Maciej Jerzy Smialek

Messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs) acquire distinct protein compositions as they move from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, yet how this transition is coordinated and how inefficient remodeling affects downstream mRNA metabolism remains poorly understood. Here, we identify PAIP1 as a metazoan cofactor of the mRNA export ATPase DDX19. By binding a conserved N-terminal motif in DDX19, PAIP1 is recruited to the nuclear pore, where it promotes exchange of the nuclear poly(A)-binding protein PABPN1 for cytoplasmic PABPC1, thereby coupling mRNA export to cytoplasmic mRNP maturation. PAIP1 depletion alters cytoplasmic mRNP composition, mRNA stability and poly(A)-tail homeostasis. In Drosophila embryos, where poly(A)-tail regulation of maternal mRNAs directs early development, maternal PAIP1 depletion shortens poly(A)-tails, delays zygotic genome activation, and causes severe developmental defects. Our findings identify an export-coupled mRNP maturation pathway linking PABP exchange to downstream mRNA metabolism.

Increasingly many studies reveal how ribosome composition can be tuned to optimally translate the transcriptome of individual cell types. In this study, we investigated the expression pattern, structure within the ribosome and effect on protein synthesis of the ribosomal protein paralog 39L (RPL39L). With a novel mass spectrometric approach we have quantified the expression of RPL39L in human pluripotent cells, cancer cell lines and tissue samples, and in mouse germ cells. We generated RPL39L knock-out mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) lines and demonstrated that RPL39L impacts the dynamics of translation, to support the pluripotency and differentiation, spontaneous and along the germ cell lineage. Most differences in protein abundance between WT and RPL39L KO lines were explained by widespread proteasomal activity. By CryoEM analysis of purified RPL39 and RPL39L-containing ribosomes we found that, unlike RPL39, RPL39L has two distinct conformations in the exposed segment of the nascent peptide exit tunnel, creating a distinct hydrophobic patch that has been predicted to support the efficient co-translational folding of alpha helices. Our study shows that ribosomal protein paralogs provide switchable modular components that can tune translation to the protein production needs of individual cell types.

Nanos RNA-binding proteins are critical factors of germline development throughout the animal kingdom and their dysfunction causes infertility. During evolution, mammalian Nanos paralogues adopted divergent roles in germ cell biology. However, the molecular basis behind this divergence, such as their target mRNAs, remains poorly understood. Our RNA-sequencing analysis in a human primordial germ cell model-TCam-2 cell line revealed distinct pools of genes involved in the cell cycle process downregulated upon NANOS1 and NANOS3 overexpression. We show that NANOS1 and NANOS3 proteins influence different stages of the cell cycle. Namely, NANOS1 is involved in the G1/S and NANOS3 in the G2/M phase transition. Many of their cell cycle targets are known infertility and cancer-germ cell genes. Moreover, NANOS3 in complex with RNA-binding protein PUM1 causes 3′UTR-mediated repression of FOXM1 mRNA encoding a transcription factor crucial for G2/M phase transition. Interestingly, while NANOS3 and PUM1 act as post-transcriptional repressors of FOXM1, FOXM1 potentially acts as a transcriptional activator of NANOS3, PUM1, and itself. Finally, by utilizing publicly available RNA-sequencing datasets, we show that the balance between FOXM1-NANOS3 and FOXM1-PUM1 expression levels is disrupted in testis cancer, suggesting a potential role in this disease.

MAF is a transcription factor that may act either as a tumor suppressor or as an oncogene, depending on cell type. We have shown previously that the overexpressed miR-1290 influences MAF protein levels in LSCC (laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma) cell lines. In this study, we shed further light on the interaction between miR-1290 and MAF, as well as on cellular MAF protein localization in LSCC. We confirmed the direct interaction between miR-1290 and MAF 3′UTR by a dual-luciferase reporter assay. In addition, we used immunohistochemistry staining to analyze MAF protein distribution and observed loss of MAF nuclear expression in 58% LSCC samples, of which 10% showed complete absence of MAF, compared to nuclear and cytoplasmatic expression in 100% normal mucosa. Using TCGA data, bisulfite pyrosequencing and CNV analysis, we excluded the possibility that loss-of-function mutations, promoter region DNA methylation or CNV are responsible for MAF loss in LSCC. Finally, we identified genes involved in the regulation of apoptosis harboring the MAF binding motif in their promoter region by applied FIMO and DAVID GO analysis. Our results highlight the role of miR-1290 in suppressing MAF expression in LSCC. Furthermore, MAF loss or mislocalization in FFPE LSCC tumor samples might suggest that MAF acts as a LSCC tumor suppressor by regulating apoptosis.

