Javier Plaza Zamora has a total of 155 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Vicente Plaza

    Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy Barcelona Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU)

    5 shared publications
  • Cesáreo Álvarez Rodríguez

    Comité Ejecutivo de GEMA, Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES), Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital de Verín, Orense, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Fernando Gómez Ruiz

    Comité Ejecutivo de GEMA, Sociedad Española de Médicos Generales y de Familia (SEMG), Medicina de Familia, Centro de Salud de Bargas, Bargas (Toledo), Spain

    4 shared publications
  • José Sanz Ortega

    Comité Ejecutivo de GEMA, Sociedad Española de Inmunología Clínica, Alergología y Asma Pediátrica (SEICAP), Unidad de Alergia y Neumología Infantil, Hospital Universitario Casa de Salud, Valencia, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Santiago Quirce Gancedo

    Comité Ejecutivo de GEMA, Sociedad Española de Alergología e Inmunología Clínica (SEAIC), Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

    4 shared publications
  • Antonio Gómez-Outes

    Comité Ejecutivo de GEMA, Sociedad Española de Farmacología Clínica (SEFC), Servicio de Área Terapéutica Clínica: Cardiovascular y Respiratorio, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), Madrid, Spain

    3 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Reframing COPD Instability Under GOLD 2026: A Bayesian Multi-Outcome Retrospective EHR Analysis in Primary Care

    by José Manuel Helguera Quevedo, Pedro Mesa Rodríguez, Luis Richard Rodríguez, Zaira María Correcher Salvador, José Manuel Paredero Domínguez, Francisco Javier Plaza Zamora, Fernando María Navarro Ros, José David Maya Viejo

    Background/Objectives: COPD instability is heterogeneous; GOLD 2026 lowers the prior-year threshold to ≥1 moderate or severe exacerbation. We assessed whether this low-threshold criterion behaves as a high-sensitivity operational signal in primary-care EHRs. Methods: A retrospective multicenter same-window EHR pilot study in two Spanish primary-care centers (n = 106). Predictors and six binary endpoints were aggregated over the same 12-month window: any exacerbation, high-risk history, severe hospitalization, SABA dispensing, SAMA dispensing, and any rescue dispensing. We fitted Bayesian multi-outcome hierarchical logistic models with patient-level random intercepts, cross-endpoint partial pooling, regularizing priors, and missingness indicators. Robustness used prespecified scenarios, 10-fold ELPD cross-validation, and high-missingness exclusion. Results: Any exacerbation occurred in 53/106 patients; high-risk history in 25/106; hospitalization in 16/106; and any rescue dispensing in 65/106. Diagnostics were stable, and posterior predictive checks supported marginal adequacy. Heart failure showed the clearest positive pattern across exacerbation-defined endpoints; reliever-dispensing endpoints showed a distinct care-pathway-sensitive pattern. No scenario improved out-of-sample adequacy. High-missingness exclusion preserved directionality in 120/120 overlapping pairs; the median |ΔlogOR| was 0.061; and 119/120 remained within ±log(1.25). Conclusions: GOLD 2026 “any exacerbation” behaved as a high-sensitivity operational signal in an endpoint-operating-point sense, not as a homogeneous phenotype. Findings are within-window associations, not causal, medication-effect, or prospective prediction estimates; external validation is required.

  • Open Access

    Availability and Costs of Allergic Rhinitis Treatments Across the World: A Survey of ARIA Experts

    by Maria Clara Urbano, Rafael José Vieira, Yi‐Kui Xiang, Sara Gil‐Mata, Anna Bedbrook, Baharudin Abdullah, Mona Al‐Ahmad, Maryam Ali Al‐Nesf, Emilio Alvarez‐Cuesta, Salma Mussagy Amade, et al.

