Carlo Maria Bellanca

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery is an established therapeutic option for severe obesity and obesity-related medical problems. Although minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery pathways have reduced postoperative morbidity, infectious complications remain clinically relevant because they may lead to readmission, reoperation, prolonged antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on infectious complications after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Evidence was synthesized across five clinically relevant domains: host-related pathophysiology, microbial epidemiology, preoperative optimization, antimicrobial prophylaxis and pharmacokinetic considerations, and diagnosis and management of postoperative infectious complications. Results: Patients with obesity present specific infection-related vulnerabilities, including chronic low-grade inflammation, altered immune responses, impaired tissue oxygenation, obesity-related medical problems, and procedure-specific risks. Contemporary prevention relies on multidisciplinary preoperative optimization, appropriate skin antisepsis, weight-based antimicrobial prophylaxis, intraoperative redosing when indicated, and adherence to enhanced recovery principles. Anastomotic leaks and intra-abdominal abscesses represent the most severe organ/space infections and require early recognition, source control, antimicrobial therapy, nutritional support, and coordinated surgical, radiological, and endoscopic management. Conclusions: Infectious complications after metabolic and bariatric surgery result from the interaction between host physiology, microbial factors, pharmacological considerations, and surgical technique. A structured approach integrating prevention, early diagnosis, and multidisciplinary management may improve outcomes. Further bariatric-specific studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base for several preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Determining the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) is a critical challenge in clinical medicine, balancing therapeutic efficacy against the risks of adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance. This narrative review synthesises current evidence and guidelines regarding antibiotic duration for MDR-GNB infections, emphasising bloodstream infections (BSI), hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), and intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Despite robust evidence supporting shorter courses (3–7 days) in uncomplicated infections caused by more susceptible pathogens, data guiding optimal therapy duration for MDR-GNB remain limited, particularly concerning carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-Pa), and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Current guidelines from major societies, including IDSA and ESCMID, provide explicit antimicrobial selection advice but notably lack detailed recommendations on the duration of therapy. Existing studies demonstrate non-inferiority of shorter versus longer antibiotic courses in specific clinical contexts but frequently exclude critically ill patients or those infected with non-fermenting MDR pathogens. Individualised duration decisions must integrate clinical response, patient immunologic status, infection severity, source control adequacy, and pharmacologic considerations. Significant knowledge gaps persist, underscoring the urgent need for targeted research, particularly randomised controlled trials assessing optimal antibiotic duration for the most challenging MDR-GNB infections. Clinicians must navigate considerable uncertainty, relying on nuanced judgement and close monitoring to achieve successful outcomes while advancing antimicrobial stewardship goals.

Acinetobacter baumannii represents a significant concern in nosocomial settings, particularly in critically ill patients who are forced to remain in hospital for extended periods. The challenge of managing and preventing this organism is further compounded by its increasing ability to develop resistance due to its extraordinary genomic plasticity, particularly in response to adverse environmental conditions. Its recognition as a significant public health risk has provided a significant impetus for the identification of new therapeutic approaches and infection control strategies. Indeed, currently used antimicrobial agents are gradually losing their efficacy, neutralized by newer and newer mechanisms of bacterial resistance, especially to carbapenem antibiotics. A deep understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms is urgently needed to shed light on the properties that allow A. baumannii enormous resilience against standard therapies. Among the most promising alternatives under investigation are the combination sulbactam/durlobactam, cefepime/zidebactam, imipenem/funobactam, xeruborbactam, and the newest molecules such as novel polymyxins or zosurabalpin. Furthermore, the potential of phage therapy, as well as deep learning and artificial intelligence, offer a complementary approach that could be particularly useful in cases where traditional strategies fail. The fight against A. baumannii is not confined to the microcosm of microbiological research or hospital wards; instead, it is a broader public health dilemma that demands a coordinated, global response.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD), marked by cognitive impairment, predominantly affects the brain regions regulated by cholinergic innervation, such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Cholinergic dysfunction, a key contributor to age-related cognitive decline, has spurred investigations into potential therapeutic interventions. We have previously shown that choline alphoscerate (α-GPC), a cholinergic neurotransmission-enhancing agent, protects from Aβ-mediated neurotoxicity. Herein, we investigated the effects of α-GPC on the microglial phenotype in response to Aβ via modulation of the nicotinic alpha-7 acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR). BV2 microglial cells were pre-treated for 1 h with α-GPC and were treated for 24, 48, and 72 h with Aβ_1–42 and/or α-BTX, a selective α7nAchR antagonist. Fluorescent immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis showed that α-GPC was able to antagonize Aβ-induced inflammatory effects. Of note, α-GPC exerted its anti-inflammatory effect by directly activating the α7nAChR receptor, as suggested by the induction of an increase in [Ca²⁺]_i and Ach-like currents. Considering that cholinergic transmission appears crucial in regulating the inflammatory profiles of glial cells, its modulation emerges as a potential pharmaco-therapeutic target to improve outcomes in inflammatory neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD.

