Emily A. Parker
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Emily A. Parker has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alex M. Meyer
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina U.S.A.
1 shared publication Aspen Miller
1 shared publicationBrett T. Allaire
Center for Advanced Orthopaedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, Massachusetts
1 shared publicationCatherine Fruehling
1 shared publicationClinton T. Rubin
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University , New York
1 shared publication- Dennis E. Anderson
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center & Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 February 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Vol. 30 (8) , e690-e702
Risk Factors for Composite Failure of Hip Dysplasia Treated With Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
Introduction: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a common surgical treatment of prearthritic hip dysplasia in young adults, but there are few long-term studies of clinical outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to report a minimum 10-year clinical follow-up of hip dysplasia treated with PAO and identify risk factors for composite failure. Methods: We identified 151 patients (198 hips) who underwent PAO to treat hip dysplasia at a single institution. Enrolled subjects completed a series of six patient-reported outcome instruments and provided information about subsequent surgeries. We defined composite failure as conversion to total hip arthroplasty or modified Harris Hip Score ≤70. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate the relationships between odds of failure and potential predictor variables in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 124 subjects (167 hips) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were enrolled. The median time from PAO to the final follow-up was 13 years (range 10-18 years). There were 71 hips that met criteria for failure: 32 with total hip arthroplasty and 39 with modified Harris Hip Score ≤70. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed multiple preoperative factors that predicted composite failure: increased age and body mass index, osteoarthritis (OA), and more severe acetabular dysplasia. Postoperative factors that predicted failure included lateral undercoverage and formation of heterotopic ossification (HO). The final multivariate model identified body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR], 3.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.68-8.78], P = 0.001), higher preoperative Tönnis grade OA (OR, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.50-4.66], P < 0.001), and HO formation (OR, 16.52 [95% CI, 2.08-135.96], P = 0.009) as independent predictors of failure. Conclusions: This study corroborates current hip dysplasia literature, identifying increasing age and presence of preoperative OA as risk factors for composite failure in univariate analyses. In addition, we found that obesity and HO formation were independent predictors of persistent hip dysfunction. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV
- 15 February 2022
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Vol. 30 (8) , e690-e702
Risk Factors for Composite Failure of Hip Dysplasia Treated With Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-up
Introduction: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a common surgical treatment of prearthritic hip dysplasia in young adults, but there are few long-term studies of clinical outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to report a minimum 10-year clinical follow-up of hip dysplasia treated with PAO and identify risk factors for composite failure. Methods: We identified 151 patients (198 hips) who underwent PAO to treat hip dysplasia at a single institution. Enrolled subjects completed a series of six patient-reported outcome instruments and provided information about subsequent surgeries. We defined composite failure as conversion to total hip arthroplasty or modified Harris Hip Score ≤70. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to evaluate the relationships between odds of failure and potential predictor variables in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 124 subjects (167 hips) with a minimum 10-year follow-up were enrolled. The median time from PAO to the final follow-up was 13 years (range 10-18 years). There were 71 hips that met criteria for failure: 32 with total hip arthroplasty and 39 with modified Harris Hip Score ≤70. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed multiple preoperative factors that predicted composite failure: increased age and body mass index, osteoarthritis (OA), and more severe acetabular dysplasia. Postoperative factors that predicted failure included lateral undercoverage and formation of heterotopic ossification (HO). The final multivariate model identified body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR], 3.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.68-8.78], P = 0.001), higher preoperative Tönnis grade OA (OR, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.50-4.66], P < 0.001), and HO formation (OR, 16.52 [95% CI, 2.08-135.96], P = 0.009) as independent predictors of failure. Conclusions: This study corroborates current hip dysplasia literature, identifying increasing age and presence of preoperative OA as risk factors for composite failure in univariate analyses. In addition, we found that obesity and HO formation were independent predictors of persistent hip dysfunction. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV
- Open Access
- 1 June 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 8 (6)
Perioperative and Postoperative Factors Influence Quadriceps Atrophy and Strength After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Background: Quadriceps dysfunction after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is common and may affect return to sport due to resulting muscle atrophy and muscle weakness. Purpose: To systematically review the available literature regarding the impact of perioperative and postoperative interventions on quadriceps atrophy and loss of strength after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2009 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Embase. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score to determine consensus scores. Eligible level 1 or level 2 studies included interventions of perioperative nerve block, intraoperative tourniquet use, postoperative nutritional supplementation, and postoperative blood flow restriction training. Additionally, the included studies quantified postoperative quadriceps measurements such as thigh circumference, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), isokinetic quadriceps strength, and/or quadriceps electromyographic (EMG) testing. Results: In total, 15 studies met stated inclusion and exclusion criteria with the following intervention types: perioperative nerve block (n = 4), intraoperative tourniquet use (n = 5), postoperative nutritional supplementation (n = 3), and postoperative blood flow restriction (n = 3). Intraoperative tourniquet use resulted in decreased thigh circumference and detrimental EMG changes in quadriceps function in 3 of the 5 included studies. Perioperative femoral nerve blocks were associated with transient decreases in postoperative quadriceps strength, persisting up to 6 weeks after surgery, in 2 of the 4 studies. Postoperative blood flow restriction training augmented quadriceps size and function after ACL reconstruction in 2 of 3 studies. Postoperative nutritional supplementation was associated with increased quadriceps volume and strength in 1 of the 3 studies examined. Conclusion: The peri- and postoperative factors reviewed here may influence quadriceps atrophy and strength after ACL reconstruction. Our results tentatively indicated that blood flow restriction training may be beneficial to the quadriceps after ACL reconstruction and that intraoperative tourniquet use and nerve block administration may be detrimental; however, the strongest finding was that all of these interventions would benefit from further level 1 and 2 evidence studies, including multicenter, randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up, to definitively determine their impact on return to activity.
