Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Anna Ramon-Aribau has a total of 54 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Cristina Borralleras

    Universitat de Vic

    4 shared publications
  • Eduard Minobes-Molina

    Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic‐Central University of Catalonia (UVic‐UCC) Vic Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza

    Technology, Inclusion and Health Research Group (TIS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), 08500 Vic, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Meritxell Mondejar-Pont

    Research Group Methodology, methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare. Universitat de Vic Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), C. Sagrada Família, 7, 08500 Vic, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Sergi Grau-Carrión

    Faculty of Science Technology and Engineering (FCTE), Universitat de Vic–Universitat Central de Catalunya, 08500 Vic, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Montse Romero-Mas

    Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare. Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS). University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Catalunya, Spain

    3 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Pain Experience and Expectations in Oncological Outpatient and Their Caregivers: Phenomenological Study

    by Alícia Minaya-Freire, Gemma Pou-Pujol, Sílvia Carbonell-Palau, Laura Montero-Aliguer, Érica Izquierdo-Sánchez, Ester Fontseré-Candell, Amal Andich, Anna Ramon-Aribau

  • Open Access

    Assessing Healthcare Integration: An Integrated Palliative Care System in Spain

    by Meritxell Mondejar-Pont, Laura Rota-Musoll, Xavier Gómez-Batiste, Anna Ramon-Aribau

    Introduction: This study explored the Osona palliative care system, recognized internationally for its good results in managing the chronic patient. The literature notices a gap of models that evaluate integration in healthcare systems. This study assesses the degree of integration of the Osona palliative care system, as well it implements a model that evaluates integration. Methods: This research used a qualitative methodology, involving a case study design with three study phases. The first phase involved reviewing primary sources, followed by conducting interviews. The final phase entailed comparing the findings with a theoretical model to analyse and validate the results. Results: The study found the integrative elements that the Osona system includes such as: multidisciplinary teams, leadership and a palliative care system that is cost-efficient. It also found aspects to improve including collaboration, continuity of care, early patient identification and lack of funding. Discussion: Our findings suggest that the Osona system has made significant progress toward integration, even though it continues the path of ongoing development in integrated care. Conclusion: This research found that the Osona palliative care system includes many integrating aspects such as multidisciplinary teams, leadership and the system’s cost-efficiency. Nevertheless, some aspects need changes such as continuity of care, collaboration, enhanced early patient identification and increase funding. Furthermore, this study provides an example of how to assess integration in a system. Resumen Introducción: Este estudio investiga el sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona, reconocido internacionalmente por sus buenos resultados en el manejo de pacientes crónicos. La literatura señala una falta de modelos que evalúen la integración en los sistemas de salud. Este estudio evalúa el grado de integración del sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona y, además, implementa un modelo que evalúa dicha integración. Métodos: Esta investigación utilizó una metodología cualitativa, con un diseño de estudio de caso con tres fases. La primera fase consistió en revisar fuentes primarias, seguida de la realización de entrevistas. La fase final implicó comparar los hallazgos del estudio con un modelo teórico para analizar y validar los resultados. Resultados: El estudio identificó elementos integradores que incluye el sistema de Osona, como equipos multidisciplinarios, liderazgo, y un sistema de cuidados paliativos rentable. También encontró aspectos a mejorar, incluyendo la colaboración, la continuidad de la atención, la identificación temprana de pacientes y la falta de financiación. Discusión: Nuestros resultados sugieren que el sistema de Osona ha logrado un progreso significativo hacia la integración, aunque continúa en el camino de un desarrollo continuo en la atención integrada. Conclusión: Esta investigación encontró que el sistema de cuidados paliativos de Osona incluye muchos aspectos integradores, como equipos multidisciplinarios, liderazgo y eficiencia en costos del sistema. Sin embargo, algunos aspectos requieren cambios, como la continuidad de la atención, la colaboración, la mejora en la identificación temprana de pacientes y el aumento de la financiación. Este estudio aporta un ejemplo de cómo evaluar la integración en un sistema. Palabras Clave: atención integrada; sistema de salud; cuidados paliativos; atención crónica; estudio de evaluación


  • Open Access

    Evaluation of the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on People and Organisations in Long-Term Care Facilities of Catalonia and Proposals for Improving the Care Model: The Resicovid-19 Project

    by Jordi Amblàs-Novellas, Laura Coll-Planas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Daniel López, Joan Carles Martori, Anna Ramon-Aribau, Adelina Comas-Herrera, Pau Moreno-Martin, Montserrat Solé-Casals, Catuxa Máiz-Mazuela, et al.

