Carla Pedrazzani

Carla Pedrazzani

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Carla Pedrazzani has a total of 66 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Navigating complex choices through legitimation: Narrative strategies in risk-reduction mastectomy decision-making among unaffected women with genetic risk for breast cancer in Switzerland

    by Maria Caiata-Zufferey, Reka Schweighoffer, Monica Aceti, Carla Pedrazzani, Maria C. Katapodi, Souria Aissaoui, Mekdes Alemu, Murat Aykut, Fulvia Brugnoletti, Rachel Bunger, et al.


  • Open Access

    Patient-reported experiences of cancer care related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland

    by Sara Colomer-Lahiguera, Claudia Canella, Stellio Giacomini, Kim Lê Van, Carla Pedrazzani, Matthias Naegele, Laure Thouvenin, Alix O’mEara Stern, Rosaria Condorelli, Tourane Corbière, et al.

    Purpose: This study aims to describe the experience of Swiss oncological patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A national multi-center study including five hospitals covering the three main language regions of Switzerland was conducted between March and July 2021. Patients with melanoma, breast, lung, or colon cancer receiving active systemic anti-cancer treatment at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic were included. We conducted semi-structured telephone or onsite interviews alongside the administration of distress and resilience-validated questionnaires. Thematic analysis was performed for the qualitative data and descriptive statistics for the quantitative data. Results: Sixty-two cancer patients with a mean age of 61 (SD=14) (58% female) were interviewed. Based on the interviews, we identified that the experience of having cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic was related to five dimensions: psychological, social, support, healthcare, and vaccination. Three themes transverse the five dimensions: (a) needs, (b) positive changes, and (c) phases of the pandemic. In general, patients did not experience delays or disruptions in their cancer treatment nor felt additionally burdened by the pandemic. Lockdown and isolation were reported as mixed experiences (positive and negative), and access to vaccination reassured patients against the risk of infection and instilled hope to return to normalcy. Additionally, we found low distress levels (M=2.9; SD=2.5) and high resilience scores (M=7; SD=1.3) in these patients. Conclusion: Swiss patients with cancer did not express major needs or disruptions in their care during this period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results identify the mixed experiences of patients and highlight the high resilience levels.


  • Open Access

    The Communication Chain of Genetic Risk: Analyses of Narrative Data Exploring Proband–Provider and Proband–Family Communication in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

    by Carla Pedrazzani, Monica Aceti, Reka Schweighoffer, Andrea Kaiser-Grolimund, Nicole Bürki, Pierre O. Chappuis, Rossella Graffeo, Christian Monnerat, Olivia Pagani, Manuela Rabaglio, et al.

    Low uptake of genetic services among members of families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) suggests limitations of proband-mediated communication of genetic risk. This study explored how genetic information proceeds from healthcare providers to probands and from probands to relatives, from the probands’ perspectives. Using a grounded-theory approach, we analyzed narrative data collected with individual interviews and focus groups from a sample of 48 women identified as carriers of HBOC-associated pathogenic variants from three linguistic regions of Switzerland. The findings describe the “communication chain”, confirming the difficulties of proband-mediated communication. Provider–proband communication is impacted by a three-level complexity in the way information about family communication is approached by providers, received by probands, and followed-up by the healthcare system. Probands’ decisions regarding disclosure of genetic risk are governed by dynamic and often contradictory logics of action, interconnected with individual and family characteristics, eventually compelling probands to engage in an arbitrating process. The findings highlight the relevance of probands’ involvement in the communication of genetic risk to relatives, suggesting the need to support them in navigating the complexity of family communication rather than replacing them in this process. Concrete actions at the clinical and health system levels are needed to improve proband-mediated communication.


  • Open Access

    Genetic Literacy and Communication of Genetic Information in Families Concerned with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Study Comparison in Two Countries and within a Timeframe of More Than 10 Years

    by Carla Pedrazzani, Chang Ming, Nicole Bürki, Maria Caiata-Zufferey, Pierre O. Chappuis, Debra Duquette, Karl Heinimann, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Rossella Graffeo-Galbiati, Sofia D. Merajver, et al.