- 1 June 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 8 (6)
Open AccessPerioperative and Postoperative Factors Influence Quadriceps Atrophy and Strength After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Background: Quadriceps dysfunction after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is common and may affect return to sport due to resulting muscle atrophy and muscle weakness. Purpose: To systematically review the available literature regarding the impact of perioperative and postoperative interventions on quadriceps atrophy and loss of strength after ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2009 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Embase. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score to determine consensus scores. Eligible level 1 or level 2 studies included interventions of perioperative nerve block, intraoperative tourniquet use, postoperative nutritional supplementation, and postoperative blood flow restriction training. Additionally, the included studies quantified postoperative quadriceps measurements such as thigh circumference, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), isokinetic quadriceps strength, and/or quadriceps electromyographic (EMG) testing. Results: In total, 15 studies met stated inclusion and exclusion criteria with the following intervention types: perioperative nerve block (n = 4), intraoperative tourniquet use (n = 5), postoperative nutritional supplementation (n = 3), and postoperative blood flow restriction (n = 3). Intraoperative tourniquet use resulted in decreased thigh circumference and detrimental EMG changes in quadriceps function in 3 of the 5 included studies. Perioperative femoral nerve blocks were associated with transient decreases in postoperative quadriceps strength, persisting up to 6 weeks after surgery, in 2 of the 4 studies. Postoperative blood flow restriction training augmented quadriceps size and function after ACL reconstruction in 2 of 3 studies. Postoperative nutritional supplementation was associated with increased quadriceps volume and strength in 1 of the 3 studies examined. Conclusion: The peri- and postoperative factors reviewed here may influence quadriceps atrophy and strength after ACL reconstruction. Our results tentatively indicated that blood flow restriction training may be beneficial to the quadriceps after ACL reconstruction and that intraoperative tourniquet use and nerve block administration may be detrimental; however, the strongest finding was that all of these interventions would benefit from further level 1 and 2 evidence studies, including multicenter, randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up, to definitively determine their impact on return to activity.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 8 (5)
Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair With an ITB-Sparing Versus ITB-Splitting Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
During hip endoscopy, the iliotibial band (ITB) can be split or preserved to access the peritrochanteric workspace. To our knowledge, no comparative studies have been performed to analyze patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and surgical failure rates (gluteus medius retear and/or revision surgery rates) for ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting approaches in endoscopic gluteus medius repairs. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate PROs and failure rates of patients undergoing ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting repairs of the gluteus medius. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic review was performed by following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Level 1-4 studies were evaluated for endoscopic abductor repair techniques on all types of gluteus medius tears. Given the small number of studies and varying population sizes, all quantitative data were adjusted for study population size. A total of 13 studies met our inclusion criteria, while more granular data, including ITB approach, were available for 8 studies. Because of the paucity of literature on the subject, all included studies were of lower quality per the modified Coleman Methodology Score. The visual analog scale for pain, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the surgical failure rates were compared between approaches. Patients who underwent ITB splitting had a significantly greater change in mHHS (45.5 ± 4.6 vs 27.3 ± 6.5; P < .001) and lower surgical failure rates (3.67 ± 2.33 vs 4.75 ± 2.54; P = .04). There was no significant difference in change in visual analog scale for splitting versus sparing (4.26 ± 0.41 vs 4.39 ± 0.14; P = .96). The results may have been biased by between-group differences, such as patients who undergo ITB sparing being significantly younger. Endoscopic gluteus medius repair is a reliable procedure to improve pain and function in appropriately selected patients. This study highlighted the lack of high-quality literature available regarding ITB approach. However, the evidence to date has suggested that ITB approach may influence hip-specific PROs. Splitting the ITB during abductor repair may be associated with a greater improvement in mHHS and lower surgical failure rates. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of ITB approach.