Until recently, post-transcriptional gene regulation (PTGR), in contrast to transcriptional regulation, was not extensively explored in cancer, even though it seems to be highly important. PUM proteins are well described in the PTGR of several organisms and contain the PUF RNA-binding domain that recognizes the UGUANAUA motif, located mostly in the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs. Depending on the protein cofactors recruited by PUM proteins, target mRNAs are directed towards translation, repression, activation, degradation, or specific localization. Abnormal profiles of PUM expression have been shown in several types of cancer, in some of them being different for PUM1 and PUM2. This review summarizes the dysregulation of PUM1 and PUM2 expression in several cancer tissues. It also describes the regulatory mechanisms behind the activity of PUMs, including cooperation with microRNA and non-coding RNA machineries, as well as the alternative polyadenylation pathway. It also emphasizes the importance of future studies to gain a more complete picture of the role of PUM proteins in different types of cancer. Such studies may result in identification of novel targets for future cancer therapies.

While two mouse NANOS paralogues, NANOS2 and NANOS3, are crucial for maintenance of germ cells by suppression of apoptosis, the mouse NANOS1 paralogue does not seem to regulate these processes. Previously, we described a human NANOS1 p.[(Pro34Thr);(Ser83del)] mutation associated with the absence of germ cells in seminiferous tubules of infertile patients, which might suggest an anti-apoptotic role of human NANOS1. In this study, we aimed to determine a potential influence of human NANOS1 on the maintenance of TCam-2 model germ cells by investigating proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. Constructs encoding wild-type or mutated human NANOS1 were used for transfection of TCam-2 cells, in order to investigate the effect of NANOS1 on cell proliferation, which was studied using a colorimetric assay, as well as apoptosis and the cell cycle, which were measured by flow cytometry. RNA-Seq (RNA sequencing) analysis followed by RT-qPCR (reverse transcription and quantitative polymerase chain reaction) was conducted for identifying pro-apoptotic genes repressed by NANOS1. Here, we show that overexpression of NANOS1 downregulates apoptosis in TCam-2 cells. Moreover, we found that NANOS1 represses a set of pro-apoptotic genes at the mRNA level. We also found that the infertility-associated p.[(Pro34Thr);(Ser83del)] mutation causes NANOS1 to functionally switch from being anti-apoptotic to pro-apoptotic in the human male germ cell line. Thus, this report is the first to show an anti-apoptotic role of NANOS1 exerted by negative regulation of mRNAs of pro-apoptotic genes.

Mammalian Pumilio (PUM) proteins are sequence-specific, RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) with wide-ranging roles. They are involved in germ cell development, which has functional implications in development and fertility. Although human PUM1 and PUM2 are closely related to each other and recognize the same RNA binding motif, there is some evidence for functional diversity. To address that problem, first we used RIP-Seq and RNA-Seq approaches, and identified mRNA pools regulated by PUM1 and PUM2 proteins in the TCam-2 cell line, a human male germ cell model. Second, applying global mass spectrometry-based profiling, we identified distinct PUM1- and PUM2-interacting putative protein cofactors, most of them involved in RNA processing. Third, combinatorial analysis of RIP and RNA-Seq, mass spectrometry, and RNA motif enrichment analysis revealed that PUM1 and PUM2 form partially varied RNP-regulatory networks (RNA regulons), which indicate different roles in human reproduction and testicular tumorigenesis. Altogether, this work proposes that protein paralogues with very similar and evolutionary highly conserved functional domains may play divergent roles in the cell by combining with different sets of protein cofactors. Our findings highlight the versatility of PUM paralogue-based post-transcriptional regulation, offering insight into the mechanisms underlying their diverse biological roles and diseases resulting from their dysfunction.

