Carina Vasconcelos Silva

Background/Objectives: This study explored the views of dermatologists in Australia on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in dermatology.Method: Fellows and Trainees of the Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey, resulting in a sample of 122 completed surveys (response rate 16.2%).Results: Although 44% have used AI in their dermatology practice, only a minority are using AI regularly for clinical (12%) or administrative purposes (17%). A key barrier is trust, with most (69%) participants either unwilling or unsure about trusting AI for supporting the diagnosis of skin cancer. Participants identified accuracy and information on datasets, limitations, benefits, and the purpose of AI as important for trust. 52% want AI accuracy to be equivalent to or superior to the best dermatologist if it is used for clinical diagnosis. Participants perceived a range of benefits and risks of AI, with key risks around accuracy and divestment of AI to tech companies, and key benefits being reduction of monotonous tasks and improved patient access. Few (10%) are concerned about AI replacing dermatologists even though almost half (47%) expect key aspects of dermatology work will be performed by AI.Conclusions: Dermatologists in Australia are at an early stage of integrating AI into practice, with most wary or unsure about the accuracy of currently available AI tools for diagnostic purposes. Developing workflows that are acceptable to clinicians may require knowledge outreach from Dermatology Colleges, such as the ACD, to help clinicians develop well informed views on AI.

Background: Three‐dimensional (3D) total‐body photography is a recent advance in melanoma early detection that can aid in monitoring and identifying new and changing skin lesions over time.Methods: A cross‐sectional survey of adults living in metropolitan and rural areas of Australia was conducted to assess perceptions of 3D total‐body photography. Participants completed a survey detailing their previous use of skin cancer photography, personal skin checking history, perceptions of 3D total‐body photography, and willingness to pay. Participants were also asked to describe the potential barriers and facilitators of 3D total‐body photography in their own words.Results: A total of 1056 participants completed the survey, with 739 (70%) from metropolitan areas of Australia and 317 (30%) from rural areas. Most participants (95%, n = 1004/1056) indicated they would consider using 3D total‐body photography if it became commercially available at their regular medical practice. Most participants indicated 3D total‐body photography would be effective to identify suspicious skin spots (94%, n = 995/1056), monitor lesion changes (94%, n = 997/1056), and reduce skin cancer related anxiety (90%, n = 950/1055). In open‐ended feedback, participants (87%, n = 918/1056) identified perceived benefits, including more comprehensive screenings, earlier detection, and less human error. Participants (84%, n = 889/1056) also identified potential barriers to 3D total‐body photography, including cost, accessibility and availability, trust in the technology, and digital security concerns.Conclusions: Participant feedback indicated a high level of acceptance and confidence in the technology. To facilitate clinical translation, addressing consumer‐identified barriers to 3D total‐body photography will be vital.

Background: Skin cancer represents a significant health burden across the globe and early detection is critical to improve health outcomes. Three-dimensional (3D) total-body photography is a new and emerging technology which can support clinicians when they monitor people's skin over time. Objectives: The aim of this study was to improve our understanding of the epidemiology and natural history of melanocytic naevi in adults, and their relationship with melanoma and other skin cancers. Methods: Mind Your Moles was a 3-year prospective, population-based cohort study which ran from December 2016 to February 2020. Participants visited the Princess Alexandra Hospital every 6 months for 3 years to undergo both a clinical skin examination and 3D total-body photography. Results: A total of 1213 skin screening imaging sessions were completed. Fifty-six percent of participants (n = 108/193) received a referral to their own doctor for 250 lesions of concern, 101/108 (94%) for an excision/biopsy. Of those, 86 people (85%) visited their doctor and received an excision/biopsy for 138 lesions. Histopathology of these lesions found 39 non-melanoma skin cancers (across 32 participants) and six in situ melanomas (across four participants). Conclusions: 3D total-body imaging results in diagnosis of a high number of keratinocyte cancers (KCs) and their precursors in the general population.

