Angelo Fama

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with ibrutinib, first-in-class, demonstrating durable efficacy even in high-risk patients. However, off-target adverse events (AEs) have raised concerns, prompting the development of more selective second-generation BTKis, such as zanubrutinib, designed to improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. Despite encouraging results from clinical trials, real-world data comparing zanubrutinib with ibrutinib remain limited. In this multicenter, retrospective study, we analyzed 934 patients with CLL treated outside clinical trials, including 393 receiving zanubrutinib and 541 receiving ibrutinib. We evaluated time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) in both the overall cohort and a propensity score–matched population. Patients who were treated with zanubrutinib experienced lower 12-month discontinuation rates (overall: 12.6% vs 21.4%; matched: 12.4% vs 20.2%) and higher 12-month TTNTD rates (overall: 91.9% vs 83.0%; matched: 93.2% vs 83.4%). Multivariable analyses confirmed zanubrutinib as an independent predictor of longer TTD and TTNTD, whereas high-risk features, including age, relapsed/refractory disease, Binet stage C, TP53 disruption, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 to 3, and congestive heart failure, were consistently associated with poorer outcomes. AEs leading to discontinuation, particularly atrial fibrillation, bleeding, and infections, were less frequent with zanubrutinib, reflecting its favorable safety profile. These findings provide real-world evidence that zanubrutinib offers more durable disease control and improved persistence compared with ibrutinib, reinforcing its clinical value as a preferred second-generation BTKi. Nevertheless, the relatively short follow-up for zanubrutinib warrants cautious interpretation of long-term outcomes, and underscores the need for ongoing observation to fully characterize its durability and safety.

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtype, and approximately 50% of the patients are >60 years of age. Patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) disease have a poor prognosis with currently available treatments. Lenalidomide is available in Italy for patients with rrDLBCL based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency. Subjects, Materials, and Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted in 24 Italian hematology centers with the aim to improve information on effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide use for rrDLBCL in real practice. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients received lenalidomide for 21/28 days with a median of four cycles. At the end of therapy, there were 36 complete responses (23.5%) and 9 partial responses with an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.4%. In the elderly (>65 years) subset, the ORR was 33.6%. With a median follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was reached at 12 months and median disease-free survival was not reached at 62 months. At the latest available follow-up, 29 patients are still in response out of therapy. Median progression-free survivals differ significantly according to age (2.5 months vs. 9.5 in the younger vs. elderly group, respectively) and to disease status at the latest previous therapy (15 months for relapsed patients vs. 3.5 for refractory subjects). Toxicities were manageable, even if 30 of them led to an early drug discontinuation. Conclusion: Lenalidomide therapy for patients with rrDLBCL is effective and tolerable even in a real-life context, especially for elderly patients. Implications for Practice: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and approximately 50% of the patients are >60 years of age. Patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) disease have a poor prognosis, reflected by the remarkably short life expectancy of 12 months with currently available treatments. The rrDLBCL therapeutic algorithm is not so well established because data in the everyday clinical practice are still poor. Lenalidomide for patients with rrDLBCL is effective and tolerable even in a real-life context, especially for elderly patients.

Summary: We evaluated the association of Human Pegivirus (HPgV) viraemia with risk of developing lymphoma, overall and by major subtypes. Because this virus has also been associated with better prognosis in the setting of co‐infection with human immunodeficiency virus, we further assessed the association of HPgV with prognosis. We used risk factor data and banked plasma samples from 2094 lymphoma cases newly diagnosed between 2002 and 2009 and 1572 frequency‐matched controls. Plasma samples were tested for HPgV RNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), and those with RNA concentrations P < 0·0001), and for all major subtypes except Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and this was not confounded by other lymphoma risk factors. In contrast, there was no association of HPgV viraemia with event‐free survival (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1·00; 95% CI 0·85–1·18) or overall survival (HR = 0·97; 95% CI 0·79–1·20) for lymphoma overall, or any of the subtypes. These data support the hypothesis for a role of HPgV in the aetiology of multiple lymphoma subtypes.

