Shubham Dutta
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Shubham Dutta has a total of 24 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Athar Alam
2 shared publicationsChinmay Pal
2 shared publications- Dannel McCollum
University of Massachusetts Medical School
2 shared publications - Manish Goyal
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
2 shared publications Murugan Paramasivam
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA USA
2 shared publicationsRahul Kumar
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 25 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 327-351
Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapies for Cancer
- 14 November 2024
- Published by The R Foundation
mapindia: Plot Map of the Indian Subcontinent
- 31 October 2024
- Published by The R Foundation
mapindiatools: Mapping Data for 'mapindia' Package
- 11 January 2024
- Published by The R Foundation
tidyplate: Transform Microplate Data into Tibbles
- Open Access
Emerging Trends in Immunotherapy for Cancer
Recent advances in cancer immunology have enabled the discovery of promising immunotherapies for various malignancies that have shifted the cancer treatment paradigm. The innovative research and clinical advancements of immunotherapy approaches have prolonged the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic cancers. Since the U.S. FDA approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor in 2011, the field of cancer immunotherapy has grown exponentially. Multiple therapeutic approaches or agents to manipulate different aspects of the immune system are currently in development. These include cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapies (such as CAR-T or NK cell therapy), monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapies, oncolytic viruses, and inhibitors targeting immune checkpoints that have demonstrated promising clinical efficacy. Multiple immunotherapeutic approaches have been approved for specific cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trial stages. Given the success of immunotherapy, there has been a tremendous thrust to improve the clinical efficacy of various agents and strategies implemented so far. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the development and clinical implementation of various immunotherapy approaches currently being used to treat cancer. We also highlight the latest developments, emerging trends, limitations, and future promises of cancer immunotherapy.
Open AccessEmerging Trends in Immunotherapy for Cancer
Recent advances in cancer immunology have enabled the discovery of promising immunotherapies for various malignancies that have shifted the cancer treatment paradigm. The innovative research and clinical advancements of immunotherapy approaches have prolonged the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory metastatic cancers. Since the U.S. FDA approved the first immune checkpoint inhibitor in 2011, the field of cancer immunotherapy has grown exponentially. Multiple therapeutic approaches or agents to manipulate different aspects of the immune system are currently in development. These include cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapies (such as CAR-T or NK cell therapy), monoclonal antibodies, cytokine therapies, oncolytic viruses, and inhibitors targeting immune checkpoints that have demonstrated promising clinical efficacy. Multiple immunotherapeutic approaches have been approved for specific cancer treatments, while others are currently in preclinical and clinical trial stages. Given the success of immunotherapy, there has been a tremendous thrust to improve the clinical efficacy of various agents and strategies implemented so far. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the development and clinical implementation of various immunotherapy approaches currently being used to treat cancer. We also highlight the latest developments, emerging trends, limitations, and future promises of cancer immunotherapy.
- 8 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in EMBO Reports
- Vol. 19 (2) , 337-350
TRIP6 inhibits Hippo signaling in response to tension at adherens junctions
The transcriptional co‐activator YAP controls cell proliferation, survival, and tissue regeneration in response to changes in the mechanical environment. It is not known how mechanical stimuli such as tension are sensed and how the signal is transduced to control YAP activity. Here, we show that the LIM domain protein TRIP6 acts as part of a mechanotransduction pathway at adherens junctions to promote YAP activity by inhibiting the LATS1/2 kinases. Previous studies showed that vinculin at adherens junctions becomes activated by mechanical tension. We show that vinculin inhibits Hippo signaling by recruiting TRIP6 to adherens junctions and stimulating its binding to and inhibition of LATS1/2 in response to tension. TRIP6 competes with MOB1 for binding to LATS1/2 thereby blocking MOB1 from recruiting the LATS1/2 activating kinases MST1/2. Together, these findings reveal a novel pathway that responds to tension at adherens junctions to control Hippo pathway signaling. Synopsis Mechanical tension regulates Hippo signaling via the mechanosensor vinculin at adherens junctions. Tension‐activated vinculin stimulates binding of LATS1/2 to TRIP6, which blocks the association of LATS1/2 with its activator MOB1, thereby increasing YAP activity. TRIP6 and LATS1/2 interact at adherens junctions in a tension‐dependent manner. TRIP6 inhibits LATS1/2 by competing for its interaction with the activator protein MOB1. Vinculin recruits TRIP6 to adherens junctions to activate YAP in response to mechanical tension.
