Cynthia K Buffington
Research Subjects
Cynthia K Buffington has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
M. Perez
U.S. Bariatric
1 shared publicationR. T. Marema
U.S. Bariatric, 4800 NE 20th Terrace, Suit 303, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308, USA
1 shared publicationRobert T Marema
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 159-165
Ethnic Differences in Obesity and Surgical Weight Loss between African-American and Caucasian Females
Background: In the general population, African-American females are more obese and resistant to weight loss than Caucasian women. In the present study, we examined the severity of obesity among morbidly obese African-American and Caucasian females, studied the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), and sought to identify factors contributing to obesity and weight loss. Methods: The study population included 153 morbidly obese females randomly selected from our general bariatric patient population. Anthropometric measurements consisted of body weight, body mass index (BMI), excess weight, and waist, hip, thigh, and neck circumferences. Factors that may contribute to obesity included age, age of obesity onset, number of childbirths, calorie intake, diet composition, and degree of psychological distress. The effects of RYBGP were studied in weight-matched groups of African-American and Caucasian females (n=37 per group) at weight loss nadir, i.e. 12 to 18 months after surgery. Results: We found that morbid obesity is more severe among African-American than Caucasian females. The greater degree of obesity of African-American, as compared to Caucasian, females is not due to ethnic differences in calorie intake, diet composition, age or age of obesity onset, number of childbirths, and psychological distress. RYGBP is less effective in reducing body fat and, consequently, excess body weight of the African-American than the Caucasian females, suggesting possible ethnic differences in fat metabolism. Conclusion: African-American females with morbid obesity have greater adiposity than do Caucasian women and lose significantly less body fat after RYGBP.
- 1 February 2006
- Published by Springer Nature in Obesity Surgery
- Vol. 16 (2) , 159-165
Ethnic Differences in Obesity and Surgical Weight Loss between African-American and Caucasian Females
Background: In the general population, African-American females are more obese and resistant to weight loss than Caucasian women. In the present study, we examined the severity of obesity among morbidly obese African-American and Caucasian females, studied the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), and sought to identify factors contributing to obesity and weight loss. Methods: The study population included 153 morbidly obese females randomly selected from our general bariatric patient population. Anthropometric measurements consisted of body weight, body mass index (BMI), excess weight, and waist, hip, thigh, and neck circumferences. Factors that may contribute to obesity included age, age of obesity onset, number of childbirths, calorie intake, diet composition, and degree of psychological distress. The effects of RYBGP were studied in weight-matched groups of African-American and Caucasian females (n=37 per group) at weight loss nadir, i.e. 12 to 18 months after surgery. Results: We found that morbid obesity is more severe among African-American than Caucasian females. The greater degree of obesity of African-American, as compared to Caucasian, females is not due to ethnic differences in calorie intake, diet composition, age or age of obesity onset, number of childbirths, and psychological distress. RYGBP is less effective in reducing body fat and, consequently, excess body weight of the African-American than the Caucasian females, suggesting possible ethnic differences in fat metabolism. Conclusion: African-American females with morbid obesity have greater adiposity than do Caucasian women and lose significantly less body fat after RYGBP.
- 3 February 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 19 (4) , 525-530
Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries
In recent years, there has been an increase in numbers of individuals seeking laparoscopic surgical procedures for obesity. The current study compared the benefits and risks between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) performed at the same center for more than 2,000 patients. The study population consisted of 1,077 laparoscopic and 1,198 open RYGBP procedures performed between the years 1999 and 2002. Measurements included population characteristics, anthropometries, complications, and hospital stay. The laparoscopic RYGBP has both advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantages include a longer operative time and a higher incidence of fistulas, internal hernias, and small bowel obstruction. The advantages of the laparoscopic procedure are shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of wound infection, and fewer incisional hernias. Both procedures cause similar changes in body weight, but laparoscopic RYGBP is associated with less lean tissue loss during the early postoperative period. Both laparoscopic and open RYGBP are effective in inducing massive weight loss. There are, however, differences in the benefits and risks between the two procedures.
- 3 February 2005
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 19 (4) , 525-530
Comparison of the benefits and complications between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgeries
In recent years, there has been an increase in numbers of individuals seeking laparoscopic surgical procedures for obesity. The current study compared the benefits and risks between laparoscopic and open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) performed at the same center for more than 2,000 patients. The study population consisted of 1,077 laparoscopic and 1,198 open RYGBP procedures performed between the years 1999 and 2002. Measurements included population characteristics, anthropometries, complications, and hospital stay. The laparoscopic RYGBP has both advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantages include a longer operative time and a higher incidence of fistulas, internal hernias, and small bowel obstruction. The advantages of the laparoscopic procedure are shorter hospital stay, lower incidence of wound infection, and fewer incisional hernias. Both procedures cause similar changes in body weight, but laparoscopic RYGBP is associated with less lean tissue loss during the early postoperative period. Both laparoscopic and open RYGBP are effective in inducing massive weight loss. There are, however, differences in the benefits and risks between the two procedures.