Beatrice Ruggerone

Background To date, little information is available about the effect of preanalytical factors on the urinary protein-to-creatinine (UPC) ratio in cats. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the effect of a commercially available cat litter, creatinine measurements at three different dilutions of urine, and different storage conditions on the UPC ratio in cats. Methods Feline urine specimens were prospectively collected. Twenty-two whole-urine specimens were placed uncovered and in contact with cat litter for 1 hour; 25 urine supernatants were diluted 1:10, 1:20, and 1:100 for creatinine measurements. The correlation, difference, agreement, and concordance in classifying specimens according to International Renal Interest Society staging were determined. Storage effects on UPC ratios were assessed in specimens stored for 6 hours at +20celcius (n = 20), 1 week at +4celcius (n = 20), and 3 months at -20celcius (n = 25). Specimens were also subjected to four freeze-thaw cycles (n = 20). Results were compared, and clinical significance was assessed by comparing each UPC ratio to the inter-assay range of the baseline value. Results Exposure to cat litter did not affect UPC ratios. A positive proportional bias was found in the 1:100 dilution compared with the 1:20 dilution; however, concordance was high for all comparisons. At +20, +4celcius, and after four repeated freeze-thaw cycles, UPC ratios were stable. Compared with baseline values, UPC ratios decreased (P < .01) after 8 and 12 weeks at -20celcius. However, all UPC ratios were within the inter-assay variability of the baseline value. Conclusions Exposure to cat litter did not affect UPC ratios, but further studies are necessary to evaluate other potential variables. The effects of the dilutions and storage conditions were clinically acceptable, although the 1:20 and 1:100 dilutions were not perfectly comparable.

Reliable diagnostic and prognostic markers of sepsis are lacking, but essential in veterinary medicine. We aimed to assess the accuracy of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), protein carbonyls (PCO) and paraoxonase-1 (PON1) in differentiating dogs with sepsis from those with sterile inflammation and healthy ones, and predict the outcome in septic dogs. These analytes were retrospectively evaluated at admission in 92 dogs classified into healthy, septic and polytraumatized. Groups were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a Mann–Whitney U test to assess differences between survivors and non-survivors. Correlation between analytes was assessed using the Spearman’s test, and their discriminating power was assessed through a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. PON1 and CRP were, respectively, significantly lower and higher in dogs with sepsis compared with polytraumatized and clinically healthy dogs (p < 0.001 for both the analytes), and also in dogs with trauma compared with healthy dogs (p = 0.011 and p = 0.017, respectively). PCO were significantly increased in septic (p < 0.001) and polytraumatized (p < 0.005) as compared with healthy dogs. PON1 and CRP were, respectively, significantly lower and higher in dogs that died compared with survivors (p < 0.001 for both analytes). Ultimately, evaluation of CRP and PON1 at admission seems a reliable support to diagnose sepsis and predict outcomes.

In view of the enormous variability of dog breeds, breed-specific reference intervals (RIs) are recommended for use in veterinary clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to determine whether RIs of the general canine population may be applied to the Italian Greyhound (Piccoli Levrieri Italiani or PLI), and to generate breed-specific RIs, where appropriate. Sixty-three privately owned clinically healthy fasted dogs were examined. Routine haematology and biochemistry were performed on 58 enrolled patients using the ADVIA 120 haematology analyzer and the Cobas Mira system, respectively. Changes in haematological and biochemical parameters depending on sex, age and attitude (resting vs. running dogs) were investigated. The results of PLI were compared with the RIs of the general canine population. In those cases in which these RIs were not validated, new RIs were generated according to the guidelines of the American Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology. Pre-existing RIs were considered valid based on the recommendations by the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). RIs were higher for mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), cell haemoglobin concentration mean (CHCM) and lower for large unstained cells (LUC). A wider discrepancy between pre-existing and newly established RIs was found for some ADVIA parameters regarding red blood cell (RBC) or reticulocyte morphology. For total protein and cholesterol the new RIs were wider than the pre-existing ones, while albumin, calcium and iron were higher. This study suggests that most of the RIs published in veterinary textbooks cannot be validated for PLIs.