Rajendra Sakhrekar

Background: Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), without causing significant neurological deficit, is a more frequently occurring disease of the spine affecting the activities of daily living with chronic back pain and sometimes progressing to produce significant functional deficit. Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression (SELD) is being increasingly used as a treatment modality for these conditions and has been shown to give effective results. We present the clinical outcomes of the patients undergoing SELD in our institute for HNP. Methods: A retrospective study of 411 patients who underwent SELD for lumbar disc herniation was done, analyzing the clinical outcomes by measuring visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Short form health survey (SF -36) scores and followed up for 6 months. Results: A total of 195 males and 216 females underwent SELD, with a mean age of 33.2 ± 0.9 years and a mean follow-up period of 7 ± 1.6 months. VAS scores for back pain and leg pain improved significantly from 6.9 ± 0.5 and 6.6 ± 0.6 preoperatively to 1.1 ± 0.5 (P > 0.05) and 0.4 ± 0.5 (P > 0.05) at 6 months. ODI score decreased from 28.2 ± 1.7 to 9.4 ± 1.7 at 6 months from the intervention (P < 0.05). SF-36 showed significant improvement in overall categories through 6 months of follow-up. Twenty-four patients had dural punctures, and four patients needed blood patches but recovered without any complications. One patient had aggravation of the disc herniation post-procedure, and was managed by endoscopic discectomy. Conclusion: SELD is a safe, accurate, and effective procedure in treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniation with excellent clinical outcomes and effective pain relief with minimal damage to paraspinal muscles with an easier learning curve, reproducible results, and high safety index.

Study Design: Retrospective study.Purpose: This study aimed to propose a method of performing unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-assisted interbody cage insertion for fusion using the “insert and revolve” technique and analyze the clinico-radiological outcomes.Overview of Literature: UBE-assisted lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) is a rapidly evolving technique combining the advantages of minimally invasive technique with ease of learning. The limited size of cages was a result of the narrow insertion channel. We propose a technique in which large extreme lateral interbody fusion cages can be inserted through the same opening.Methods: This study included 104 patients who underwent ULIF using the “insert and revolve technique” between July 2019 and September 2022. The patients were followed up for at least 12 months postoperatively. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified McNab’s criteria. Changes in segmental lordosis (SL), intervertebral disc height (IVDH), segmental coronal alignment (SCA), cage subsidence, and fusion grade were evaluated at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Results: The VAS scores for leg and back pain and ODI score showed significant improvement. Based on the Macnab’s criteria, 97 patients showed excellent outcomes and seven demonstrated good outcomes at 12 months. The mean IVDH increased from 6.3±2 to 10±2.1 mm immediately after surgery and 10±1.1 mm at 6 months. SL improved from 9.3°±11.5° to 17.78°±8.1°, while SCA improved from 7.7°±2.1° to 3.4°±1.2° at 1 year. Moreover, 92 and 11 patients showed grade 1 and 2 fusion, respectively, according to the Bridwell grading at 1 year.Conclusions: The “insert and revolve technique” facilitates the successful insertion of large cages, contributing to the restoration of disc height and coronal and sagittal spinal correction with favorable fusion rates.

Introduction Pedicle screws are the primary method of vertebral fixation in scoliosis surgery, but there are lingering concerns over potential malposition. The rates of pedicle screw malposition in pediatric spine surgery vary from 10% to 21%. Malpositioned screws can lead to potentially catastrophic neurological, vascular, and visceral complications. Pedicle screw positioning in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is challenging due to a combination of large curves, complex pelvic anatomy, and osteopenia. This study aimed to determine the rate of pedicle screw malposition, associated complications, and subsequent revision from screws placed with the assistance of machine vision navigation technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior instrumentation and fusion. Method A retrospective analysis of the records of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent thoracolumbar pedicle screw insertion with the assistance of machine-vision image guidance navigation was performed. Screws were inserted by either a staff surgeon, orthopaedic fellow, or orthopaedic resident. Post-operative ultra-low dose CT scans were used to assess pedicle screw accuracy. The Gertzbein classification was used to grade any pedicle breaches (grade 0, no breach; grade 1, 4 mm). A screw was deemed accurate if no breach was identified (grade 0). Results 25 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 13.6 years (range 11 to 18 years; 13/25 (52.0%) were female. The average pre-operative supine Cobb angle was 90.0 degrees (48–120 degrees). A total of 687 screws from 25 patients were analyzed (402 thoracic, 241 lumbosacral, 44 S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws). Surgical trainees (fellows and orthopaedic residents) inserted 46.6% (320/687) of screws with 98.8% (4/320) accuracy. The overall accuracy of pedicle screw insertion was 98.0% (Grade 0, no breach). All 13 breaches that occurred in the thoracic and lumbar screws were Grade 1. Of the 44 S2AI screws placed, one screw had a Grade 3 breach (2.3%) noted on intra-operative radiographs following rod placement and correction. This screw was subsequently revised. None of the breaches resulted in neuromonitoring changes, vessel, or visceral injuries. Conclusion Machine vision navigation technology combined with careful free-hand pedicle screw insertion techniques demonstrated high levels of pedicle screw insertion accuracy, even in patients with challenging anatomy.

