Amanda A. Honeycutt
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Amanda A. Honeycutt has a total of 185 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Olga Khavjou
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, USA
8 shared publications Thomas J. Hoerger
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC
8 shared publicationsOlga Khavjou
RTI International, Public Health Economics Program, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Durham, NC 27709 USA
7 shared publicationsChristina Bradley
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
6 shared publications- Katherine A. Hicks
RTI Health Solutions
6 shared publications - Deborah J. Jones
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 16 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 124 (1) , 54-55
Cost considerations for uterine transplant
- 16 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 124 (1) , 54-55
Cost considerations for uterine transplant
- Open Access
A Modeling Analysis on Eliminating Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV Incidence in the United States
Background: Despite progress in HIV prevention and treatment, resulting in overall incidence reductions in the United States, large racial/ethnic (r/e) disparities in HIV incidence remain due to stigma, discrimination, racism, poverty, and other social and structural factors. Setting: We used the HIV Optimization and Prevention Economics (HOPE) model to analyze which intervention strategies provide the most effective path towards eliminating r/e disparities in HIV incidence. Methods: We considered four intervention scenarios for 2023-2035, which focused on eliminating r/e disparities by 2027 in the HIV care continuum only, HIV prevention services only, both continuum and prevention services, and a final scenario where prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino were set to maximum feasible levels. The primary outcome is the incidence-rate-ratio (IRR) for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations compared to Other populations (of whom 89% are White) with the goal of IRRs ≤ 1 by 2035. Results: All scenarios reduced IRRs but only Maximum Feasible eliminated HIV incidence disparities by 2035, with respective IRRs of 0.9 and 1.1 among the Black and Hispanic/Latino populations, compared to 6.5 and 4.1 in the baseline scenario. Continuum-only was more effective at reducing disparities (2035 IRRs of 4.7 for Black and 3.1 for Hispanic/Latino populations) than Prevention-only (6.1 and 3.7 respectively). Conclusions: With no prioritized changes, our simulation showed that r/e disparities in HIV incidence persist through 2035. Elimination of r/e incidence disparities by 2035 is only possible if maximum HIV prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations can be realized by 2027.
Open AccessA Modeling Analysis on Eliminating Racial/Ethnic Disparities in HIV Incidence in the United States
Background: Despite progress in HIV prevention and treatment, resulting in overall incidence reductions in the United States, large racial/ethnic (r/e) disparities in HIV incidence remain due to stigma, discrimination, racism, poverty, and other social and structural factors. Setting: We used the HIV Optimization and Prevention Economics (HOPE) model to analyze which intervention strategies provide the most effective path towards eliminating r/e disparities in HIV incidence. Methods: We considered four intervention scenarios for 2023-2035, which focused on eliminating r/e disparities by 2027 in the HIV care continuum only, HIV prevention services only, both continuum and prevention services, and a final scenario where prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino were set to maximum feasible levels. The primary outcome is the incidence-rate-ratio (IRR) for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations compared to Other populations (of whom 89% are White) with the goal of IRRs ≤ 1 by 2035. Results: All scenarios reduced IRRs but only Maximum Feasible eliminated HIV incidence disparities by 2035, with respective IRRs of 0.9 and 1.1 among the Black and Hispanic/Latino populations, compared to 6.5 and 4.1 in the baseline scenario. Continuum-only was more effective at reducing disparities (2035 IRRs of 4.7 for Black and 3.1 for Hispanic/Latino populations) than Prevention-only (6.1 and 3.7 respectively). Conclusions: With no prioritized changes, our simulation showed that r/e disparities in HIV incidence persist through 2035. Elimination of r/e incidence disparities by 2035 is only possible if maximum HIV prevention and care levels for Black and Hispanic/Latino populations can be realized by 2027.
