Lenka Špinarová

Lenka Špinarová

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Lenka Špinarová has a total of 108 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Optimizing beta-blocker therapy in chronic heart failure: a real-world study of patients with and without atrial fibrillation

    by Karel Labr, Jindrich Spinar, Jiri Parenica, Lenka Spinarova, Jan Krejci, Filip Malek, Petr Ostadal, Ondrej Ludka, Jiri Jarkovsky, Klara Benesova, et al.

    Heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) frequently coexists with atrial fibrillation (AF), leading to worse prognosis and greater therapeutic complexity. Although beta-blockers (BBs) are a cornerstone of HF treatment, their benefit in patients with AF remains unclear. We analyzed 1088 patients with stable chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% enrolled in the multicentre FAR NHL registry. Patients were stratified by the presence of AF and achieved BB dose: low ( < 25%), medium (25-49%), or high (≥50% of target). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for acute HF, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, or heart transplantation. AF was present in 379 patients (34.5%). BBs were prescribed to 94% of patients, but only 17% achieved high-dose therapy. The event rate was higher in AF patients (28.0%) than in those without AF (20.5%, p = 0.005). High BB dose was independently associated with a lower risk of the primary endpoint (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.80; p < 0.001), consistently across both rhythm group. Higher BB doses were associated with improved outcomes in patients with chronic HF, regardless of AF status. These real-world data support up-titration of BBs as a key component in optimized guideline-directed therapy, even in patients with coexisting AF.

  • Open Access

    The EMPULSE Trial

    by Lenka Špinarová, JindřIch Špinar, Jiří Vítovec

    Glifloziny pat?? od publikace nov?ch Guidelines pro diagnostiku a l??bu srde?n?ho selh?n? z roku 2021 ke ?ty?em z?kladn?m pil???m l??by chronick?ho srde?n?ho selh?n? (CHSS). ??innost gliflozin? byla jasn? prok?z?na u pacient? se sn??enou ejek?...

  • Open Access

    Iron Deficiency in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure

    by Maria Bakosova, Jan Krejci, Julius Godava, Eva Ozabalova, Hana Poloczkova, Tomas Honek, Peter Hude, Jan Machal, Helena Bedanova, Petr Nemec, et al.

    Background and Objectives: Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure. It is associated with reduced physical performance, frequent hospitalisations for heart failure decompensation, and high cardiovascular and overall mortality. The aim was to determine the prevalence of ID in patients with advanced heart failure on the waiting list for heart transplantation. Methods and Materials: We included 52 patients placed on the waiting list for heart transplantation in 2021 at our centre. The cohort included seven patients with LVAD (left ventricle assist device) as a bridge to transplantation implanted before the time of results collection. In addition to standard tests, the parameters of iron metabolism were monitored. ID was defined as a ferritin value Results: ID was present in 79% of all subjects, but only in 35% of these patients anaemia was expressed. In the group without LVAD, ID was present in 82%, a median (lower–upper quartile) of ferritin level was 95.4 (62.2–152.1) µg/mL and mean T-sat was 0.18 ± 0.09. In LVAD group, ID was present in 57%, ferritin level was 268 (106–368) µg/mL and mean T-sat was 0.14 ± 0.04. Haemoglobin concentration was the same in patients with or without ID (133 ± 16) vs. (133 ± 23). ID was not associated with anaemia defined with regard to patient’s gender. In 40.5% of cases, iron deficiency was accompanied by chronic renal insufficiency, compared to 12.5% of the patients without ID. In the patients with LVAD, ID was present in four out of seven patients, but the group was too small for reliable statistical testing due to low statistical power. Conclusions: ID was present in the majority of patients with advanced heart failure and was not always accompanied by anaemia and renal insufficiency. Research on optimal markers for the diagnosis of iron deficiency, especially for specific groups of patients with heart failure, is still ongoing.


  • Open Access

    Comparison of Patients with Reduced and Mildly Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Intermediate Data from the FAR NHL Registry

    by Alžběta Trčková, Lenka Špinarová, Jindřich Špinar, Jiří Pařenica, Filip Málek, Monika Špinarová, Ondřej Ludka, Jan Krejčí, Jiří Jarkovský, Klára Benešová, et al.