    Introduction: Medication availability and costs can be highly variable across countries and in different time periods. We aimed to conduct a survey among local experts to obtain information on the availability and costs of allergic rhinitis medications in different countries. Methods: We sent a survey to members of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) group, asking for the availability and the lowest cost of specific allergic rhinitis medications in their respective countries. Data in local currencies were converted to 2024 US Dollars adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). We compared the costs of different medication classes, assuming, for each class, the least expensive drug in each country, as well as full treatment adherence. Results: We received responses from ARIA experts in 51 different countries. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and oral antihistamines (OAH) were available in all countries, but this was not observed for intranasal antihistamines (INAH) or for INAH+INCS. In most countries, OAH was the least costly drug class, while INAH+INCS was the most expensive. Among INCS, beclomethasone was the medication most frequently identified as the cheapest, while cetirizine and loratadine were the OAH most frequently reported as the least expensive. Among INAH+INCS, azelastine‐fluticasone was more frequently identified as less costly than olopatadine‐mometasone. Conclusion: There is an important across‐country and across‐class variability in terms of costs of allergic rhinitis medications. The results of this study will inform the ARIA‐EAACI 2024–2025 guidelines.


  • Knowledge of Nurses and Primary Care Physicians on Inhaled Therapy Devices and Techniques

    by Francisco Javier Plaza-Zamora, Valentín López-Carrasco, Jordi Giner-Donaire, Jaime Gonzalvez-Rey, María del Carmen Mata-Hernández, Marta Villanueva Pérez

    Background: We aimed to assess the knowledge of health care professionals regarding inhaled therapy devices and techniques and to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted educational intervention. Methods: An educational program designed to update the knowledge and improve the technical skills of these professionals in the use of different types of inhalers was developed. Before and after each training session, we applied an ad hoc questionnaire that consisted of 15 multiple-choice questions on inhaled therapy grouped into three sections, including knowledge about devices used for inhaled therapy, knowledge about inhaler techniques, and knowledge about adherence to inhaled therapy, as well as the Test of the Adherence to Inhalers. The questionnaire also included a summary question. We calculated the mean score and the standard deviation for the pre- and postevaluations, compared the mean scores using Student’s t-test, and evaluated the relevance of the changes using Cohen’s d . Results: During the 23 meetings held throughout Spain, 267 participants completed the pretraining questionnaire, including 105 primary care physicians, 90 nurses of specialized care, 41 nurses working in primary care, and 31 health care professionals of various origins. Overall, the mean (SD) total score (i.e., number of correct answers out of a maximum of 15; range 0–15) significantly increased from 8.99 (2.26) to 11.46 (2.50) points, for a mean pre–post difference of 2.5 ( p < 0.001). Notable issues included the misidentification of device types and confusion between inhalation techniques for pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. The mean total scores significantly increased across the three main specialties, with large effect sizes in all cases. Conclusion: Our study suggests that both primary care physicians and nurses have relevant gaps in knowledge- and technique-related issues regarding the use of inhalation devices that could be improved using a brief educational intervention.

  • Open Access

    Second audit of the Happy Patient project: impact of training on the dispensing of antibiotics in community pharmacies in Spain

    by Francisco Javier Plaza Zamora, Ana Mendoza Barbero, Ana Molinero, Navidad Sánchez Marcos, Maarten Lambert, Katja Taxis, Ana García-Sangenis, Carles Llor

    Antibiotic resistance is a major public health problem. The European Happy Patient project aims to optimize antimicrobial use through audits and training of healthcare professionals, including community pharmacists. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the quality of antibiotic dispensing in Spanish community pharmacies and to identify areas for improvement following the training. A five-hour multifactorial intervention was conducted at IDIAP Jordi Gol (Barcelona) in January 2023, including feedback on results, communication workshops, and educational materials. Subse-quently, a second audit (February–April 2023) was carried out using the Audit Project Odense® method in 16 community pharmacies. A total of 450 dispensations of oral antibiotics for acute infections were analyzed. Sixty percent of patients were women, and 90% were aware of the indication for the antibiotic. Relevant increases were observed in safety checks: drug interactions (+26%), contraindications (+23%), and allergies (+20%), with all three being performed in 60% of cases. Personalized information provided to patients increased regarding treatment duration (66%à80%), antimicrobial resistance (30%à48%), and medicine return/disposal (6%à28%). Contact with the prescriber increased from 0.9% to 9.3%. The educational intervention significantly improved the quality of antibiotic dispensing by increasing patient counseling and safety checks. These results support the implementation of ongoing training programs that strengthen the clinical role of community pharmacists in the rational use of antibiotics and the fight against antimicrobial resistance.

