Masahiko Nishioka
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Masahiko Nishioka has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Toshimichi Hata
Faculty of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe-city, Kyoto, 610-0394, Japan
2 shared publications Aoi Kinoshita
Faculty of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, 610-0394, Japan
1 shared publicationAtsushi Nakata
Faculty of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, 610-0394, Japan
1 shared publicationNaoko Shiokawa
Faculty of Psychology, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, 610-0394, Japan
1 shared publicationNobuhiro Nagata
Department of Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, Okinawa Prefectural Nanbu Medical Center & Children's Medical Center, Okinawa, Japan
1 shared publication- Shotaro Higa
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, Ginowann, Okinawa, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal striatum play an important role in the acquisition of duration memory
Although the formation of duration memory is important to optimize the timing of behavior based on previous experiences, the neural mechanism of formation remains unclear. A previous study suggested that muscarinic acetylcholine 1 receptors (M1Rs) in the dorsal striatum of rats are involved in the consolidation of duration memory in interval timing. Therefore, cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) may also be involved in the formation of duration memory in interval timing because ChIs activate M1Rs in the dorsal striatum. In the Exp. 1A, rats underwent a peak interval (PI)-20 s training. During the training, two different trials were randomly presented. One was a food trial in which the initial lever press was reinforced 20 s after the start of the trial (i.e., fixed interval (FI), 20 s). The other was an empty trial in which the reinforcement did not occur for 80 s. After sufficient training, the rats responded at approximately 20 s in the empty trials. They were then subjected to a PI-40 s training (i.e., FI, 40 s) after ChI lesions were present in the dorsal striatum. In this training, the sham-lesioned group responded frequently at approximately 40 s, whereas the ChI-lesioned group responded at approximately 20 s. As the PI-40 s additional learning progressed in the Exp. 1B, the ChI-lesioned group frequently responded at approximately 40 s, similar to that of the sham-lesioned group. In the following PI-20 s re-shift training, the ChI-lesioned group responded similar to the sham-lesioned group. In Exp. 2 of another cohort, the results of a PI-20 s training after the occurrence of ChI lesions were similar to that before the presence of the lesion. Together, these results suggest that ChI lesions delayed only the acquisition of new duration memory, but had no effect on the adjustment of behavior associated with changing the reinforcement schedule of the PI-training and interval timing itself.
Open AccessCholinergic interneurons in the dorsal striatum play an important role in the acquisition of duration memory
Although the formation of duration memory is important to optimize the timing of behavior based on previous experiences, the neural mechanism of formation remains unclear. A previous study suggested that muscarinic acetylcholine 1 receptors (M1Rs) in the dorsal striatum of rats are involved in the consolidation of duration memory in interval timing. Therefore, cholinergic interneurons (ChIs) may also be involved in the formation of duration memory in interval timing because ChIs activate M1Rs in the dorsal striatum. In the Exp. 1A, rats underwent a peak interval (PI)-20 s training. During the training, two different trials were randomly presented. One was a food trial in which the initial lever press was reinforced 20 s after the start of the trial (i.e., fixed interval (FI), 20 s). The other was an empty trial in which the reinforcement did not occur for 80 s. After sufficient training, the rats responded at approximately 20 s in the empty trials. They were then subjected to a PI-40 s training (i.e., FI, 40 s) after ChI lesions were present in the dorsal striatum. In this training, the sham-lesioned group responded frequently at approximately 40 s, whereas the ChI-lesioned group responded at approximately 20 s. As the PI-40 s additional learning progressed in the Exp. 1B, the ChI-lesioned group frequently responded at approximately 40 s, similar to that of the sham-lesioned group. In the following PI-20 s re-shift training, the ChI-lesioned group responded similar to the sham-lesioned group. In Exp. 2 of another cohort, the results of a PI-20 s training after the occurrence of ChI lesions were similar to that before the presence of the lesion. Together, these results suggest that ChI lesions delayed only the acquisition of new duration memory, but had no effect on the adjustment of behavior associated with changing the reinforcement schedule of the PI-training and interval timing itself.
- Open Access
Intra-dorsal striatal acetylcholine M1 but not dopaminergic D1 or glutamatergic NMDA receptor antagonists inhibit the consolidation of duration memory in interval timing
The striatal beat frequency (SBF) model assumes that striatal medium spiny neurons encode duration via synaptic plasticity. Muscarinic 1 (M1) cholinergic receptors, as well as dopamine and glutamate receptors, are important for neural plasticity in the dorsal striatum. Therefore, we investigated the effect of inhibiting these receptors on the formation of duration memory. After sufficient training in a Peak interval (PI)-20 s procedure, rats were given a single or mixed infusion of a selective antagonist for the dopamine D1 receptor (SCH23390, 0.5 μg per side), the NMDA-type glutamate receptor (D-AP5, 3 μg), or the M1 receptor (pirenzepine, 10 μg) bilaterally in the dorsal striatum, immediately before starting a PI 40 s session (shift session). On the next day, the rats were tested for new duration memory (40 s) in a session in which no lever presses were reinforced (probe session). In the shift session, performance was tie, irrespective of the drug injected. However, in the probe session, the mean peak time (an index of duration memory) of the M1 + NMDA co-blockade group, but not of the D1 + NMDA co-blockade group, was lower than that of the control group (Exp. 1 and 2). In Exp. 3, the effect of the co-blockade of M1 and NMDA receptors was replicated. Moreover, sole blockade of M1 receptors induced the same effect as M1 and NMDA blockade. These results suggest that in the dorsal striatum, the M1 receptor, but not the D1 or NMDA receptors, are involved in the consolidation of duration memory.
Open AccessIntra-dorsal striatal acetylcholine M1 but not dopaminergic D1 or glutamatergic NMDA receptor antagonists inhibit the consolidation of duration memory in interval timing
The striatal beat frequency (SBF) model assumes that striatal medium spiny neurons encode duration via synaptic plasticity. Muscarinic 1 (M1) cholinergic receptors, as well as dopamine and glutamate receptors, are important for neural plasticity in the dorsal striatum. Therefore, we investigated the effect of inhibiting these receptors on the formation of duration memory. After sufficient training in a Peak interval (PI)-20 s procedure, rats were given a single or mixed infusion of a selective antagonist for the dopamine D1 receptor (SCH23390, 0.5 μg per side), the NMDA-type glutamate receptor (D-AP5, 3 μg), or the M1 receptor (pirenzepine, 10 μg) bilaterally in the dorsal striatum, immediately before starting a PI 40 s session (shift session). On the next day, the rats were tested for new duration memory (40 s) in a session in which no lever presses were reinforced (probe session). In the shift session, performance was tie, irrespective of the drug injected. However, in the probe session, the mean peak time (an index of duration memory) of the M1 + NMDA co-blockade group, but not of the D1 + NMDA co-blockade group, was lower than that of the control group (Exp. 1 and 2). In Exp. 3, the effect of the co-blockade of M1 and NMDA receptors was replicated. Moreover, sole blockade of M1 receptors induced the same effect as M1 and NMDA blockade. These results suggest that in the dorsal striatum, the M1 receptor, but not the D1 or NMDA receptors, are involved in the consolidation of duration memory.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 103 (1) , e111-e113
Off-Pump Atrial Septectomy for Infants With Restrictive Atrial Septal Defect
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 103 (1) , e111-e113
Open AccessOff-Pump Atrial Septectomy for Infants With Restrictive Atrial Septal Defect