Helen O'LEary

Background: Management of a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) or symptoms consistent with early knee osteoarthritis (OA) frequently deviates from international clinical practice guidelines, which recommend education and exercise as first‐line treatments and strongly advise against arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. There is a need for implementation strategies to support the uptake of evidence‐based care. Methods: A systematic, four‐step intervention development process was used to guide development of a multi‐faceted implementation intervention targeting both individuals with a DMT or early knee OA and their general practitioners (GPs). The process integrated behavioural theory, stakeholder perspectives and evidence on intervention effectiveness. Target behaviours were identified through a literature review and stakeholder consultation. Previously conducted qualitative interviews with 17 GPs and 11 people with DMT were re‐analysed and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify behavioural barriers and enablers to the targeted behaviours. Behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention components were then selected to address these determinants. Stakeholder input was incorporated to enhance acceptability and feasibility. Results: The resulting intervention aims to promote guideline‐concordant management of a DMT and early knee OA. A programme theory to guide implementation was developed to describe hypothesised mechanisms of action, and candidate outcome measures were identified to support future evaluation and assess the mediating mechanisms of behaviour change. Conclusion: Using a systematic, theory‐informed and stakeholder‐engaged approach, we developed a multi‐faceted intervention to support delivery and uptake of evidence‐based care for DMT and early knee OA. The intervention comprised GP educational workshops and resources to support an ‘enhanced consultation’, alongside referral to an early ‘best practice’ physiotherapy session. Patients received both components. The intervention was designed to be feasible, acceptable and locally relevant, but requires further testing to assess implementation and potential for scale‐up in clinical practice. Lived Experience or Public Contribution: Stakeholder contributions played a central role in this study. People with lived experience of degenerative meniscal tears and/or knee OA ( n = 6) and healthcare professional stakeholders ( n = 15) were consulted during group discussions and individual meetings. Stakeholders informed every step of the development process, aiming to ensure the final intervention was feasible, acceptable and adapted to the local context.

Background The Knowledge Translation and Exercise for Degenerative Meniscal Pathology and Early Knee Osteoarthritis (KNEE-DEeP) intervention was designed to promote greater uptake of evidence-based non-surgical treatments for knee pain attributed to degenerative meniscal pathology and early knee osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care, by tackling barriers at a service, clinician and patient level. Evidence indicates that patients frequently do not access first-line treatments, namely exercise and patient education, prior to specialist referral. The KNEE-DEeP intervention supports general practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists to enhance their skills and confidence in managing patients with this type of knee pain through professional development workshops. In turn, patients will receive an ‘enhanced consultation’ from their GP and be referred to an early ‘best practice’ physiotherapy session. Physiotherapists will work with patients to develop a collaborative action plan focussing on self-management and exercise. Methods This protocol outlines a single arm non-randomised feasibility study with a mixed method process evaluation. The study intends to recruit 15 GPs, five physiotherapists and 36 patients from general practices in the South-West of Ireland. Eligible patients, will be aged between 35 years and 69 years inclusive, and attend their GP with an episode of non-traumatic knee pain attributed to a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT) or early OA. Physiotherapists and GPs will be trained in intervention delivery. Within two weeks of receiving an ’enhanced consultation‘ from their participating GP, patients will attend the one-hour ‘best practice’ physiotherapy session. Patient data will be collected via online questionnaires at baseline, 12 weeks and 6 months. Qualitative interviews to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention will be conducted with a purposive sample of GPs, physiotherapists and their enrolled patients. Ethics and Dissemination Approved by Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. Registration clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT06576557 )

