Daniel McCarthy
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Daniel McCarthy has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Anita Ahmed Turk
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
1 shared publication B. Matz
Department of Clinical Sciences Auburn University Auburn AL 36849 USA
1 shared publication- Cassie N. Lux
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN, United States
1 shared publication - Darryl L. Millis
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
1 shared publication - David Levine
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA
1 shared publication - Dustin A. Deming
Division of Hematology, Medical Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 September 2021
- Published by Wiley in Veterinary Surgery
- Vol. 51 (1) , 182-190
Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations
Objective: To improve the accuracy of drilling during the repair of sacroiliac luxations (SILs) with a 3D‐printed patient‐specific drill guide (3D‐GDT) compared to free‐hand drilling technique (FHDT).Study design: Blinded, randomized, prospective ex vivo study.Sample population: Sixteen canine cadavers (20–25 kg).Methods: Dorsal, bilateral SILs were created. Pelvic CT was performed pre‐ and post‐drilling. The FHDT was drilled followed by 3D‐GDT. CT and 3D measurements of craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles were compared between FHDT and 3D‐GDT, as well as deviations of entry and exit points relative to optimal trajectory.Results: Mean craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles for both CT‐ and 3D‐measured 3D‐GDT (CT 4.2 ± 3.9° and 3.9 ± 3.2°, respectively; 3D 5.1 ± 5.1° and 2.8 ± 2.3°, respectively p = .0006) were lower compared to FHDT (CT 11.8 ± 4.0°, p < .0001 and 8.9 ± 6.1°, p = .01; 3D 12.4 ± 5.9°, p = .0006 and 5.3 ± 5.24°, p = .05). Entry dorsoventral and end craniocaudal, dorsoventral, and 3D linear deviations were reduced with 3D‐GDT. Sacral corridor disruption was present in 20% (3/15) for FHDT compared with 0% for 3D‐GDT. CT and 3D analyses were in strong agreement (r = 0.77).Conclusion: Deviations of drill trajectories were minimized relative to optimal trajectories with 3D‐GDT compared to FHDT in the dorsoventral and craniocaudal planes.Clinical significance: The use of 3D‐GDT improves accuracy of sacral drilling compared with FHDT in canine cadavers. These results justify further evaluation in a clinical, prospective study.
- 25 September 2021
- Published by Wiley in Veterinary Surgery
- Vol. 51 (1) , 182-190
Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations
Objective: To improve the accuracy of drilling during the repair of sacroiliac luxations (SILs) with a 3D‐printed patient‐specific drill guide (3D‐GDT) compared to free‐hand drilling technique (FHDT).Study design: Blinded, randomized, prospective ex vivo study.Sample population: Sixteen canine cadavers (20–25 kg).Methods: Dorsal, bilateral SILs were created. Pelvic CT was performed pre‐ and post‐drilling. The FHDT was drilled followed by 3D‐GDT. CT and 3D measurements of craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles were compared between FHDT and 3D‐GDT, as well as deviations of entry and exit points relative to optimal trajectory.Results: Mean craniocaudal and dorsoventral angles for both CT‐ and 3D‐measured 3D‐GDT (CT 4.2 ± 3.9° and 3.9 ± 3.2°, respectively; 3D 5.1 ± 5.1° and 2.8 ± 2.3°, respectively p = .0006) were lower compared to FHDT (CT 11.8 ± 4.0°, p < .0001 and 8.9 ± 6.1°, p = .01; 3D 12.4 ± 5.9°, p = .0006 and 5.3 ± 5.24°, p = .05). Entry dorsoventral and end craniocaudal, dorsoventral, and 3D linear deviations were reduced with 3D‐GDT. Sacral corridor disruption was present in 20% (3/15) for FHDT compared with 0% for 3D‐GDT. CT and 3D analyses were in strong agreement (r = 0.77).Conclusion: Deviations of drill trajectories were minimized relative to optimal trajectories with 3D‐GDT compared to FHDT in the dorsoventral and craniocaudal planes.Clinical significance: The use of 3D‐GDT improves accuracy of sacral drilling compared with FHDT in canine cadavers. These results justify further evaluation in a clinical, prospective study.
