Gregory G. Ginsberg

Supplementary Table S2. Individual PDGO DNA sequencing data.

Supplementary Table S1. Baseline characteristics of the study cohort.

An accumulating body of evidence suggests that carriers of a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have an increased gastric cancer risk. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes involved in promoting homologous recombination to repair double-stranded DNA breaks. The aim of this investigation was to identify differences within the gastric epithelium and in patient-derived gastric organoids (PDGO) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers to determine if evidence of early gastric carcinogenesis exists among these carriers. First, using gastric epithelial biopsies, BRCA2 carriers were found to harbor higher expression of the proliferative marker Ki-67 within the antral gastric epithelium, and strikingly, biopsies from both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers displayed a marked increase in double-stranded DNA damage. These results were further explored using PDGOs, in which a growth advantage was observed for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 PDGOs compared with noncarrier PDGOs. Furthermore, both BRCA1 and BRCA2 PDGOs displayed a more pronounced enhancement of Ki-67 expression as well as increased double-stranded DNA damage compared with noncarrier PDGOs. Importantly, none of the PDGOs showed signs of BRCA1 or BRCA2 loss of heterozygosity, potentially indicating a haploinsufficient phenotype. Taken together, these novel findings suggest that haploinsufficiency in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers may lead to DNA damage in the gastric epithelium, which may serve as an early event contributing to gastric cancer development. Implications: The elevated risk of gastric cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 PGV carriers may be due to haploinsufficiency, which warrants further investigation into mechanisms of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated gastric cancer.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers may be at increased risk for gastric cancer; however, the mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis remain poorly understood. We sought to determine the prevalence of gastric cancer risk factors Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) among BRCA1/2 carriers to gain insight into the pathogenesis of gastric cancer in this population. A total of 100 unselected BRCA1/2 carriers who underwent endoscopic ultrasound from March 2022 to March 2023 underwent concomitant upper endoscopy with nontargeted gastric antrum and body biopsies. The study population (70% women; mean age 60.1 years) included 66% BRCA2 carriers. H. pylori was detected in one (1%) individual, 7 (7%) had GIM, 2 (2%) had autoimmune atrophic gastritis, and no gastric cancers were diagnosed. Among BRCA1/2 carriers, H. pylori prevalence was low and GIM prevalence was similar to that in the general population; however, identification of H. pylori or GIM may help inform future gastric cancer risk management strategies in BRCA1/2 carriers. Prevention Relevance: Evaluating the burden of H. pylori infection and GIM among BRCA1/2 carriers is warranted to better understand the mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis and to help inform risk management strategies for gastric cancer among this at-risk population.

Carriers of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 variant are at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet current guidelines recommend surveillance only for those with a family history of PDAC. We aimed to investigate outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)–based PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC. We performed a retrospective analysis of all P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS at a tertiary care center. Of 194 P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS, 64 (33%) had no family history of PDAC and had at least 1 EUS for PDAC surveillance. These individuals underwent 143 total EUSs, were predominantly female (72%), and BRCA2 carriers (73%), with the majority having a personal history of cancer other than PDAC (67%). The median age at time of first EUS was 62 years [interquartile range (IQR), 53–67 years] and a median of 2 EUSs (IQR 1–3) were performed per patient, with a median of 3 years (IQR 2–4.5 years) between the first and last EUS for those with more than 1 EUS. Pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 44%, including cysts in 27%, and incidental luminal abnormalities in 41%. Eight percent developed a new pancreatic mass or cyst during surveillance, 2 individuals developed PDAC, and no serious complications resulted from surveillance. After discussion of the risks, limitations, and potential benefits, PDAC surveillance can be considered in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC; however, the effectiveness of PDAC surveillance in this population requires further study.Prevention Relevance:BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers have increased pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk, yet are typically not eligible for PDAC surveillance in the absence of PDAC family history. Herein we describe outcomes of PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC, showing that PDAC surveillance can be considered in this high-risk group.

Supplementary Tables 1-3 Supplementary Table 1: Characteristics of P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers who underwent EUS. Supplementary Table 2: Non-EUS imaging in P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers without a family history of PDAC. Supplementary Table 3: Pancreatic findings from MRI/CT in P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers.

Supplementary Tables 1-3 Supplementary Table 1: Characteristics of P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers who underwent EUS. Supplementary Table 2: Non-EUS imaging in P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers without a family history of PDAC. Supplementary Table 3: Pancreatic findings from MRI/CT in P/LP BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM carriers.

