Ge Wang
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ge Wang has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Chao Qin
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
4 shared publications - Baosheng Wu
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering Department of Hydraulic Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing China
3 shared publications - Dan Li
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2 shared publications Baosheng Wu
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
1 shared publicationBowei Chen
Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
1 shared publicationGuangqian Wang
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing PR China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
Multifrequency Downstream Hydraulic Geometry of Alluvial Mountain Rivers Located on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Downstream hydraulic geometry (DHG) for multiple discharge frequencies remains poorly investigated. This paper seeks to clarify the DHG relations of different discharge frequencies and proposes the definition, mathematical expression, and geomorphological interpretation of multifrequency DHG (MFDHG). It also verifies the existence of DHG and MFDHG in the six major exoreic rivers located in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. MFDHG can be depicted with (1) log-linear plots between DHG coefficients and exponents for multiple discharge frequencies and (2) independent DHG curves intersecting near congruent discharge, width, depth, or velocity. The results show that rivers in the study area exhibit strong DHG relations. The variations in the DHG coefficients and exponents usually exhibit opposite trends with increasing discharge frequency. The MFDHG of a river reach is generally stronger than that of a river basin. Congruent hydraulics, as indices of geometric variability and hydraulic self-similarity, reflect consistent changes in hydraulic variables downstream. MFDHG is a novel geomorphic phenomenon that bridges spatiotemporal dimensions in HG systems and provides a basis for establishing an overall HG relationship.
Open AccessMultifrequency Downstream Hydraulic Geometry of Alluvial Mountain Rivers Located on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
Downstream hydraulic geometry (DHG) for multiple discharge frequencies remains poorly investigated. This paper seeks to clarify the DHG relations of different discharge frequencies and proposes the definition, mathematical expression, and geomorphological interpretation of multifrequency DHG (MFDHG). It also verifies the existence of DHG and MFDHG in the six major exoreic rivers located in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. MFDHG can be depicted with (1) log-linear plots between DHG coefficients and exponents for multiple discharge frequencies and (2) independent DHG curves intersecting near congruent discharge, width, depth, or velocity. The results show that rivers in the study area exhibit strong DHG relations. The variations in the DHG coefficients and exponents usually exhibit opposite trends with increasing discharge frequency. The MFDHG of a river reach is generally stronger than that of a river basin. Congruent hydraulics, as indices of geometric variability and hydraulic self-similarity, reflect consistent changes in hydraulic variables downstream. MFDHG is a novel geomorphic phenomenon that bridges spatiotemporal dimensions in HG systems and provides a basis for establishing an overall HG relationship.
- Open Access
- 16 August 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-13
A bankfull geometry dataset for major exorheic rivers on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Bankfull river discharge shapes river morphology. The bankfull river surface planform and river width can be used to quantify river size. Regional studies of stream ecology, hydrologic modelling, river carbon emissions and geomorphology from the perspective of fluvial processes are hindered by the lack of a highly accurate spatially distributed river network that considers bankfull river geometry. Based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 5/7/8 multispectral instrument imagery andin situmeasured hydrological data, the river discharge and width of spatially distributed cross sections of six major exorheic rivers and their tributaries located on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) are calculated under bankfull conditions. Then, the bankfull river surface is extracted. Finally, a bankfull river width and surface area database is established. The provided planform river hydromorphology data can supplement global hydrography datasets and effectively represent the combined fluvial geomorphology and geological background in the study area.
- 16 August 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-13
Open AccessA bankfull geometry dataset for major exorheic rivers on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Bankfull river discharge shapes river morphology. The bankfull river surface planform and river width can be used to quantify river size. Regional studies of stream ecology, hydrologic modelling, river carbon emissions and geomorphology from the perspective of fluvial processes are hindered by the lack of a highly accurate spatially distributed river network that considers bankfull river geometry. Based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 5/7/8 multispectral instrument imagery andin situmeasured hydrological data, the river discharge and width of spatially distributed cross sections of six major exorheic rivers and their tributaries located on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) are calculated under bankfull conditions. Then, the bankfull river surface is extracted. Finally, a bankfull river width and surface area database is established. The provided planform river hydromorphology data can supplement global hydrography datasets and effectively represent the combined fluvial geomorphology and geological background in the study area.
- Open Access
- 6 July 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 13 (14) , 2650
River Extraction under Bankfull Discharge Conditions Based on Sentinel-2 Imagery and DEM Data
River discharge and width, as essential hydraulic variables and hydrological data, play a vital role in influencing the water cycle, driving the resulting river topography and supporting ecological functioning. Insights into bankfull river discharge and bankfull width at fine spatial resolutions are essential. In this study, 10-m Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument (MSI) imagery and digital elevation model (DEM) data, as well as in situ discharge and sediment data, are fused to extract bankfull river widths on the upper Yellow River. Using in situ cross-section morphology data and flood frequency estimations to calculate the bankfull discharge of 22 hydrological stations, the one-to-one correspondence relationship between the bankfull discharge data and the image cover data was determined. The machine learning (ML) method is used to extract water bodies from the Sentinel-2 images in the Google Earth Engine (GEE). The mean overall accuracy was above 0.87, and the mean kappa value was above 0.75. The research results show that (1) for rivers with high suspended sediment concentrations, the water quality index (SRMIR-Red) constitutes a higher contribution; the infrared band performs better in areas with greater amounts of vegetation coverage; and for rivers in general, the water indices perform best. (2) The effective river width of the extracted connected rivers is 30 m, which is 3 times the image resolution. The R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE) of the estimated river width values are 0.991, 7.455 m, and −0.232 m, respectively. (3) The average river widths of the single-thread sections show linear increases along the main stream, and the R2 value is 0.801. The river width has a power function relationship with bankfull discharge and the contributing area, i.e., the downstream hydraulic geometry, with R2 values of 0.782 and 0.630, respectively. More importantly, the extracted river widths provide basic data to analyze the spatial distribution of bankfull widths along river networks and other applications in hydrology, fluvial geomorphology, and stream ecology.