- 8 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in EMBO Reports
- Vol. 19 (2) , 337-350
TRIP6 inhibits Hippo signaling in response to tension at adherens junctions
The transcriptional co‐activator YAP controls cell proliferation, survival, and tissue regeneration in response to changes in the mechanical environment. It is not known how mechanical stimuli such as tension are sensed and how the signal is transduced to control YAP activity. Here, we show that the LIM domain protein TRIP6 acts as part of a mechanotransduction pathway at adherens junctions to promote YAP activity by inhibiting the LATS1/2 kinases. Previous studies showed that vinculin at adherens junctions becomes activated by mechanical tension. We show that vinculin inhibits Hippo signaling by recruiting TRIP6 to adherens junctions and stimulating its binding to and inhibition of LATS1/2 in response to tension. TRIP6 competes with MOB1 for binding to LATS1/2 thereby blocking MOB1 from recruiting the LATS1/2 activating kinases MST1/2. Together, these findings reveal a novel pathway that responds to tension at adherens junctions to control Hippo pathway signaling. Synopsis Mechanical tension regulates Hippo signaling via the mechanosensor vinculin at adherens junctions. Tension‐activated vinculin stimulates binding of LATS1/2 to TRIP6, which blocks the association of LATS1/2 with its activator MOB1, thereby increasing YAP activity. TRIP6 and LATS1/2 interact at adherens junctions in a tension‐dependent manner. TRIP6 inhibits LATS1/2 by competing for its interaction with the activator protein MOB1. Vinculin recruits TRIP6 to adherens junctions to activate YAP in response to mechanical tension.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 290 (22) , 13667-13668
Translocation of heme oxygenase-1 to mitochondria is a novel cytoprotective mechanism against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress, apoptosis, and gastric mucosal injury.
- 1 May 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 290 (22) , 13667-13668
Open AccessTranslocation of heme oxygenase-1 to mitochondria is a novel cytoprotective mechanism against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced mitochondrial oxidative stress, apoptosis, and gastric mucosal injury.
- Open Access
- 15 May 2014
- Published by American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Vol. 25 (10) , 1676-1685
Angiomotins link F-actin architecture to Hippo pathway signaling
The Hippo pathway regulates the transcriptional coactivator YAP to control cell proliferation, organ size, and stem cell maintenance. Multiple factors, such as substrate stiffness, cell density, and G protein–coupled receptor signaling, regulate YAP through their effects on the F-actin cytoskeleton, although the mechanism is not known. Here we show that angiomotin proteins (AMOT130, AMOTL1, and AMOTL2) connect F-actin architecture to YAP regulation. First, we show that angiomotins are required to relocalize YAP to the cytoplasm in response to various manipulations that perturb the actin cytoskeleton. Second, angiomotins associate with F-actin through a conserved F-actin–binding domain, and mutants defective for F-actin binding show enhanced ability to retain YAP in the cytoplasm. Third, F-actin and YAP compete for binding to AMOT130, explaining how F-actin inhibits AMOT130-mediated cytoplasmic retention of YAP. Furthermore, we find that LATS can synergize with F-actin perturbations by phosphorylating free AMOT130 to keep it from associating with F-actin. Together these results uncover a mechanism for how F-actin levels modulate YAP localization, allowing cells to make developmental and proliferative decisions based on diverse inputs that regulate actin architecture.
- 15 May 2014
- Published by American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Vol. 25 (10) , 1676-1685
Open AccessAngiomotins link F-actin architecture to Hippo pathway signaling
The Hippo pathway regulates the transcriptional coactivator YAP to control cell proliferation, organ size, and stem cell maintenance. Multiple factors, such as substrate stiffness, cell density, and G protein–coupled receptor signaling, regulate YAP through their effects on the F-actin cytoskeleton, although the mechanism is not known. Here we show that angiomotin proteins (AMOT130, AMOTL1, and AMOTL2) connect F-actin architecture to YAP regulation. First, we show that angiomotins are required to relocalize YAP to the cytoplasm in response to various manipulations that perturb the actin cytoskeleton. Second, angiomotins associate with F-actin through a conserved F-actin–binding domain, and mutants defective for F-actin binding show enhanced ability to retain YAP in the cytoplasm. Third, F-actin and YAP compete for binding to AMOT130, explaining how F-actin inhibits AMOT130-mediated cytoplasmic retention of YAP. Furthermore, we find that LATS can synergize with F-actin perturbations by phosphorylating free AMOT130 to keep it from associating with F-actin. Together these results uncover a mechanism for how F-actin levels modulate YAP localization, allowing cells to make developmental and proliferative decisions based on diverse inputs that regulate actin architecture.
- Open Access
- 1 November 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 286 (45) , 39387-39402
Translocation of Heme Oxygenase-1 to Mitochondria Is a Novel Cytoprotective Mechanism against Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-induced Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, and Gastric Mucosal Injury
- 1 November 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 286 (45) , 39387-39402
Open AccessTranslocation of Heme Oxygenase-1 to Mitochondria Is a Novel Cytoprotective Mechanism against Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-induced Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress, Apoptosis, and Gastric Mucosal Injury