The European Medicine Agency (EMA) has defined Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) as “a noxious and unintended response to a medicine”, not including poisoning, accidental, or intentional overdoses. The ADR occurrence differs based on the approach adopted for defining and detecting them, the characteristics of the population under study, and the research setting. ADRs have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality, particularly among older adults, and represent a financial burden for health services. Between 30% and 60% of ADRs might be predictable and preventable, emerging as a result of inappropriate prescription, drug chemistry inherent toxicity, cell-specific drug toxicity, age- and sex-related anomalies in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME), and drug–drug interactions (DDIs) in combination therapies or when a patient is treated with different drugs for concomitant disorders. This is particularly important in chronic diseases which require long-term treatments. Rapid developments in pharmacogenetics/genomics have improved the understanding of ADRs accompanied by more accurate prescriptions and reduction in unnecessary costs. To alleviate the burden of ADRs, especially in the elderly, interventions focused on pharmaceutical principles, such as medication review and reconciliation, should be integrated into a broader assessment of patients’ characteristics, needs, and health priorities. Digital health interventions could offer valuable solutions to assist healthcare professionals in identifying inappropriate prescriptions and promoting patient adherence to pharmacotherapies.

TRAIL, a member of TNF superfamily, is a potent inducer of neuronal death. Neurotoxic effects of TRAIL appear mediated by its death receptor TRAIL-R2/DR5. To assess the role of TRAIL/TRAIL-R2 pathway in AD-related neurodegeneration, we studied the impact of the treatment with amyloid-β (Aβ) upon cell viability and inflammation in TRAIL-R-deficient mice (TRAIL-R^−/−). Here, we demonstrate that the lack of TRAIL-R2 protects from death cultured TRAIL-R^−/− mouse embryonic hippocampal cells after treatment with either Aβ1-42 or TRAIL. Consistently, stereotaxic injection of Aβ1-42 resulted in blunted caspase activation, as well as in reduction of JNK phosphorylation and increased AKT phosphorylation in TRAIL-R^−/− mice. Moreover, the lack of TRAIL-R2 was associated with blunted constitutive p53 expression in mice that have undergone Aβ1-42 treatment, as well as in decrease of phosphorylated forms of tau and GSK3β proteins. Likewise, TRAIL-R2 appears essential to both TRAIL and Aβ-mediated neurotoxicity and inflammation. Indeed, hippocampi of TRAIL-R^−/− mice challenged with Aβ1-42, showed a slight expression of microglial (Iba-1) and astrocytic (GFAP) markers along with attenuated levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, NOS2 and COX2. In conclusion, the bulk of these results demonstrate that the constitutive lack of TRAIL-R2 is associated with a substantial reduction of noxious effects of Aβ1-42, providing further evidence on the prominent role played by TRAIL in course of Aβ-related neurodegeneration and confirming that the TRAIL system represents a potential target for innovative AD therapy.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia worldwide, with a complex, poorly understood pathogenesis. Cerebral atrophy, amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles represent the main pathological hallmarks of the AD brain. Recently, neuroinflammation has been recognized as a prominent feature of the AD brain and substantial evidence suggests that the inflammatory response modulates disease progression. Additionally, dysregulation of calcium (Ca²⁺) homeostasis represents another early factor involved in the AD pathogenesis, as intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration is essential to ensure proper cellular and neuronal functions. Although growing evidence supports the involvement of Ca²⁺ in the mechanisms of neurodegeneration-related inflammatory processes, scant data are available on its contribution in microglia and astrocytes functioning, both in health and throughout the AD continuum. Nevertheless, AD-related aberrant Ca²⁺ signalling in astrocytes and microglia is crucially involved in the mechanisms underpinning neuroinflammatory processes that, in turn, impact neuronal Ca²⁺ homeostasis and brain function. In this light, we attempted to provide an overview of the current understanding of the interactions between the glia cells-mediated inflammatory responses and the molecular mechanisms involved in Ca²⁺ homeostasis dysregulation in AD.