Introduction: Death is the most common outcome of longitudinal atlanto-occipital dissociation (L-AOD). Even though rare, survival is commonly seen in the pediatric population. This study reports a successful outcome of a pediatric patient with an L-AOD without neurodeficits, immobilized in a visor (head-neck-chest) orthosis. Case Report: A 9-year-old boy came off his motorbike during a jump at ~50 kph. He was transferred from the primary hospital with spine precautions and a cervical collar with multiple injuries with neurologically intact on presentation. The computed tomography (CT) spine demonstrated a widening of the basion–dens interval, estimated approximately at 16 mm (normal <10 mm), with the widening of the atlanto-occipital articulations with occipital condyles and atlas facet distance markedly widened approximately at 7 mm (normal <5 mm). Considering intact neurology and no complete tear of the tectorial membrane, the decision was made to immobilize in a visor (head-neck-chest) orthosis for controlled vertical cranial settling to occur. Periodic cervical spine imaging over 3 months was done to assess the reduction. At the end of 3 months, dynamic cervical spine X-rays and CT scans confirmed atlanto-occipital articulations with the basion–dens interval and intercondylar distance within normal limits. Conclusion: L-AOD is a rare diagnosis with a high rate of neurological deficits and mortality. The advancements in emergency care, diagnostic methods, and treatment options have increased survival rates and overall prognosis of the atlanto-occipital dissociation. A visor (head-neck-chest) orthosis and careful observation could be one of the treatment options for L-AOD. Keywords: Longitudinal atlanto-occipital dissociation, visor (head-neck-chest) orthosis, pediatric cervical spine injury.

Introduction: Os odontoideum is a rare condition described radiographically and clinically as a congenital anomaly of the second cervical vertebra (axis). It is a smooth, independent ossicle of variable size and shape separated from the base of a shortened odontoid process by an obvious gap, with no osseous connection to the body of C2. Material and Methods: This study reviewed the literature on OO to evaluate its etiology, clinical presentations, differential diagnosis, imaging modalities, and outcomes in the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of Os odontoideum. Key articles from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were searched. Discussion: Considering etiology, the traumatic hypothesis is favored over the congenital hypothesis as per recent literature on OO. Clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic to mild neck pain to severe myelopathy and neurodeficit. Various C1-C2 instrumentation and fusion techniques such as wiring, transarticular screw, and laminar screws have been described with success rates. Conclusion: Os odontoideum is a rare condition with limited existing literature. Considering the significant risks involved if conservative management opts, like severe neurodeficit to sudden death on trivial trauma and the recent improvement of imaging tools helping to understand the pathology of the disease, surgery can be indicated even in an incidentally detected os odontoideum. However, a case-by-case approach can be considered for stable asymptomatic patients depending on factors such as age, activity level, comorbidities, syndromic association, and radiographic findings. Keywords: Os odontoideum, surgical management, etiology, atlantoaxial instability, complications.

