FAFaris Alomran

Faris Alomran

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Faris Alomran has a total of 81 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Predicting the need for subclavian artery revascularization in thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    by Tariq Alanezi, Abdulmajeed Altoijry, Sultan AlSheikh, Husain Al-Mubarak, Musaad Alhamzah, Faris Alomran, Omer Abdulrahim, Badr Aljabri, Elisa Greco, Mohamad A. Hussain, et al.


  • Open Access

    Coagulopathy of hospitalised COVID-19: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Anticoagulation versus Standard Care as a Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (RAPID COVID COAG – RAPID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

    by Michelle Sholzberg, Grace H. Tang, Elnara Negri, Hassan Rahhal, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Carlos E. Pompilio, Paula James, Michael Fralick, Musaad AlHamzah, Faris Alomran, et al.

    Objectives: To determine the effect of therapeutic anticoagulation, with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH, high dose nomogram), compared to standard care in hospitalized patients admitted for COVID-19 with an elevated D-dimer on the composite outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation or death up to 28 days. Trial design: Open-label, parallel, 1:1, phase 3, 2-arm randomized controlled trial Participants: The study population includes hospitalized adults admitted for COVID-19 prior to the development of critical illness. Excluded individuals are those where the bleeding risk or risk of transfusion would generally be considered unacceptable, those already therapeutically anticoagulated and those who have already have any component of the primary composite outcome. Participants are recruited from hospital sites in Brazil, Canada, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and the United States of America. The inclusion criteria are: Laboratory confirmed COVID-19 (diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction as per the World Health Organization protocol or by nucleic acid based isothermal amplification) prior to hospital admission OR within first 5 days (i.e. 120 hours) after hospital admission; Admitted to hospital for COVID-19; One D-dimer value above the upper limit of normal (ULN) (within 5 days (i.e. 120 hours) of hospital admission) AND EITHER: D-Dimer ≥2 times ULN OR D-Dimer above ULN and Oxygen saturation ≤ 93% on room air; > 18 years of age; Informed consent from the patient (or legally authorized substitute decision maker). The exclusion criteria are: pregnancy; hemoglobin 9/L in the last 72 hours; known fibrinogen 1.8 (if testing deemed clinically indicated by the treating physician prior to the initiation of anticoagulation); patient already prescribed intermediate dosing of LMWH that cannot be changed (determination of what constitutes an intermediate dose is to be at the discretion of the treating clinician taking the local institutional thromboprophylaxis protocol for high risk patients into consideration); patient already prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation at the time of screening [low or high dose nomogram UFH, LMWH, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant (any dose of dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban)]; patient prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy, when one of the agents cannot be stopped safely; known bleeding within the last 30 days requiring emergency room presentation or hospitalization; known history of a bleeding disorder of an inherited or active acquired bleeding disorder; known history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; known allergy to UFH or LMWH; admitted to the intensive care unit at the time of screening; treated with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or invasive mechanical ventilation at the time of screening; Imminent death according to the judgement of the most responsible physician; enrollment in another clinical trial of antithrombotic therapy involving hospitalized patients. Intervention and comparator: Intervention: Therapeutic dose of LMWH (dalteparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin) or high dose nomogram of UFH. The choice of LMWH versus UFH will be at the clinician’s discretion and dependent on local institutional supply. Comparator: Standard care [thromboprophylactic doses of LMWH (dalteparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin, fondaparinux)] or UFH. Administration of LMWH, UFH or fondaparinux at thromboprophylactic doses for acutely ill hospitalized medical patients, in the absence of contraindication, is generally considered standard care. Main outcomes: The primary composite outcome of ICU admission, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation or death at 28 days. Secondary outcomes include (evaluated up to day 28): All-cause death Composite of ICU admission or all-cause death Composite of mechanical ventilation or all-cause death Major bleeding as defined by the ISTH Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) recommendation; Red blood cell transfusion (>1 unit); Transfusion of platelets, frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate, cryoprecipitate and/or fibrinogen concentrate; Renal replacement therapy; Hospital-free days alive; ICU-free days alive; Ventilator-free days alive; Organ support-free days alive; Venous thromboembolism (defined as symptomatic or incidental, suspected or confirmed via diagnostic imaging and/or electrocardiogram where appropriate); Arterial thromboembolism (defined as suspected or confirmed via diagnostic imaging and/or electrocardiogram where appropriate); Heparin induced thrombocytopenia; Trajectories of COVID-19 disease-related coagulation and inflammatory biomarkers. Randomisation: Randomisation will be stratified by site and age (>65 versus ≤65 years) using a 1:1 computer-generated random allocation sequence with variable block sizes. Randomization will occur within the first 5 days (i.e. 120 hours) of participant hospital admission. However, it is recommended that randomization occurs as early as possible after hospital admission. Central randomization using an interactive web response system will ensure allocation concealment. Blinding (masking): No blinding involved. This is an open-label trial. Numbers to be randomised (sample size): 462 patients (231 per group) are needed to detect a 15% risk difference, from 50% in the control group to 35% in the experimental group, with power of 90% at a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Trial Status: Protocol Version Number 1.4. Recruitment began on May 11th, 2020. Recruitment is expected to be completed March 2022. Recruitment is ongoing. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04362085 Date of Trial Registration: April 24, 2020 Full protocol: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