- 20 May 2019
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 37 (15_suppl) , 4041
Safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in combination with avelumab (A) in the treatment of resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer.
4041 Background: Neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery is the standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with stage II/III E/GEJ cancer. However, recurrence rates are high. Immunotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in advanced E/GEJ cancer. This trial evaluates safety and efficacy of perioperative A with CRT in resectable E/GEJ cancer. Methods: This is a 2-part phase I/II trial. Part 1 is a run-in phase with 6 pts for safety evaluation. Part 2 will enroll additional 18 pts in the expansion cohort. Pts with E/GEJ cancer of any histology receive CRT (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions) with carboplatin and paclitaxel as per SOC. Three doses of A (10 mg/kg, q14 days) are administered starting on day 29 of treatment, to coincide with the last chemotherapy dose. Surgery is performed ~8 weeks after CRT completion. Pts receive 6 doses of A after resection. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluations are completed on the first post-operative clinic visit, 2-4 weeks post resection. Results: Between 6/2018 and 2/2019, 6 pts (all male, median age 62) enrolled in part 1: 6 adenocarcinoma (100%); 1 E, 3 Siewert 1, 2 Siewert 2; 1 cT2N0, 2 cT3N0, 3 cT3N1. All pts underwent successful resection with negative surgical margins. 1/6 pts had R1 resection due to tumor extension to inked adventitial surface without invasion of surrounding structures. There were no unexpected surgical complications. At resection, 2 pts had ypT0N0, 2 ypT1N0, 1 ypT2N0, and 1 ypT3N1 disease. Combination of CRT and A had an acceptable toxicity profile. No DLTs were seen in the first 5 pts, so expansion cohort is open to enrollment. No grade ≥3 immune-related AEs were observed. Immune-related hypothyroidism was seen in 1 patient (grade 2). 6/6 pts had reversible grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia; 1/6 had grade 3 neutropenia. Correlative studies are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Perioperative CRT with A is well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Additional safety and correlative data will be presented at the meeting. This study is actively enrolling pts to an expansion cohort at University of Wisconsin. Clinical trial information: NCT03490292.
- 20 May 2019
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 37 (15_suppl) , 4041
Safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in combination with avelumab (A) in the treatment of resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (E/GEJ) cancer.
4041 Background: Neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery is the standard of care (SOC) for patients (pts) with stage II/III E/GEJ cancer. However, recurrence rates are high. Immunotherapy has demonstrated promising activity in advanced E/GEJ cancer. This trial evaluates safety and efficacy of perioperative A with CRT in resectable E/GEJ cancer. Methods: This is a 2-part phase I/II trial. Part 1 is a run-in phase with 6 pts for safety evaluation. Part 2 will enroll additional 18 pts in the expansion cohort. Pts with E/GEJ cancer of any histology receive CRT (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions) with carboplatin and paclitaxel as per SOC. Three doses of A (10 mg/kg, q14 days) are administered starting on day 29 of treatment, to coincide with the last chemotherapy dose. Surgery is performed ~8 weeks after CRT completion. Pts receive 6 doses of A after resection. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluations are completed on the first post-operative clinic visit, 2-4 weeks post resection. Results: Between 6/2018 and 2/2019, 6 pts (all male, median age 62) enrolled in part 1: 6 adenocarcinoma (100%); 1 E, 3 Siewert 1, 2 Siewert 2; 1 cT2N0, 2 cT3N0, 3 cT3N1. All pts underwent successful resection with negative surgical margins. 1/6 pts had R1 resection due to tumor extension to inked adventitial surface without invasion of surrounding structures. There were no unexpected surgical complications. At resection, 2 pts had ypT0N0, 2 ypT1N0, 1 ypT2N0, and 1 ypT3N1 disease. Combination of CRT and A had an acceptable toxicity profile. No DLTs were seen in the first 5 pts, so expansion cohort is open to enrollment. No grade ≥3 immune-related AEs were observed. Immune-related hypothyroidism was seen in 1 patient (grade 2). 6/6 pts had reversible grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia; 1/6 had grade 3 neutropenia. Correlative studies are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Perioperative CRT with A is well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Additional safety and correlative data will be presented at the meeting. This study is actively enrolling pts to an expansion cohort at University of Wisconsin. Clinical trial information: NCT03490292.
