Daniel Liebau
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Daniel Liebau has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Thomas Lambert
Rotterdam School of Management Rotterdam School of Management Erasmus University Erasmus University Burgemeester Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam the Netherlands
2 shared publications - Dion Bongaerts
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Finance
1 shared publication - Nicholas J. Krapels1 shared publication
- Peter Roosenboom
RSM Erasmus University
1 shared publication - Peter Roosenboom
Rotterdam School of Management Rotterdam School of Management Erasmus University Erasmus University Burgemeester Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam the Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Vote Delegation in DeFi Governance
We investigate the drivers of vote delegation in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), using the Uniswap governance DAO as a laboratory. We show that parties with fewer self-owned votes and those affiliated with the controlling venture capital firm, Andreesen Horowitz (a16z), receive more vote delegations. These patterns suggest that while the Uniswap ecosystem values decentralization, a16z may engage in window-dressing around it. Moreover, we find that an active and successful track record in submitting improvement proposals, especially in the final stage, leads to more vote delegations, indicating that delegation in DAOs is at least partly reputation- or merit-based. Combined, our findings provide new insights into how governance and decentralization operate in DeFi.
Open AccessVote Delegation in DeFi Governance
We investigate the drivers of vote delegation in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), using the Uniswap governance DAO as a laboratory. We show that parties with fewer self-owned votes and those affiliated with the controlling venture capital firm, Andreesen Horowitz (a16z), receive more vote delegations. These patterns suggest that while the Uniswap ecosystem values decentralization, a16z may engage in window-dressing around it. Moreover, we find that an active and successful track record in submitting improvement proposals, especially in the final stage, leads to more vote delegations, indicating that delegation in DAOs is at least partly reputation- or merit-based. Combined, our findings provide new insights into how governance and decentralization operate in DeFi.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 12 September 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Small Business Economics
- Vol. 59 (1) , 299-325
Security token offerings
This paper posits that distinguishing security token offerings (STOs) from initial coin offerings (ICOs) is important for the study of entrepreneurial finance. We first provide a working definition of a security token and present an overview of the STO market using a unique STO sample. The STO activity developed after the end of the ICO market bubble. The STO market is, however, still a nascent market. STOs are geographically dispersed but concentrated in jurisdictions with accommodating securities laws. Next, we explore STO success factors. We show that various issuer and offering characteristics traditionally used in the ICO literature also matter for STO success. We also find that success is associated with good governance practices, consistent with the corporate finance literature. We conclude by discussing the implications of native digital securities, the next generation of security tokens, for entrepreneurial finance.
- 12 September 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Small Business Economics
- Vol. 59 (1) , 299-325
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessSecurity token offerings
This paper posits that distinguishing security token offerings (STOs) from initial coin offerings (ICOs) is important for the study of entrepreneurial finance. We first provide a working definition of a security token and present an overview of the STO market using a unique STO sample. The STO activity developed after the end of the ICO market bubble. The STO market is, however, still a nascent market. STOs are geographically dispersed but concentrated in jurisdictions with accommodating securities laws. Next, we explore STO success factors. We show that various issuer and offering characteristics traditionally used in the ICO literature also matter for STO success. We also find that success is associated with good governance practices, consistent with the corporate finance literature. We conclude by discussing the implications of native digital securities, the next generation of security tokens, for entrepreneurial finance.
- Open Access
- 10 April 2021
- Published by PubPub
An Exploratory Essay on Minimum Disclosure Requirements for Cryptocurrency and Utility Token Issuers
- 10 April 2021
- Published by PubPub
Open AccessAn Exploratory Essay on Minimum Disclosure Requirements for Cryptocurrency and Utility Token Issuers