Yan-Li Zhou
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Yan-Li Zhou has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Adila Aisaiti
Orofacial Pain and TMD Research Unit, Institute of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China
1 shared publicationBingjie Wang
Orofacial Pain and TMD Research Unit, Institute of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China
1 shared publicationDong-Jie Xu
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
1 shared publication- Fang Zhou
Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
1 shared publication - Haifeng Zhang
Department of Cardiology The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University Suzhou China
1 shared publication - Hao Ji
Department of Drug Discovery & Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina Columbia, 715 Sumter St., Columbia, SC 29208, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 January 2021
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Occupational Health
- Vol. 63 (1) , e12269
Dentists have a high occupational risk of neck disorders with impact on somatosensory function and neck mobility
Objectives Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in the neck and shoulder region may be associated with significant impairment of quality of life and well-being. The study was to determine the prevalence of painful MSDs in Chinese dentists and evaluate somatosensory function and neck mobility compared with non-dental professional controls. Methods One hundred dentists (age: 36.5 ± 9.8 years) and 102 controls (age: 36.2 ± 10.0 years) were recruited between September 2019 and December 2020. The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short-form health survey questionnaire and information of MSDs history were recorded. The cervical range of motion (CROM) with and without pain, and the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the facial and neck muscles were tested. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The factors in the multiple linear regression analysis were occupation, working age, and gender. Results The prevalence rate of neck pain was significantly higher in dentists (73.0%) compared with the controls (52.0%) (P = .002). The regression models of cervical range of posterior extension, lateral flexion and rotation were statistically significant (P ≤ .001). The regression models of PPTs of the tested facial and neck muscles were statistically significant (P < .001). Conclusion Dentists are at higher risk of neck pain. The bigger cervical range of left rotation of dentists could be related to the working posture. The lower PPTs in dentists may reflect a hypersensitivity in the facial and neck muscles. Preventive measures are needed to reduce occupational hazards in dentists.
- 10 January 2021
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Occupational Health
- Vol. 63 (1) , e12269
Open AccessDentists have a high occupational risk of neck disorders with impact on somatosensory function and neck mobility
Objectives Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) in the neck and shoulder region may be associated with significant impairment of quality of life and well-being. The study was to determine the prevalence of painful MSDs in Chinese dentists and evaluate somatosensory function and neck mobility compared with non-dental professional controls. Methods One hundred dentists (age: 36.5 ± 9.8 years) and 102 controls (age: 36.2 ± 10.0 years) were recruited between September 2019 and December 2020. The Medical Outcome Study 36-item short-form health survey questionnaire and information of MSDs history were recorded. The cervical range of motion (CROM) with and without pain, and the pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) of the facial and neck muscles were tested. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. The factors in the multiple linear regression analysis were occupation, working age, and gender. Results The prevalence rate of neck pain was significantly higher in dentists (73.0%) compared with the controls (52.0%) (P = .002). The regression models of cervical range of posterior extension, lateral flexion and rotation were statistically significant (P ≤ .001). The regression models of PPTs of the tested facial and neck muscles were statistically significant (P < .001). Conclusion Dentists are at higher risk of neck pain. The bigger cervical range of left rotation of dentists could be related to the working posture. The lower PPTs in dentists may reflect a hypersensitivity in the facial and neck muscles. Preventive measures are needed to reduce occupational hazards in dentists.
- Open Access
- 5 October 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Chinese Medical Journal
- Vol. 132 (19) , 2278-2285
Growth differentiation factor-15 combined with N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide increase 1-year prognosis prediction value for patients with acute heart failure
Clinical assessment and treatment guidance for heart failure depends on a variety of biomarkers. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic predictive value of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in assessing hospitalized patients with acute heart failure (AHF). In total, 260 patients who were admitted for AHF in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled from April 2012 to May 2016. Medical history and blood samples were collected within 24 h after the admission. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality within 1 year. The patients were divided into survival group and death group based on the endpoint. With established mortality risk factors and serum GDF-15 level, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Cox regression analyses were used to further analyze the combination values of NT-proBNP and GDF-15. Baseline GDF-15 and NT-proBNP were significantly higher amongst deceased than those in survivors (P < 0.001). In ROC analyses, area under curve (AUC) for GDF-15 to predict 1-year mortality was 0.707 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.648–0.762, P < 0.001), and for NT-proBNP was 0.682 (95% CI: 0.622–0.738, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two markers (P = 0.650). Base on the optimal cut-offs (GDF-15: 4526.0 ng/L; NT-proBNP: 1978.0 ng/L), the combination of GDF-15 and NT-proBNP increased AUC for 1-year mortality prediction (AUC = 0.743, 95% CI: 0.685–0.795, P < 0.001). GDF-15, as a prognostic marker in patients with AHF, is not inferior to NT-proBNP. Combining the two markers could provide an early recognition of high-risk patients and improve the prediction values of AHF long-term prognosis. ChiCTR-ONC-12001944, http://www.chictr.org.cn.
- 5 October 2019
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Chinese Medical Journal
- Vol. 132 (19) , 2278-2285
Open AccessGrowth differentiation factor-15 combined with N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide increase 1-year prognosis prediction value for patients with acute heart failure
Clinical assessment and treatment guidance for heart failure depends on a variety of biomarkers. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic predictive value of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in assessing hospitalized patients with acute heart failure (AHF). In total, 260 patients who were admitted for AHF in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled from April 2012 to May 2016. Medical history and blood samples were collected within 24 h after the admission. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality within 1 year. The patients were divided into survival group and death group based on the endpoint. With established mortality risk factors and serum GDF-15 level, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Cox regression analyses were used to further analyze the combination values of NT-proBNP and GDF-15. Baseline GDF-15 and NT-proBNP were significantly higher amongst deceased than those in survivors (P < 0.001). In ROC analyses, area under curve (AUC) for GDF-15 to predict 1-year mortality was 0.707 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.648–0.762, P < 0.001), and for NT-proBNP was 0.682 (95% CI: 0.622–0.738, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the two markers (P = 0.650). Base on the optimal cut-offs (GDF-15: 4526.0 ng/L; NT-proBNP: 1978.0 ng/L), the combination of GDF-15 and NT-proBNP increased AUC for 1-year mortality prediction (AUC = 0.743, 95% CI: 0.685–0.795, P < 0.001). GDF-15, as a prognostic marker in patients with AHF, is not inferior to NT-proBNP. Combining the two markers could provide an early recognition of high-risk patients and improve the prediction values of AHF long-term prognosis. ChiCTR-ONC-12001944, http://www.chictr.org.cn.