DLDouglas A. Lappi

Douglas A. Lappi

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Douglas A. Lappi has a total of 245 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Substance P–Saporin for the Treatment of Intractable Pain

    by Hugh Nymeyer, Douglas A. Lappi, Denise Higgins, Carl E. Noe, Arthur E. Frankel


  • Abstract CT030: Preliminary results from a phase I study of Substance P-Saporin in advanced cancer patients with intractable pain

    by Arthur E. Frankel, Douglas A. Lappi, Carl Noe, Denise Higgins, Brian J. Russell

    Cancer pain is a great fear, at times greater than even death, in the progression of the disease. 10-15% of cancer patients have pain that is refractory to opioid treatment. There is a common fear among terminal patients that pain treatments will leave them unable to function normally at a time when that is extremely important for them. Substance P-Saporin (SP-SAP), targets with Substance P (SP), a neuromodulator that binds to receptors on laminae I and X of the dorsal horn of NK1r-bearing neurons. These neurons are critical components of the high level, intense pain pathway. The toxic portion of the drug is Saporin (SAP), a ribosome-inactivating protein that, once assisted inside a cell by Substance P, ablates neurons that express NK1r. A single intrathecal infusion of SP-SAP alleviated pathologic pain perception without affecting other sensory signal pathways in preclinical studies conducted in rats. Studies published in the journal Science show pathological pain relief is permanent with no long-term side effects such as central sensitization. A veterinary single-blind clinical trial for the treatment of pain associated with bone tumors in canine companion animals showed that after one injection of SP-SAP, dogs had a much higher quality of life throughout the cancer. Patients in the ongoing SP-SAP phase I clinical trial (NCT02036281) are treated at University of Texas Southwestern. Eligibility: 18 years or older, signed consent, able to verbally report pain, able to complete pain surveys, perform motor/sensory tests, able to undergo intrathecal catheter placement, other therapeutics and palliative options have been exhausted, and have been diagnosed with advanced cancer leading to intractable pain with minimum expected survival of one month. Treatment: a percutaneous intraspinal catheter is placed at the L5-S1 interspace and the advanced 4-5 cm into the intrathecal space under fluoroscopic guidance. 1 mL SP-SAP is mixed with 1 mL patient CSF fluid and administered via the catheter. Subjects are monitored for four hours in the recovery room before catheter is removed, monitored in hospital 24 hours, and discharged. The starting dose of SP-SAP was 1 mcg in 1mL, 1/10th the dog no observable adverse effect level. Dose: Single subject cohorts are at doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 90 mcg. If a drug-related dose-limiting toxicity is observed in two or more patients in a cohort, the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) has been exceeded, and the next lower dose level will be the MTD. An additional 15 patients will be treated at the MTD to confirm safety. Endpoints: Response measurements include pain level measurements, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), VAS “pain bothersomeness,” VAS “pain intensity,” ODI, SF-36, EQ-5D, BDI, and Medication Use logs in patient diary. Primary endpoints for the trial are either a 20% reduction in pain scores or a 20% reduction in pain medications taken by the patient. Citation Format: Arthur E. Frankel, Douglas A. Lappi, Carl Noe, Denise Higgins, Brian J. Russell. Preliminary results from a phase I study of Substance P-Saporin in advanced cancer patients with intractable pain. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT030.


  • Intrathecal Substance P-Saporin for the Treatment of Intractable Cancer Pain

    by Hugh Nymeyer, Douglas A. Lappi, Denise Higgins, Carl E. Noe, Arthur E. Frankel


  • Preliminary results from a phase I study of substance P-saporin in terminal cancer patients with intractable pain.

    by Arthur E. Frankel, Hugh Nymeyer, Douglas A. Lappi, Denise Higgins, Chul Ahn, Carl Noe

