Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Hussein Al-Yafei has a total of 44 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions in methanol production: A life cycle approach for a sustainable additive industry

    by Hussein Al‐Yafei, Ahmed AlNouss, Saleh Aseel, Ahmad Al‐Kuwari, Mohannad AlJarrah, Tareq Al‐Ansari

    Integrating sustainability into distribution networks remains a critical challenge for organizations aiming to align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) while maintaining competitiveness in the global market. This challenge is especially pronounced in the additive manufacturing industry, where natural gas is the primary energy source. While previous studies have assessed life cycle impacts of methanol production, region‐specific analyses evaluating environmental consequences across methanol supply chains are limited. This study addresses this gap by conducting a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of methanol production, focusing on Qatar as a case study. The analysis evaluates environmental impacts across all stages, from raw material acquisition to product synthesis, quantifying primary and secondary greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Aspen HYSYS simulations, known for their engineering rigor, were employed. Results indicate that the Steam Reforming process contributes 81.9% of direct CO 2 ‐equivalent emissions, making it the leading source of the carbon footprint. The methanol synthesis phase accounts for 52.4% of Scope 2 emissions, primarily due to energy‐intensive separation operations. Based on these findings, this research proposes a framework to inform sustainability strategies and policy development aligned with corporate environmental goals.


  • Open Access

    Driving Green: A Comprehensive Sustainability Analysis of Natural Gas-to-Methanol and Methanol-to-Gasoline Supply Chains

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Saleh Aseel, Ahmed AlNouss, Mohannad AlJarrah, Nagi Abdussamie, Ahmad Al-Kuwari, Alaa Kerret, Noman Abdul Ghafoor, Muhammad Rizki Winarno, Aisha Al-Bader, et al.

    This study presents an integrated Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) of the Natural gas-to-methanol (NGTM) and methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) pathways using Aspen HYSYS process modeling, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA), and Life Cycle Costing (LCC). The results reveal significant variability in sustainability performance across process units. The DME and MTG Reactors Section generates the highest direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at 0.86 million tons CO2-eq, representing 54.9% of total global warming potential, while the Compression Section consumes 2717.5 TJ/year of energy, making it the dominant source of electricity-related indirect emissions. Distillation and Purification withdraws 31,100 Mm3/year of water—approximately 99% of total demand—yet delivers 86.6% of the overall economic surplus despite high operating costs. Social impacts concentrate in the Methanol Reactor Looping and DME and MTG Reactors Sections, with human health burdens of 305.79 and 804.22 DALYs, respectively, due to catalyst handling and high-pressure operations. Sensitivity results show that methanol purity rises from 0.9993 to 0.9994 with increasing methane content, while gasoline output decreases from 3780 to 3520 kg/h as natural gas flow increases. The findings provide process-level evidence to support sustainable development of natural gas-based fuel conversion industries, aligning with Qatar National Vision 2030 objectives for industrial diversification and lower-carbon energy systems.


  • Open Access

    Shades of sustainability: A comprehensive analysis of the carbon footprint in conventional blue ammonia and urea manufacturing processes

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Ahmed AlNouss, Saleh Aseel, Talal Al Tamimi, Hamad Al Mannaei, Heba Ibrahim, Noor Abu Hashim, Bader Al Delayel, Hagar Nasr, Ahmad Al-Kuwari


  • Open Access

    Evaluating the Sustainability of the Natural Gas-Based Methanol-to-Gasoline Industry: A Global Systematic Review

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Saleh Aseel, Ali Ansaruddin Kunju

    The sustainability of the natural gas-to-methanol (NGTM) and methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) processes are assessed in this systematic review as a potential substitute in the global energy transition. Methanol offers itself as a versatile and less carbon-intensive substitute for conventional gasoline in light of growing environmental concerns and the demand for cleaner fuels. This review’s rationale is to assess MTG’s ability to lessen environmental impact while preserving compatibility with current fuel infrastructure. The goal is to examine methanol and gasoline’s effects on the environment, society, and economy throughout their life cycles. This review used a two-phase systematic literature review methodology, filtering and evaluating studies that were indexed by Scopus using bibliometric and thematic analysis. A total of 25 documents were reviewed, in which 22 documents analyzed part of this study, and 68% employed LCA or techno-economic analysis, with the U.S. contributing 35% of the overall publications. A comparative analysis of the reviewed literature indicates that methanol-based fuels offer significantly lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and life cycle environmental impacts than gasoline, particularly when combined with carbon capture and renewable feedstocks. This review also highlights benefits, such as improved safety and energy security, while acknowledging challenges, including high production costs, infrastructure adaptation, and toxicity concerns. Several drawbacks are high manufacturing costs, the necessity to adjust infrastructure, and toxicity issues. The report suggests investing in renewable methanol production, AI-driven process optimization, and robust legislative frameworks for integrating green fuels. The life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of NGTM and MTG systems should be investigated in future studies, particularly in light of different feedstock and regional circumstances. The findings emphasize NGTM and MTG’s strategic role in aligning with several UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and add to the worldwide conversation on sustainable fuels. A strong transition necessitates multi-stakeholder cooperation, innovation, and supporting policies to fully realize the sustainability promise of cleaner fuels like methanol.