Bacterial prostatitis infections are described as infections that are difficult-to-treat, due to prostate anatomic characteristics along with clinical difficulty in terms of diagnosis and management. Furthermore, the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producer Escherichia coli, also representing the main causative pathogen in prostatitis, poses major problems in terms of antibiotic management and favorable clinical outcome. Oral fosfomycin, an antibiotic commonly used for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), has been recently evaluated for the treatment of bacterial prostatitis due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile, its activity against MDR gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, safety profile, and multiple synergic effect with other antibiotics as well as the low resistance rate. This review addresses fosfomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and discusses the latest clinical evidence on its clinical use to treat acute and chronic bacterial prostatitis in hospitalized patients and in outpatients. As described in several reports, oral fosfomycin may represent a valid therapeutic option to treat susceptible germs commonly causing prostatitis, such as E. coli and other Enterobacterales as well as Enterococcus faecium, even as a first-line regimen in particular clinical settings (patients with previous treatment failure, with allergies or outpatients). Stronger data from further studies, including randomized controlled trials, would be helpful to establish the proper dosage and specific indications.

Two years have passed since WHO declared a pandemic state for SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 pathogenesis consists of a first viral phase responsible for early symptoms followed by an inflammatory phase, cytokine-mediated, responsible for late-onset manifestations up to ARDS. The dysregulated immune response has an outstanding role in the progression of pulmonary damage in COVID-19. IL-6, through the induction of pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines, plays a key role in the development and maintenance of inflammation, acting as a pioneer of the hyperinflammatory condition and cytokine storm in severe COVID-19. Therefore, drugs targeting both IL-6 and IL-6 receptors have been evaluated in order to blunt the abnormal SARS-CoV-2-induced cytokine release. Sarilumab, a high-affinity anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, may represent a promising weapon to treat the fearsome hyperinflammatory phase by improving the outcome of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Further prospective and well-designed clinical studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed to assess the efficacy and the safety of this therapeutic approach to achieve improved outcomes in COVID-19.

Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the progressive loss of structure and/or function of both neurons and glial cells, leading to different degrees of pathology and loss of cognition. The hypothesis of circuit reconstruction in the damaged brain via direct cell replacement has been pursued extensively so far. In this context, stem cells represent a useful option since they provide tissue restoration through the substitution of damaged neuronal cells with exogenous stem cells and create a neuro-protective environment through the release of bioactive molecules for healthy neurons, as well. These peculiar properties of stem cells are opening to potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of severe neurodegenerative disorders, for which the absence of effective treatment options leads to an increasingly socio-economic burden. Currently, the introduction of new technologies in the field of stem cells and the implementation of alternative cell tissues sources are pointing to exciting frontiers in this area of research. Here, we provide an update of the current knowledge about source and administration routes of stem cells, and review light and shadows of cells replacement therapy for the treatment of the three main neurodegenerative disorders (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s, and Alzheimer’s disease).