Carriers of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 variant are at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet current guidelines recommend surveillance only for those with a family history of PDAC. We aimed to investigate outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)–based PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC. We performed a retrospective analysis of all P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS at a tertiary care center. Of 194 P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS, 64 (33%) had no family history of PDAC and had at least 1 EUS for PDAC surveillance. These individuals underwent 143 total EUSs, were predominantly female (72%), and BRCA2 carriers (73%), with the majority having a personal history of cancer other than PDAC (67%). The median age at time of first EUS was 62 years [interquartile range (IQR), 53–67 years] and a median of 2 EUSs (IQR 1–3) were performed per patient, with a median of 3 years (IQR 2–4.5 years) between the first and last EUS for those with more than 1 EUS. Pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 44%, including cysts in 27%, and incidental luminal abnormalities in 41%. Eight percent developed a new pancreatic mass or cyst during surveillance, 2 individuals developed PDAC, and no serious complications resulted from surveillance. After discussion of the risks, limitations, and potential benefits, PDAC surveillance can be considered in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC; however, the effectiveness of PDAC surveillance in this population requires further study.Prevention Relevance:BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers have increased pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk, yet are typically not eligible for PDAC surveillance in the absence of PDAC family history. Herein we describe outcomes of PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC, showing that PDAC surveillance can be considered in this high-risk group.

PURPOSE: To report pancreas surveillance outcomes of high-risk individuals within the multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening-5 (CAPS5) study and to update outcomes of patients enrolled in prior CAPS studies. METHODS: Individuals recommended for pancreas surveillance were prospectively enrolled into one of eight CAPS5 study centers between 2014 and 2021. The primary end point was the stage distribution of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) detected (stage I v higher-stage). Overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 1,461 high-risk individuals enrolled into CAPS5, 48.5% had a pathogenic variant in a PDAC-susceptibility gene. Ten patients were diagnosed with PDAC, one of whom was diagnosed with metastatic PDAC 4 years after dropping out of surveillance. Of the remaining nine, seven (77.8%) had a stage I PDAC (by surgical pathology) detected during surveillance; one had stage II, and one had stage III disease. Seven of these nine patients with PDAC were alive after a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Eight additional patients underwent surgical resection for worrisome lesions; three had high-grade and five had low-grade dysplasia in their resected specimens. In the entire CAPS cohort (CAPS1-5 studies, 1,731 patients), 26 PDAC cases have been diagnosed, 19 within surveillance, 57.9% of whom had stage I and 5.2% had stage IV disease. By contrast, six of the seven PDACs (85.7%) detected outside surveillance were stage IV. Five-year survival to date of the patients with a screen-detected PDAC is 73.3%, and median overall survival is 9.8 years, compared with 1.5 years for patients diagnosed with PDAC outside surveillance (hazard ratio [95% CI]; 0.13 [0.03 to 0.50], P = .003). CONCLUSION: Most pancreatic cancers diagnosed within the CAPS high-risk cohort in the recent years have had stage I disease with long-term survival.

Carriers of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 variant are at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), yet current guidelines recommend surveillance only for those with a family history of PDAC. We aimed to investigate outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)–based PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC. We performed a retrospective analysis of all P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS at a tertiary care center. Of 194 P/LP BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers who underwent EUS, 64 (33%) had no family history of PDAC and had at least 1 EUS for PDAC surveillance. These individuals underwent 143 total EUSs, were predominantly female (72%), and BRCA2 carriers (73%), with the majority having a personal history of cancer other than PDAC (67%). The median age at time of first EUS was 62 years [interquartile range (IQR), 53–67 years] and a median of 2 EUSs (IQR 1–3) were performed per patient, with a median of 3 years (IQR 2–4.5 years) between the first and last EUS for those with more than 1 EUS. Pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 44%, including cysts in 27%, and incidental luminal abnormalities in 41%. Eight percent developed a new pancreatic mass or cyst during surveillance, 2 individuals developed PDAC, and no serious complications resulted from surveillance. After discussion of the risks, limitations, and potential benefits, PDAC surveillance can be considered in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC; however, the effectiveness of PDAC surveillance in this population requires further study. Prevention Relevance: BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers have increased pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) risk, yet are typically not eligible for PDAC surveillance in the absence of PDAC family history. Herein we describe outcomes of PDAC surveillance in BRCA1/BRCA2/ATM/PALB2 carriers without a family history of PDAC, showing that PDAC surveillance can be considered in this high-risk group.