Roslynn Brain McCann
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Roslynn Brain McCann has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Andrew Millison
Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
1 shared publication- Bayli Hanson
Department of Environment and Society Utah State University Old Main Hill 84322 Logan UT USA
1 shared publication - Blake Thomas1 shared publication
- Brett Alan Miller
Utah State University
1 shared publication - Bryn Watkins
Utah State University
1 shared publication - Danielle Smiley
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science Utah State University Blanding 8451 Blanding UT USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 16 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 209-225
Permaculture in Primary Teaching: Decolonizing and Building a More Socially and Environmentally Responsible World
- 16 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 209-225
Permaculture in Primary Teaching: Decolonizing and Building a More Socially and Environmentally Responsible World
- Open Access
- 1 April 2025
- Published by Utah State University Libraries in Outcomes and Impact Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (1) , 4
Cultivating Community and Commerce: A Summary of the Statewide Social and Economic Impacts of Utah Farmers Markets
Data collected from six markets throughout the market seasons between 2023 and 2024 highlights the transformative impact of Utah’s farmers’ markets on the state’s economy, health, and sense of community. According to market patrons, Utah’s farmers' markets are vital economic and social hubs supporting local agriculture, small businesses, and community well-being.
- 1 April 2025
- Published by Utah State University Libraries in Outcomes and Impact Quarterly
- Vol. 5 (1) , 4
Open AccessCultivating Community and Commerce: A Summary of the Statewide Social and Economic Impacts of Utah Farmers Markets
Data collected from six markets throughout the market seasons between 2023 and 2024 highlights the transformative impact of Utah’s farmers’ markets on the state’s economy, health, and sense of community. According to market patrons, Utah’s farmers' markets are vital economic and social hubs supporting local agriculture, small businesses, and community well-being.
- Open Access
- 25 September 2024
- Published by Hapres in Journal of Sustainability Research
- Vol. 6 (3)
Exploring Indigenous Climate Change Perceptions Through Tribal Talking Circles in the Colorado Plateau
Marginalized communities, including Indigenous populations, experience climate change at a more extreme rate given where they live, despite their knowledge of and connection to the land. Due to this interconnection, there have been many negative impacts on cultural identities in correlation with climate change. For example, Indigenous communities that continue growing food, hunting and foraging on traditional lands now face increasingly limited resources due to changes in the land itself. To better understand Tribal experiences with our changing climate, this qualitative research study involved talking circles with Tribal members in the Colorado Plateau region of the United States. Specifically, our diverse research team aimed to identify and highlight Tribal perceptions of climate change, community, and education within the Colorado Plateau. This region, also known as the Four Corners, includes parts of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. The land is home to many Tribes with regional ancestral ties, including, but not limited to, Hopi, Navajo (Diné), Havasupai, Hualapai, White Mountain Apache, Ute Mountain, Southern Ute, and Kaibab. We hosted four Tribal talking circles in this region to better understand Indigenous perspectives of climate change, local solutions, and lessons learned from collaborating with Indigenous communities. We partnered with the Nature Conservancy’s Native American Tribes Upholding Restoration and Education (NATURE) program based out of Bears Ears National Monument to conduct this research. Results were used to guide curriculum development for the NATURE program and can provide invaluable insight for those wishing to collaborate with Tribal members on climate resilience.
- 25 September 2024
- Published by Hapres in Journal of Sustainability Research
- Vol. 6 (3)
Open AccessExploring Indigenous Climate Change Perceptions Through Tribal Talking Circles in the Colorado Plateau
Marginalized communities, including Indigenous populations, experience climate change at a more extreme rate given where they live, despite their knowledge of and connection to the land. Due to this interconnection, there have been many negative impacts on cultural identities in correlation with climate change. For example, Indigenous communities that continue growing food, hunting and foraging on traditional lands now face increasingly limited resources due to changes in the land itself. To better understand Tribal experiences with our changing climate, this qualitative research study involved talking circles with Tribal members in the Colorado Plateau region of the United States. Specifically, our diverse research team aimed to identify and highlight Tribal perceptions of climate change, community, and education within the Colorado Plateau. This region, also known as the Four Corners, includes parts of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. The land is home to many Tribes with regional ancestral ties, including, but not limited to, Hopi, Navajo (Diné), Havasupai, Hualapai, White Mountain Apache, Ute Mountain, Southern Ute, and Kaibab. We hosted four Tribal talking circles in this region to better understand Indigenous perspectives of climate change, local solutions, and lessons learned from collaborating with Indigenous communities. We partnered with the Nature Conservancy’s Native American Tribes Upholding Restoration and Education (NATURE) program based out of Bears Ears National Monument to conduct this research. Results were used to guide curriculum development for the NATURE program and can provide invaluable insight for those wishing to collaborate with Tribal members on climate resilience.
- Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sustainability and Climate Change
- Vol. 14 (4) , 249-257
Life Paths to Leading Systems-Level Change: Higher Education's Pitfalls and Potential
Global protests calling for accelerated climate change action, social justice, and racial equity have been shifting long-standing conversations and policies from local to national scales. Yet many activists can become psychologically drained by the frustration and loss of hope in fighting against structural oppression. This study was comprised of semi-structured qualitative interviews spanning across the United States with 25 leaders and practitioners in permaculture design, a solutions-based ecological design framework to enact positive, systems-level environmental and social change. The objective was to better understand their life paths toward such work. The research showed that higher education is not adequately preparing individuals for engaging in systems-level change, and it is also not accessible to many looking to pursue this work. Given these institutional inadequacies, transdisciplinary programs and practical applications of systems-level frameworks remain underdeveloped and underutilized. There is a need for inclusive, hands-on, solutions-based frameworks that can confront the growing and complex contemporary concerns and can be integrated throughout academic programs and institutional structures. Higher education must serve a more central role in promoting transformative change to help current and future generations move away from degenerative patterns of environmental and social destruction and toward a more socially just and environmentally regenerated planet.
- 1 August 2021
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sustainability and Climate Change
- Vol. 14 (4) , 249-257
Open AccessLife Paths to Leading Systems-Level Change: Higher Education's Pitfalls and Potential
Global protests calling for accelerated climate change action, social justice, and racial equity have been shifting long-standing conversations and policies from local to national scales. Yet many activists can become psychologically drained by the frustration and loss of hope in fighting against structural oppression. This study was comprised of semi-structured qualitative interviews spanning across the United States with 25 leaders and practitioners in permaculture design, a solutions-based ecological design framework to enact positive, systems-level environmental and social change. The objective was to better understand their life paths toward such work. The research showed that higher education is not adequately preparing individuals for engaging in systems-level change, and it is also not accessible to many looking to pursue this work. Given these institutional inadequacies, transdisciplinary programs and practical applications of systems-level frameworks remain underdeveloped and underutilized. There is a need for inclusive, hands-on, solutions-based frameworks that can confront the growing and complex contemporary concerns and can be integrated throughout academic programs and institutional structures. Higher education must serve a more central role in promoting transformative change to help current and future generations move away from degenerative patterns of environmental and social destruction and toward a more socially just and environmentally regenerated planet.
- Open Access
- 12 May 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (10) , 5413
(Re-)Defining Permaculture: Perspectives of Permaculture Teachers and Practitioners across the United States
The solutions-based design framework of permaculture exhibits transformative potential, working to holistically integrate natural and human systems toward a more just society. The term can be defined and applied in a breadth of ways, contributing to both strengths and weaknesses for its capacity toward change. To explore the tension of breadth as strength and weakness, we interviewed 25 prominent permaculture teachers and practitioners across the United States (US) regarding how they define permaculture as a concept and perceive the term’s utility. We find that permaculture casts a wide net that participants grapple with in their own work. They engaged in a negotiation process of how they associate or disassociate themselves with the term, recognizing that it can be both unifying and polarizing. Further, there was noted concern of permaculture’s failure to cite and acknowledge its rootedness in Indigenous knowledge, as well as distinguish itself from Indigenous alternatives. We contextualize these findings within the resounding call for a decolonization of modern ways of living and the science of sustainability, of which permaculture can be critically part of. We conclude with recommended best practices for how to continuously (re-)define permaculture in an embodied and dynamic way to work toward these goals.
