Bahram Forouzesh

Purpose: This phase I study evaluated the feasibility, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary evidence of anticancer activity of the sequential administration of paclitaxel and trabectedin on an every-2-week schedule in patients with refractory solid malignancies. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level on this schedule, as well as to recommend doses for disease-directed studies. Experimental Design: Twenty-seven patients were treated with paclitaxel (80-120 mg/m²; 1-hour i.v. infusion, day 1) and trabectedin (0.525-0.775 mg/m²; 3-hour i.v. infusion, day 2) with doses increased in successive cohorts. Blood sampling for PK and drug-drug interaction studies was done. Results: Neutropenia, which resulted in treatment delay exceeding 1 week, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity for this paclitaxel-trabectedin regimen and precluded dose escalation above 120 mg/m² paclitaxel and 0.650 mg/m² trabectedin. At the MTD (120 mg/m² paclitaxel and 0.650 mg/m² trabectedin), the safety profile was favorable in patients receiving cumulative treatment. Relevant drug-drug PK interactions between paclitaxel and trabectedin were not identified. A patient with soft tissue sarcoma had a complete response and several patients with various refractory solid malignancies showed protracted stable disease as their best response. Conclusions: The MTD level of sequential paclitaxel 1-hour infusion (day 1) and trabectedin 3-hour infusion (day 2) administered every 2 weeks is 120 and 0.650 mg/m², respectively. The manageable toxicities at the MTD, preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, and lack of notable PK drug-drug interactions warrant further disease-directed studies of this regimen in relevant tumor types and settings. Clin Cancer Res; 16(9); 2656–65. ©2010 AACR.

Purpose: This study was designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics, and to seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity of trabectedin, a novel marine-derived DNA minor grove binder, when administered as a 1-hour or 3-hour i.v. infusion for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) levels of trabectedin on these schedules, as well as to recommend doses for disease-directed studies.

An oral formulation of temsirolimus (Torisel®), an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, was evaluated on an intermittent schedule (once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced cancer. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 75 mg after dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 elevated aminotransferases (1 patient) and grade 3 rash (1 patient) occurred with a 100-mg dose. The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events were mucositis, rash/maculopapular rash, and asthenia. Six of 12 patients who received the 75-mg dose required dose reductions due to temsirolimus-related adverse events. Two patients who received 75-mg temsirolimus and did not have dose reductions had minor tumor responses. Relative exposure from contributions of both temsirolimus and sirolimus, the principal metabolite, was 17.9% of the 75-mg dose. Thus, oral temsirolimus, 75 mg administered once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks, was further evaluated in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of administering XRP6258, a new taxane with a low affinity for the multidrug resistance 1 protein, as a 1-hour i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. The study also sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose, to describe the pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of the compound, and to seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. Experimental Design: Twenty-five patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with 102 courses of XRP6258 at four dose levels ranging from 10 to 25 mg/m². Dose escalation was based on the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at each dose level, provided that PK variables were favorable. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as the dose at which at least two patients developed a DLT at the first course. Results: Neutropenia was the principal DLT, with one patient experiencing febrile neutropenia and two others showing prolonged grade 4 neutropenia at the 25 mg/m² dose level. Nonhematologic toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, neurotoxicity, and fatigue, were generally mild to moderate in severity. XRP6258 exhibited dose-proportional PK, a triphasic elimination profile, a long terminal half-life (77.3 hours), a high clearance (mean CL, 53.5 L/h), and a large volume of distribution (mean V_ss, 2,034 L/m²). Objective antitumor activity included partial responses in two patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma, one unconfirmed partial response, and two minor responses. Conclusion: The recommended phase II dose of XRP6258 on this schedule is 20 mg/m². The general tolerability and encouraging antitumor activity in taxane-refractory patients warrant further evaluations of XRP6258.

Cisplatin remains a principal chemotherapy agent in the treatment of many solid tumours. However because of its nephrotoxicity, inpatient hydration schedules have been utilized to ensure safe administration. In May 1995, due to significant load on in-patient bed availability, the Medical Oncology Department of the Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, developed a short, intravenous fluid hydration protocol to be used on an out-patient setting. Following an initial pilot program of the abbreviated hydration regimen, a retrospective study of all adult in-patients and out-patients who received cisplatin (60-100 mg/m2) from May 1995 to August 1998 was conducted. Biochemistry was performed prior to the start of chemotherapy, and a repeat serum creatinine level was taken immediately prior to each subsequent cycle of chemotherapy, unless clinically indicated at an earlier time. The in-patient hydration protocol was 6000 ml of normal saline with 60 mmol/L KCL, and 30 mmol/L MgSO4 over 24 to 28 hours, and the out-patient hydration was 4000 ml of normal saline over 6 hours. A total of 145 patients were included, 57 in-patient (39%) and 88 out-patients (61%), 95 males, and 50 females. The mean age was 56 years. The maximum mean percentage change in creatinine from baseline for all cycles of chemotherapy for in-patients was 32.5% ranging from -7% to 288% (95% CI=19.9-45.11), and for outpatients 19.9% ranging from -20% to 154% (95% CI=13.47-26.39). Although the mean increase was higher in the in-patient group by 12.6%, it was not statistically significant (p=0.079). In patient's eligible for cis-platinum therapy on the basis of good performance status and normal renal function, this agent can be safely administered in the out-patient setting with an abbreviated duration, moderate volume intravenous hydration regimen.