- 1 May 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 8 (5)
Open AccessEndoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair With an ITB-Sparing Versus ITB-Splitting Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
During hip endoscopy, the iliotibial band (ITB) can be split or preserved to access the peritrochanteric workspace. To our knowledge, no comparative studies have been performed to analyze patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and surgical failure rates (gluteus medius retear and/or revision surgery rates) for ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting approaches in endoscopic gluteus medius repairs. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate PROs and failure rates of patients undergoing ITB-sparing versus ITB-splitting repairs of the gluteus medius. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. A systematic review was performed by following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the modified Coleman Methodology Score. Level 1-4 studies were evaluated for endoscopic abductor repair techniques on all types of gluteus medius tears. Given the small number of studies and varying population sizes, all quantitative data were adjusted for study population size. A total of 13 studies met our inclusion criteria, while more granular data, including ITB approach, were available for 8 studies. Because of the paucity of literature on the subject, all included studies were of lower quality per the modified Coleman Methodology Score. The visual analog scale for pain, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and the surgical failure rates were compared between approaches. Patients who underwent ITB splitting had a significantly greater change in mHHS (45.5 ± 4.6 vs 27.3 ± 6.5; P < .001) and lower surgical failure rates (3.67 ± 2.33 vs 4.75 ± 2.54; P = .04). There was no significant difference in change in visual analog scale for splitting versus sparing (4.26 ± 0.41 vs 4.39 ± 0.14; P = .96). The results may have been biased by between-group differences, such as patients who undergo ITB sparing being significantly younger. Endoscopic gluteus medius repair is a reliable procedure to improve pain and function in appropriately selected patients. This study highlighted the lack of high-quality literature available regarding ITB approach. However, the evidence to date has suggested that ITB approach may influence hip-specific PROs. Splitting the ITB during abductor repair may be associated with a greater improvement in mHHS and lower surgical failure rates. Further prospective comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the effect of ITB approach.
- Open Access
- 26 October 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Vol. 71 (6) , 811-816
Associations of Computed Tomography-Based Trunk Muscle Size and Density With Balance and Falls in Older Adults
Deficits in balance and muscle function are important risk factors for falls in older adults. Aging is associated with significant declines in muscle size and density, but associations of trunk muscle size and density with balance and falls in older adults have not been previously examined. Trunk muscle size (cross-sectional area) and attenuation (a measure of tissue density) were measured in computed tomography scans (at the L2 lumbar level) in a cohort of older adults (mean ± SD age of 81.9±6.4) residing in independent living communities. Outcome measures were postural sway measured during quiet standing and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at baseline, and falls reported by participants for up to 3 years after baseline measurements. Higher muscle density was associated with reduced postural sway, particularly sway velocities, in both men and women, and better Short Physical Performance Battery score in women, but was not associated with falls. Larger muscle size was associated with increased postural sway in men and women and with increased likelihood of falling in men. The results suggest that balance depends more on muscle quality than on the size of the muscle. The unexpected finding that larger muscle size was associated with increased postural sway and increased fall risk requires further investigation, but highlights the importance of factors besides muscle size in muscle function in older adults.
- 26 October 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Vol. 71 (6) , 811-816
Open AccessAssociations of Computed Tomography-Based Trunk Muscle Size and Density With Balance and Falls in Older Adults
Deficits in balance and muscle function are important risk factors for falls in older adults. Aging is associated with significant declines in muscle size and density, but associations of trunk muscle size and density with balance and falls in older adults have not been previously examined. Trunk muscle size (cross-sectional area) and attenuation (a measure of tissue density) were measured in computed tomography scans (at the L2 lumbar level) in a cohort of older adults (mean ± SD age of 81.9±6.4) residing in independent living communities. Outcome measures were postural sway measured during quiet standing and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) at baseline, and falls reported by participants for up to 3 years after baseline measurements. Higher muscle density was associated with reduced postural sway, particularly sway velocities, in both men and women, and better Short Physical Performance Battery score in women, but was not associated with falls. Larger muscle size was associated with increased postural sway in men and women and with increased likelihood of falling in men. The results suggest that balance depends more on muscle quality than on the size of the muscle. The unexpected finding that larger muscle size was associated with increased postural sway and increased fall risk requires further investigation, but highlights the importance of factors besides muscle size in muscle function in older adults.