    Introduction: We present the results of a study by the Pharmacology and NeuroHumoral Activation Registry (FAR NHL), which collects data on patients with chronic heart failure. The register contains 1088 patients from three workplaces in the Czech Republic which specialize in the care of patients with heart failure. Objectives: The aim was to obtain a comparison of pharmacotherapy and the incidence of comorbidities in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus patients with mid-range (or newly mildly reduced) ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Methods: Patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% were included and divided into HFrEF with EF below 40% and HFmrEF with EF 40–49%, according to the 2016 ESC Guidelines. In addition to the clinical condition, we also monitored laboratory parameters, comorbidities and pharmacotherapy in the patients. Results: Patients with HFrEF versus HFmrEF are more likely to be male (p < 0.008), younger (p < 0.001), have lower systolic blood pressure and are less likely to have ischemic etiology of heart failure (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in the proportion of comorbidities: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, ischemic lower limb disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There were no differences in the proportion of smokers and non-smokers between the groups. Patients with HFrEF have a higher class of New York Heart Association (NYHA), a level of N-terminal fraction of natriuretic peptide B (NT-proBNP), and a higher level of urea and uric acid. They are more often treated with loop diuretics or mineral corticosteroid receptor (MRA) blockers and less often with thiazides (p < 0.001), and also have a worse two-year prognosis. Conclusion: Compared to patients with HFmrEF, patients with HFrEF have more severe heart failure, more pronounced neurohumoral activation and a worse prognosis. They do not differ in the presence of comorbidities.


  • Open Access

    Relation between Mid-Regional Pro-Adrenomedullin in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and the Dose of Diuretics in 2-Year Follow-Up—Data from FAR NHL Registry

    by Monika Špinarová, Jindřich Špinar, Lenka Špinarová, Jan Krejčí, Monika Goldbergová-Pávková, Jiří Pařenica, Ondřej Ludka, Filip Málek, Petr Ošťádal, Klára Benešová, et al.

    Background and Objectives: The aim of this paper is to evaluate the impact of humoral substance mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) on the two-year survival of patients with chronic heart failure and relate it to the dosage of furosemide. Materials and Methods: The data is taken from the stable systolic heart failure (EF < 50%) FAR NHL registry (FARmacology and NeuroHumoraL activation). The primary endpoint at two-year follow-up was death, heart transplantation, or LVAD implantation. Results: A total of 1088 patients were enrolled in the FAR NHL registry; MR-proADM levels were available for 569 of them. The mean age was 65 years, and 81% were male. The aetiology of HF was ischemic heart disease in 53% and dilated cardiomyopathy in 41% of patients. The mean EF was 31 ± 9%. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were obtained in several parameters: patients with higher MR-proADM levels were older, rated higher in NYHA class, suffered more often from lower limb oedema, and had more comorbidities such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and renal impairment. MR-proADM level was related to furosemide dose. Patients taking higher doses of diuretics had higher MR-proADM levels. The mean MR-proADM level without furosemide (n = 122) was 0.62 (±0.55) nmol/L, with low dose (n = 113) 1–39 mg/day was 0.67 (±0.30) nmol/L, with mid dose (n = 202) 40–79 mg/day was 0.72 (±0.34) nmol/L, with high dose (n = 58) 80–119 mg/day was 0.85 (±0.40) nmol/L, and with maximum dose (n = 74) ≥120 mg/day was 1.07 (±0.76) nmol/L, p < 0.001. Patients with higher MR-proADM levels were more likely to achieve the primary endpoint at a two-year follow-up (p < 0.001) according to multivariant analysis. Conclusions: Elevated plasma MR-proADM levels in patients with chronic heart failure are associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization. Higher MR-proADM levels in combination with increased use of loop diuretics reflect residual congestion and are associated with a higher risk of severe disease progression.


  • Open Access

    Trends in the Treatment and Survival of Heart Failure Patients: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in the Czech Republic

    by Milos Táborský, Tomas Skála, Marie Lazárová, Renata Aiglová, Jindrich Špinar, Lenka Špinarová, Jiri Vítovec, Josef Kautzner, Vojtech Melenovský, Filip Málek, et al.

