Ferdinand Geißler
Research Subjects
Ferdinand Geißler has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Felix Hartmann
Department of Social Science, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2 shared publications Heike Klüver
Affiliation Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1 shared publication- Heike Klüver
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
1 shared publication Johannes Giesecke
Affiliation Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1 shared publication- Johannes Giesecke
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
1 shared publication Macartan Humphreys
Affiliations WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany, Columbia University, New York City, New York, United States of America
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 December 2022
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (12) , e0278337
Public support for global vaccine sharing in the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Germany
By September 2021 an estimated 32% of the global population was fully vaccinated for COVID-19 but the global distribution of vaccines was extremely unequal, with 72% or more vaccinated in the ten countries with the highest vaccination rates and less than 2% in the ten countries with the lowest vaccination rates. Given that governments need to secure public support for investments in global vaccine sharing, it is important to understand the levels and drivers of public support for international vaccine solidarity. Using a factorial experiment administered to more than 10,000 online survey respondents in Germany in 2021, we demonstrate that the majority of German citizens are against global inequalities in vaccine distribution. Respondents are supportive of substantive funding amounts, on the order of the most generous contributions provided to date, though still below amounts that are likely needed for a successful global campaign. Public preferences appear largely to be driven by intrinsic concern for the welfare of global populations though are in part explained by material considerations—particularly risks of continued health threats from a failure to vaccinate globally. Strategic considerations are of more limited importance in shaping public opinion; in particular we see no evidence for free riding on contributions by other states. Finally, drawing on an additional survey experiment, we show that there is scope to use information campaigns highlighting international health externalities to augment public support for global campaigns.
- 14 December 2022
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (12) , e0278337
Open AccessPublic support for global vaccine sharing in the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Germany
By September 2021 an estimated 32% of the global population was fully vaccinated for COVID-19 but the global distribution of vaccines was extremely unequal, with 72% or more vaccinated in the ten countries with the highest vaccination rates and less than 2% in the ten countries with the lowest vaccination rates. Given that governments need to secure public support for investments in global vaccine sharing, it is important to understand the levels and drivers of public support for international vaccine solidarity. Using a factorial experiment administered to more than 10,000 online survey respondents in Germany in 2021, we demonstrate that the majority of German citizens are against global inequalities in vaccine distribution. Respondents are supportive of substantive funding amounts, on the order of the most generous contributions provided to date, though still below amounts that are likely needed for a successful global campaign. Public preferences appear largely to be driven by intrinsic concern for the welfare of global populations though are in part explained by material considerations—particularly risks of continued health threats from a failure to vaccinate globally. Strategic considerations are of more limited importance in shaping public opinion; in particular we see no evidence for free riding on contributions by other states. Finally, drawing on an additional survey experiment, we show that there is scope to use information campaigns highlighting international health externalities to augment public support for global campaigns.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 19 August 2021
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 118 (36)
Incentives can spur COVID-19 vaccination uptake
Recent evidence suggests that vaccination hesitancy is too high in many countries to sustainably contain COVID-19. Using a factorial survey experiment administered to 20,500 online respondents in Germany, we assess the effectiveness of three strategies to increase vaccine uptake, namely, providing freedoms, financial remuneration, and vaccination at local doctors. Our results suggest that all three strategies can increase vaccination uptake on the order of two to three percentage points (PP) overall and five PP among the undecided. The combined effects could be as high as 13 PP for this group. The returns from different strategies vary across age groups, however, with older cohorts more responsive to local access and younger cohorts most responsive to enhanced freedoms for vaccinated citizens.
- 19 August 2021
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 118 (36)
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessIncentives can spur COVID-19 vaccination uptake
Recent evidence suggests that vaccination hesitancy is too high in many countries to sustainably contain COVID-19. Using a factorial survey experiment administered to 20,500 online respondents in Germany, we assess the effectiveness of three strategies to increase vaccine uptake, namely, providing freedoms, financial remuneration, and vaccination at local doctors. Our results suggest that all three strategies can increase vaccination uptake on the order of two to three percentage points (PP) overall and five PP among the undecided. The combined effects could be as high as 13 PP for this group. The returns from different strategies vary across age groups, however, with older cohorts more responsive to local access and younger cohorts most responsive to enhanced freedoms for vaccinated citizens.
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 23-60
Konzeptuelle Vorüberlegungen
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 163-180
Hypothesen
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 181-205
Daten und Methode
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 61-161
Theoretischer Rahmen und Forschungsstand
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 13-22
Einleitung
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 321-329
Fazit
- 15 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 207-320
Empirische Ergebnisse