MVMirela Nicoleta Voicu

Mirela Nicoleta Voicu

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Mirela Nicoleta Voicu has a total of 26 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Fibrinogen-to-Platelet Ratio and Hematologic Inflammatory Indexes in Spondylarthritis

    by Roxana Doina Ungureanu, Cristina Elena Bita, Mirela Nicoleta Voicu, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Sineta Cristina Firulescu, Mihai Turcu-Stiolica, Andreea Lili Bărbulescu, Stefan Cristian Dinescu, Florentin Ananu Vreju

    Background/Objectives: Spondylarthritis (SA) is characterized by high clinical heterogeneity, often resulting in a discrepancy between systemic inflammation and patient-reported symptoms. While hematologic indices are emerging as cost-effective biomarkers, their role in phenotypic differentiation remains unclear. We investigated the utility of traditional inflammatory markers, including the novel fibrinogen-to-platelet ratio (FPR), in differentiating SA subtypes and predicting patient-reported disease activity. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 64 patients with spondylarthritis: axial SA (n = 32), peripheral SA (n = 8), and psoriatic SA (n = 24). Clinical assessments included the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Functional Index (BASFI). Systemic inflammation was evaluated via C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and calculated ratios (NLR, PLR, MLR, and FPR). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was employed to map the inflammatory architecture, while Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the predictive power for high disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4). Results: Significant phenotypic differences were observed with the FPR demonstrating superior discriminative capacity (p = 0.003). Patients with peripheral SA exhibited significantly higher FPR (median 1.88) compared to axial (1.33) and psoriatic (1.32) subtypes, and the dedicated ROC analysis for phenotypic discrimination yielded an AUC of 0.866 (95% CI: 0.745–0.987) (1.36, p = 0.039). HLA-B27 prevalence was low overall (31.3%) and in psoriatic SA (4.2%, p = 0.012). Correlation analysis revealed strong associations between BASDAI and BASFI (ρ = 0.79), NLR and MLR (ρ = 0.78), and CRP and fibrinogen (ρ = 0.66). PCA identified two independent inflammatory dimensions explaining 74.8% of variance: neutrophil-hypercoagulable axis (41.4%, driven by NLR, PLR, and MLR), and an acute-phase/fibrinogen axis (33.4%, driven by CRP, fibrinogen, and FPR). Notably, FPR clustered with acute-phase reactants rather than leukocyte-derived ratios, supporting its role as a marker of systemic inflammatory burden. Although fibrinogen is involved in the coagulation cascade, the absence of direct coagulation markers precludes definitive characterization of this component as hypercoagulable. ROC analysis revealed that fibrinogen showed the highest discriminative ability for disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4), with an AUC of 0.690 (95% CI: 0.519–0.861), followed by NLR (0.621), MLR (0.592), and FPR (0.583). However, overall discriminative performance remained modest, with most 95% confidence intervals crossing 0.5. Conclusions: FPR emerges as a robust phenotypic biomarker capable of discriminating against SA subtypes, particularly identifying peripheral SA with high accuracy and excellent negative predictive value. In contrast, its ability to predict patient-reported disease activity remains limited, reinforcing the distinction between trait and state biomarkers. Exploratory PCA revealed that FPR clusters with acute-phase reactants rather than leukocyte-derived ratios, supporting its biological link to systemic inflammatory burden. These findings advocate for a dual-purpose biomarker approach in SA: FPR for phenotypic stratification and fibrinogen for activity assessment, while clinical indices remain indispensable for symptom monitoring. Validation in larger, prospective cohorts is warranted.


  • Open Access

    Changes in Quality of Life Among Glaucoma Patients Following Six Months of Niacinamide Supplementation

    by Constantin Alin Nicola, Maria Cristina Marinescu, Anne Marie Firan, Georgica Tartea, Mihaela Simona Naidin, Radu Constantin Ciuluvica, Marina Daniela Dimulescu, Nicoleta Mirela Voicu, Carmen Marinela Mihailescu, Andreea-Daniela Meca, et al.

    Background/Objectives: Glaucoma is the primary cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, with enormous impact on quality of life and activities of daily living. Since one pathogenic mechanism of glaucoma is mitochondrial dysfunction at the retinal ganglion cell level, niacin has been proposed as an adjuvant treatment, with encouraging results. The objective of this prospective, non-randomized, single-arm clinical trial was to investigate the effect of oral supplementation with niacin on the quality of life of a cohort of glaucoma patients in Romania. Methods: Fifty-eight patients diagnosed with primary open angle glaucoma, under topical hypotensive treatment, were evaluated before and after a 6-month period of daily administration of 500 mg of oral niacinamide. Evaluation involved a complete ophthalmological exam and QoL quantification using the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) Questionnaire. Results: We found strong evidence that niacin supplementation for 6 months led to a statistically significant improvement in QoL scores among glaucoma patients (mean difference = −2.10, 95% CI: [−2.89, −1.32], p < 0.0001), including central and near vision (mean difference = −2.16, 95% CI: [−3.91, −0.4], p = 0.017), peripheral vision (mean difference = −2.66, 95% CI: [−0.23, −0.08], p < 0.001), and the glare and dark adaptation (mean difference = −5.24, 95% CI: [−0.33, −0.14], p < 0.001). In addition, B3 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in intraocular pressure in both eyes over 6 months (mean difference = 0.53, 95% CI: [0.21, 0.86] in the left eye and mean difference = 0.36, 95% CI: [0.04, 0.68] in the right eye), indicating potential clinical benefits. Conclusions: The observed GQL-15 score reductions suggest that B3 may be of benefit in glaucoma management. Further research with larger sample sizes and placebo-controlled designs is needed to confirm B3 potential impact on disease progression and quality of life. Trial Registration at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT07007260.


  • Open Access

    Clostridioides difficile Infection among Cirrhotic Patients with Variceal Bleeding

    by Mirela Nicoleta Voicu, Florica Popescu, Dan Nicolae Florescu, Ion Rogoveanu, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Dan Ionut Gheonea, Vlad Florin Iovanescu, Sevastita Iordache, Sergiu Marian Cazacu, Bogdan Silviu Ungureanu

    Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) stands as the leading cause of nosocomial infection with high morbidity and mortality rates, causing a major burden on the healthcare system. Driven by antibiotics, it usually affects older patients with chronic disease or immunosuppressed or oncologic management. Variceal bleeding secondary to cirrhosis requires antibiotics to prevent bacterial translocation, and thus patients become susceptible to CDI. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for CDI in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding following ceftriaxone and the mortality risk in this patient’s population. We retrospectively screened 367 cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding, from which 25 patients were confirmed with CDI, from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. We found MELD to be the only multivariate predictor for mortality (odds ratio, OR = 1.281, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.098–1.643, p = 0.042). A model of four predictors (age, days of admission, Charlson index, Child–Pugh score) was generated (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, AUC = 0.840, 95% CI: 0.758–0.921, p < 0.0001) to assess the risk of CDI exposure. Determining the probability of getting CDI for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding could be a tool for doctors in taking decisions, which could be integrated in sustainable public health programs.