Regulation of proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle is crucial for the physiology of germ cells. Their malfunction contributes to infertility and germ cell tumours. The kinesin KIF18A is an important regulator of those processes in animal germ cells. Post-transcriptional regulation of KIF18A has not been extensively explored. Owing to the presence of PUM-binding elements (PBEs), KIF18A mRNA is a potential target of PUM proteins, where PUM refers to Pumilio proteins, RNA-binding proteins that act in post-transcriptional gene regulation. We conducted RNA co-immunoprecipitation combined with RT-qPCR, as well as luciferase reporter assays, by applying an appropriate luciferase construct encoding wild-type KIF18A 3′-UTR, upon PUM overexpression or knockdown in TCam-2 cells, representing human male germ cells. We found that KIF18A is repressed by PUM1 and PUM2. To study how this regulation influences KIF18A function, an MTS proliferation assay, and apoptosis and cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry, was performed upon KIF18A mRNA siRNA knockdown. KIF18A significantly influences proliferation, apoptosis and the cell cycle, with its effects being opposite to PUM effects. Repression by PUM proteins might represent one of mechanisms influencing KIF18A level in controlling proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in TCam-2 cells.

Background: While Nanos-mediated maintenance of germ cells in Drosophila and mice has been related to regulation of apoptosis, the relevance of these findings to human physiology is uncertain. Previously we have described the p.[(Pro34Thr);(Ser83del)] double NANOS1 mutation as associated with an absence of germ cells in the testes of infertile patients. The aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying infertility phenotype of patients bearing the NANOS1 mutation. Methods: Constructs encoding a wild-type or mutated NANOS1 protein were used for transfection of TCam-2 cell line, representing male germ cells in culture. Influence of this mutation on cell proliferation was performed using MTS assay while apoptosis and cell cycle were measured by flow cytometry. RNA-Seq analysis including quantitative RT-PCR was conducted for selecting pro-apoptotic genes, repressed by the wild-type NANOS1. Influence of the p.[(Pro34Thr);(Ser83del)] NANOS1 mutation on that repression was investigated by quantitative RT-PCR. Results: We show here that the p.[(Pro34Thr);(Ser83del)] double NANOS1 mutation causes NANOS1 to functionally switch from being anti-apoptotic to pro-apoptotic in the human male germ cell line TCam-2. This mutation disrupts repression of mRNAs encoding pro-apoptotic GADG45A, GADD45B, GADD45G and RHOB factors, which could contribute to an increase in apoptosis. Conclusions: This report underscores the conservation of Nanos from flies to humans as a repressor of pro-apoptotic mRNAs in germ cells, and provides a basis for understanding NANOS1 functions in human reproductive health.

Regulation of proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle is crucial for the physiology of germ cells. Their malfunction contributes to infertility and germ cell tumours. Kinesin KIF18A is an important germ cell specific regulator which downregulates apoptosis while promoting cell proliferation in animal models. Whereas regulation of KIF18A expression was studied at the transcriptional level, its posttranscriptional regulation has not been extensively explored. Due to the presence of two PUM Binding Elements (PBEs) within 3’UTR, KIF18A mRNA is a potential target of PUMs, well known RNA-binding proteins involved in posttranscriptional gene regulation (PTGR). We investigated that possibility in TCam-2 cells originating from seminoma, representing human male germ cells. We conducted RNA co-immunoprecipitation combined with RT-qPCR, as well as luciferase reporter assay by applying appropriate luciferase construct encoding the wild type KIF18A 3’UTR, upon PUM1 and PUM2 overexpression or knockdown. We found that KIF18A is repressed by PUM1 and PUM2. To study how this regulation influences KIF18A function in TCam-2 cells, MTS proliferation assay, apoptosis and cell cycle, analysis using flow cytometry was performed upon KIF18A siRNA knockdown. We uncovered that KIF18A significantly influences proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle, these effects being opposite to PUM effects in TCam-2 cells. We propose that repression by PUM proteins may represent one of mechanisms influencing KIF18A level in controlling proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in TCam-2 cells. To the best of our knowledge, this paper identifies the first mammalian functionally germ cell specific gene that is regulated by Pum proteins via 3’UTR.