Background: Exercise is the recommended first-line therapy for a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT). Despite this, knee pain attributed to DMTs are a common presentation to specialist orthopaedic clinics. In the primary care setting, the general practitioner (GP) plays a central role in managing patients with knee pain, but to date their perspective has not been explored in relation to DMTs. This study explored GPs’ experiences of managing people with knee pain attributed to a DMT. Methods: A qualitative research design was adopted and practices in the South and Mid-West of Ireland were contacted via recruitment emails circulated through professional and research networks. Interested GPs contacted the researchers via email, and purposive and snowball sampling was used for recruitment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online or over the telephone. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Ethical approval was granted by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP_REC_21_0031). Results: Seventeen semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted. Three main themes were identified with related subthemes: (1) GPs’ experiences of relational aspects of care, (2) GP beliefs about what constitutes best care for patients with a DMT, and (3) how GP practice is enacted within the current healthcare setting. GPs described the challenge of maintaining a strong clinical alliance, while managing perceived patient expectations of a ‘quick fix’ and advanced imaging. They reported slowing down clinical decisions and feeling ‘stuck’ with limited options when conservative treatment had failed. GPs believed that exercise should be the core treatment for DMTs and emphasised engaging patients in an active approach to recovery. Some GPs believed arthroscopy had a role in circumstances where patients didn’t improve with physiotherapy. Limited access to public physiotherapy and orthopaedic services hampered GPs’ management plans and negatively impacted patient outcomes. Conclusions: GP beliefs around what constitutes best care for a DMT generally aligned with the evidence base. Nonetheless, there was sometimes tension between these beliefs and the patient’s own treatment expectations. The ability to enact their beliefs was hampered by limited access to conservative management options, sometimes leading to early escalation of care.

Background Exercise is the recommended first-line therapy for a degenerative meniscal tear (DMT). Despite this, knee pain attributed to DMTs is a common presentation to specialist orthopaedic clinics. In the primary care setting, the general practitioner (GP) plays a central role in managing patients with knee pain, but to date their perspective has not been explored in relation to DMTs. This study explored GPs' experiences of managing people with knee pain attributed to a DMT. Methods A qualitative research design was adopted and practices in the South and Mid-West of Ireland were contacted via recruitment emails circulated through professional and research networks. Interested GPs contacted the researchers via email, and purposive and snowball sampling was used for recruitment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online or over the telephone. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Data was analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Ethical approval was granted by the Irish College of General Practitioners (ICGP_REC_21_0031). Results Seventeen semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted. Three main themes were identified with related subthemes: 1) GPs’ experiences of relational aspects of care, 2) GP beliefs about what constitutes best care for patients with a DMT, and 3) how GP practice is enacted within the current healthcare setting. GPs described the challenge of maintaining a strong clinical alliance, while managing perceived patient expectations of a ‘quick fix’ and advanced imaging. They reported slowing down clinical decisions and feeling ‘stuck’ with limited options when conservative treatment had failed. GPs believed that exercise should be the core treatment for DMTs and emphasised engaging patients in an active approach to recovery. Some GPs believed arthroscopy had a role in circumstances where patients didn’t improve with physiotherapy. Limited access to public physiotherapy and orthopaedic services hampered GPs’ management plans and negatively impacted patient outcomes. Conclusions GP beliefs around what constitutes best care for a DMT generally aligned with the evidence base. Nonetheless, there was sometimes tension between these beliefs and the patient’s own treatment expectations. The ability to enact their beliefs was hampered by limited access to conservative management options, sometimes leading to early escalation of care.

Objective: Despite the known benefits of physical activity, high numbers of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remain physically inactive and sedentary. Little is known about the determinants of sedentary behavior (SB) in RA. This cross‐sectional study was undertaken to examine a range of pain characteristics and RA‐related symptoms and their relationship with objectively measured SB.Methods: In total, 76 adults with RA wore an activPAL4 accelerometer (PAL Technologies) over a 7‐day period. Pain characteristics (pain intensity, painful joint count, nonarticular pain), fatigue, sleep, depression, anxiety, and disease activity were assessed. Analyses were first conducted to evaluate correlations with sedentary time. The independent contribution of pain characteristics to variation in SB was analyzed with multivariable linear regression (adjusted for demographic data and disease activity).Results: Participants with valid accelerometer data (n = 72) spent a mean ± SD of 533.7 ± 100.1 minutes/day in SB. Positive associations with daily SB were found for pain intensity (r = 0.31, P < 0.01) and number of painful joints (r = 0.24, P < 0.05) but not nonarticular pain. In multivariable analyses, pain characteristics were not independently associated with SB. Analyses indicated that disease activity had an indirect association with SB mediated by pain intensity. Other correlates of daily SB included anxiety and depression but not fatigue or sleep.Conclusion: Results suggest that while pain and other RA‐related factors do play a role in SB, they do not appear to have a significant influence after accounting for other variables. Future research should investigate SB and the role of factors unrelated to the symptoms of RA.

