Andrew B. Buermeyer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Andrew B. Buermeyer has a total of 54 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Peter M. Glazer
Yale University
4 shared publications R. Michael Liskay
Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR 97201-3098, USA
4 shared publicationsDenise Campisi Hegan
Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208040, New Haven, CT 06520-8040, USA
3 shared publicationsGuy Tomer
2 shared publicationsLatha Narayanan
Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208040, New Haven, CT 06520-8040, USA
2 shared publicationsSean M. Baker
Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201-3098
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 April 2014
- Published by Elsevier in DNA Repair
- Vol. 16
In memory of John Bruce Hays (1937–2014)
- 1 November 2010
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Prevention Research
- Vol. 3 (11) , 1409-1416
An MLH1 Mutation Links BACH1/FANCJ to Colon Cancer, Signaling, and Insight toward Directed Therapy
Defects in MLH1, as with other mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, are the primary cause of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). Mutations in MMR genes often disrupt mismatch repair and MMR signaling functions. However, some HNPCC-associated mutations have unknown pathogenicity. Here, we uncover an MLH1 clinical mutation with a leucine (L)-to-histidine (H) amino acid change at position 607 that ablates MLH1 binding to FANCJ. Given that a DNA helicase is not essential for mammalian MMR in vitro, we considered that loss of MLH1 binding to FANCJ could alter MMR signaling. Consistent with this hypothesis, FANCJ-deficient cells exhibit delayed MMR signaling and apoptotic responses that generate resistance to agents that induce O6-methylguanine lesions. Our data indicate that the delay in MMR signaling provides time for the methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) enzyme to reverse DNA methylation. In essence, FANCJ deficiency alters the competition between two pathways: MGMT-prosurvival versus MMR-prodeath. This outcome could explain the HNPCC familial cancers that present as microsatellite stable and with intact MMR, such as MLHL607H. Importantly, the link between FANCJ and HNPCC provides insight toward directed therapies because loss of the FANCJ/MLH1 interaction also uniquely sensitizes cells to DNA cross-linking agents. Cancer Prev Res; 3(11); 1409–16. ©2010 AACR.
- 1 November 2010
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Prevention Research
- Vol. 3 (11) , 1409-1416
An MLH1 Mutation Links BACH1/FANCJ to Colon Cancer, Signaling, and Insight toward Directed Therapy
Defects in MLH1, as with other mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, are the primary cause of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). Mutations in MMR genes often disrupt mismatch repair and MMR signaling functions. However, some HNPCC-associated mutations have unknown pathogenicity. Here, we uncover an MLH1 clinical mutation with a leucine (L)-to-histidine (H) amino acid change at position 607 that ablates MLH1 binding to FANCJ. Given that a DNA helicase is not essential for mammalian MMR in vitro, we considered that loss of MLH1 binding to FANCJ could alter MMR signaling. Consistent with this hypothesis, FANCJ-deficient cells exhibit delayed MMR signaling and apoptotic responses that generate resistance to agents that induce O6-methylguanine lesions. Our data indicate that the delay in MMR signaling provides time for the methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) enzyme to reverse DNA methylation. In essence, FANCJ deficiency alters the competition between two pathways: MGMT-prosurvival versus MMR-prodeath. This outcome could explain the HNPCC familial cancers that present as microsatellite stable and with intact MMR, such as MLHL607H. Importantly, the link between FANCJ and HNPCC provides insight toward directed therapies because loss of the FANCJ/MLH1 interaction also uniquely sensitizes cells to DNA cross-linking agents. Cancer Prev Res; 3(11); 1409–16. ©2010 AACR.
- Open Access
- 14 July 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 101 (2) , 269-277
MLH1 expression sensitises ovarian cancer cells to cell death mediated by XIAP inhibition
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:
- 14 July 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 101 (2) , 269-277
Open AccessMLH1 expression sensitises ovarian cancer cells to cell death mediated by XIAP inhibition
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:
- 1 December 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Letters
- Vol. 244 (2) , 195-202
Overexpression of the DNA mismatch repair factor, PMS2, confers hypermutability and DNA damage tolerance
- 1 December 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Letters
- Vol. 244 (2) , 195-202
Overexpression of the DNA mismatch repair factor, PMS2, confers hypermutability and DNA damage tolerance
- 28 November 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Letters
- Vol. 244 (1) , 79-85
Induction of aberrant crypt foci in DNA mismatch repair-deficient mice by the food-borne carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP)
- 28 November 2006
- Published by Elsevier in Cancer Letters
- Vol. 244 (1) , 79-85
Induction of aberrant crypt foci in DNA mismatch repair-deficient mice by the food-borne carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP)
- 1 March 2006
- Published by Elsevier in DNA Repair
- Vol. 5 (3) , 347-361
Truncation of the C-terminus of human MLH1 blocks intracellular stabilization of PMS2 and disrupts DNA mismatch repair
- 1 March 2006
- Published by Elsevier in DNA Repair
- Vol. 5 (3) , 347-361
Truncation of the C-terminus of human MLH1 blocks intracellular stabilization of PMS2 and disrupts DNA mismatch repair
- Open Access
- 1 June 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 277 (24) , 21801-21809
Contribution of Human Mlh1 and Pms2 ATPase Activities to DNA Mismatch Repair
- 1 June 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 277 (24) , 21801-21809
Open AccessContribution of Human Mlh1 and Pms2 ATPase Activities to DNA Mismatch Repair
- 1 December 1999
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Genetics
- Vol. 33 (1) , 533-564
Mammalian DNA Mismatch Repair
▪ Abstract DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is one of multiple replication, repair, and recombination processes that are required to maintain genomic stability in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In the wake of the discoveries that hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and other human cancers are associated with mutations in MMR genes, intensive efforts are under way to elucidate the biochemical functions of mammalian MutS and MutL homologs, and the consequences of defects in these genes. Genetic studies in cultured mammalian cells and mice are proving to be instrumental in defining the relationship between the functions of MMR in mutation and tumor avoidance. Furthermore, these approaches have raised awareness that MMR homologs contribute to DNA damage surveillance, transcription-coupled repair, and recombinogenic and meiotic processes.