    Examining genetic literacy in families concerned with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) helps understand how genetic information is passed on from individuals who had genetic counseling to their at-risk relatives. This cross-study comparison explored genetic literacy both at the individual and the family level using data collected from three sequential studies conducted in the U.S. and Switzerland over ≥10 years. Participants were primarily females, at-risk or confirmed carriers of HBOC-associated pathogenic variants, who had genetic counselling, and ≥1 of their relatives who did not. Fifteen items assessed genetic literacy. Among 1933 individuals from 518 families, 38.5% had genetic counselling and 61.5% did not. Although genetic literacy was higher among participants who had counselling, some risk factors were poorly understood. At the individual level, genetic literacy was associated with having counselling, ≤5 years ago, higher education, and family history of cancer. At the family level, genetic literacy was associated with having counselling, higher education, and a cancer diagnosis. The findings suggest that specific genetic information should be emphasized during consultations, and that at-risk relatives feel less informed about inherited cancer risk, even if information is shared within families. There is a need to increase access to genetic information among at-risk individuals.


  • Open Access

    Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study

    by Sue Kim, Monica Aceti, Vasiliki Baroutsou, Nicole Bürki, Maria Caiata-Zufferey, Marco Cattaneo, Pierre O Chappuis, Florina M Ciorba, Rossella Graffeo-Galbiati, Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz, et al.

    Background: In hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), family communication of genetic test results is essential for cascade genetic screening, that is, identifying and testing blood relatives of known mutation carriers to determine whether they also carry the pathogenic variant, and to propose preventive and clinical management options. However, up to 50% of blood relatives are unaware of relevant genetic information, suggesting that potential benefits of genetic testing are not communicated effectively within family networks. Technology can facilitate communication and genetic education within HBOC families. Objective: The aims of this study are to develop the K-CASCADE (Korean–Cancer Predisposition Cascade Genetic Testing) cohort in Korea by expanding an infrastructure developed by the CASCADE (Cancer Predisposition Cascade Genetic Testing) Consortium in Switzerland; develop a digital health intervention to support the communication of cancer predisposition for Swiss and Korean HBOC families, based on linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Family Gene Toolkit; evaluate its efficacy on primary (family communication of genetic results and cascade testing) and secondary (psychological distress, genetic literacy, active coping, and decision making) outcomes; and explore its translatability using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. Methods: The digital health intervention will be available in French, German, Italian, Korean, and English and can be accessed via the web, mobile phone, or tablet (ie, device-agnostic). K-CASCADE cohort of Korean HBOC mutation carriers and relatives will be based on the CASCADE infrastructure. Narrative data collected through individual interviews or mini focus groups from 20 to 24 HBOC family members per linguistic region and 6-10 health care providers involved in genetic services will identify the local cultures and context, and inform the content of the tailored messages. The efficacy of the digital health intervention against a comparison website will be assessed in a randomized trial with 104 HBOC mutation carriers (52 in each study arm). The translatability of the digital health intervention will be assessed using survey data collected from HBOC families and health care providers. Results: Funding was received in October 2019. It is projected that data collection will be completed by January 2023 and results will be published in fall 2023. Conclusions: This study addresses the continuum of translational research, from developing an international research infrastructure and adapting an existing digital health intervention to testing its efficacy in a randomized controlled trial and exploring its translatability using an established framework. Adapting existing interventions, rather than developing new ones, takes advantage of previous valid experiences without duplicating efforts. Culturally sensitive web-based interventions that enhance family communication and understanding of genetic cancer risk are timely. This collaboration creates a research infrastructure between Switzerland and Korea that can be scaled up to cover other hereditary cancer syndromes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04214210; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04214210 and CRiS KCT0005643; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/


  • Open Access

    DIMENSIONES PRÁCTICO-POLÍTICAS Y ESPACIALIDADES DE COLECTIVOS SUBALTERNOS EN LO URBANO. UNA APROXIMACIÓN AL MOVIMIENTO Y RESISTENCIA DE LA MULTISECTORIAL DEFENDAMOS ALBERDI

    by Santiago Llorens, Lucas Palladino, Carla Pedrazzani

    Estudios recientes en Ciencias Sociales -y específicamente en Geografía-, plantean que espacio y política son co-constitutivos (Massey, 2008, Thrift, 2008, Feat...