In knee osteoarthritis (OA), pain sensitization has been linked to a more severe symptomatology, but the prognostic implications of pain sensitivity in people undergoing conservative treatment such as physiotherapy are not established. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the association between features of pain sensitization and clinical outcome (nonresponse) after guideline-based physiotherapy in people with knee OA. Participants (n = 156) with moderate/severe knee OA were recruited from secondary care. All participants completed self-administered questionnaires and underwent quantitative sensory testing at baseline, thereby establishing subjective and objective measures of pain sensitization. Participants (n = 134) were later classified after a physiotherapy intervention, using treatment responder criteria (responder/nonresponder). Quantitative sensory testing data were reduced to a core set of latent variables using principal component analysis. A hierarchical logistic regression model was constructed to investigate whether features related to pain sensitization predicted nonresponse after controlling for other known predictors of poor outcome in knee OA. Higher temporal summation (odds ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.23-3.27) and lower pressure pain thresholds (odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.81) emerged as robust predictors of nonresponse after physiotherapy, along with a higher comorbidity score. The model demonstrated high sensitivity (87.8%) but modest specificity (52.3%). The independent relationship between pain sensitization and nonresponse may indicate an underlying explanatory association between neuroplastic changes in nociceptive processing and the maintenance of ongoing pain and disability in knee OA pain. These preliminary results suggest that interventions targeting pain sensitization may warrant future investigation in this population.

Background: Research suggests that peripheral and central nervous system sensitization can contribute to the overall pain experience in peripheral musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. It is unclear, however, whether sensitization of the nervous system results in poorer outcomes following the treatment. This systematic review investigated whether nervous system sensitization in peripheral MSK conditions predicts poorer clinical outcomes in response to a surgical or conservative intervention.Methods: Four electronic databases were searched to identify the relevant studies. Eligible studies had a prospective design, with a follow‐up assessing the outcome in terms of pain or disability. Studies that used baseline indices of nervous system sensitization were included, such as quantitative sensory testing (QST) or questionnaires that measured centrally mediated symptoms.Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, of which six were at a high risk of bias. The peripheral MSK conditions investigated were knee and hip osteoarthritis, shoulder pain, and elbow tendinopathy. QST parameters indicative of sensitization (lower electrical pain thresholds, cold hyperalgesia, enhanced temporal summation, lower punctate sharpness thresholds) were associated with negative outcome (more pain or disability) in 5 small exploratory studies. Larger studies that accounted for multiple confounders in design and analysis did not support a predictive relationship between QST parameters and outcome. Two studies used self‐report measures to capture comorbid centrally mediated symptoms, and found higher questionnaire scores were independently predictive of more persistent pain following a total joint arthroplasty.Conclusion: This systematic review found insufficient evidence to support an independent predictive relationship between QST measures of nervous system sensitization and treatment outcome. Self‐report measures demonstrated better predictive ability. Further high‐quality prognostic research is warranted.

Introduction Pain is the dominant symptom of knee osteoarthritis (OA), and recent evidence suggests factors outside of local joint pathology, such as pain sensitisation, can contribute significantly to the pain experience. It is unknown how pain sensitisation influences outcomes from commonly employed interventions such as physiotherapy. The aims of this study are, first, to provide a comprehensive description of the somatosensory characteristics of people with pain associated with knee OA. Second, we will investigate if indicators of pain sensitisation in patients with knee osteoarthritis are predictive of non-response to physiotherapy. Methods and analysis This is a multicentre prospective cohort study with 140 participants. Eligible patients with moderate to severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis will be identified at outpatient orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics. A baseline assessment will provide a comprehensive description of the somatosensory characteristics of each participant by means of clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing, and validated questionnaires measuring pain and functional capacity. Participants will then undergo physiotherapy treatment. The primary outcome will be non-response to physiotherapy on completion of the physiotherapy treatment programme as defined by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International treatment responder criteria. A principal component analysis will identify measures related to pain sensitisation to include in the predictive model. Regression analyses will explore the relationship between responder status and pain sensitisation while accounting for confounders. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by St James’ Hospital/AMNCH Research Ethics Committee and by the St Vincent's Healthcare Group Ethics and Medical Research Committee. The results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer review journal. Trial registration number NCT02310945.