  • Mapeo de comorbilidades en asma bronquial: análisis desagregado de exacerbaciones y uso de SABA y SAMA en la cohorte Seleida

    by D. Murillo García, V. González Blanco, J.M. Helguera Quevedo, C.M. Jiménez Ramos, J.M. Paredero Domínguez, J. Plaza Zamora, F.M. Navarro i Ros, J.D. Maya Viejo

  • COPD patient profiles in primary care. Referral criteria

    by E. Trillo-Calvo, J. de Miguel Díez, C. González Villaescusa, P. Panero Hidalgo, J.E. Cimas Hernando, M. Villanueva Pérez, F.J. Plaza Zamora, M. Sanz Almazán, J.M. Figueira-Gonçalves


  • Open Access

    Age and education as factors associated with medication literacy: a community pharmacy perspective

    by Javier Plaza-Zamora, Isabel Legaz, Eduardo Osuna, María D. Pérez-Cárceles

    Background: Aging implies a higher prevalence of chronic pathologies and a corresponding increase in medication. The correct adherence and use of the medication are prerequisites for reducing risks of disease progression, comorbidity, and mortality. Medication literacy (ML) is the specific ability to safely access and understand the information available concerning medication, and to act accordingly. Currently, there are few specific instruments that ascertain the extent of ML in the general population. The aim of this work was to analyse ML in a large cohort of pharmacy customers. Methods: A total of 400 community pharmacy clients were analyzed to assess the level of ML (documental and numeracy) through the validated MedLitRxSE tool. Results: The results showed that out of a total of 400 community pharmacy clients only 136 (34%) had an adequate degree of ML, while the rest of the clients (n = 264; 66%) were adjudged not to have this ability. Statistically significant differences were found between the different age groups in terms of ML (P < 0.001; OR = 0.312; 95% CI: 0.195–0.499), the 51–65 and >65-year age groups having a lower frequency of adequate ML (23.5 and 7.1%, respectively) than the rest of the age groups. A statistically significant increase in adequate ML was observed as the academic level of the clients increased (P < 0.001; OR = 15.403; 95% CI: 8.109–29.257). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed the influence of both variables on ML. Conclusions: An inadequate ML level was found in community pharmacy clients over the age of 51, and also in those with primary or non-formal studies. Our data add to our knowledge about ML, and should pharmacists and other health professionals to adopt new strategies to prevent, or at least reduce, errors in taking medicines, thus avoiding the undesirable effects of any misuse.


  • Discrepancies Between GEMA and GINA in the Classification of Inhaled Corticosteroids

    by Vicente Plaza, Antonio Gómez-Outes, Santiago Quirce Gancedo, Isam Alobid, Cesáreo Álvarez Rodríguez, Marina Blanco Aparicio, Gabriel García, Fernando Gómez Ruiz, Antonio Hidalgo Requena, Javier Korta Murua, et al.


  • Discrepancias en la clasificación de los glucocorticoides inhalados entre GEMA y GINA

    by Vicente Plaza Moral, Antonio Gómez-Outes, Santiago Quirce Gancedo, Isam Alobid, Cesáreo Álvarez Rodríguez, Marina Blanco Aparicio, Gabriel García, Fernando Gómez Ruiz, Antonio Hidalgo Requena, Javier Korta Murua, et al.