Alain Kaldany

Objective To investigate if predictors of wound complications differed between patients undergoing excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty (EPA) and augmented urethroplasty. Methods The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2006 to 2018 was queried for male patients undergoing urethroplasty. Thirty-day wound complications were identified and categorized (superficial/deep/organ-space surgical site infections and dehiscence). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors associated with wound complications. Smoking history was defined as current smoker within the past year. Results Urethroplasty was performed in 2251 males, with 25.46% (n = 573) using a flap or graft. There was no significant difference in wound complications for patients undergoing augmented urethroplasty (n = 17, 2.97%) or EPA (n = 45, 2.68%) (p = 0.9). The augmented group had a higher BMI, longer operative time, and longer length of stay. On multivariable logistic regression, risk factors associated with wound complications for patients undergoing EPA were diabetes (OR 2.56, p = 0.03) and smoking (OR 2.32, p = 0.02). However, these factors were not associated with wound complications in patients undergoing augmented urethroplasty. Conclusions Smoking and diabetes were associated with increased wound complications for men undergoing EPA, but not in patients undergoing augmented urethroplasty. Patients with comorbidities associated with worse wound healing may be more likely to have a wound complication when undergoing EPA.

There are multiple treatment strategies for patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma. In intermediate- and high-risk patients, external beam radiation therapy demonstrates effective long-term cancer control rates comparable to radical prostatectomy. In patients who opt for initial radiotherapy but have a local recurrence of their cancer, there is no unanimity on the optimal salvage approach. The lack of randomized trials comparing surgery to other local salvage therapy or observation makes it difficult to ascertain the ideal management. A narrative review of existing prospective and retrospective data related to salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy was undertaken. Based on retrospective and prospective data, post-radiation salvage radical prostatectomy confers oncologic benefits, with overall survival ranging from 84 to 95% at 5 years and from 52 to 77% at 10 years. Functional morbidity after salvage prostatectomy remains high, with rates of post-surgical incontinence and erectile dysfunction ranging from 21 to 93% and 28 to 100%, respectively. Factors associated with poor outcomes after post-radiation salvage prostatectomy include preoperative PSA, the Gleason score, post-prostatectomy staging, and nodal involvement. Salvage radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment option for patients with biochemical recurrence after radiotherapy, although careful patient selection is important to optimize oncologic and functional outcomes.

Patients with advanced or malignant renal cell carcinoma at the time of diagnosis have historically had a poor prognosis. Immunonologic agents have significantly altered the therapeutic landscape and clinical outcomes of these patients. In this review, we highlight recent and upcoming clinical trials investigating the role of immunotherapies in clear cell RCC. In particular, we emphasize immunotherapy-based combinations, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant ICI, and ICI agents combined with anti-VEGF therapy.