- Open Access
- 23 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 67 (6) , 916-923
Cost-Effectiveness of Social Determinants of Health Interventions: Evaluating Multisector Community Partnerships’ Efforts
- 23 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Vol. 67 (6) , 916-923
Open AccessCost-Effectiveness of Social Determinants of Health Interventions: Evaluating Multisector Community Partnerships’ Efforts
- Open Access
Scaling hypertension treatment in 24 low-income and middle-income countries: economic evaluation of treatment decisions at three blood pressure cut-points
Objective Estimate the incremental costs and benefits of scaling up hypertension care in adults in 24 select countries, using three different systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment cut-off points—≥140, ≥150 and ≥160 mm Hg. Intervention Strengthening the hypertension care cascade compared with status quo levels, with pharmacological treatment administered at different cut-points depending on the scenario. Target population Adults aged 30+ in 24 low-income and middle-income countries spanning all world regions. Perspective Societal. Time horizon 30 years. Discount rate 4%. Costing year 2020 USD. Data sources Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Epi Visualisations database—country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, prevalence and death rates. Mean SBP and prevalence—National surveys and NCD-RisC. Treatment protocols—WHO HEARTS. Treatment impact—academic literature. Costs—national and international databases. Outcome measures Health outcomes—averted stroke and myocardial infarction events, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years; economic outcomes—averted health expenditures, value of averted mortality and workplace productivity losses. Results of analysis Across 24 countries, over 30 years, incremental scale-up of hypertension care for adults with SBP≥140 mm Hg led to 2.6 million averted CVD events and 1.2 million averted deaths (7% of expected CVD deaths). 68% of benefits resulted from treating those with very high SBP (≥160 mm Hg). 10 of the 12 highest-income countries projected positive net benefits at one or more treatment cut-points, compared with 3 of the 12 lowest-income countries. Treating hypertension at SBP≥160 mm Hg maximised the net economic benefit in the lowest-income countries. Limitations The model only included a few hypertension-attributable diseases and did not account for comorbid risk factors. Modelled scenarios assumed ambitious progress on strengthening the care cascade. Conclusions In areas where economic considerations might play an outsized role, such as very low-income countries, prioritising treatment to populations with severe hypertension can maximise benefits net of economic costs.
Open AccessScaling hypertension treatment in 24 low-income and middle-income countries: economic evaluation of treatment decisions at three blood pressure cut-points
Objective Estimate the incremental costs and benefits of scaling up hypertension care in adults in 24 select countries, using three different systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment cut-off points—≥140, ≥150 and ≥160 mm Hg. Intervention Strengthening the hypertension care cascade compared with status quo levels, with pharmacological treatment administered at different cut-points depending on the scenario. Target population Adults aged 30+ in 24 low-income and middle-income countries spanning all world regions. Perspective Societal. Time horizon 30 years. Discount rate 4%. Costing year 2020 USD. Data sources Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Epi Visualisations database—country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence, prevalence and death rates. Mean SBP and prevalence—National surveys and NCD-RisC. Treatment protocols—WHO HEARTS. Treatment impact—academic literature. Costs—national and international databases. Outcome measures Health outcomes—averted stroke and myocardial infarction events, deaths and disability-adjusted life-years; economic outcomes—averted health expenditures, value of averted mortality and workplace productivity losses. Results of analysis Across 24 countries, over 30 years, incremental scale-up of hypertension care for adults with SBP≥140 mm Hg led to 2.6 million averted CVD events and 1.2 million averted deaths (7% of expected CVD deaths). 68% of benefits resulted from treating those with very high SBP (≥160 mm Hg). 10 of the 12 highest-income countries projected positive net benefits at one or more treatment cut-points, compared with 3 of the 12 lowest-income countries. Treating hypertension at SBP≥160 mm Hg maximised the net economic benefit in the lowest-income countries. Limitations The model only included a few hypertension-attributable diseases and did not account for comorbid risk factors. Modelled scenarios assumed ambitious progress on strengthening the care cascade. Conclusions In areas where economic considerations might play an outsized role, such as very low-income countries, prioritising treatment to populations with severe hypertension can maximise benefits net of economic costs.
- Open Access
- 12 February 2024
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Research Protocols
- Vol. 13 (1) , e52689
A Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial
Background: Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. Objective: Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. Methods: This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. Results: Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. Conclusions: This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/52689
- 12 February 2024
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Research Protocols
- Vol. 13 (1) , e52689
Open AccessA Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial
Background: Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. Objective: Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. Methods: This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. Results: Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. Conclusions: This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/52689
- Open Access
- 12 September 2023
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Preprints
A Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. OBJECTIVE Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. METHODS This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. RESULTS Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. CONCLUSIONS This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR1-10.2196/52689
- 12 September 2023
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Preprints
Open AccessA Digital Intervention to Improve Skin Self-Examination Among Survivors of Melanoma: Protocol for a Type-1 Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Randomized Trial (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Although melanoma survival rates have improved in recent years, survivors remain at risk of recurrence, second primary cancers, and keratinocyte carcinomas. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends skin examinations by a physician every 3 to 12 months. Regular thorough skin self-examinations (SSEs) are recommended for survivors of melanoma to promote the detection of earlier-stage, thinner melanomas, which are associated with improved survival and lower treatment costs. Despite their importance, less than a quarter of survivors of melanoma engage in SSEs. OBJECTIVE Previously, our team developed and evaluated a web-based, fully automated intervention called mySmartSkin (MSS) that successfully improved SSE among survivors of melanoma. Enhancements were proposed to improve engagement with and outcomes of MSS. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and methodology for a type-1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized trial evaluating the enhanced MSS versus control and exploring implementation outcomes and contextual factors. METHODS This study will recruit from state cancer registries and social media 300 individuals diagnosed with cutaneous malignant melanoma between 3 months and 5 years after surgery who are currently cancer free. Participants will be randomly assigned to either enhanced MSS or a noninteractive educational web page. Surveys will be collected from both arms at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to assess measures of intervention engagement, barriers, self-efficacy, habit, and SSE. The primary outcome is thorough SSE. The secondary outcomes are the diagnosis of new or recurrent melanomas and sun protection practices. RESULTS Multilevel modeling will be used to examine whether there are significant differences in survivor outcomes between MSS and the noninteractive web page over time. Mixed methods will evaluate reach, adoption, implementation (including costs), and potential for maintenance of MSS, as well as contextual factors relevant to those outcomes and future scale-up. CONCLUSIONS This trial has the potential to improve outcomes in survivors of melanoma. If MSS is effective, the results could guide its implementation in oncology care and nonprofit organizations focused on skin cancers. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR1-10.2196/52689
- Open Access
- 20 July 2023
- Published by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Preventing Chronic Disease
- Vol. 20, E62
Using the Prevention Impacts Simulation Model to Estimate Long-Term Impacts of Multisector Community Partnerships’ Efforts to Address Social Determinants of Health
Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. PCD provides an open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention.