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a malignant and aggressive bony tumor affecting the most common age group of 5-20 years. It constitutes 10%-15% of all bone sarcomas and is the second most common primary malignant bone tumor after osteosarcoma. It usually presents with pain, which is typically constant and progressive in nature. The primary source of pain is due to the instability of the spine to support the weight of the body, the vertebral body's expanding cortices due to the growing mass, compression of nerve roots due to tumour mass, pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and invasion of tissue by the tumour mass. We reviewed the literature on Ewing's Sarcoma of the spine to evaluate its etiology, clinical presentations, differential diagnosis, imaging modalities and management with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical management. PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane key articles were searched. Keywords like 'Ewing's Sarcoma,' 'Spine,' 'etiology,' 'treatment,' 'surgical management,' and 'en bloc resection' were used. The current management of Ewing's sarcoma of the spine usually involves three primary modalities: combination chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. Recent improvements in combination chemotherapy (vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide +/- Ifosfamide and etoposide) are among the most significant factors for improving survival. Also, recent advancements in radiotherapy, instrumentation, and fusion techniques in surgical management have been demonstrated to improve local disease control and overall survival. Primary Ewing sarcoma of the spine is a rare condition affecting the most common age group of 5-20 years, accounting for 1-3 cases/million/year. About 5 % of cases have spine involvement. Recent improvements in combination chemotherapy have improved the overall survival rates. Enbloc resection and/or radiotherapy have improved local control of the disease.

IntroductionHigh-grade spondylolisthesis is defined as cases with more than 50% displacement and spondylolisthesis with Meyerding grade III and higher. The surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is highly controversial. Many surgical methods have been reported such as posterior in situ fusion, instrumented posterior fusion with or without reduction, combined anterior and posterior procedures, spondylectomy with reduction of L4 to the sacrum (for spondyloptosis), and posterior interbody fusion with trans-sacral fixation. The literature has recently mentioned minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to review the recent literature that describes the surgical outcomes associated with various surgical techniques used for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Materials and MethodsRecent articles were searched on search engines such as PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords such as “high-grade spondylolisthesis,” “surgical techniques,” and “complications.” DiscussionThe surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis is an area of significant controversy. The literature is replete with regards to the need for reduction, decompression, levels of fusion, the nature of instrumentation, surgical approaches including open, minimally invasive, and “mini-open” procedures, and various techniques for reducing the slip and fusion strategy. The three basic options of high-grade spondylolisthesis include in-situ fusion, partial reduction and fusion, and complete reduction. ConclusionVarious techniques have been described for high-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine deformity study group classification gives guidelines about balanced and unbalanced pelvis and advises reduction and fusion in case of unbalanced pelvis for correction of biomechanical and global sagittal alignment. Each of the surgical techniques has its advantages and disadvantages. However, individual authors’ experience, skill levels, and anatomic reduction with fusion techniques have yielded encouraging results. KeywordsHigh-grade spondylolisthesis, surgical techniques, in situ fusion, reduction and fusion, complications.

A new navigable percutaneous disc decompressor (L'DISQ-C, U&I Co., Uijeongbu, Korea), introduced in 2012, is designed to allow direct access to herniated disc material. The L'DISQ device can be curved by rotating a control wheel, directed into disc herniation treats, and decompresses contained herniated discs with minimal collateral thermal damage. This study reports the case of contained central disc herniation in a 34-year-old male with a 2-year follow-up successfully treated with navigable ablation decompression treatment (L-DISQ). A 34-year-old man presented to the outpatient department with a 6-month history of neck pain and bilateral upper limb radiation. His neck pain had increased progressively. At the time of presentation, his neck pain visual analog scale score was 7/10, and his neck disability index score was 30. The magnetic resonance images showed a single fluid-containing lesion with a hyperintense zone at the C4-5 levels with central disc herniation. The patient was successfully treated with the navigable ablation decompression treatment (L-DISQ) procedure. The navigable ablation decompression treatment (L-DISQ) is a valuable technique in treating contained cervical disc herniation with rapid pain relief and improvements in functional outcomes without any significant injury to surrounding structures. It is safe, precise, and effective in the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc herniations. Large, randomized, and multicenter trials are needed to explore the potential of the same technique further.

It is a historic and common practice while performing spine surgery on patients with a VNS has been to have the patient’s neurologist turn off the VNS generator in the pre-operative anesthetic care unit and to use bipolar rather than monopolar electrocautery. Here we report a case of a 16-year-old male patient with cerebral palsy and refractory epilepsy managed with an implanted VNS who had scoliosis surgery (and subsequent hip surgery) conducted with the use of monopolar cautery. Although VNS manufacturer guidelines suggest that monopolar cautery should not be avoided, perioperative care providers should consider its selective use in high-risk instances (with greater risks of morbidity and mortality due to blood loss which outweigh the risk of surgical re-insertion of a VNS) such as cardiac or major orthopedic surgery. Considering the number of patients with VNS devices presenting for major orthopedic surgery is increasing, itis important to have an approach and strategy for perioperative management of VNS devices.