    Background: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is estimated that around 25% of infected residents in Nursing Homes in Catalonia died, which accounted for more than 50% of total COVID-19 deaths in the region. This devasting impact not only highlights the structural deficits of the long-term care facilities system, but it also provides a unique opportunity to gather evidence to support a redesign of the health and social care models–a redesign that focuses on individuals and their singularities, and is equipped with the staff and infrastructure required to meet their needs. Methods: The ResiCOVID-19 project will include five work packages to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (from March 2020 to June 2022) on the individuals living in long-term care facilities in Catalonia, their family members, health care workers, and the organisations themselves. In this project, we will develop proposals for improvement and indicators for the long-term care model in Catalonia to better adapt to the current and future needs of people-centred care through conducting a rapid review, analysis of international experiences, retrospective analysis, and a cross-sectional study. The analysis will be conducted both from a quantitative and a qualitative perspective, measuring the impact at a system level as well as at a setting and individual level, including residents, families, professionals, and managers of long-term care facilities. Conclusions: The ResiCOVID-19 project is expected to have a significant impact at different dimensions, including the care model, social and organisational aspects (on professionals and facilities), systemic efforts (both for the healthcare and the social systems), and scientific contributions (providing evidence in a field of limited research in Catalonia).


  • PEER ASSESSMENT AND SELF-ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION HEALTH DEGREES

    by Anna Ramon-Aribau, Desirée Valera-Gran, Cristina Vaqué-Crusellas, Meritxell Mondejar-Pont, Ester Goutan-Roura, Ricard Castro-Prat, Montserrat Serra-Mas, Blanca Ribot-Serra, Lourdes Albiac-Suñer, Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz

  • Open Access

    Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review

    by Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Cristina Borralleras Andreu, Eduard Minobes-Molina, Sergi Grau Carrión, Montse Romero-Mas, Anna Ramon-Aribau

    Background: Support interventions for caregivers can reduce their stress, possibly improving the quality of patients’ care while reducing care costs. Technological solutions have been designed to cover their needs, but there are some challenges in making them truly functional for end users. Co-design approaches present important opportunities for engaging diverse populations to help ensure that technological solutions are inclusive and accessible. Objective: This study aimed to identify co-created technological solutions, as well as the process followed for their co-creation, in the field of health for caregivers. Methods: The literature review was conducted in the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Scielo, and IEEE Xplore databases. The inclusion criteria were studies written in English or Spanish and with a publication date until May 2021. The content had to specify that the caregivers actively participated in the co-creation process, which covered until the development phase of the technological solution (prototype). The level of evidence and the methodological quality were analyzed when possible, using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2018, respectively. Results: In total, 410 papers were identified, and 11 met the eligibility criteria. The most predominant articles were mixed methods studies and qualitative studies. The technology used in the analyzed articles were mobile or web applications (9 studies) and specific devices such as sensors, cameras, or alarm systems (2 studies) to support the health and social aspects of caregivers and improve their education in care. The most common patient profile was older people (7 studies); 6 studies used co-creation in the requirements phase, 6 studies detailed the design phase. In 9 studies, the prototype was iteratively refined in the development phase, and the validation phase was performed in 5 of the reviewed studies. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that existing co-created technological solutions in the field of health for caregivers are mostly mobile or web applications to support caregivers’ social health and well-being and improve their health knowledge when delivering care to patients, especially older people. As for the co-creation process, caregivers are particularly involved during development and in the design. The scarce literature found indicates that further research with higher methodological quality is needed.


  • PREPARING STUDENTS FOR THE FUTURE: INTRODUCING CO-CREATION AS LEARNING STRATEGY

    by Anna Ramon-Aribau, Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Cristina Borralleras-Andreu, Eduard Minobes-Molina, Sergi Grau-Carrión

  • CO-CREATING: DESIGNING MULTI-DISCIPLINARY SOLUTIONS WITH FAMILY CAREGIVERS OF PERSONS WITH ALZHEIMER'S AND BRINGING THE THIRD AND PRIVATE SECTOR INTO THE CLASSROOMS

    by Sergi Grau-Carrión, Anna Ramon-Aribau, Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Eduard Minobes-Molina, Cristina Borralleras-Andreu

  • Open Access

    Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review (Preprint)

    by Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Cristina Borralleras Andreu, Eduard Minobes-Molina, Sergi Grau Carrión, Montse Romero-Mas, Anna Ramon-Aribau