  • Open Access

    Blue Ammonia and the Supply Chain Pioneering Sustainability Assessment for a Greener Future

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Saleh Aseel, Ahmed Alnouss, Ahmad Al-Kuwari, Nagi Abdussamie, Talal Al Tamimi, Hamad Al Mannaei, Heba Ibrahim, Noor Abu Hashim, Bader Al Delayel, et al.

    With the global shift to sustainability, the energy sector faces pressure to adopt low-carbon solutions. Blue ammonia (BA), derived from natural gas (NG) with carbon capture, presents significant opportunities but requires a holistic sustainability assessment. This study conducts a novel life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) of BA, evaluating environmental, economic, and social impact performance from feedstock processing to maritime transport for a 1.2 MMTPA production capacity. Process simulations in Aspen HYSYS V12 and the ammonia maritime transport operations’ sustainability assessment model provide critical insights. The ammonia converter unit contributes the highest emissions (17.9 million tons CO2-eq), energy use (963.2 TJ), and operational costs (USD 189.2 million). CO2 removal has the most considerable land use (141.7 km2), and purification records the highest water withdrawal (14.8 million m3). Carbon capture eliminates 6.5 million tons of CO2 annually. Economically, ammonia shipping dominates gross surplus (USD 653.9 million, 72%) and tax revenue (USD 65.3 million) despite employing just 43 workers. Socially, the ammonia converter unit has the highest human health impact (16,621 DALY, 54%). Sensitivity analysis reveals transport distance (46.5% CO2 emissions) and LNG fuel prices (63.8% costs) as key uncertainties. Findings underscore the need for optimized logistics and alternative fuels to enhance BA sustainability.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    A Systematic Literature Review of the Digital Transformation in the Arabian Gulf’s Oil and Gas Sector

    by Abdulla Al-Hajri, Galal M. Abdella, Hussein Al-Yafei, Saleh Aseel, Abdel Magid Hamouda

    Digital transformation has emerged as a significant driver of innovation globally, with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations actively participating in this evolution. This systematic review provides a comprehensive assessment of the digital transformation in the GCC’s oil and gas sector over the past decade. Through a rigorous bibliometric analysis of 505 documents sourced from the SCOPUS database, this study examines trends in research outputs, affiliations, and publication types. The analysis reveals dynamic trends in research outputs, with the GCC showing a substantial growth in publications in recent years, particularly mirroring global trends, albeit on a smaller scale. Despite this progress, GCC publications in 2023 represent approximately 30% of the decade’s total, reflecting opportunities for increased research investment and international collaboration to enhance scientific output. Key findings highlight the United Arab Emirates as a leading contributor with (35%) of publications, followed by Saudi Arabia (29%) and Kuwait (26%). Oman, Bahrain, and Qatar exhibit comparatively fewer publications, suggesting potential areas for increased research focus. Conference papers dominate the scholarly output, comprising 92% of the publications, underscoring their role in disseminating research findings effectively. The top six world-leading research centers in digital transformation in oil and gas were analyzed and found to represent approximately 26% of global publications in the research field. This review contributes to the global discourse on technological adoption, innovation, and sustainable development by synthesizing the existing literature. It emphasizes the imperative of sustained research investment and strategic initiatives to strengthen scientific output in the GCC’s digital transformation of the oil and gas sector. By providing robust analysis and insights into regional contributions, this study informs policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers aiming to advance digital initiatives across the GCC.


