Federico Albrecht
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Federico Albrecht has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Haley Appel
Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
3 shared publications - Minesh P. Mehta
Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
3 shared publications - Rupesh Kotecha
Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
3 shared publications - Muni Rubens
Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine Florida International University Miami Florida USA
2 shared publications - Paul Kaywin
Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
2 shared publications - Suyen Ramos
Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Tumor Treating Fields Therapy After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Real-World Analysis
Background/Objectives: The LUNAR trial demonstrated the benefit of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, real-world outcomes in patients treated with contemporary systemic regimens have yet to be empirically demonstrated. Methods: In this retrospective single-institution study, patients with mNSCLC treated with TTFields (150 kHz) after platinum-based chemotherapy between 2018 and 2026 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from TTFields therapy initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 73 years, 63% were male, 69% had adenocarcinoma histology, and 69% were PD-L1 positive. At TTFields therapy initiation, 94% had ECOG performance status ≤ 2, 19% had brain metastases, 31% had liver metastases, and 94% had prior ICI exposure. Median PFS was 11.8 months, and median OS was 19.9 months. OS did not differ significantly between the ICI-based and docetaxel-based groups (not reached vs. 13.5 months; p = 0.60) but PFS was shorter (3.9 months vs. not reached; p = 0.046). Treatment-related dermatitis was limited to grade 1–2 events, and no grade 3 or higher device-related toxicities were observed. Conclusions: TTFields therapy demonstrated encouraging real-world OS outcomes and favorable tolerability in this first report of a contemporary post-platinum NSCLC population, supporting further prospective evaluation of optimal timing and integration with modern systemic therapies.
- 27 October 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessTumor Treating Fields Therapy After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Real-World Analysis
Background/Objectives: The LUNAR trial demonstrated the benefit of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy. However, real-world outcomes in patients treated with contemporary systemic regimens have yet to be empirically demonstrated. Methods: In this retrospective single-institution study, patients with mNSCLC treated with TTFields (150 kHz) after platinum-based chemotherapy between 2018 and 2026 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated from TTFields therapy initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 73 years, 63% were male, 69% had adenocarcinoma histology, and 69% were PD-L1 positive. At TTFields therapy initiation, 94% had ECOG performance status ≤ 2, 19% had brain metastases, 31% had liver metastases, and 94% had prior ICI exposure. Median PFS was 11.8 months, and median OS was 19.9 months. OS did not differ significantly between the ICI-based and docetaxel-based groups (not reached vs. 13.5 months; p = 0.60) but PFS was shorter (3.9 months vs. not reached; p = 0.046). Treatment-related dermatitis was limited to grade 1–2 events, and no grade 3 or higher device-related toxicities were observed. Conclusions: TTFields therapy demonstrated encouraging real-world OS outcomes and favorable tolerability in this first report of a contemporary post-platinum NSCLC population, supporting further prospective evaluation of optimal timing and integration with modern systemic therapies.
- Open Access
- 3 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Biomarker Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-11
Pembrolizumab activity in patients with Fanconi anemia repair pathway competent and deficient tumors
Given the observed antitumor activity of immune-checkpoint-inhibitors in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (MSI-H) tumors, we hypothesized that deficiency in homologous-recombination-repair (HRR) can also influence susceptibility. Patients with disease progression on standard of care and for whom pembrolizumab had no FDA approved indication received pembrolizumab. Patients with MSI-H tumors were excluded. Objectives included immune-related objective response rate (iORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and 20-weeks-PFS. Pembrolizumab was given every 3 weeks and scans performed every six. We evaluated a triple-stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway: FATSI, in treated patients’ archived tumors. The two-stage sample size of 20/39 patients evaluated an expected iORR≥20% in the whole population vs. the null hypothesis of an iORR≤5%, based on an assumed iORR≥40% in patients with functional FA deficiency, and < 10% in patients with intact HRR. An expansion cohort of MSI stable endometrial cancer (MS-EC) followed. Exploratory stool microbiome analyses in selected patients were performed. Fifty-two patients (45F,7M;50-evaluable) were enrolled. For the 39 in the two-stage cohort, response evaluation showed 2CR,5PR,11SD,21PD (iORR-18%). FATSI tumor analyses showed 29 competent (+) and 10 deficient (−). 2PR,9SD,17PD,1NE occurred among the FATSI+ (iORR-7%) and 2CR,3PR,2SD,3PD among the FATSI(−) patients (iORR-50%). mPFS and 20w-PFS were 43 days and 21% in FATSI+, versus 202 days and 70% in FATSI(−) patients. One PR occurred in the MS-EC expansion cohort. Pembrolizumab has meaningful antitumor activity in malignancies with no current FDA approved indications and FA functional deficiency. The results support further evaluation of FATSI as a discriminatory biomarker for population-selected studies.
