Shunsaku Nishihara

Introduction In total hip arthroplasty (THA), improper cup orientation can result in dislocation, early excessive polyethylene wear, and pain following THA. The supine position during THA provides a more reproducible functional pelvic position than the lateral decubitus position and may allow freehand cup placement as reliable as that obtained by computer navigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of freehand cup placement through a supine direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with computed tomography (CT)-based navigation. Materials and methods The same surgeon performed primary cementless THA through the DAA in 144 supine patients. Seventy-two patients underwent freehand cup placement with standard mechanical guidance-oriented radiographic target cup positioning, and 72 underwent placement with CT-based navigation guidance. Using three-dimensional templating software, the study group calculated cup inclination and anteversion on postoperative CT scans. Results The navigation method resulted in a significantly smaller deviation of inclination from the target (p < 0.05); the difference in anteversion was not significant. In addition, the navigation method resulted in significantly fewer cups placed ± 10° outside the target position (0% for inclination, 0% for anteversion) than did the freehand procedure (26% for inclination, 25% for anteversion) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Freehand cup placement is less reliable even in the supine position. Use of a CT-based navigation system can significantly improve cup positioning in THA through the DAA by reducing the incidence of outliers.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been used to reduce blood loss during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but its use could increase the risk of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Several studies have reported that TXA does not increase the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but most of those used routine chemical thromboprophylaxis, thereby masking the potential increased risk of TXA on VTE. We wished to ascertain whether TXA increases the prevalence of VTE in patients undergoing THA without routine chemical thromboprophylaxis. We carried out a retrospective case-control study in 254 patients who underwent a primary THA, 127 of whom received TXA (1 g given pre-operatively) and a control group of 127 who did not. All patients had mechanical but no chemical thomboprophylaxis. Each patient was examined for DVT by bilateral ultrasonography pre-operatively and on post-operative days 1 and 7. TXA was found to statistically significantly increase the incidence of total DVT on post-operative day 7 compared with the control group (24 (18.9%) and 12 (9.4%), respectively; p < 0.05) but most cases of DVT were isolated distal DVT, with the exception of one patient with proximal DVT in each group. One patient in the control group developed a non-fatal symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). The use of TXA did not appear to affect the prevalence of either proximal DVT or PE. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:458–62.

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether safe acetabular component position depends on differences in pelvic location between the supine, standing, and sitting positions. The subjects of the current study were 101 patients who had total hip arthroplasty. Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis with the patients in the supine, standing, and sitting positions were obtained preoperatively and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Computed tomography images of the pelvis were obtained preoperatively. Using image matching between the three-dimensional computed tomography model and anteroposterior radiograph, pelvic flexion angles with the patient in the supine, standing, and sitting positions were calculated. The mean preoperative pelvic flexion angle was 5° ± 9° (range, −37°–30°) in the supine position, 3° ± 12° (range, −46°–33°) in the standing position, and −29° ± 12° (range, −62°–10°) in the sitting position. Because there was much intersubject variability in pelvic flexion angle, it is not appropriate to determine orientation of the acetabular component from anatomic landmarks. In 90% of the cases, the difference in pelvic flexion angle between the supine and standing positions preoperatively was 10° or less. In 90% of the cases, there was 20° or greater extension of the pelvis from the supine position to the sitting position preoperatively, and the safe range of flexion of the hip from anterior prosthetic impingement in the sitting position was 20° or greater than that in the supine position. Preoperative pelvic position in each case was almost completely maintained 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. It is reasonable to regard the pelvic position in the supine position as the functional pelvic position and proper pelvic reference frame in determining optimal orientation of the acetabular component in 90% of cases before and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty, although an adjustment of orientation of the acetabular component was needed for the remaining cases.

This study evaluated the effect of computed tomography (CT) slice thickness, reconstruction pitch, intraoperative data sampling area, and data sampling volume on the accuracy of registration and determined a clinically acceptable trade-off between accuracy and surgical invasiveness. One cadaveric femur and one cadaveric tibia were used. Computed tomography of the femur and tibia were obtained using a helical scanner. Three sets of slice thickness and slice pitch were chosen for data acquisition, and two additional sets of reconstructed data were made. Bone contours were extracted by removing surrounding substrate. Surface models of bones were made from the resulting data. Registration of surface models to real objects was performed by measuring the position of various surface points on various areas of each object using an OPTOTRAK pen-probe (Northern Digital Inc, Ontario, Canada). The following trade-off is proposed as clinically optimal: perform CT with 3-mm slice thickness and 1-mm reconstruction pitch, and sample a periarticular area of 30 sampling points. The accuracy of registration in terms of position and angle was 0.8 mm and 0.6 degrees of bias with 0.2 mm and 0.3 degrees of root-mean-square in the femur, and 0.5 mm and 0.4 degrees of bias with 0.2 mm and 0.3 degrees of root-mean-square in the tibia.

Little is known about scintigraphic image patterns in the various stages of coxarthrosis. We assessed bone scintigraphy in 159 patients (210 hips) with dysplastic arthrosis of the hip. Scintigraphic images were divided into 5 types related to the radiographic stages of the disease. The scintigraphic images showed little, if any, uptake in the stage of prearthrosis. In the early stage, we found an increase in uptake in the weight bearing area in 30% of cases. In the advanced stage, more than half of the cases had an increase in uptake in the medial side of the joint and in the weight bearing area. In the terminal stage, a marked increase in uptake in the weight bearing area was commonest. Since the osteoblastic reaction intensified, a marked increase in uptake was seen not only in the weight bearing area, but also throughout the entire joint. These types of scintigraphic patterns, which change with the stage of coxarthrosis, seem to reflect the natural course of the disease. All hips with rapid progression of the disease showed a marked increase in uptake of radionuclide the entire joint at earlier stages.