  • Open Access

    Innovation-Based Strategic Roadmap for Economic Sustainability and Diversity in Hydrocarbon-Driven Economies: The Qatar Perspective

    by Ahmed Al-Sulaiti, Abdel Magid Hamouda, Hussein Al-Yafei, Galal M. Abdella

    This research addresses the critical opportunities and challenges confronting economic sustainability for hydrocarbon-based economies. The primary objective is to advocate for a transformative shift towards diversified and knowledge-centric economic models to ensure long-term sustainability. The literature review exposes vulnerabilities in hydrocarbon-based economies. The study innovatively explores multifaceted dimensions of economic diversification, including governance issues, societal well-being, and the necessity for robust ecosystem frameworks. Utilizing a qualitative case study methodology, the research investigates Qatar’s initiatives, such as the Qatar National Vision 2030 and government programs, aiming to reduce dependence on hydrocarbons and foster innovation. Insightful semi-structured interviews provide nuanced perspectives on innovation in the hydrocarbon context with business and academic professionals. The primary data collection method involved the following distinct groups: five business professionals and eleven academic experts, representing eight outstanding local and external organizations. Key findings underscore a holistic view of innovation, associating it with practical solutions, adaptability, and transformative potential, showcasing diverse approaches ranging from business-centric to collaborative and user-centric methods. Identified challenges in the education system, the urgency for a matured innovation ecosystem, and opportunities in sustainable energy further enrich the study. Moreover, this research examines the challenges and mitigation strategies associated with economic diversification in hydrocarbon-driven economies, focusing on Qatar. The research recommends sustained efforts in economic diversification, educational reform, and technological integration for hydrocarbon-based economies. Policymakers, businesses, and academics can leverage these insights to navigate the complexities of resource dependency and ensure long-term viability. The commitment to addressing challenges faced by hydrocarbon-dependent nations remains crucial, with a dedication to fostering economic diversity, innovation, and educational excellence for a resilient and prosperous future.


  • Open Access

    Innovation Ecosystems in Hydrocarbon-Based Economies: Opportunities and Challenges

    by Ahmed Al-Sulaiti, Iman T. Madhoun, Galal M. Abdella, Hussein Al-Yafei, Abdel Magid Hamouda

    Innovation is rapidly growing and affecting various industries, including hydrocarbon processing. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive and organized review of the literature on innovation ecosystems and their performance within hydrocarbon-based economies. It will examine existing definitions of innovation ecosystems and related concepts and conduct an in-depth analysis of certain hydrocarbon-based economies and their Global Innovation Index (GII) development from 2011 to 2022. The term “innovation ecosystem” has gained considerable attention from scholars and practitioners over the past fifteen years. Despite the proliferation of research in this area, there are concerns about its fragmented knowledge base. While previous reviews have highlighted the theoretical connections between innovation ecosystems and related concepts, there is still a need for a more comprehensive understanding of the current state of innovation ecosystem research. This study used a systematic literature review approach that combines bibliographic coupling and content analysis methods, drawing on over 40 studies to identify five streams of current innovation ecosystem research: Technology innovation, platform innovation ecosystems, regional development, innovation ecosystem conceptualization and theorization, and entrepreneurship and innovation. This study’s contribution lies in highlighting the specific elements that contribute to the development of an innovative economy based on hydrocarbons.


  • Open Access

    A systematic review for sustainability of global liquified natural gas industry: A 10-year update

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Saleh Aseel, Murat Kucukvar, Nuri C. Onat, Ahmed Al-Sulaiti, Abdulla Al-Hajri


  • Open Access

    A Novel Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Approach to Air Emissions and Human Health Impacts of Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain

    by Hussein Al-Yafei, Murat Kucukvar, Ahmed AlNouss, Saleh Aseel, Nuri C. Onat

    Global interest in LNG products and supply chains is growing, and demand continues to rise. As a clean energy source, LNG can nevertheless emit air pollutants, albeit at a lower level than transitional energy sources. An LNG plant capable of producing up to 126 MMTA was successfully developed and simulated in this study. A hybrid life cycle assessment model was developed to examine the social and human health impacts of the LNG supply chain’s environmental air emission formation. The Multiregional Input–Output (MRIO) database, the Aspen HYSYS model, and the LNG Maritime Transportation Emission Quantification Tool are the key sources of information for this extensive novel study. We began our research by grouping environmental emissions sources according to the participation of each stage in the supply chain. The MDEA Sweetening plant, LNG loading (export terminal), and LNG transportation stages were discovered to have the maximum air emissions. The midpoint air emissions data estimated each stage’s CO2-eq, NOx-eq, and PM2.5-eq emissions per unit LNG generated. According to the midpoint analysis results, the LNG loading terminal has the most considerable normalized CO2-eq and NOx-eq emission contribution across all LNG supply chain stages. Furthermore, the most incredible intensity value for normalized PM2.5-eq was recorded in the SRU and TGTU units. Following the midpoint results, the social human health impact findings were calculated using ReCiPe 2016 characterization factors to quantify the daily loss of life associated with the LNG process chain. SRU and TGTU units have the most significant social human health impact, followed by LNG loading (export terminal) with about 7409.0 and 1203.9 (DALY/million Ton LNG produced annually), respectively. Natural gas extraction and NGL recovery and fractionation units are the lowest for social human health consequences.