Arisa Yamaguchi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Arisa Yamaguchi has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Naho Morisaki
Department of Social Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
2 shared publications - Yui Yamaoka
Department of Public Health, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
2 shared publications Aurelie Piedvache
Department of Social Medicine National Center for Child Health and Development Setagaya‐ku Japan
1 shared publicationAyaka Hasegawa
Department of Social Medicine National Center for Child Health and Development Setagaya‐ku Japan
1 shared publication- Christina Bethell
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
1 shared publication Harumi Sonehara
Natl Ctr Child Hlth & Dev, Dept Psychosocial Med, Tokyo, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 October 2024
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Paediatrics Open
- Vol. 8 (1) , e002962
How listening to children impacts their quality of life: a cross-sectional study of school-age children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan
Objective: To examine the association between children’s quality of life (QOL) and their experience of being heard by family and/or teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design: A cross-sectional study.Settings: A randomly sampled postal survey of fifth or eighth grade children conducted in December 2020 in Japan.Participants: Responses from child/caregiver dyads (n=700) were adjusted for complex sampling to ensure the sample’s national representativeness, incorporating all regions.Interventions: Based on the survey results, children were categorised as ‘being heard’ if they reported being frequently asked about their thoughts regarding the pandemic and having their thoughts and feelings considered by family, teachers or both.Main outcome measures: Overall QOL and six QOL subscales measured through the Kid-KINDL Questionnaire (KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents).Results: About half (52.9%) of children were heard by both family and teachers, with higher rates in fifth grade (59.9%) than in eighth grade (45.1%). The adjusted prevalence ratio for above median QOL was 4.40-fold (95% CI: 2.80 to 6.94) higher in children heard by both family and teachers than in unheard children. Associations remained significant but were lower in children heard only by family or teachers. QOL subscales showed similar associations, with family, self-esteem and friends being the strongest. Children asked for their thoughts or feelings without adult consideration did not exhibit higher QOL.Conclusions: ‘Being heard’ during the pandemic was positively associated with higher QOL. Recognising children’s right to be heard and promoting environments where they are heard at home and school may improve their well-being.
- 23 October 2024
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Paediatrics Open
- Vol. 8 (1) , e002962
Open AccessHow listening to children impacts their quality of life: a cross-sectional study of school-age children during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan
Objective: To examine the association between children’s quality of life (QOL) and their experience of being heard by family and/or teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design: A cross-sectional study.Settings: A randomly sampled postal survey of fifth or eighth grade children conducted in December 2020 in Japan.Participants: Responses from child/caregiver dyads (n=700) were adjusted for complex sampling to ensure the sample’s national representativeness, incorporating all regions.Interventions: Based on the survey results, children were categorised as ‘being heard’ if they reported being frequently asked about their thoughts regarding the pandemic and having their thoughts and feelings considered by family, teachers or both.Main outcome measures: Overall QOL and six QOL subscales measured through the Kid-KINDL Questionnaire (KINDL Questionnaire for Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents).Results: About half (52.9%) of children were heard by both family and teachers, with higher rates in fifth grade (59.9%) than in eighth grade (45.1%). The adjusted prevalence ratio for above median QOL was 4.40-fold (95% CI: 2.80 to 6.94) higher in children heard by both family and teachers than in unheard children. Associations remained significant but were lower in children heard only by family or teachers. QOL subscales showed similar associations, with family, self-esteem and friends being the strongest. Children asked for their thoughts or feelings without adult consideration did not exhibit higher QOL.Conclusions: ‘Being heard’ during the pandemic was positively associated with higher QOL. Recognising children’s right to be heard and promoting environments where they are heard at home and school may improve their well-being.
- 10 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Child Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 134, 105867
The characteristics of children referred to a child protection team in Japan and factors associated with decision-making: A retrospective study using a medical database
- 10 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Child Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 134, 105867
The characteristics of children referred to a child protection team in Japan and factors associated with decision-making: A retrospective study using a medical database
- Open Access
- 18 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Pediatrics International
- Vol. 64 (1) , e14913
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the rights of the child in Japan
Background: Few studies have used direct reports by children to assess how the rights documented in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) have been affected during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Methods: Data were obtained from the CORONA‐CODOMO Survey, a web‐based survey conducted from April to May 2020 in Japan, targeting children aged 7–17 and parents/guardians of children aged 0–17. We focused on self‐reports from children, including two open‐ended questions asking their needs and opinions. The results were analyzed according to the five categories of rights defined by the CRC: education, health, safety, play, and participation. Results: Among the 2,591 children who participated in the survey, 1,292 children (49.9%) answered at least one of the two open‐ended questions. The most frequent concern was COVID‐19 infecting members of their families (78.2%), followed by the inability to see their friends (74.3%). There were 1,523 direct comments from children. The comments covered a wide range of the rights in the CRC, including reopening of schools, disparities in education, access to health information, alternatives for playing and seeing friends, and needs for participation and being heard. Few comments were related to safety whereas a certain proportion of children were victimized within households. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the rights outlined in the CRC have been restricted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Health and educational professionals working with children and policymakers should introduce the rights‐based approach to protect the best interests of children during and after the pandemic.
- 18 December 2021
- Published by Wiley in Pediatrics International
- Vol. 64 (1) , e14913
Open AccessThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the rights of the child in Japan
Background: Few studies have used direct reports by children to assess how the rights documented in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) have been affected during the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Methods: Data were obtained from the CORONA‐CODOMO Survey, a web‐based survey conducted from April to May 2020 in Japan, targeting children aged 7–17 and parents/guardians of children aged 0–17. We focused on self‐reports from children, including two open‐ended questions asking their needs and opinions. The results were analyzed according to the five categories of rights defined by the CRC: education, health, safety, play, and participation. Results: Among the 2,591 children who participated in the survey, 1,292 children (49.9%) answered at least one of the two open‐ended questions. The most frequent concern was COVID‐19 infecting members of their families (78.2%), followed by the inability to see their friends (74.3%). There were 1,523 direct comments from children. The comments covered a wide range of the rights in the CRC, including reopening of schools, disparities in education, access to health information, alternatives for playing and seeing friends, and needs for participation and being heard. Few comments were related to safety whereas a certain proportion of children were victimized within households. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the rights outlined in the CRC have been restricted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Health and educational professionals working with children and policymakers should introduce the rights‐based approach to protect the best interests of children during and after the pandemic.