- Open Access
- 30 August 2018
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Vol. 5, 203
Variables Affecting Thigh Girth Measurement and Observer Reliability in Dogs
Objective: The purpose of the study reported here was to describe variables affecting thigh girth measurements preoperatively and 2 weeks after surgical stabilization of the stifle and to examine inter- and intra-observer reliability. Animals: Ten hound-type dogs with experimental, unilateral, cranial cruciate ligament transection, and surgical stabilization. Procedures: Dogs were placed in lateral recumbency for measurements of thigh circumference after the stifle was placed in flexed (F), estimated standing (S), and extended (E) positions. Measurements were made at 50 and 70% of thigh length (TL), with hair unclipped and then clipped prior to surgery, before and 2 weeks after cruciate ligament transection and stifle stabilization, and with and without sedation. A spring tension measuring tape was used to determine thigh girth that allowed a consistent amount of end-tension to be applied to the tape. All measurements were made by two blinded individuals in triplicate, data were recorded for each set of measurements and the mean of the three measurements for each condition was used for analysis. Results: Thigh girth was significantly greater at the more proximal site of 50% TL (36.7 ± 2.6 cm) when compared to the 70% TL (31.7 ± 2.7 cm) (P = 0.001). Sedation did not significantly affect thigh girth at any stifle position at the 70% and 50% TL. Although there were no differences in thigh circumference between the flexion and standing positions at 50% TL (F 38.2 ± 2.8 cm, S 38.1 ± 2.9 cm) and 70% TL (F 33.6 ± 1.6 cm; S 33.6 ± 1.8 cm), full extension of the stifle resulted in significantly less thigh girth (50% TL 36.6 ± 2.6 cm, P = 0.006; 70% TL 31.7 ± 2.6 cm, P = 0.006). Significant decreases in thigh girth were seen after surgery in all limb positions at both measurement sites. The highest correlations between Observer 1 (OB1) and Observer 2 (OB2) with least differences in measurements were with the stifle in the extended position. Agreement between two observers using standard measuring technique was significant at both the 50% (OB1: 34.10 ± 2.93 cm, OB2: 34.08 ± 2.65 cm, P = 0.007, ICC = 0.984) and 70% (OB1: 29.89 ± 2.43 cm, OB2: 30.04 ± 2.30 cm, P = 0.004, ICC = 0.981) TL positions with the stifle placed in extended position. Conclusion and Clinical Importance: Thigh girth measurement may be useful as an outcome measure when appropriate measuring technique is used. It is recommended that thigh girth be obtained at a distance of 70% thigh length, with the leg in an extended position while in lateral recumbency, and the dog relaxed or under sedation. Further studies should be performed in a variety of clinical situations.