- 6 July 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 13 (14) , 2650
Open AccessRiver Extraction under Bankfull Discharge Conditions Based on Sentinel-2 Imagery and DEM Data
River discharge and width, as essential hydraulic variables and hydrological data, play a vital role in influencing the water cycle, driving the resulting river topography and supporting ecological functioning. Insights into bankfull river discharge and bankfull width at fine spatial resolutions are essential. In this study, 10-m Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument (MSI) imagery and digital elevation model (DEM) data, as well as in situ discharge and sediment data, are fused to extract bankfull river widths on the upper Yellow River. Using in situ cross-section morphology data and flood frequency estimations to calculate the bankfull discharge of 22 hydrological stations, the one-to-one correspondence relationship between the bankfull discharge data and the image cover data was determined. The machine learning (ML) method is used to extract water bodies from the Sentinel-2 images in the Google Earth Engine (GEE). The mean overall accuracy was above 0.87, and the mean kappa value was above 0.75. The research results show that (1) for rivers with high suspended sediment concentrations, the water quality index (SRMIR-Red) constitutes a higher contribution; the infrared band performs better in areas with greater amounts of vegetation coverage; and for rivers in general, the water indices perform best. (2) The effective river width of the extracted connected rivers is 30 m, which is 3 times the image resolution. The R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean bias error (MBE) of the estimated river width values are 0.991, 7.455 m, and −0.232 m, respectively. (3) The average river widths of the single-thread sections show linear increases along the main stream, and the R2 value is 0.801. The river width has a power function relationship with bankfull discharge and the contributing area, i.e., the downstream hydraulic geometry, with R2 values of 0.782 and 0.630, respectively. More importantly, the extracted river widths provide basic data to analyze the spatial distribution of bankfull widths along river networks and other applications in hydrology, fluvial geomorphology, and stream ecology.
- Open Access
- 1 June 2021
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 57 (6)
Spatial Distributions of At‐Many‐Stations Hydraulic Geometry for Mountain Rivers Originated From the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau
At‐many‐stations hydraulic geometry (AMHG) has provided a novel way to understand river network development, simulate water flow, and retrieve river discharge in data‐scared regions. Based on in‐situ measurements of six major rivers originating from the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau (QTP), this study verifies the existence of AMHG relations along the rivers and explores AMHG relations for cross sections that are not located in the same river reach. The mainstreams and tributaries of the studied rivers in the southern and the eastern portions of the QTP have satisfactory AMHG relation strengths with R2 > 0.9 for over 60% of the relations. For cross sections located in the same stream order or within a certain range of contributing area (CA), approximately 60% (9/15) and 53% (8/15) of the AMHG relations have an R2 > 0.6. AMHG strength increases with increasing stream order and CA; this finding reflects the increasing coherence and maturity of the river networks associated with the geomorphic shaping power of increased discharge. Width‐AMHG intercepts are larger than those of depth‐AMHG and velocity‐AMHG for all stream orders and CAs. Most of the congruent hydraulics generated from cross sections located in middle‐scale rivers (orders 7–8) are within the observed range. Congruent hydraulics generally increase with an increase in in‐situ measured hydraulics when the stream order or the CA increases. The AMHG relations existing among cross sections that are not located in the same reach, which is named as cross channel AMHG, indicate linear variability of cross‐sectional geometric and hydraulic similarities in the same stream order or within a certain CA range. The results break the watershed divide boundary control on AMHG and have the potential to provide background knowledge for discharge estimation in mountain rivers located in the QTP.
- 1 June 2021
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 57 (6)
Open AccessSpatial Distributions of At‐Many‐Stations Hydraulic Geometry for Mountain Rivers Originated From the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau
At‐many‐stations hydraulic geometry (AMHG) has provided a novel way to understand river network development, simulate water flow, and retrieve river discharge in data‐scared regions. Based on in‐situ measurements of six major rivers originating from the Qinghai‐Tibet Plateau (QTP), this study verifies the existence of AMHG relations along the rivers and explores AMHG relations for cross sections that are not located in the same river reach. The mainstreams and tributaries of the studied rivers in the southern and the eastern portions of the QTP have satisfactory AMHG relation strengths with R2 > 0.9 for over 60% of the relations. For cross sections located in the same stream order or within a certain range of contributing area (CA), approximately 60% (9/15) and 53% (8/15) of the AMHG relations have an R2 > 0.6. AMHG strength increases with increasing stream order and CA; this finding reflects the increasing coherence and maturity of the river networks associated with the geomorphic shaping power of increased discharge. Width‐AMHG intercepts are larger than those of depth‐AMHG and velocity‐AMHG for all stream orders and CAs. Most of the congruent hydraulics generated from cross sections located in middle‐scale rivers (orders 7–8) are within the observed range. Congruent hydraulics generally increase with an increase in in‐situ measured hydraulics when the stream order or the CA increases. The AMHG relations existing among cross sections that are not located in the same reach, which is named as cross channel AMHG, indicate linear variability of cross‐sectional geometric and hydraulic similarities in the same stream order or within a certain CA range. The results break the watershed divide boundary control on AMHG and have the potential to provide background knowledge for discharge estimation in mountain rivers located in the QTP.