Background. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has the worst prognosis of B‐cell subtypes owing to its aggressive clinical disease course and incurability with standard chemo‐immunotherapy. Options for relapsed MCL are limited, although several single agents have been studied. Lenalidomide is available in Italy for patients with MCL based on a local disposition of the Italian Drug Agency. Subjects, Materials, and Methods. An observational retrospective study was conducted in 24 Italian hematology centers with the aim to improve information on effectiveness and safety of lenalidomide use in real practice. Results. Seventy patients received lenalidomide for 21/28 days with a median of eight cycles. At the end of therapy, there were 22 complete responses (31.4%), 11 partial responses, 6 stable diseases, and 31 progressions, with an overall response rate of 47.1%. Eighteen patients (22.9%) received lenalidomide in combination with either dexamethasone (n = 13) or rituximab (n = 5). Median overall survival (OS) was reached at 33 months and median disease‐free survival (DFS) at 20 months: 14/22 patients are in continuous complete response with a median of 26 months. Patients who received lenalidomide alone were compared with patients who received lenalidomide in combination: OS and DFS did not differ. Progression‐free survivals are significantly different: at 56 months, 36% in the combination group versus 13% in patients who received lenalidomide alone. Toxicities were manageable, even if 17 of them led to an early drug discontinuation. Conclusion. Lenalidomide therapy for relapsed MCL patients is effective and tolerable even in a real‐life context. Implication for Practice. Several factors influence treatment choice in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (rrMCL), and the therapeutic scenario is continuously evolving. In fact, rrMCL became the first lymphoma for which four novel agents have been approved: temsirolimus, lenalidomide, ibrutinib, and bortezomib. The rrMCL therapeutic algorithm is not so well established because data in the everyday clinical practice are still poor. Lenalidomide for rrMCL patients is effective and tolerable even in a real‐life context.

Between November 2012 and July 2014, in accordance with national law 648/96, brentuximab vedotin was available in Italy for patients with relapsed systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma outside a clinical trial context. A large Italian observational retrospective study was conducted on the use of brentuximab vedotin in everyday clinical practice to check whether clinical trial results are confirmed in a real-life context. The primary endpoint of this study was best response; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate at the end of the treatment, duration of response, survival and safety profile. A total of 40 heavily pretreated patients were enrolled. Best response was observed after a median of four cycles in 77.5%: globally, 47.5% patients obtained a complete response, 64.2% in the elderly subset. The overall response rate was 62.5%. At the latest follow up, 15/18 patients are still in complete remission (3 with consolidation). The progression-free survival rate at 24 months was 39.1% and the disease-free survival rate at the same time was 54% (median not reached). All the long-term responders were aged <30 years at first infusion. The treatment was well tolerated even in this real-life context and no deaths were linked to drug toxicity. Brentuximab vedotin induces clinical responses quite rapidly, i.e. within the first four cycles of treatment in most responders, thus enabling timely use of transplantation. For patients ineligible for transplant or for those in whom a transplant procedure failed, brentuximab vedotin may represent a feasible effective therapeutic option in everyday clinical practice.

A large Italian multicenter observational retrospective study was conducted on the use of brentuximab vedotin (BV) for patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) to check if clinical trial results are confirmed even in a real life context. 234 CD30+ HL patients were enrolled. Best response was observed after a median of 4 cycles in 140 patients (59.8%): 74 (31.6%) patients obtained a complete response (CR) and 66 (28.2%) achieved a partial response (PR); overall response rate at the end of the treatment was 48.3% (62 CR and 51 PR). The best response rate was higher in the elderly subset: 14 (50%) CR and 5 (17.8%) PR. Disease free survival was 26.3% at 3 years and progression free survival 31.9% at 4.5 years. Duration of response did not differ for who achieved at least PR and then either did or did not undergo consolidative transplant. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated and no death has been linked to BV-induced toxicity.

An accurate histological diagnosis may distinguish essential thrombocythaemia (ET) from early primary myelofibrosis (early‐PMF), which is associated with worse outcome. Outcome of ET is also negatively affected by the presence of the JAK2^V617F mutation. To investigate the impact of JAK2^V617F mutation burden and histology on outcome, we collected 475 WHO‐diagnosed ET (69.2%) or early‐PMF JAK2^V617F‐positive patients followed in 4 Italian haematology centers. JAK2^V617F allele burden was ≤50% in 90% and 87% of ET and early‐PMF patients, respectively (P = .34). During follow‐up, 32 (9.7%) ET and 18 (12.3%) early‐PMF patients experienced 59 thrombotic events, and 27 patients (5.6%) and 6 (1.2%) patients evolved to myelofibrosis and acute leukemia, respectively. At last contact, 28 (5.8%) patients had died. In early‐PMF compared to ET, the 10‐year mortality rates (6.7% and 4.3%, P = .73), leukemic transformation rates (1.4% and 1.2%, P = .45), and thrombosis rates (16.7% and 12.2%, P = .12) were comparable. Only progression to overt myelofibrosis at 10 years was significantly worse (11.4% and 1.5%, P = .004). In multivariate analysis, a higher (>50%) JAK2^V617F burden was significantly correlated with fibrotic progression and histology. Considering JAK2^V617F‐positive disease, a higher (>50%) JAK2^V617F burden and histological classification are independent prognostic risk factors for disease progression. These findings reinforce the need for standardized detection of this mutation.