Purpose: This phase I study evaluated the effect of folate supplementation on the toxicity, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. It also examined two different types of vitamin supplementation and whether the extent of prior myelosuppressive therapy affected pemetrexed tolerability. Patients and Methods: Patients received a 10-min infusion of 600 to 14,00 mg/m² pemetrexed every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified into cohorts by pretreatment status [lightly pretreated (LPT) or heavily pretreated (HPT)] and were supplemented with intermittent high-dose folic acid (HDFA) or with continuous daily multivitamins (MVI) containing nutritional doses of folic acid. Pemetrexed plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated for cycle 1. Results: Sixty-two HDFA patients (28 HPT and 34 LPT) were treated with 204 cycles of pemetrexed, and 43 MVI patients (20 HPT and 23 LPT) were treated with 182 cycles. Hematologic dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (5 of 105 patients), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (4 of 105 patients), and febrile neutropenia (3 of 105 patients). Nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue, vomiting, diarrhea, and nausea. Pemetrexed doses of 800 and 1,050 mg/m² were well tolerated when administered with vitamin supplementation to HPT and LPT patients, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in toxicities or pemetrexed pharmacokinetics for LPT versus HPT patients or for patients receiving HDFA versus daily MVI supplementation. Conclusions: The pemetrexed doses tolerated in this study with vitamin supplementation were significantly higher than those tolerated in earlier studies without supplementation, and toxicities were independent of the type of vitamin supplementation or prior myelosuppressive treatment. The recommended dose of pemetrexed is 1,050 mg/m² in LPT patients and 800 mg/m² in HPT patients, irrespective of the type of vitamin supplementation.

This phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity of the tetracycline analog COL-3, a potent inhibitor of metalloproteinases (MMPs), particularly MMP-2 and MMP-9, on a continuous oral schedule at a dose of 50 mg/m² daily in patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The principal endpoints were the rate of objective tumor regression and the proportion of patients who did not experience disease progression during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Other study objectives included an assessment of pharmacology of COL-3, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival. A Simon two-stage design with multinomial stopping rule was employed, with 15 patients enrolled during the first stage of the study. Although COL-3 was generally well-tolerated, there were no objective responses and 5(33%) patients experienced disease progression during the first 8 weeks of treatment, which exceeded the criteria established a priori with regard to pursuing further evaluations of COL-3 in STS. The median values for TTP and survival were 109 and 279 days, respectively. Based on these results, further studies of COL-3 on this administration schedule in patients with STS are not warranted.

Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to characterize the principal toxicities and determine the maximum tolerated dose of the multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed administered in combination with irinotecan. The study also sought to detect major pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between these agents and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Experimental Design: Pemetrexed was administered as a 10-min i.v. infusion followed by irinotecan given i.v. over 90 min every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid malignancies. The study objectives were first pursued in heavily pretreated patients and then in lightly pretreated patients who also received vitamin supplementation. Results: Twenty-three heavily pretreated patients enrolled in the first stage of the study, and the maximum tolerated dose level of pemetrexed/irinotecan without vitamin supplementation was 400/250 mg/m²; further dose escalation was precluded by severe neutropenia that was protracted and/or associated with fever. In the second stage of the study, 28 lightly pretreated patients were administered pemetrexed/irinotecan with vitamin supplementation; these patients tolerated pemetrexed/irinotecan at a dose level of 500/350 mg/m², which reflected clinically relevant single-agent doses of both agents. No major pharmacokinetic interactions between the agents were evident. Four patients, two patients each with colorectal cancer refractory to fluoropyrimidines and advanced mesothelioma, had partial responses. Conclusions: The pemetrexed/irinotecan regimen is well tolerated in patients with advanced solid malignancies at clinically relevant single-agent doses. The recommended dose level of pemetrexed/irinotecan for subsequent disease-directed evaluations involving lightly pretreated patients is 500/350 mg/m² every 3 weeks with vitamin supplementation.