Aim: Globally, type 2 diabetes care is often fragmented and still organised in a provider‐centred way, resulting in suboptimal care for many individuals. As healthcare systems seek to implement digital care innovations, it is timely to reassess stakeholders' priorities to guide the redesign of diabetes care. This study aimed to identify the needs and wishes of people with type 2 diabetes, and specialist and primary care teams regarding optimal diabetes care to explore how to better support people with diabetes in a metropolitan healthcare service in Australia.Methods: Our project was guided by a Participatory Design approach and this paper reports part of the first step, identification of needs. We conducted four focus groups and 16 interviews (November 2019–January 2020) with 17 adults with type 2 diabetes and seven specialist clinicians from a diabetes outpatient clinic in Brisbane, Australia, and seven primary care professionals from different clinics in Brisbane. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, building on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour model.Results: People with diabetes expressed the wish to be equipped, supported and recognised for their efforts in a holistic way, receive personalised care at the right time and improved access to connected services. Healthcare professionals agreed and expressed their own burden regarding their challenging work. Overall, both groups desired holistic, personalised, supportive, proactive and coordinated care pathways.Conclusions: We conclude that there is an alignment of the perceived needs and wishes for improved diabetes care among key stakeholders, however, important gaps remain in the healthcare system.

Background: Mobile teledermatology is increasingly being used in clinical practice and offers the opportunity to counsel the general public about sun protection and skin cancer early detection. Growing evidence suggests that SMS text messaging interventions are an effective way to reach a large number of people and promote sun protection behaviors. Many medical practices already have SMS text message systems in place to communicate with patients, especially for appointment reminders and information. However, could we use these systems for even better outcomes? If so, how? Objective: This presentation will outline the results of the SunText study, a theory-based SMS text messaging intervention designed to evaluate how often and in what way we could communicate with people at risk of skin cancer to have a beneficial effect on sun protection behaviors, sunburn, and participant engagement. Methods: The SunText study was conducted between February-July 2019 in Queensland, Australia. Volunteer participants aged 18 to 40 years were randomized to 4 different intervention schedules using a Latin square design. The schedules included personalized or interactive messages with constant frequency and personalized and interactive messages with either increasing or decreasing frequency. Outcomes measured were reduction in sunburn and engagement with interactive messages, defined as responding to messages by return text. Results: Compared to baseline, the self-reported sun protection habits index was significantly higher in all 4 interventions (P<.01). Overall, sunburn rates decreased from baseline to the end of the intervention (40.3% to 7.0%), and remained significantly below baseline levels (23.5%) at the 6-month follow-up (P<.01). All 4 interventions achieved reductions in sunburn rates (18%-48% reduction) during the intervention period. The overall engagement rate with interactive messages was 71%. The intervention involving interactive messages with constant frequency achieved the highest engagement rate. The intervention with personalized and interactive messages with increasing frequency had the lowest engagement rate. Conclusions: This study adds to the evidence that text messages targeting sun protection are effective in improving sun protection behaviors and reducing sunburn. Results also suggest higher engagement with constant or decreasing message frequency. Although many clinics already use SMS text messaging for scheduling, this presentation may encourage its extended use to raise awareness of sun protection. Interactive messages could also be integrated into sun protection mobile health apps, and provide an opportunity for engaging in health promotion content.

