VKVictoria A. Kibangou
Victoria A. Kibangou
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Victoria A. Kibangou has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ashton B. Mpofu
Department of Chemical Engineering, Bellville Campus, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Symphony Way, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
1 shared publication - Oluwaseun O. Oyekola
Department of Chemical Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
1 shared publication - Pamela Jean Welz
Applied Microbial and Health Biotechnology Institute, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa
1 shared publication - Walusungu M. Kaira
Applied Microbial and Health Biotechnology Institute, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Symphony way, Bellville, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Tannery and Slaughterhouse Wastewater for Solids Reduction and Resource Recovery: Effect of Sulfate Concentration and Inoculum to Substrate Ratio
Anaerobic digestion is considered unsuitable for the bioremediation of tannery effluent due to process inhibition, mainly due to high concentrations of sulfur species, and the accumulation of and/or . This study using the standardized biochemical methane potential protocol showed that efficient processing is possible with slaughterhouse wastewater, provided sufficient functional biomass is present at the start of the process and the concentration is below inhibition threshold. Methanogenic activity (K = 13.4–17.5 and µm = 0.15–0.27) and yields were high when reactors were operated ISR ≥ 3 and/or lower ≤ 710 mg/L while high ≥ 1960 mg/L and ISR < 3.0 caused almost complete inhibition regardless of corresponding ISR and . The theoretical optimum operating conditions (922 mg/L , ISR = 3.72) are expected to generate 361 mL biogas/gVS, 235 mL /gVS with reduction efficiencies of 27.5% VS, 27.4% TS, 75.1% TOC, 75.6% , and 41.1% COD. This implies that tannery sludge will be reduced by about 27% (dry mass) and by 76%, with a fraction of it recovered as . The models displayed a perfect fit to the cumulative yields with high precision in the order Logistic > Cone > modified Gompertz > first order.Open AccessAnaerobic Co-Digestion of Tannery and Slaughterhouse Wastewater for Solids Reduction and Resource Recovery: Effect of Sulfate Concentration and Inoculum to Substrate Ratio
Anaerobic digestion is considered unsuitable for the bioremediation of tannery effluent due to process inhibition, mainly due to high concentrations of sulfur species, and the accumulation of and/or . This study using the standardized biochemical methane potential protocol showed that efficient processing is possible with slaughterhouse wastewater, provided sufficient functional biomass is present at the start of the process and the concentration is below inhibition threshold. Methanogenic activity (K = 13.4–17.5 and µm = 0.15–0.27) and yields were high when reactors were operated ISR ≥ 3 and/or lower ≤ 710 mg/L while high ≥ 1960 mg/L and ISR < 3.0 caused almost complete inhibition regardless of corresponding ISR and . The theoretical optimum operating conditions (922 mg/L , ISR = 3.72) are expected to generate 361 mL biogas/gVS, 235 mL /gVS with reduction efficiencies of 27.5% VS, 27.4% TS, 75.1% TOC, 75.6% , and 41.1% COD. This implies that tannery sludge will be reduced by about 27% (dry mass) and by 76%, with a fraction of it recovered as . The models displayed a perfect fit to the cumulative yields with high precision in the order Logistic > Cone > modified Gompertz > first order.