- 3 June 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Biomarker Research
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-11
Open AccessPembrolizumab activity in patients with Fanconi anemia repair pathway competent and deficient tumors
Given the observed antitumor activity of immune-checkpoint-inhibitors in patients with mismatch-repair deficient (MSI-H) tumors, we hypothesized that deficiency in homologous-recombination-repair (HRR) can also influence susceptibility. Patients with disease progression on standard of care and for whom pembrolizumab had no FDA approved indication received pembrolizumab. Patients with MSI-H tumors were excluded. Objectives included immune-related objective response rate (iORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and 20-weeks-PFS. Pembrolizumab was given every 3 weeks and scans performed every six. We evaluated a triple-stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway: FATSI, in treated patients’ archived tumors. The two-stage sample size of 20/39 patients evaluated an expected iORR≥20% in the whole population vs. the null hypothesis of an iORR≤5%, based on an assumed iORR≥40% in patients with functional FA deficiency, and < 10% in patients with intact HRR. An expansion cohort of MSI stable endometrial cancer (MS-EC) followed. Exploratory stool microbiome analyses in selected patients were performed. Fifty-two patients (45F,7M;50-evaluable) were enrolled. For the 39 in the two-stage cohort, response evaluation showed 2CR,5PR,11SD,21PD (iORR-18%). FATSI tumor analyses showed 29 competent (+) and 10 deficient (−). 2PR,9SD,17PD,1NE occurred among the FATSI+ (iORR-7%) and 2CR,3PR,2SD,3PD among the FATSI(−) patients (iORR-50%). mPFS and 20w-PFS were 43 days and 21% in FATSI+, versus 202 days and 70% in FATSI(−) patients. One PR occurred in the MS-EC expansion cohort. Pembrolizumab has meaningful antitumor activity in malignancies with no current FDA approved indications and FA functional deficiency. The results support further evaluation of FATSI as a discriminatory biomarker for population-selected studies.
- Open Access
Feasibility of Tumor Treating Fields with Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Single-Center, Real-World Data
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the implementation, device usage rates, clinical outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities associated with TTFields and pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with unresectable MPM, outside the initial trial results. Methods: Consecutive patients with unresectable MPM were enrolled onto an FDA-required HDE protocol from 2019 to 2021. All patients were treated with a protocol-defined regimen of continuous TTFields (150 kHz) and pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Five patients with unresectable MPM were enrolled. The median number of 4-week TTFields cycles was 5 (range: 2–7 cycles). Median TTFields device usage in the first 3 months was 12.5 h per day (range: 5–16.8 h), representing 52% (21–70%) of the potential daily duration. The median follow-up was 5.4 months (range: 1.1–20.9 months). Treatment-related dermatitis was the only side effect associated with TTFields and was reported as grade 1–2 in all patients; no patient had grade 3+ device-related toxicities. Conclusions: This study represents the first results of real-world implementation of TTFields for MPM. In comparison to the initial clinical trial (STELLAR), compliance rates were lower, although skin-related toxicities appeared similar. Further initiatives and guidelines should be developed to manage treatment-related dermatitis and improve device usage.