BACKGROUND Mobile teledermatology is increasingly being used in clinical practice and offers the opportunity to counsel the general public about sun protection and skin cancer early detection. Growing evidence suggests that SMS text messaging interventions are an effective way to reach a large number of people and promote sun protection behaviors. Many medical practices already have SMS text message systems in place to communicate with patients, especially for appointment reminders and information. However, could we use these systems for even better outcomes? If so, how? OBJECTIVE This presentation will outline the results of the SunText study, a theory-based SMS text messaging intervention designed to evaluate how often and in what way we could communicate with people at risk of skin cancer to have a beneficial effect on sun protection behaviors, sunburn, and participant engagement. METHODS The SunText study was conducted between February-July 2019 in Queensland, Australia. Volunteer participants aged 18 to 40 years were randomized to 4 different intervention schedules using a Latin square design. The schedules included personalized or interactive messages with constant frequency and personalized and interactive messages with either increasing or decreasing frequency. Outcomes measured were reduction in sunburn and engagement with interactive messages, defined as responding to messages by return text. RESULTS Compared to baseline, the self-reported sun protection habits index was significantly higher in all 4 interventions (P<.01). Overall, sunburn rates decreased from baseline to the end of the intervention (40.3% to 7.0%), and remained significantly below baseline levels (23.5%) at the 6-month follow-up (P<.01). All 4 interventions achieved reductions in sunburn rates (18%-48% reduction) during the intervention period. The overall engagement rate with interactive messages was 71%. The intervention involving interactive messages with constant frequency achieved the highest engagement rate. The intervention with personalized and interactive messages with increasing frequency had the lowest engagement rate. CONCLUSIONS This study adds to the evidence that text messages targeting sun protection are effective in improving sun protection behaviors and reducing sunburn. Results also suggest higher engagement with constant or decreasing message frequency. Although many clinics already use SMS text messaging for scheduling, this presentation may encourage its extended use to raise awareness of sun protection. Interactive messages could also be integrated into sun protection mobile health apps, and provide an opportunity for engaging in health promotion content.

There is growing evidence suggesting that text-message-based interventions are effective to promote sun protection behaviors. However, it is still unclear how engagement and adherence with the intervention messages can be optimized through intervention design. This study evaluated the effect of different combinations of personalized and two-way interactive messages on participant engagement with a theory-based skin cancer prevention intervention. In the SunText study conducted in February–July 2019 in Queensland, Australia participants 18–40 years were randomized to four different text message schedules using a Latin square design. This study analyzed if the order and intensity in which the schedules were received were associated with participants’ level of engagement, and if this differed by demographic factors. Out of the 389 participants enrolled in the study, 375 completed the intervention period and remained for analysis. The overall intervention engagement rate was 71% and decreased from the beginning to the end of the study (82.2%–61.4%). The group starting with personalized, but not interactive messaging showed the lowest engagement rate. The intervention involving interactive messages three times a week for 4 weeks achieved the highest engagement rate. The intervention with increasing frequency (personalized and interactive three times a week for 2 weeks; then daily for 2 weeks) had lower engagement than intervention with constant or decreasing frequency. Engagement with two-way interactive messages was high across all intervention groups. Results suggest enhanced engagement with constant or decreasing message frequency compared to increasing frequency.

Issue addressed: Skin self‐examination (SSE) empowers individuals to be aware of their skin and to identify and present to a doctor with any suspicious lesions; however evidence‐based, clear guidance for SSE is lacking.Methods: A new acronym entitled SCAN (Sore, Changing, Abnormal, New) was compiled to help laypeople recognise early signs of skin cancer. This study undertook a qualitative investigation on how well laypeople understand SCAN and other commonly used educational tools (ABCDE, AC, and “ugly duckling”), whether they have a preferred SSE tool, and whether pictorial presentations enhance their understanding.Results: Seven focus groups were conducted with 28 participants (age range 19‐78 years), including 6 participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis. Among all the educational tools presented, SCAN was commonly described as the favoured to guide SSE. SCAN was perceived as patient‐oriented due to its simplicity and use of easily understood words, while other tools, although perceived as positive in some aspects, were often identified as complex, difficult to understand and aimed towards clinician use. Pictorial presentations were desired as part of an educational tool; however, many also raised their potential disadvantages.Conclusion: This was the first study to determine the patient perspective of SCAN and established a diverse range of potential quality indicators for SSE educational tools.So what?: The findings of this study suggest that current widely used SSE tools may not be the most effective to promote SSE. SCAN may be preferred, as it simplifies SSE by using lay language and is applicable to all skin cancers.