 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
- Vol. 9 (2) , e00746
Effects of dosing frequency on the clinical efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam in Japanese elderly patients with pneumonia: A single‐center retrospective observational study
This study sought to investigate whether dosing frequency (the number of doses per day) affects the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) in Japanese elderly pneumonia patients treated with ABPC/SBT at 6 g/day. This was a retrospective observational study that included hospitalized elderly patients (aged ≥75 years, 10 ml/min ≤CLcr n = 61) or 1.5 g every 6 h (QID; n = 45) for the treatment of pneumonia. The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by measuring body temperature, white blood cell count, and C‐reactive protein levels. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations were conducted in silico to rationalize the clinical findings. The clinical response rates (extremely effective and effective) in the BID and QID groups were 36.1% and 55.6%, respectively (p = .0459). QID tended to be more effective in patients with gram‐negative rods detected (p = .0563). According to the simulated minimum plasma ABPC concentrations at steady state for BID and QID were 2.5 and 7.3 μg/ml, respectively (p < .0001). Based on the simulated time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), pharmacological (not clinical) efficacy was predicted to be higher with QID. Both groups had similar safety profiles. The main adverse event in both groups was liver damage. The present retrospective survey demonstrated that ABPC/SBT treatment for elderly patients with pneumonia and renal dysfunction was more effective with QID than with BID. Therefore, the QID regimen is worthy of consideration to improve the clinical outcomes of ABPC/SBT therapy in the present patient population.
- 25 March 2021
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
- Vol. 9 (2) , e00746
Open AccessEffects of dosing frequency on the clinical efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam in Japanese elderly patients with pneumonia: A single‐center retrospective observational study
This study sought to investigate whether dosing frequency (the number of doses per day) affects the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) in Japanese elderly pneumonia patients treated with ABPC/SBT at 6 g/day. This was a retrospective observational study that included hospitalized elderly patients (aged ≥75 years, 10 ml/min ≤CLcr n = 61) or 1.5 g every 6 h (QID; n = 45) for the treatment of pneumonia. The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by measuring body temperature, white blood cell count, and C‐reactive protein levels. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations were conducted in silico to rationalize the clinical findings. The clinical response rates (extremely effective and effective) in the BID and QID groups were 36.1% and 55.6%, respectively (p = .0459). QID tended to be more effective in patients with gram‐negative rods detected (p = .0563). According to the simulated minimum plasma ABPC concentrations at steady state for BID and QID were 2.5 and 7.3 μg/ml, respectively (p < .0001). Based on the simulated time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), pharmacological (not clinical) efficacy was predicted to be higher with QID. Both groups had similar safety profiles. The main adverse event in both groups was liver damage. The present retrospective survey demonstrated that ABPC/SBT treatment for elderly patients with pneumonia and renal dysfunction was more effective with QID than with BID. Therefore, the QID regimen is worthy of consideration to improve the clinical outcomes of ABPC/SBT therapy in the present patient population.