    Aims A retrospective nationwide observational analysis of diagnoses, procedures, and treatment reported to the Czech National Registry of Reimbursed Health Services between 2012 and 2018. Methods and results Prevalence of heart failure (HF) patients increased from 176 496 (1679.4 per 100 000 population) in 2012 to 285 745 (2689.0 per 100 000 population) patients in 2018 (mean age 74.4 ± 12.8 years). In the last years, a stable incidence of HF patients was observed (544 per 100 000 population in 2016 vs. 551 per 100 000 population in 2018; P = 0.310). Mortality rate decreased from 20.55% in 2012 to 15.89% in 2018. The number of hospitalized patients remained similar (318.2 per 100 000 population in 2012 vs. 311.8 per 100 000 population in 2018; P = 0.479). The most used drugs were diuretics (173 295; 60.6%) and beta-blockers (178 823; 62.6%), followed by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors 120.581; 42.2%; angiotensin II receptor blockers 47 216; 16.5%). Even though the whole number of implanted devices in HF patients increased steadily (from 25 205 in 2012 to 45 363 in 2018), the prevalence of all devices (pacemakers and defibrillators) in the HF patients remained about the same (14.3% in 2012; 15.9% in 2018). Conclusions The study included all patients with HF in the Czech Republic. These are the first nationwide data of HF epidemiology in the Eastern bloc. The incidence of HF remains stable in the last years. Due to aging of the population, the prevalence of HF significantly increased in the last 6 years. Despite a continuous increase in the prevalence of HF and a suboptimal utilization of its pharmacological therapy, mortality decreased, and the number of hospitalized patients remained the same.


  • Open Access

    Identification of a Diagnostic Set of Endomyocardial Biopsy microRNAs for Acute Cellular Rejection Diagnostics in Patients after Heart Transplantation Using Next-Generation Sequencing

    by Tereza Nováková, Táňa Macháčková, Jan Novák, Petr Hude, Július Godava, Víta Žampachová, Jan Oppelt, Filip Zlámal, Petr Němec, Helena Bedáňová, et al.

    Introduction: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) of heart allografts represents the most common reason for graft failure. Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are still subject to substantial interobserver variability. Novel biomarkers enabling precise ACR diagnostics may decrease interobserver variability. We aimed to identify a specific subset of microRNAs reflecting the presence of ACR. Patients and Methods: Monocentric retrospective study. A total of 38 patients with the anamnesis of ACR were identified and for each patient three consecutive samples of EMB (with, prior and after ACR) were collected. Sixteen trios were used for next-generation sequencing (exploratory cohort); the resting 22 trios were used for validation with qRT-PCR (validation cohort). Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Results: The analysis of the exploration cohort provided the total of 11 miRNAs that were altered during ACR, the three of which (miR-144, miR-589 and miR-182) were further validated in the validation cohort. Using the levels of all 11 miRNAs and principal component analysis, an ACR score was created with the specificity of 91% and sensitivity of 68% for detecting the presence of ACR in the EMB sample. Conclusion: We identified a set of microRNAs altered in endomyocardial biopsies during ACR and using their relative levels we created a diagnostic score that can be used for ACR diagnosis.


  • Open Access

    Edoxaban

    by Lenka Špinarová, JindřIch Špinar, Růžena Lábrová


    • 15 September 2016
      • Vol. 62, 646-51

    [Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction].

    by Jindřich Špinar, Jiří Vítovec, Lenka Špinarová

    Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction occurs almost with the same frequency as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The diagnosis is based on echocardiography with evidence-based ejection fraction over 50 %, or with left atrial enlargement and left ventricular hypertrophy, and specification of natriuretic peptides. BNP 35 pg/ml and NT-proBNP 125 pg/ml are considered the limits of the norm for chronic heart failure. The treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction lacks clear evidence of mortality reduction, diuretics are recommended to remove symptoms, ACE inhibitors or sartans and beta-blockers to improve the prognosis. Anticoagulation treatment is recommended for atrial fibrillation and possibly digoxin, hypolipidemics for patients in secondary prevention. An important goal of the treatment is the control of accompanying diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease. accompanying diseases - treatment - heart failure - heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

    • 1 November 2015
      • Vol. 61  (11) , 976-83

    [The TECOS, EXAMINE and SAVOR studies--how do they differ and what are their outcomes?].

    by Jindřich Špinar, Lenka Špinarová, Jiří Vítovec

    The treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2 is effective, but still is not optimal. DPP4 inhibitors (gliptins) are a new group of peroral antidiabetic drugs. The third clinical mortality study with gliptins in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 was finished in 2015. The studies are known under acronym TECOS, SAVOR and EXAMINE and the tested drugs are sitagliptin, saxagliptin and alogliptin. The studies included about 37,000 patients. The studies confirmed the cardiovascular safety of the DPP4 inhibitors, but the question about increased heart failure remains open. The effectiveness of lowering glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin) was confirmed and also the pancreatic safety is confirmed.