- 30 August 2018
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
- Vol. 5, 203
Open AccessVariables Affecting Thigh Girth Measurement and Observer Reliability in Dogs
Objective: The purpose of the study reported here was to describe variables affecting thigh girth measurements preoperatively and 2 weeks after surgical stabilization of the stifle and to examine inter- and intra-observer reliability. Animals: Ten hound-type dogs with experimental, unilateral, cranial cruciate ligament transection, and surgical stabilization. Procedures: Dogs were placed in lateral recumbency for measurements of thigh circumference after the stifle was placed in flexed (F), estimated standing (S), and extended (E) positions. Measurements were made at 50 and 70% of thigh length (TL), with hair unclipped and then clipped prior to surgery, before and 2 weeks after cruciate ligament transection and stifle stabilization, and with and without sedation. A spring tension measuring tape was used to determine thigh girth that allowed a consistent amount of end-tension to be applied to the tape. All measurements were made by two blinded individuals in triplicate, data were recorded for each set of measurements and the mean of the three measurements for each condition was used for analysis. Results: Thigh girth was significantly greater at the more proximal site of 50% TL (36.7 ± 2.6 cm) when compared to the 70% TL (31.7 ± 2.7 cm) (P = 0.001). Sedation did not significantly affect thigh girth at any stifle position at the 70% and 50% TL. Although there were no differences in thigh circumference between the flexion and standing positions at 50% TL (F 38.2 ± 2.8 cm, S 38.1 ± 2.9 cm) and 70% TL (F 33.6 ± 1.6 cm; S 33.6 ± 1.8 cm), full extension of the stifle resulted in significantly less thigh girth (50% TL 36.6 ± 2.6 cm, P = 0.006; 70% TL 31.7 ± 2.6 cm, P = 0.006). Significant decreases in thigh girth were seen after surgery in all limb positions at both measurement sites. The highest correlations between Observer 1 (OB1) and Observer 2 (OB2) with least differences in measurements were with the stifle in the extended position. Agreement between two observers using standard measuring technique was significant at both the 50% (OB1: 34.10 ± 2.93 cm, OB2: 34.08 ± 2.65 cm, P = 0.007, ICC = 0.984) and 70% (OB1: 29.89 ± 2.43 cm, OB2: 30.04 ± 2.30 cm, P = 0.004, ICC = 0.981) TL positions with the stifle placed in extended position. Conclusion and Clinical Importance: Thigh girth measurement may be useful as an outcome measure when appropriate measuring technique is used. It is recommended that thigh girth be obtained at a distance of 70% thigh length, with the leg in an extended position while in lateral recumbency, and the dog relaxed or under sedation. Further studies should be performed in a variety of clinical situations.
- 11 June 2018
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
- Vol. 31 (04) , 239-245
Use of the Animal Trauma Triage Score, RibScore, Modified RibScore and Other Clinical Factors for Prognostication in Canine Rib Fractures
Objectives To characterize the clinical features among dogs sustaining rib fractures and to determine if age, type and severity of injury, entry blood lactate, trauma score and rib fracture score were associated with outcome. Methods A retrospective study was performed to include dogs that were presented with rib fractures. Risk factors evaluation included breed, age, body weight, diagnosis, presence of a flail chest, bandage use, puncture wound presence, rib fracture number, location of the fracture along the thoracic wall, hospital stay length, body weight, other fractures, pleural effusion, pulmonary contusions, pneumothorax and occurrence of an anaesthetic event. A retrospective calculation of an animal trauma triage (ATT) score, RibScore and Modified RibScore was assigned. Results Forty-one medical records were collected. Motor vehicular trauma represented 56% of the rib fracture aetiology, 41% of patients sustained dog bites and one case was of an unknown aetiology. Significant correlations with risk factors were found only with the ATT score. All patients that died had an ATT score ≥ 5. The ATT score correlated positively with mortality (p < 0.05) with an ATT score ≥ 7 was 88% sensitive and 81% specific for predicting mortality. A 1-point increase in ATT score corresponded to 2.1 times decreased likelihood of survival. Mean hospital stay was 3 days longer for dog bite cases. Clinical Significance There was no increased mortality rate in canine patients that presented with the suspected risk factors. The only risk factor that predicted mortality was the ATT score.
- 11 June 2018
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
- Vol. 31 (04) , 239-245
Use of the Animal Trauma Triage Score, RibScore, Modified RibScore and Other Clinical Factors for Prognostication in Canine Rib Fractures
Objectives To characterize the clinical features among dogs sustaining rib fractures and to determine if age, type and severity of injury, entry blood lactate, trauma score and rib fracture score were associated with outcome. Methods A retrospective study was performed to include dogs that were presented with rib fractures. Risk factors evaluation included breed, age, body weight, diagnosis, presence of a flail chest, bandage use, puncture wound presence, rib fracture number, location of the fracture along the thoracic wall, hospital stay length, body weight, other fractures, pleural effusion, pulmonary contusions, pneumothorax and occurrence of an anaesthetic event. A retrospective calculation of an animal trauma triage (ATT) score, RibScore and Modified RibScore was assigned. Results Forty-one medical records were collected. Motor vehicular trauma represented 56% of the rib fracture aetiology, 41% of patients sustained dog bites and one case was of an unknown aetiology. Significant correlations with risk factors were found only with the ATT score. All patients that died had an ATT score ≥ 5. The ATT score correlated positively with mortality (p < 0.05) with an ATT score ≥ 7 was 88% sensitive and 81% specific for predicting mortality. A 1-point increase in ATT score corresponded to 2.1 times decreased likelihood of survival. Mean hospital stay was 3 days longer for dog bite cases. Clinical Significance There was no increased mortality rate in canine patients that presented with the suspected risk factors. The only risk factor that predicted mortality was the ATT score.