  • Isolated Idiopathic Right Common Iliac Artery Aneurysm Presenting as Acute Appendicitis in a 9-Year-Old Girl: A Case Report and Literature Review

    by Louai R. Zaidan, Muhammad Tariq Siddique, Muhammad Anees Sharif, Saad AlGarni, Faris Alomran, Samer Koussayer


  • Open Access

    Incidence of Finding Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan and its Implication on its Prevalence in Saudi Arabia

    by Faris Alomran, Husain Aljawad, Mohammed Alshehri, Jaffar Alshahri, Mohammed Owais Alzwadi, Saad Algarni

    Background: In Saudi Arabia, the number of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated does not exceed 200/year. For a population of over 30 million, this number is far below international standards. The lack of studies on incidence of AAA in the gulf has left many questioning whether AAA is massively underdiagnosed or whether the prevalence is inferior to international standards. We designed a study to estimate the prevalence of AAA in our region. Methods: This was a retrospective review of all abdominal computer technologies (CTs) done from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016, in our hospital. We included all male patients at age 65–75 years in whom a CT was done for reasons other than diagnosing and managing aortic aneurysms. All external aortic diameters of 3 cm or more were considered positive for AAA. Results: The total number of reviewed CTs was 2032. The mean age was 69.8 ± 3.1 years and the mean aortic size was 1.9 ± 0.3 cm. There were 2026 cases (99.7%) with sizes <3 cm and the mean age was 69.8 ± 3.1 years. There were six cases (0.3%) with sizes ≥3 cm and the mean age was 72.3 ± 3.1 years. The only statistically significant factor for AAA was age, 69.8 versus 72.3 ± 3.1 years (P = 0.0433). Conclusion: Based on our data, the number of AAA in our population is inferior to most international screening programs. This low incidence could explain the far inferior number of diagnosed AAA in our population, and there are a number of scientific theories to support this result. However, these data are from a tertiary referral center, and many risk factors for AAA were not available. A pilot screening program in the nonhospital population would provide more robust evidence on the need of an AAA screening program. Publication Date: 11 May 2021 (online) © 2018. The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • Impact of Stent-Graft Oversizing on Gutter Areas after Chimney Graft Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

    by Romain de Blic, Frédéric Cochennec, Faris Alomran, Hicham Kobeiter, Eric Allaire, Pascal Desgranges, Jean-Pierre Becquemin


  • Double Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy of Tandem Carotid Lesions

    by Yannick Georg, Emmanouil Psathas, Faris Alomran, Julien Gaudric, Laurent Chiche, Fabien Koskas


  • Endovascular management of transplant renal artery stenosis

    by Joseph Touma, Alessandro Costanzo, Benoît Boura, Faris Alomran, Myriam Combes


  • Long-Term Preservation of Native Arteriovenous Dialysis Fistulas

    by Alexandros Mallios, Alessandro Costanzo, Benoit Boura, Myriam Combes, Faris Alomran, Romain de Blic, William C. Jennings


  • Experience of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System in the emergency setting of malperfusion in acute type B dissections

    by Jean-Marc Alsac, Antoine Girault, Salma El Batti, Marwan Abou Rjeili, Faris Alomran, Paul Achouh, Pierre Julia, Jean-Noël Fabiani