Dhananjaya Sabat
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Dhananjaya Sabat has a total of 50 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Vinod Kumar
Cranfield University
15 shared publications Anil Dhal
Department of Orthopedics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
8 shared publications- Lalit Maini
Department of Orthopaedics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
6 shared publications Sumit Arora
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
6 shared publications- Sumit Arora
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maulana Azad Medical College & Associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
6 shared publications - Ajay Gupta
Consultant, Department of Medicine, Sanjeevan Hospital, New Delhi, India
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Medknow in MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences
- Vol. 8 (1) , 82-84
Sequential Fracture of Neck of Femur of Both Sides in a Patient with Psychosis
The authors describe the case of an adult male patient with psychosis developed fractures of neck femur of both sides sequentially at a year interval following trivial trauma. In addition, the patient was found to have hyperthyroidism. The rare presentation, possible complex etiopathogenesis for the problem and difficulties in treatment are discussed.
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Medknow in MAMC Journal of Medical Sciences
- Vol. 8 (1) , 82-84
Open AccessSequential Fracture of Neck of Femur of Both Sides in a Patient with Psychosis
The authors describe the case of an adult male patient with psychosis developed fractures of neck femur of both sides sequentially at a year interval following trivial trauma. In addition, the patient was found to have hyperthyroidism. The rare presentation, possible complex etiopathogenesis for the problem and difficulties in treatment are discussed.
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 15, 22-26
3D CT evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 15, 22-26
3D CT evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- 8 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Vol. 55 (2) , 425-432
Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: A Forgotten Entity in Multi-Ligament Injuries of the Knee
Purpose The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTJF) can be injured with the structures in the lateral aspect of the knee in a multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) patient. Such injuries are scarce but require attention in the management of the complex MLKIs. The assessment and management of such injuries are not well described in the English literature. This study describes the frequency of PTFJ injuries, clinical assessment and functional outcomes of such injuries in MLKI patients. Methodology The data were collected retrospectively from the cohort from 2013 to 2018. The 84 MLKI were included in the study, out of which 9 patients had associated PTFJ injury. All the PTFJ injuries were operated by one single surgeon (D.S) which involves stabilization with K-wires (Kirschner wire) and fixation with 4 mm cancellous cannulated screw along with reconstruction surgery for MLKI in single stage. Results The frequency of PTFJ injury in our patient cohort is 10.71%. Three patients out of the nine patients received Larson procedure apart from the fixation of PTFJ. At a mean follow-up of 13 months, the Lysholm score was 77.4 (range: 69–86) and mean modified Cincinnati score was 62 (range: 52–72). There was grade I posterior laxity present in one patient with PCL and PLC injury, one patient with ACL, PCL and PLC injury, and one patient with ACL, PCL, MCL and PLC injury at final follow-up. Terminal flexion of 15° or more restriction was noted in six patients. All patients were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion Evaluation of PTFJ should be an integral part of preoperative as well as an intraoperative examination of MLKI patients. The fixation of this joint is of utmost importance for the reconstructive ligament procedures on the lateral aspect of the knee. The dial test used for the assessment of the integrity of PLC injury should have a prerequisite of proximal tibiofibular joint stability, otherwise, it can lead to erroneous assessment. Level of evidence IV.
- 8 November 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Vol. 55 (2) , 425-432
Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: A Forgotten Entity in Multi-Ligament Injuries of the Knee
Purpose The proximal tibiofibular joint (PTJF) can be injured with the structures in the lateral aspect of the knee in a multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) patient. Such injuries are scarce but require attention in the management of the complex MLKIs. The assessment and management of such injuries are not well described in the English literature. This study describes the frequency of PTFJ injuries, clinical assessment and functional outcomes of such injuries in MLKI patients. Methodology The data were collected retrospectively from the cohort from 2013 to 2018. The 84 MLKI were included in the study, out of which 9 patients had associated PTFJ injury. All the PTFJ injuries were operated by one single surgeon (D.S) which involves stabilization with K-wires (Kirschner wire) and fixation with 4 mm cancellous cannulated screw along with reconstruction surgery for MLKI in single stage. Results The frequency of PTFJ injury in our patient cohort is 10.71%. Three patients out of the nine patients received Larson procedure apart from the fixation of PTFJ. At a mean follow-up of 13 months, the Lysholm score was 77.4 (range: 69–86) and mean modified Cincinnati score was 62 (range: 52–72). There was grade I posterior laxity present in one patient with PCL and PLC injury, one patient with ACL, PCL and PLC injury, and one patient with ACL, PCL, MCL and PLC injury at final follow-up. Terminal flexion of 15° or more restriction was noted in six patients. All patients were satisfied with the outcome. Conclusion Evaluation of PTFJ should be an integral part of preoperative as well as an intraoperative examination of MLKI patients. The fixation of this joint is of utmost importance for the reconstructive ligament procedures on the lateral aspect of the knee. The dial test used for the assessment of the integrity of PLC injury should have a prerequisite of proximal tibiofibular joint stability, otherwise, it can lead to erroneous assessment. Level of evidence IV.
