Mahideen Afridi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Mahideen Afridi has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Adil Hussain
Food and Biotechnology Research Centre (FBRC), Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR) Laboratories Complex, Lahore, Pakistan
3 shared publicationsMuhammad Ramzan Khan
National Centre for Bioinformatics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
3 shared publicationsNazia Rehman
National Institute for Genomics and Advanced Biotechnology, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad, Pakistan
3 shared publications- Hongmei Cheng
National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
2 shared publications - Huiming Guo
Academician Workstation, National Nanfan Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, China
2 shared publications - Khurshid Ahmad
State Key Laboratory of Marine Food Processing & Safety Control, College of Food Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, No.1299, Sansha Road, Qingdao, Shandong Province 266404, China
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 2 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Plant and Soil
- Vol. 527 (2) , 2059-2075
Overexpression of DR1372 gene from Deinococcus radiodurans improves the salt and drought tolerance in soybean
- 2 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Plant and Soil
- Vol. 527 (2) , 2059-2075
Overexpression of DR1372 gene from Deinococcus radiodurans improves the salt and drought tolerance in soybean
- 2 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Functional & Integrative Genomics
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-12
An efficient hairy root system for validation of CRISPR/Cas system activities in cotton
The hairy root induction system has been widely applied in studying gene expression and function in plant species due to its rapidity and efficiency. The hairy root system is an efficient tool for evaluating the activities of CRISPR/Cas systems. Cotton hairy roots were primarily induced through cotton tissue culture under aseptic conditions and by injecting cotton stem tips under non-aseptic conditions. However, both methods are lab-intensive and time-consuming. In this study, an efficient cotton hairy root induction procedure was established via infecting cotton hypocotyls with Agrobacterium rhizogenes under non-sterile conditions. Cotton seedlings with expanded cotyledons were decapitated with a slanted cut, and the residual hypocotyl (maintained 1 cm apical portion) was inoculated with A. rhizogenes. Over 90% of the infected explants from all three tested varieties could produce hairy roots after 8 days of inoculation. The effictiveness of the method was tested by overexpressing two reporter genes (eGFP and GUS). The transformation efficiency of the GUS and eGFP were ranged from50–68.18% and 40.9–68.18%. In addition, the editing efficiency of target sites in different CRISPR/Cas systems were also tested in hairy root. This method provided technical support for screening suitable target sites for cotton gene editing.
- 2 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Functional & Integrative Genomics
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-12
An efficient hairy root system for validation of CRISPR/Cas system activities in cotton
The hairy root induction system has been widely applied in studying gene expression and function in plant species due to its rapidity and efficiency. The hairy root system is an efficient tool for evaluating the activities of CRISPR/Cas systems. Cotton hairy roots were primarily induced through cotton tissue culture under aseptic conditions and by injecting cotton stem tips under non-aseptic conditions. However, both methods are lab-intensive and time-consuming. In this study, an efficient cotton hairy root induction procedure was established via infecting cotton hypocotyls with Agrobacterium rhizogenes under non-sterile conditions. Cotton seedlings with expanded cotyledons were decapitated with a slanted cut, and the residual hypocotyl (maintained 1 cm apical portion) was inoculated with A. rhizogenes. Over 90% of the infected explants from all three tested varieties could produce hairy roots after 8 days of inoculation. The effictiveness of the method was tested by overexpressing two reporter genes (eGFP and GUS). The transformation efficiency of the GUS and eGFP were ranged from50–68.18% and 40.9–68.18%. In addition, the editing efficiency of target sites in different CRISPR/Cas systems were also tested in hairy root. This method provided technical support for screening suitable target sites for cotton gene editing.
- Open Access
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 139-1
Correction: Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression profiling analysis of shattering genes in rapeseed and mustard plants
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 139-1
Open AccessCorrection: Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression profiling analysis of shattering genes in rapeseed and mustard plants
- Open Access
- 18 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 124-12
Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression profiling analysis of shattering genes in rapeseed and mustard plants
- 18 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 124-12
Open AccessGenome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression profiling analysis of shattering genes in rapeseed and mustard plants
- Open Access
- 22 June 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Genome Wide Identification, Phylogeny and Expression Profiling Analysis of Shattering genes in Rapeseed and Mustard Plants
Background: Non-synchronized pods shattering in the Brassicaceae family bring upon huge yield losses around the world. The shattering process was validated to be controlled by eight different genes in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, including SHATTERPROOF1, SHATTERPROOF2, FRUITFULL, INDEHISCENT, ALCATRAZ, NAC, REPLUMLESS and POLYGlACTOURANAZE. To obtain gene family & examine their expression patterns into fresh & mature silique, then completed genome wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of shattering genes in B. napus and B. juncea.Results: Complete genome analysis of B. napus and B. juncea revealed 32 shattering genes, which were identified and categorize based on protein motif structure, exon-intron organization and phylogeny. The phylogenetic study revealed that these shattering genes contain little duplications that were determined with a distinct chromosome number. Motifs of 32 shattering proteins were also observed where motifs 6 were found to be more conserved. A single motif was observed for other genes like BrnS7, BrnS8, BrjS23 and BrjS26. Comparative genomics for synteny analysis was performed that validated a conserved pattern of blocks among these cultivars. RT-PCR based expressions profile showed higher expression of shattering genes in B. juncea as compared to B. napus. FUL gene was expressed more in the mature silique. ALC gene was not expressed in the fresh silique of B. napus but highly expressed in the mature silique. Conclusion: This study authenticates that shattering genes exist in the local cultivars of Brassica. ALC exhibited strong expression in both the mature and fresh silique of B. juncea. Our results showed that shattering genes expression occurred more in B. juncea as compared to B. napus. It also contributes to the screening of more candidate gene for further investigation and characterization.
- 22 June 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Research Square
Open AccessGenome Wide Identification, Phylogeny and Expression Profiling Analysis of Shattering genes in Rapeseed and Mustard Plants
Background: Non-synchronized pods shattering in the Brassicaceae family bring upon huge yield losses around the world. The shattering process was validated to be controlled by eight different genes in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, including SHATTERPROOF1, SHATTERPROOF2, FRUITFULL, INDEHISCENT, ALCATRAZ, NAC, REPLUMLESS and POLYGlACTOURANAZE. To obtain gene family & examine their expression patterns into fresh & mature silique, then completed genome wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of shattering genes in B. napus and B. juncea.Results: Complete genome analysis of B. napus and B. juncea revealed 32 shattering genes, which were identified and categorize based on protein motif structure, exon-intron organization and phylogeny. The phylogenetic study revealed that these shattering genes contain little duplications that were determined with a distinct chromosome number. Motifs of 32 shattering proteins were also observed where motifs 6 were found to be more conserved. A single motif was observed for other genes like BrnS7, BrnS8, BrjS23 and BrjS26. Comparative genomics for synteny analysis was performed that validated a conserved pattern of blocks among these cultivars. RT-PCR based expressions profile showed higher expression of shattering genes in B. juncea as compared to B. napus. FUL gene was expressed more in the mature silique. ALC gene was not expressed in the fresh silique of B. napus but highly expressed in the mature silique. Conclusion: This study authenticates that shattering genes exist in the local cultivars of Brassica. ALC exhibited strong expression in both the mature and fresh silique of B. juncea. Our results showed that shattering genes expression occurred more in B. juncea as compared to B. napus. It also contributes to the screening of more candidate gene for further investigation and characterization.