- 1 December 1999
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Genetics
- Vol. 33 (1) , 533-564
Mammalian DNA Mismatch Repair
▪ Abstract DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is one of multiple replication, repair, and recombination processes that are required to maintain genomic stability in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In the wake of the discoveries that hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and other human cancers are associated with mutations in MMR genes, intensive efforts are under way to elucidate the biochemical functions of mammalian MutS and MutL homologs, and the consequences of defects in these genes. Genetic studies in cultured mammalian cells and mice are proving to be instrumental in defining the relationship between the functions of MMR in mutation and tumor avoidance. Furthermore, these approaches have raised awareness that MMR homologs contribute to DNA damage surveillance, transcription-coupled repair, and recombinogenic and meiotic processes.
- 8 June 1999
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 96 (12) , 6850-6855
Different mutator phenotypes in Mlh1 - versus Pms2 -deficient mice
Deficiencies in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) result in increased mutation rates and cancer risk in both humans and mice. Mouse strains homozygous for knockouts of either the Pms2 or Mlh1 MMR gene develop cancer but exhibit very different tumor spectra; only Mlh1 −/− animals develop intestinal tumors. We carried out a detailed study of the microsatellite mutation spectra in each knockout strain. Five mononucleotide repeat tracts at four different chromosomal locations were studied by using single-molecule PCR or an in vivo forward mutation assay. Three dinucleotide repeat loci also were examined. Surprisingly, the mononucleotide repeat mutation frequency in Mlh1 −/− mice was 2- to 3-fold higher than in Pms2 −/− animals. The higher mutation frequency in Mlh1 −/− mice may be a consequence of some residual DNA repair capacity in the Pms2 −/− animals. Relevant to this idea, we observed that Pms2 −/− mice exhibit almost normal levels of Mlh1p, whereas Mlh1 −/− animals lack both Mlh1p and Pms2p. Comparison between Mlh1 −/− animals and Mlh1 −/− and Pms2 −/− double knockout mice revealed little difference in mutator phenotype, suggesting that Mlh1 nullizygosity is sufficient to inactivate MMR completely. The findings may provide a basis for understanding the greater predisposition to intestinal cancer of Mlh1 −/− mice. Small differences (2- to 3-fold) in mononucleotide repeat mutation rates may have dramatic effects on tumor development, requiring multiple genetic alterations in coding regions. Alternatively, this strain difference in tumor spectra also may be related to the consequences of the absence of Pms2p compared with the absence of both Pms2p and Mlh1p on as yet little understood cellular processes.
- 8 June 1999
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 96 (12) , 6850-6855
Different mutator phenotypes in Mlh1 - versus Pms2 -deficient mice
Deficiencies in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) result in increased mutation rates and cancer risk in both humans and mice. Mouse strains homozygous for knockouts of either the Pms2 or Mlh1 MMR gene develop cancer but exhibit very different tumor spectra; only Mlh1 −/− animals develop intestinal tumors. We carried out a detailed study of the microsatellite mutation spectra in each knockout strain. Five mononucleotide repeat tracts at four different chromosomal locations were studied by using single-molecule PCR or an in vivo forward mutation assay. Three dinucleotide repeat loci also were examined. Surprisingly, the mononucleotide repeat mutation frequency in Mlh1 −/− mice was 2- to 3-fold higher than in Pms2 −/− animals. The higher mutation frequency in Mlh1 −/− mice may be a consequence of some residual DNA repair capacity in the Pms2 −/− animals. Relevant to this idea, we observed that Pms2 −/− mice exhibit almost normal levels of Mlh1p, whereas Mlh1 −/− animals lack both Mlh1p and Pms2p. Comparison between Mlh1 −/− animals and Mlh1 −/− and Pms2 −/− double knockout mice revealed little difference in mutator phenotype, suggesting that Mlh1 nullizygosity is sufficient to inactivate MMR completely. The findings may provide a basis for understanding the greater predisposition to intestinal cancer of Mlh1 −/− mice. Small differences (2- to 3-fold) in mononucleotide repeat mutation rates may have dramatic effects on tumor development, requiring multiple genetic alterations in coding regions. Alternatively, this strain difference in tumor spectra also may be related to the consequences of the absence of Pms2p compared with the absence of both Pms2p and Mlh1p on as yet little understood cellular processes.