    BACKGROUND Support interventions for caregivers can reduce their stress, possibly improving the quality of patients’ care while reducing care costs. Technological solutions have been designed to cover their needs, but there are some challenges in making them truly functional for end users. Co-design approaches present important opportunities for engaging diverse populations to help ensure that technological solutions are inclusive and accessible. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify co-created technological solutions, as well as the process followed for their co-creation, in the field of health for caregivers. METHODS The literature review was conducted in the Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Scielo, and IEEE Xplore databases. The inclusion criteria were studies written in English or Spanish and with a publication date until May 2021. The content had to specify that the caregivers actively participated in the co-creation process, which covered until the development phase of the technological solution (prototype). The level of evidence and the methodological quality were analyzed when possible, using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2018, respectively. RESULTS In total, 410 papers were identified, and 11 met the eligibility criteria. The most predominant articles were mixed methods studies and qualitative studies. The technology used in the analyzed articles were mobile or web applications (9 studies) and specific devices such as sensors, cameras, or alarm systems (2 studies) to support the health and social aspects of caregivers and improve their education in care. The most common patient profile was older people (7 studies); 6 studies used co-creation in the requirements phase, 6 studies detailed the design phase. In 9 studies, the prototype was iteratively refined in the development phase, and the validation phase was performed in 5 of the reviewed studies. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review suggests that existing co-created technological solutions in the field of health for caregivers are mostly mobile or web applications to support caregivers’ social health and well-being and improve their health knowledge when delivering care to patients, especially older people. As for the co-creation process, caregivers are particularly involved during development and in the design. The scarce literature found indicates that further research with higher methodological quality is needed. CLINICALTRIAL

  • Open Access

    Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study

    by Meritxell Mondejar-Pont, Kristen Abbott-Anderson, Anna Ramon-Aribau, Renee Kumpula, Tammy Neiman, Hans-Peter De Ruiter

    Background: The aging population in the Global North is associated with an increased prevalence of multiple chronic diseases that would benefit from integrated palliative care. In this context, it is vital to consider the effectiveness of health care systems’ response to the needs of the older population residing in rural areas, including access to palliative care services. Understanding palliative care program availability and palliative care system characteristics is important in creating useful health interventions in rural areas. Objective: This study aims to provide an international view on palliative care in rural areas. A study exploring palliative care services offered in Southern Minnesota will be carried out, building on a previous study conducted in Osona, Spain. Findings from both studies will be compared, providing insights into the strengths of each system and identifying areas for growth. Methods: This study will be performed using qualitative case study methodology. Using a similar methodology to the one used in the Spanish study, palliative care services will be explored in a similarly sized rural area in Southern Minnesota. This will be accomplished by (1) reviewing available literature related to the Southern Minnesota palliative care system and (2) identifying key providers in this US palliative care system who will be invited to participate in semistructured interviews. The study participants will be asked about the gaps between ideal integrated palliative care system services and the existing complementary palliative care services, and the ethical issues and dilemmas that evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Following ethical approval for this protocol, data collection is anticipated to begin in spring or summer 2022 and is expected to take 6 months. Data collection will be followed by data analysis in fall 2022. Finally, the researchers plan to disseminate the findings in spring 2023. Conclusions: Comparing 2 similarly sized but culturally different rural palliative care systems in Minnesota and Osona will provide insights into how integrated palliative care systems impact the older population and those with chronic illnesses. Study findings will contribute to enhanced patient care, organizational improvements, policy change, and an understanding of the impact of different health care system models. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/36037


  • Open Access

    High hiring rate of nurses in Catalonia and the rest of Spain hides precarious employment from 2010 to 2019: A quantitative study

    by Paola Galbany‐Estragués, Pere Millán‐Martínez, Joan‐Carles Casas‐Baroy, Mireia Subirana‐Casacuberta, Anna Ramon‐Aribau

    This study aims to describe the hiring of nurses in Catalonia and the rest of Spain over 10 years. Precarious employment (PE) has negative consequences for nurses' quality of life and work performance. Quantitative study using a retrospective, longitudinal, descriptive design. We analysed publicly available employment data from Catalonia and the rest of Spain. Nurses are among the health professionals with the lowest proportion of open‐term (permanent) contracts, 25% during the first 4 years of employment. During the study period, each nurse hired had an average of 3.44 contracts per year. The proportion of nurses with a fixed‐term (non‐permanent) contract shrank from 25.3% in 2006 to 20.5% in 2012 and grew rapidly to 38.7% in 2018. We estimate that 14,800 nurses signed fixed‐term contracts in 2018 without ever having registered as unemployed in nursing. High rates of fixed‐term hiring and the high number of contracts per nurse are evidence of a high level of PE for nurses in Catalonia. When policymakers and workforce planners design recruitment and retention programmes for nurses, they should consider improving working conditions by extending more open‐term contracts to combat PE and, indirectly, the shortage of nurses.