Tatsuma Fukuda

Background: The process of care for traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be different at night and on the weekend. However, little is known about whether the rate of survival after OHCA is affected by the time of day and day of the week. Methods: This observational study analyzed the Japanese government-led nationwide population-based registry data of OHCA patients. Patients who experienced traumatic OHCA following traffic collisions from 2013 to 2017 were included in the study. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the association of both time of day (day/evening vs. night) and day of the week (weekday vs. weekend) with outcomes after traumatic OHCA. Night was defined as 23:00 p.m. to 6:59 a.m., and weekends were defined as Saturday and Sunday. The primary outcome was one-month survival. Results: A total of 8500 patients (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [22.3] years; 68.6% male) were included. 2267 events (26.7%) occurred at night, and 2482 events (29.2%) occurred on weekends. Overall, 173 patients (2.0%) survived one month after OHCA. After adjusting for potential confounders, one-month survival during the day/evening (148/6233 [2.4%]) was significantly higher than during the night (25/2267 [1.1%]) (adjusted OR, 1.95 [95%CI, 1.24–3.07]), whereas there was no significant difference in one-month survival between weekdays (121/6018 [2.0%]) and weekends (52/2482 [2.1%]) (adjusted OR, 0.97 [95%CI, 0.69–1.38]). Conclusions: One-month survival after traumatic OHCA was significantly lower during the night than during the day/evening, although there was no difference in one-month survival between weekdays and weekends. Further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of decreased survival at night.

Objective: Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) recommend that standard-dose epinephrine be administered every 3–5 minutes during cardiac arrest. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the optimal epinephrine dosing interval. This study aimed to examine the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: This was a nationwide population-based observational study using data from a Japanese government-led registry of OHCA, including patients who experienced OHCA in Japan from 2011 to 2017. We defined the epinephrine dosing interval as the time interval between the first epinephrine administration and return of spontaneous circulation in the prehospital setting, divided by the total number of epinephrine doses. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically favorable survival. Results: A total of 10,965 patients (mean (SD) age, 75.8 (14.3) years; 59.8% male) were included. The median epinephrine dosing interval was 3.5 minutes (IQR, 2.5–4.5; mean (SD), 3.6 (1.8)). Only approximately half of the patients received epinephrine administration with a standard dosing interval, as recommended in the current CPR guidelines. After multivariable adjustment, compared with the standard dosing interval, neither shorter nor longer epinephrine dosing intervals were associated with neurologically favorable survival after OHCA (Short vs Standard: adjusted OR 0.87 [95%CI 0.66–1.15]; and Long vs Standard: adjusted OR 1.08 [95%CI 0.76–1.55]). Similar associations were observed in propensity score-matched analyses. Conclusions: The epinephrine dosing interval was not associated with 1-month neurologically favorable survival after OHCA. Our findings do not deny the recommended epinephrine dosing interval in the current CPR guidelines.

Background: Current guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommend that standard dose of epinephrine be administered every 3 to 5 min during cardiac arrest. However, there is controversy about the association between timing of epinephrine administration and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to determine whether the timing of intravenous epinephrine administration is associated with outcomes after OHCA. Methods: We analyzed Japanese government-led nationwide population-based registry data for OHCA. Adult OHCA patients who received intravenous epinephrine by emergency medical service personnel in the prehospital setting from 2011 to 2017 were included. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between time to first epinephrine administration and outcomes after OHCA. Subsequently, associations between early (≤20 min) versus delayed (>20 min) epinephrine administration and outcomes after OHCA were examined using propensity score-matched analyses. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically favorable survival. Results: A total of 119,946 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.2 [14.8] years; 61.4% male) were included. The median time to epinephrine was 23 min (interquartile range, 19–29). Longer time to epinephrine was significantly associated with a decreased chance of 1-month neurologically favorable survival (multivariable adjusted OR per minute delay, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.90–0.92]). In the propensity score-matched cohort, when compared with early (≤20 min) epinephrine, delayed (>20 min) epinephrine was associated with a decreased chance of 1-month neurologically favorable survival (959/42,804 [2.2%] vs. 330/42,804 [0.8%]; RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.30–0.39; NNT, 69). Conclusions: Delay in epinephrine administration was associated with a decreased chance of 1-month neurologically favorable survival among patients with OHCA.

Background: There is controversy as to which is superior, basic or advanced airway management (AAM), for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the prehospital setting. The effect of AAM may differ depending on the timing. Aim: We sought to determine whether time to AAM is associated with a neurological status after OHCA. Methods: This was a nationwide population-based study based on the government-led registry data of OHCA. We included OHCA patients who received prehospital AAM by EMS personnel in Japan from 2014 to 2017. The primary outcome was 1-month neurologically favorable survival. Outcomes were compared with logistic regression with treating time to AAM as both categorical and continuous variable and for a propensity-matched subset of patients. Results: A total of 16445 patients were included. Of these, 1618 (1.0%) survived without sequelae. The median time to AAM was 17min (IQR, 14–22min). Longer time to AAM was associated with a decreased chance of neurologically favorable survival as in the Figure when treated as categorical variable. When treated as continuous variable, multivariable-adjusted OR per minute delay in time to AAM was 0.90 (95%CI 0.90–0.91). In a propensity score-matched analysis (Time to AAM ≤20 vs >20min), similar association was observed (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.36–0.50). Conclusion: Delayed AAM was associated with a decreased chance of neurologically favorable survival after OHCA.

Background: This study aims to compare the Bouchama heatstroke (B-HS) and Japanese Association for Acute Medicine heatstroke (JAAM-HS) criteria with regard to the diagnosis and prediction of mortality and neurological status of heatstroke patients. Methods: This multicenter observational study recruited eligible patients from the emergency departments of 110 major hospitals in Japan from 1 July to 30 September, 2014. Results: A total of 317 patients (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 39–80 years) were included and divided into the B-HS, JAAM-HS, and non-HS groups, with each group consisting of 97, 302, and 15 patients, respectively. The JAAM-HS (1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87–1.0) and B-HS (0.29; 95% CI, 0.14–0.49) criteria showed high and low sensitivity to mortality, respectively. Similarly, the JAAM-HS (1.0; 95% CI, 0.93–1.0) and B-HS (0.35; 95% CI, 0.23–0.49) criteria showed high and low sensitivity to poor neurological status, respectively. Meanwhile, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores demonstrated good accuracy in predicting mortality among heat-related illness (HRI) patients. However, both JAAM-HS and B-HS criteria could not predict in-hospital mortality. The AUC of the SOFA score for mortality was 0.83 (day 3) among the HRI patients. The patients’ neurological status was difficult to predict using the JAAM-HS and B-HS criteria. Concurrently, the total bilirubin level could relatively predict the central nervous system function at discharge. Conclusions: The JAAM-HS criteria showed high sensitivity to mortality and could include all HRI patients who died. The JAAM-HS criterion was considered a useful tool for judgement of admission at ED. Further investigations are necessary to determine the accuracy of both B-HS and JAAM-HS criteria in predicting mortality and neurological status at discharge.