Je Marcoux

Background: Biocompatible circuits (BCC) are intended to decrease the activation of blood to the artificial cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surface. Typically, the coatings are made of various inert substances or molecules physiologically similar to endothelium. Thromboelastography (TEG) graphically represents clot formation, strength of clotting and fibrinolysis. TEG analysis was undertaken to determine if coagulation could be preserved by the BCC. Methods: Five different BCC were studied in clinical applications. These five coated circuits were then compared to an identical circuit where only the oxygenator was coated. A pre- and post-bypass TEG was done for comparison. Six well-studied parameters of TEG analysis were compared: R time, Angle, K, Maximum Amplitude (MA), LY30% and Clot Index (CI). Postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements were compared to TEG results for comparison. Results: All postoperative TEG results were significantly different from preoperative parameters except LY30%. No BCC circuit was able to prevent the significant disruption of the observed TEG coagulation parameters R, K, angle, MA and CI. Of note, the postoperative TEG parameters resulting from the Control and Trillium™ groups – which had the same type of oxygenator – were practically identical. The oxygenator, which represents the largest surface area in the CPB circuit, is the single most important factor influencing coagulation. Conclusion: While not harmful, BCC are ineffective in preserving TEG coagulation parameters post CPB. Clinical findings support laboratory TEG results in that there were no differences in bleeding or transfusion requirements between groups.

A 27-year-old, G₃P ₂A₀ female with acute Staph aureus (SA) endocarditis successfully underwent CPB-assisted aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic aortic valve at 22 weeks’ gestation. This patient’s presentation of acute endocarditis complicated by septic shock, congestive heart failure, severe aortic insufficiency, multiple septic embolic events and borderline renal failure appeared on the daunting background of chronic heavy tobacco usage, hepatitis C positivity, long-term IV drug abuse and a pregnancy into its twenty-second week. Optimal treatment strategies implemented for both mother and fetus throughout the perioperative period contributed to a successful outcome for both.

Attenuated inflammatory response and decreased platelet activation have been claimed repeatedly when biocompatible circuits are used for cardiopulmonary bypass. We evaluated five Health Canada approved biocompatible circuit coatings (BCC) against an un-coated control group to determine their effectiveness in improving post-operative outcomes. Patients were assigned to the Control group or one of the 5 coated circuit groups: 40 Control; 33 Trillium; 32 Phisio; 34 Bioline; 33 X; and 11 GBS. Measured outcomes included: ventilator time; ICU time; post-operative chest tube drainage and transfusion volume; high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP); tau protein; and pre- and 72-hour post-operative anti-saccadic eye movement test comparisons. Results: 183 patients were enlisted into the study. One arm of the study (GBS) was abandoned after 11 patients on account of inconsistent pressure excursions within the oxygenator and the excessive consumption of platelets necessitating transfusion. Patients in the X-coated group had significantly longer ventilator and intensive care unit (ICU) time compared to the three remaining coated circuit study groups. Though not significant, patients in the X group also demonstrated the highest post-operative chest tube losses, the most platelet transfusions, the highest tau protein levels and the lowest post-operative anti-saccadic eye movement test (ASEMT) results compared to the three remaining coated groups. The patients in the Trillium, Bioline and Phisio groups showed an improvement in ventilator and ICU time relative to the Control group. The diabetic patients in the Trillium, Bioline and Phisio groups showed an improvement in bleeding relative to the diabetic patients in the Control group. Conclusion: We compared all 5 coated circuits approved for clinical use in Canada against an uncoated control circuit. Three of the 5 coated circuits (Trillium, Phisio and Bioline BCC) were found to improve ventilator and ICU time compared to Control. Further studies are indicated to validate these results and their impact upon approval criteria, purchasing choices and safe clinical practice, especially as applied to higher risk diabetic patients.