- 24 January 2018
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Small Animal Practice
- Vol. 59 (5) , 298-304
Investigation of the HotDog patient warming system: detection of thermal gradients
Objective: To assess the performance of an active patient‐warming device.Materials and Methods: Temperatures of an active patient‐warming device (HotDog system) were measured at various time points using an infrared thermometer. The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 compared temperatures among four different areas of the warming blanket. Phase 2 compared conditions simulating different scenarios using a weighted patient simulator.Results: Phase 1: Three out of four positions on the warming blanket had significantly different temperature measurements. Phase 2: Temperature output by the warming blanket was reduced: (1) in the absence of the patient simulator placed across the blanket (−1·9°C, P=0·013); (2) if the patient simulator was placed away from the blanket sensor (−2·0°C, P=0·009); and (3) if there was fluid between the patient simulator and warming blanket (−2·2°C, P=0·004). In a majority of measurements (95%), the set temperature of 43°C on the control unit was not reached (range, 29·8 to 42·9°C) and 2·3% of measurements were higher (range, 43·1 to 45·8°C) than the control unit set temperature of 43°C. Clinical Significance: Measured temperatures on the active warming blanket did not reflect control unit settings. This could result in the potential for hyperthermic injury, ineffectual heating and uneven heat distribution.
- 24 January 2018
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Small Animal Practice
- Vol. 59 (5) , 298-304
Investigation of the HotDog patient warming system: detection of thermal gradients
Objective: To assess the performance of an active patient‐warming device.Materials and Methods: Temperatures of an active patient‐warming device (HotDog system) were measured at various time points using an infrared thermometer. The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 compared temperatures among four different areas of the warming blanket. Phase 2 compared conditions simulating different scenarios using a weighted patient simulator.Results: Phase 1: Three out of four positions on the warming blanket had significantly different temperature measurements. Phase 2: Temperature output by the warming blanket was reduced: (1) in the absence of the patient simulator placed across the blanket (−1·9°C, P=0·013); (2) if the patient simulator was placed away from the blanket sensor (−2·0°C, P=0·009); and (3) if there was fluid between the patient simulator and warming blanket (−2·2°C, P=0·004). In a majority of measurements (95%), the set temperature of 43°C on the control unit was not reached (range, 29·8 to 42·9°C) and 2·3% of measurements were higher (range, 43·1 to 45·8°C) than the control unit set temperature of 43°C. Clinical Significance: Measured temperatures on the active warming blanket did not reflect control unit settings. This could result in the potential for hyperthermic injury, ineffectual heating and uneven heat distribution.
- 1 October 2016
- Vol. 57 (10) , 1053-1056
Perineal evisceration secondary to a bite injury in a dog with an untreated perineal hernia.
Emergency surgery was performed on a 6-year-old castrated male springer spaniel dog with evisceration of most of the small intestinal tract through the perineal region, secondary to a dog attack. This is the first report describing successful treatment of perineal evisceration secondary to dog attack at an untreated perineal hernia, employing abdominal and perineal approaches.
- 1 October 2016
- Vol. 57 (10) , 1053-1056
Perineal evisceration secondary to a bite injury in a dog with an untreated perineal hernia.
Emergency surgery was performed on a 6-year-old castrated male springer spaniel dog with evisceration of most of the small intestinal tract through the perineal region, secondary to a dog attack. This is the first report describing successful treatment of perineal evisceration secondary to dog attack at an untreated perineal hernia, employing abdominal and perineal approaches.