- 1 October 2020
- Published by Medknow in Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 7 (4) , 230-234
Role of proximal tibio-fibular joint stability in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction- A case report and review of literature
- 1 October 2020
- Published by Medknow in Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery
- Vol. 7 (4) , 230-234
Role of proximal tibio-fibular joint stability in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction- A case report and review of literature
- 1 May 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 11, S298-S300
Fast and economic cardboard cutout use to increase compliance of face mask wear during COVID-19 pandemic
- 1 May 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 11, S298-S300
Fast and economic cardboard cutout use to increase compliance of face mask wear during COVID-19 pandemic
- Open Access
- 7 October 2019
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy Techniques
- Vol. 8 (11) , E1273-E1276
A Percutaneous Technique to Reposition the Cortical Button of Adjustable‐Loop Devices in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Adjustable‐loop devices are relatively new but quite popular and have been routinely used for around a decade in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for hamstring graft fixation on the femur. They allow surgeons to adapt to different tunnel lengths, eliminate the need for multiple loop sizes, decrease the “bungee cord effect,” maximize the amount of graft within the femoral socket available for incorporation, and allow retensioning of the graft. Apart from these advantages, certain complications are associated with the use of adjustable‐loop devices. When the cortical button is being pulled up through the femoral tunnel, it may be pulled up with greater force, causing it to come out of the vastus lateralis, the iliotibial band, or even the skin. When the graft is pulled back from the tibial side, the cortical button may flip in the substance of the vastus lateralis or outside the iliotibial band. This soft‐tissue interposition can cause ischemic necrosis of the interposed tissue, soft‐tissue irritation, migration of the cortical button, or early loosening of the graft, leading to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. We describe a percutaneous solution to this common intraoperative technical complication. The outer sheath of a 4.5‐mm arthroscope, 4.5‐mm acromionizer, or notchplasty burr can be safely used to put the cortical button back against the lateral cortex of the femur. Technique Video: video See video under supplementary data.
- 7 October 2019
- Published by Wiley in Arthroscopy Techniques
- Vol. 8 (11) , E1273-E1276
Open AccessA Percutaneous Technique to Reposition the Cortical Button of Adjustable‐Loop Devices in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Adjustable‐loop devices are relatively new but quite popular and have been routinely used for around a decade in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for hamstring graft fixation on the femur. They allow surgeons to adapt to different tunnel lengths, eliminate the need for multiple loop sizes, decrease the “bungee cord effect,” maximize the amount of graft within the femoral socket available for incorporation, and allow retensioning of the graft. Apart from these advantages, certain complications are associated with the use of adjustable‐loop devices. When the cortical button is being pulled up through the femoral tunnel, it may be pulled up with greater force, causing it to come out of the vastus lateralis, the iliotibial band, or even the skin. When the graft is pulled back from the tibial side, the cortical button may flip in the substance of the vastus lateralis or outside the iliotibial band. This soft‐tissue interposition can cause ischemic necrosis of the interposed tissue, soft‐tissue irritation, migration of the cortical button, or early loosening of the graft, leading to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. We describe a percutaneous solution to this common intraoperative technical complication. The outer sheath of a 4.5‐mm arthroscope, 4.5‐mm acromionizer, or notchplasty burr can be safely used to put the cortical button back against the lateral cortex of the femur. Technique Video: video See video under supplementary data.
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 9, S35-S38
Bicondylar conjoint Hoffa’s fracture with patella entrapped in the fracture: A rare case report
- 1 June 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 9, S35-S38
Bicondylar conjoint Hoffa’s fracture with patella entrapped in the fracture: A rare case report
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 8 (4) , 353-354
Pediatric conjoint Hoffa's fracture: An uncommon injury and review of literature
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 8 (4) , 353-354
Pediatric conjoint Hoffa's fracture: An uncommon injury and review of literature
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 8, S80-S83
Arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment of shoulder ochronotic arthropathy – A case report
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
- Vol. 8, S80-S83
Arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment of shoulder ochronotic arthropathy – A case report