- 12 May 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (10) , 5413
Open Access(Re-)Defining Permaculture: Perspectives of Permaculture Teachers and Practitioners across the United States
The solutions-based design framework of permaculture exhibits transformative potential, working to holistically integrate natural and human systems toward a more just society. The term can be defined and applied in a breadth of ways, contributing to both strengths and weaknesses for its capacity toward change. To explore the tension of breadth as strength and weakness, we interviewed 25 prominent permaculture teachers and practitioners across the United States (US) regarding how they define permaculture as a concept and perceive the term’s utility. We find that permaculture casts a wide net that participants grapple with in their own work. They engaged in a negotiation process of how they associate or disassociate themselves with the term, recognizing that it can be both unifying and polarizing. Further, there was noted concern of permaculture’s failure to cite and acknowledge its rootedness in Indigenous knowledge, as well as distinguish itself from Indigenous alternatives. We contextualize these findings within the resounding call for a decolonization of modern ways of living and the science of sustainability, of which permaculture can be critically part of. We conclude with recommended best practices for how to continuously (re-)define permaculture in an embodied and dynamic way to work toward these goals.
- 25 February 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
- Vol. 45 (8) , 1246-1266
“From a chef’s perspective or what I can sell on the menu?” Exploring culinary professionals’ attitudes toward specialty beef production and barriers to adoption
This research aims to understand the attitudes and values of culinary ‘innovators’ already working with ‘local’ or ‘grass-fed/finished’ beef. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with specialty chefs and butchers in the Rocky Mountain Region based on the hypothesis that they operate as opinion leaders and understand that the benefits of, and barriers to, implementation of their current meat program is crucial for successfully introducing new products, such as Rocky Mountain Legume-Finished beef. Interviews revealed that professionals struggle with being ‘conscientious’ and ‘sustainable’ while still providing a consistent product for their customers. Although a few chefs spoke of setting ‘hard limits’ and ‘high standards’ for products, this did not emerge as a financial reality for other chefs or customers. In order for alternative sources of beef to be truly viable, beef production must address both environmental and economic concerns, while providing a consistent product in terms of taste and quality. Understanding the concerns of culinary professionals allows alternative ranching and agricultural production methods to be tailored as a viable for beef producers.
- 25 February 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
- Vol. 45 (8) , 1246-1266
“From a chef’s perspective or what I can sell on the menu?” Exploring culinary professionals’ attitudes toward specialty beef production and barriers to adoption
This research aims to understand the attitudes and values of culinary ‘innovators’ already working with ‘local’ or ‘grass-fed/finished’ beef. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with specialty chefs and butchers in the Rocky Mountain Region based on the hypothesis that they operate as opinion leaders and understand that the benefits of, and barriers to, implementation of their current meat program is crucial for successfully introducing new products, such as Rocky Mountain Legume-Finished beef. Interviews revealed that professionals struggle with being ‘conscientious’ and ‘sustainable’ while still providing a consistent product for their customers. Although a few chefs spoke of setting ‘hard limits’ and ‘high standards’ for products, this did not emerge as a financial reality for other chefs or customers. In order for alternative sources of beef to be truly viable, beef production must address both environmental and economic concerns, while providing a consistent product in terms of taste and quality. Understanding the concerns of culinary professionals allows alternative ranching and agricultural production methods to be tailored as a viable for beef producers.
- Open Access
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Clemson University in Journal of Extension
- Vol. 54 (5) , 26
Opportunities for and Barriers to Renewable Energy Outreach in Extension: A Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment
This article illuminates the far-reaching applications of renewable energy programming for Extension's rural and urban clientele. An online survey of attendees of the inaugural National Extension Energy Summit revealed the need for increased energy programming in Extension. Following survey analysis, focus group interviews were conducted at the National Extension Sustainability Summit to determine the best way to address the reported need for energy programming. The results provide readers with an understanding of how renewable energy programming can expand the role and relevancy of Extension in the 21st century.
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Clemson University in Journal of Extension
- Vol. 54 (5) , 26
Open AccessOpportunities for and Barriers to Renewable Energy Outreach in Extension: A Mixed-Methods Needs Assessment
This article illuminates the far-reaching applications of renewable energy programming for Extension's rural and urban clientele. An online survey of attendees of the inaugural National Extension Energy Summit revealed the need for increased energy programming in Extension. Following survey analysis, focus group interviews were conducted at the National Extension Sustainability Summit to determine the best way to address the reported need for energy programming. The results provide readers with an understanding of how renewable energy programming can expand the role and relevancy of Extension in the 21st century.