- 20 July 2023
- Published by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Preventing Chronic Disease
- Vol. 20, E62
Open AccessUsing the Prevention Impacts Simulation Model to Estimate Long-Term Impacts of Multisector Community Partnerships’ Efforts to Address Social Determinants of Health
Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal established by the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. PCD provides an open exchange of information and knowledge among researchers, practitioners, policy makers, and others who strive to improve the health of the public through chronic disease prevention.
- 3 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Evaluation and Program Planning
- Vol. 99, 102298
Key insights on multisector community partnerships from real-world efforts to address social determinants of health
- 3 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Evaluation and Program Planning
- Vol. 99, 102298
Key insights on multisector community partnerships from real-world efforts to address social determinants of health
- Open Access
- 20 April 2022
- Published by RTI Press
Reach Health Assessing Cost-Effectiveness for Family Planning (RACE-FP) Methodology Report: Estimating the Impact of Family Planning Interventions in the Philippines
In the Philippines, demand for family planning (FP) is high, and the government is committed to helping the population achieve universal access to quality FP information and services. Reach Health Assessing Cost-Effectiveness for Family Planning (RACE-FP) is a decision support tool designed to estimate the impact FP interventions have on averting unintended pregnancies and on
- 20 April 2022
- Published by RTI Press
Open AccessReach Health Assessing Cost-Effectiveness for Family Planning (RACE-FP) Methodology Report: Estimating the Impact of Family Planning Interventions in the Philippines
In the Philippines, demand for family planning (FP) is high, and the government is committed to helping the population achieve universal access to quality FP information and services. Reach Health Assessing Cost-Effectiveness for Family Planning (RACE-FP) is a decision support tool designed to estimate the impact FP interventions have on averting unintended pregnancies and on
- 1 February 2022
- Published by Becaris Publishing Limited in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Vol. 11 (2) , 79-88
Impact analysis of expanding anti-TNF therapy for Crohn’s disease
Aim: To estimate the impact of universal anti-TNF therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Materials & methods: Developed a population-level Markov model to estimate the impact on health outcomes and medical expenditures of expanding anti-TNF therapy use versus current treatment practices. Results: Reductions in deaths (2600), hip fractures (980), major adverse cardiac events (2700) and patient out-of-pocket medical spending (2%) over 5 years. Total societal costs would be US$22,100 higher per patient per year, primarily due to the high cost of anti-TNF therapy. Conclusion: Expanding anti-TNF therapy use among US adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease would reduce morbidity and mortality, decrease disease-related medical costs and increase treatment costs compared with current practice. Despite the higher costs, this approach could substantially benefit patients.
- 1 February 2022
- Published by Becaris Publishing Limited in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Vol. 11 (2) , 79-88
Impact analysis of expanding anti-TNF therapy for Crohn’s disease
Aim: To estimate the impact of universal anti-TNF therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease. Materials & methods: Developed a population-level Markov model to estimate the impact on health outcomes and medical expenditures of expanding anti-TNF therapy use versus current treatment practices. Results: Reductions in deaths (2600), hip fractures (980), major adverse cardiac events (2700) and patient out-of-pocket medical spending (2%) over 5 years. Total societal costs would be US$22,100 higher per patient per year, primarily due to the high cost of anti-TNF therapy. Conclusion: Expanding anti-TNF therapy use among US adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease would reduce morbidity and mortality, decrease disease-related medical costs and increase treatment costs compared with current practice. Despite the higher costs, this approach could substantially benefit patients.