    191 Background: For 10-15% of cancer patients, pain cannot be controlled using existing therapies (Zech et al., Pain, 63, 65-76, 1995). SP-SAP is the first targeted toxin to undergo phase I testing for pain. SP-SAP (Wiley and Lappi, Neurosci Lett, 230, 97-100, 1997) covalently linkes substance P (SP), a neuromodulator that binds to NK1 receptors on laminae I and X of the dorsal horn, and saporin (SAP), a ribosomal toxin that ablates cells that express NK1 and endocytose the toxin. Intrathecal injections of SP-SAP in rats reduce chemically or thermally induced pain, thermal hyperalgesia, and mechanical allodynia, with no signs of motor, sensory, or behavioral dysfunction (Mantyh et al., Science, 278, 275-9, 1997; Nichols et al., Science, 286, 1558-61, 1999; Suzuki et al., Nature Neurosci, 5, 139-26, 2002; Vierck et al., Neurosci, 199, 223-32, 2003). In canines, intrathecal injections into the lumbar region – 45 mcg for 10-15 kg (Allen et al., Toxicol Sci, 91, 286-98, 2006) or 15 mcg for 8-12 kg (Wiese et al., Anesthesiol, 119, 1163-77, 2013) – produce no neurological, behavioral, or histological deficits. A double-blinded RCT of SP-SAP for the treatment of bone pain in canines (Brown and Agnello, Anesthesiol, 199, 1178-85, 2013) showed that a single injection of 60 mcg (above 30 kg) or 40 mcg (below 30 kg) significantly reduced pain as measured by time to owner unblinding (p=0.002) or number of canines unblended (p=0.001). Methods: A single intrathecal injection of SP-SAP is made at the L5-S1 interspace of cancer patients with intractable sub-umbilical pain. Single subject cohorts are at doses of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 90 mcg. Primary outcomes are assessed by pain survey (VAS “bothersome pain”, VAS “pain intensity”, ODI, EQ-5D, and BDI) and medication use log. Patients are monitored for toxicity, neurological and cardiac abnormalities, and SP-SAP antibodies for 6 months. Results: This report presents the results from the first three subjects of the phase I study. No evidence of toxicity or neurological or cardiac abnormalities were found. No clear evidence for pain reduction was observed. Conclusions: At existing doses (< 4 mcg), SP-SAP appears safe for human use. The study is continuing with dose escalation. Clinical trial information: NCT02036281.


  • Nervous System Research with RIP Conjugates

    by Douglas A. Lappi, Jack Feldman, Dale Sengelaub, Jill McGaughy


  • Ribosome‐inactivating Proteins in Cancer Treatment

    by Douglas A. Lappi, Fiorenzo Stirpe

  • Open Access

    Intrathecal Substance P-Saporin in the Dog

    by Ashley J. Wiese, Michael Rathbun, Mark T. Butt, Shelle A. Malkmus, Philip J. Richter, Kent G. Osborn, Qinghao Xu, Samantha L. Veesart, Joanne J. Steinauer, Denise Higgins, et al.

    Background: Neurokinin-1 receptors (NK1-rs) located on superficial dorsal horn neurons are essential for integration of nociceptive input. Intrathecal injection of substance P-saporin (SP-SAP) leads to local loss of spinal NK1-r (+) neurons suggesting its potential as a therapeutic agent for chronic pain. The authors determined, in a canine model, effects of lumbar intrathecal SP-SAP. Methods: Distribution of SP-SAP and Saporin was determined in plasma, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue. Safety of intrathecal SP-SAP was determined in four groups (six dogs each) administered 0 (0.9% saline), 1.5, 15, or 150 µg SP-SAP through lumbar intrathecal catheters. Behavioral, physiologic, and biochemical variables were assessed. Spinal tissues were collected at 7 and approximately 90 days, or earlier if significant morbidity developed, and analyzed for NK1-r (+) neuron loss and histopathology. Results: SP-SAP and Saporin were detectable in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid for up to 4 and 24 h, respectively. Animals receiving intrathecal saline, 1.5, or 15 µg of SP-SAP showed no persistent neurologic deficits. Three animals receiving 150 µg of SP-SAP developed pelvic limb paraparesis and were euthanized prematurely. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization cell counts confirmed a significant reduction in NK1-r (+) in superficial dorsal horn neurons from lumbar spinal cord after intrathecal administration of 15 and 150 µg of SP-SAP. A significant loss of NK1-r neurons in the lumbar ventral horn occurred only with 150-µg SP-SAP. Conclusion: Intrathecal 15-µg SP-SAP reduced dorsal, but not ventral, NK1-r (+) neurons at the spinal level of delivery with minimal side effects, whereas 150-µg SP-SAP resulted in motor neuron toxicity.