Open AccessFeasibility of Tumor Treating Fields with Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Single-Center, Real-World Data
Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the implementation, device usage rates, clinical outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities associated with TTFields and pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with unresectable MPM, outside the initial trial results. Methods: Consecutive patients with unresectable MPM were enrolled onto an FDA-required HDE protocol from 2019 to 2021. All patients were treated with a protocol-defined regimen of continuous TTFields (150 kHz) and pemetrexed plus platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Five patients with unresectable MPM were enrolled. The median number of 4-week TTFields cycles was 5 (range: 2–7 cycles). Median TTFields device usage in the first 3 months was 12.5 h per day (range: 5–16.8 h), representing 52% (21–70%) of the potential daily duration. The median follow-up was 5.4 months (range: 1.1–20.9 months). Treatment-related dermatitis was the only side effect associated with TTFields and was reported as grade 1–2 in all patients; no patient had grade 3+ device-related toxicities. Conclusions: This study represents the first results of real-world implementation of TTFields for MPM. In comparison to the initial clinical trial (STELLAR), compliance rates were lower, although skin-related toxicities appeared similar. Further initiatives and guidelines should be developed to manage treatment-related dermatitis and improve device usage.
- Open Access
Meta-Analysis of Survival and Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy
(1) Purpose: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer with an aggressive course. For patients who are medically inoperable or surgically unresectable, multi-agent systemic chemotherapy remains an accepted standard-of-care. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide baseline summative survival estimates as well as evaluate the influence of prognostic variables to provide comparative estimates for future trial designs. (2) Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of MPM studies published from 2002–2019 obtained from the Medline database evaluating systemic therapy combinations for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Weighted random effects models were used to calculate survival estimates. The influence of proportions of known prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) were evaluated in the creation of a prognostic nomogram to estimate survival. The performance of this model was evaluated against data generated from one positive phase II study and two positive randomized trials. (3) Results: Twenty-four phase II studies and five phase III trials met the eligibility criteria; 2534 patients were treated on the included clinical studies. Ten trials included a platinum-pemetrexed-based treatment regimen, resulting in a pooled estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.7 months (95% CI: 6.2–7.2 months) and OS of 14.2 months (95% CI: 12.7–15.9 months). Fifteen experimental chemotherapy regimens have been tested in phase II or III studies, with a pooled median survival estimate of 13.5 months (95% CI: 12.6–14.6 months). Meta-regression analysis was used to estimate OS with platinum-pemetrexed using a variety of features, such as pathology (biphasic vs. epithelioid), disease extent (locally advanced vs. metastatic), ECOG performance status, age, and gender. The nomogram-predicted estimates and corresponding 95% CIs performed well when applied to recent randomized studies. (4) Conclusions: Given the rarity of MPM and the aggressive nature of the disease, innovative clinical trial designs with significantly greater randomization to experimental regimens can be performed using robust survival estimates from prior studies. This study provides baseline comparative values and also allows for accounting for differing proportions of known prognostic variables.
Open AccessMeta-Analysis of Survival and Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy
(1) Purpose: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare cancer with an aggressive course. For patients who are medically inoperable or surgically unresectable, multi-agent systemic chemotherapy remains an accepted standard-of-care. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide baseline summative survival estimates as well as evaluate the influence of prognostic variables to provide comparative estimates for future trial designs. (2) Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of MPM studies published from 2002–2019 obtained from the Medline database evaluating systemic therapy combinations for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Weighted random effects models were used to calculate survival estimates. The influence of proportions of known prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) were evaluated in the creation of a prognostic nomogram to estimate survival. The performance of this model was evaluated against data generated from one positive phase II study and two positive randomized trials. (3) Results: Twenty-four phase II studies and five phase III trials met the eligibility criteria; 2534 patients were treated on the included clinical studies. Ten trials included a platinum-pemetrexed-based treatment regimen, resulting in a pooled estimate of progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.7 months (95% CI: 6.2–7.2 months) and OS of 14.2 months (95% CI: 12.7–15.9 months). Fifteen experimental chemotherapy regimens have been tested in phase II or III studies, with a pooled median survival estimate of 13.5 months (95% CI: 12.6–14.6 months). Meta-regression analysis was used to estimate OS with platinum-pemetrexed using a variety of features, such as pathology (biphasic vs. epithelioid), disease extent (locally advanced vs. metastatic), ECOG performance status, age, and gender. The nomogram-predicted estimates and corresponding 95% CIs performed well when applied to recent randomized studies. (4) Conclusions: Given the rarity of MPM and the aggressive nature of the disease, innovative clinical trial designs with significantly greater randomization to experimental regimens can be performed using robust survival estimates from prior studies. This study provides baseline comparative values and also allows for accounting for differing proportions of known prognostic variables.