Mitch Sevigny
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Mitch Sevigny has a total of 28 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jessica L. Ryan
Research Service & Tampa Veterans Research and Education, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Tampa, Tampa, Florida, United States
2 shared publications - Natalie Gilmore
Research Service & Tampa Veterans Research and Education, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, Florida, United States
2 shared publications - Risa Nakase-Richardson
Department of Neurosurgery, Brain, and Spine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
2 shared publications - Aaron M. Martin
Department of Neurosurgery, Brain, and Spine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
1 shared publication C.B. Eagye
Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado, USA
1 shared publication- Daniel W. Klyce
Mental Health Service Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System Richmond Virginia USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 20 October 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Mental Health Symptom Severity Is Positively Associated With Rehabilitation Needs in Veterans and Service Members With Polytrauma, Including Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
Objective: To assess the relationship between rehabilitation needs and mental health symptoms in Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, including history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Five Veterans Affairs (VA) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Programs. Participants: Veterans and Service Members enrolled in the VA TBI Model Systems study who completed a follow-up greater than 6 months postprogram. Design: Cohort study. Main Measures: Primary regression analyses included rehabilitation needs (Rehabilitation Needs Survey) and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSD Checklist-Civilian version). Age, sex, months from rehabilitation to follow-up interview, preinjury mental health, disability level (Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended), and number of comorbidities were included as covariates. Secondary analyses applied the same model structure to assess the relationship between rehabilitation needs and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) symptoms. Results: Most Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, including mild TBI, reported a current need for services to control physical symptoms (55%) and greater than one-third endorsed a current need for services to improve memory (46%), manage emotions (45%), improve health (44%), manage daily stress (42%), and solve daily problems (38%). Adjusted regression analyses revealed that rehabilitation needs were significantly and positively associated with post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression self-report symptoms. These relationships were maintained when analyses were repeated with mental health–related items removed from the Rehabilitation Needs Survey, suggesting the finding was not solely because of mental health needs. Higher comorbidity burden and disability were also independently associated with higher rehabilitation needs. Conclusions: Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, especially those with elevated post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and/or depressive symptoms in the context of mild TBI, could benefit from ongoing access to evidence-based psychotherapies and other specialty care, rehabilitation, and support services to manage long-term care and rehabilitation needs in the chronic phase of injury.
- 20 October 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Mental Health Symptom Severity Is Positively Associated With Rehabilitation Needs in Veterans and Service Members With Polytrauma, Including Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study
Objective: To assess the relationship between rehabilitation needs and mental health symptoms in Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, including history of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Five Veterans Affairs (VA) Intensive Evaluation and Treatment Programs. Participants: Veterans and Service Members enrolled in the VA TBI Model Systems study who completed a follow-up greater than 6 months postprogram. Design: Cohort study. Main Measures: Primary regression analyses included rehabilitation needs (Rehabilitation Needs Survey) and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSD Checklist-Civilian version). Age, sex, months from rehabilitation to follow-up interview, preinjury mental health, disability level (Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended), and number of comorbidities were included as covariates. Secondary analyses applied the same model structure to assess the relationship between rehabilitation needs and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) symptoms. Results: Most Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, including mild TBI, reported a current need for services to control physical symptoms (55%) and greater than one-third endorsed a current need for services to improve memory (46%), manage emotions (45%), improve health (44%), manage daily stress (42%), and solve daily problems (38%). Adjusted regression analyses revealed that rehabilitation needs were significantly and positively associated with post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression self-report symptoms. These relationships were maintained when analyses were repeated with mental health–related items removed from the Rehabilitation Needs Survey, suggesting the finding was not solely because of mental health needs. Higher comorbidity burden and disability were also independently associated with higher rehabilitation needs. Conclusions: Veterans and Service Members with polytrauma, especially those with elevated post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and/or depressive symptoms in the context of mild TBI, could benefit from ongoing access to evidence-based psychotherapies and other specialty care, rehabilitation, and support services to manage long-term care and rehabilitation needs in the chronic phase of injury.
- 13 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 107 (1) , 32-41
TBI Disability, Health Beliefs, and Workforce Capacity Are Top Barriers to Chronic Pain Guideline-Based Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- 13 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Vol. 107 (1) , 32-41
TBI Disability, Health Beliefs, and Workforce Capacity Are Top Barriers to Chronic Pain Guideline-Based Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- 13 May 2021
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 38 (11) , 1526-1534
Patterns of Functional Change Five to Ten Years after Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
This study aims to characterize the patterns of functional change experienced between 5 and 10 years after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study included TBI Model Systems national database participants ( N = 372) at six sites who experienced TBI, received inpatient rehabilitation, and were followed at 5 and 10 years post-TBI. Outcome measures included self- or proxy-reported Functional Independence Measure (FIM TM ) structured interview at 5 and 10 years post-TBI and domain change indices (DCIs) at 10 years to assess subjective change over the previous 5 years. When all seven FIM and subjective DCI subscales were considered together, 69% reported improvement in at least one subscale and 41% reported decline in at least one subscale; 51% reported more domains improved than declined, and 20% reported more domains declined than improved. Age at injury, post-traumatic amnesia duration, FIM, and depression and anxiety at year 5 were associated with FIM change and DCI measures. Although most persons with moderate-severe TBI do not experience widespread change from year 5 to 10 on individual FIM subscales or perceived domain-specific subscales, the vast majority do report change in one or more domains, with more improvement than decline and more change in subjective DCI than in FIM. Clinicians and researchers should be alert to the possibility of both positive and deleterious changes many years after TBI.
- 13 May 2021
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Neurotrauma
- Vol. 38 (11) , 1526-1534
Patterns of Functional Change Five to Ten Years after Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
This study aims to characterize the patterns of functional change experienced between 5 and 10 years after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study included TBI Model Systems national database participants ( N = 372) at six sites who experienced TBI, received inpatient rehabilitation, and were followed at 5 and 10 years post-TBI. Outcome measures included self- or proxy-reported Functional Independence Measure (FIM TM ) structured interview at 5 and 10 years post-TBI and domain change indices (DCIs) at 10 years to assess subjective change over the previous 5 years. When all seven FIM and subjective DCI subscales were considered together, 69% reported improvement in at least one subscale and 41% reported decline in at least one subscale; 51% reported more domains improved than declined, and 20% reported more domains declined than improved. Age at injury, post-traumatic amnesia duration, FIM, and depression and anxiety at year 5 were associated with FIM change and DCI measures. Although most persons with moderate-severe TBI do not experience widespread change from year 5 to 10 on individual FIM subscales or perceived domain-specific subscales, the vast majority do report change in one or more domains, with more improvement than decline and more change in subjective DCI than in FIM. Clinicians and researchers should be alert to the possibility of both positive and deleterious changes many years after TBI.