  • Abstract 5218: Basigin-2 (EMMPRIN), a prognostic marker, is a dynamic portal of entry into cancer cells

    by Leonardo R. Ancheta, Douglas A. Lappi

    Basigin-2 (EMMPRIN) is a marker for prognosis of several tumor types. With the identification of the internalization of basigin-2 in response to antibody binding, we now further explore the possibility of its use as a dynamic portal of entry for molecules into cancer cells. We also wish to identify a correlation between number of basigin-2 on the cell surface and half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of a targeted toxin by examining eleven tumor cell lines which encompass various tumor types such as breast (MCF-7, BT549), leukemia (K562, HL-60), multiple myeloma (RPMI-8226), neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y), non-small cell lung (A549, NCI-H23, NCI-H522), and prostate (PC3). In this investigation, we employed the use of flow cytometry to characterize each cell line according to mean fluorescence as well as to determine the number of basigin-2 molecules expressed on the cell surface through a surface quantification assay. This was visualized by staining with a monoclonal antibody directed to basigin-2 ECD with comparison of results against a standard with known Antibody Binding Capacity (ABC) and standardizing the results into Molecules of Equivalent Soluble Fluorochromes (MESF; Bangs Laboratories, Inc.). Last year at this meeting we showed the ability of an antibody to basigin-2 ECD to cause internalization of secondary targeted toxins to cause cell death. We now report on the activity of a primary toxin: the ribosome-inactivating protein saporin attached directly to an antibody to basigin-2. Cytotoxicity assays yielded an EC50 range of 3.5-420 pM while surface quantification assays resulted in expression that ranged from 1-4 million basigin-2 molecules per cell. Cell lines showing potent EC50 values were characterized to have higher surface expression of basign-2 when compared to cell lines with less potent EC50 values. Preliminary results suggest a correlation between EC50 and basigin-2 surface expression such that more basigin-2 available on the cell surface would facilitate greater opportunity for a primary toxin to bind and enter into the cell and cause cell death. These data suggest the use of basigin-2 as a means to identify an entry system for molecules into cancer cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5218. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5218

  • Abstract 2244: Internalization of basigin-2, a poor prognosis marker, by a monoclonal antibody

    by Douglas A. Lappi, Leonardo Ancheta, Romana A. Nowak

    Basigin-2 (EMMPRIN, CD147) is widely expressed on the surface of numerous tumor types and is associated with poor prognosis. Basigin is an integral membrane glycoprotein also expressed on numerous normal cell types. Several functions have been described for basigin-2 within both normal and malignant tissues. The best characterized is its ability to induce the expression of matrix metalloproteinases in stromal cells. As such, it is suggested to play a role in tumor metastasis. Because of its association with poor prognosis and possible role in metastasis, we examined the ability of basigin-2 to be targeted on the cell surface and internalized as a possible gateway for entry into tumor cells, or for down-regulation for inhibition of metastasis. Belton et al. have documented internalization of basigin-2 by a recombinant soluble protein corresponding to the extracellular domain (ECD) of basigin-2 (J Biol Chem, 2008, 283:17805). We have extended this investigation to examine antibody-mediated endocytosis. A monoclonal antibody to the basigin ECD (also reported in Belton et al.) has been used in an internalization assay using biotinylated antibody mixed with streptavidinylated-saporin (the ribosome-inactivating protein). This complex will eliminate cells only if there is antibody-mediated endocytosis, since saporin has no mechanism of cell entry. HeLa cells, which are known to express basigin-2, were challenged and a potent cytotoxicity was observed: the ED50 of the biotinylated antibody-streptavidin-saporin complex is 370 pM. This is evidence that the antibody internalizes in HeLa cells. Similar data were observed with ovarian carcinoma cells (OVCAR3, SKOV3). Non-tumor cells with low expression have low sensitivity to the complex and there was a correlation between basigin-2 expression on the cell surface and cytotoxicity. We conclude that basigin-2 internalizes in response to antibody binding. Further work is necessary to determine if this can be used for introduction of molecules into basigin-2-expressing cells or if down-regulation would have an effect on metastasis promoted by this poor prognosis molecule. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2244.