Alexander Dimitrios Colevas
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Alexander Dimitrios Colevas has a total of 299 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Eben Lloyd Rosenthal
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
15 shared publications - Fred M. Baik
Stanford University Stanford University Stanford University Stanford University Stanford University
15 shared publications - John B. Sunwoo
Stanford University
15 shared publications - Michael J. Kaplan
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine. Stanford, California
15 shared publications - Alex Valencia
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine. Stanford, California
13 shared publications - Andrei Iagaru
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
13 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Treatment of Stage IB to III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO-ASCO Guideline Update
PURPOSE: To update the 2021 CSCO-ASCO guideline on chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), incorporating new evidence on radiotherapy techniques and target-volume de-escalation, chemotherapy regimens and their sequencing, adjuvant therapy, and immunotherapy for patients with stage IB-III disease. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed evidence published since the prior guideline, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant prospective and retrospective studies. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, failure-free or progression-free survival, locoregional and distant disease control, acute and late toxicities, and patient-reported quality of life. Recommendations were developed using the ASCO guideline development process and Expert Panel consensus. RESULTS: The updated evidence supports: IMRT with image guidance and MRI-based target delineation as core components of definitive treatment; selected response-adapted target delineation following induction chemotherapy; elective nodal de-escalation in appropriately selected patients; risk-adapted chemotherapy sequencing according to stage and biologic risk; cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine–cisplatin (GP) or docetaxel–cisplatin–fluorouracil (TPF) as preferred induction regimens; and selected adjuvant chemotherapy options, including metronomic capecitabine for patients with higher residual post-chemoradiotherapy risk. Several randomized trials evaluating PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated improved disease-control outcomes, but overall survival data remain immature. RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline update provides recommendations on radiotherapy technique, dose, imaging, and target delineation; sequencing of additional chemotherapy with radiotherapy; concurrent chemotherapy options; induction chemotherapy regimens and timing; adjuvant chemotherapy options; and the role of immunotherapy. At present, the Panel makes no recommendation for or against routine addition of immunotherapy to induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy; applicability of the trial evidence, benefits and harms, local approval and access, and patient preferences should guide individualized decisions. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/head-neck-cancer .
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Treatment of Stage IB to III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO-ASCO Guideline Update
PURPOSE: To update the 2021 CSCO-ASCO guideline on chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), incorporating new evidence on radiotherapy techniques and target-volume de-escalation, chemotherapy regimens and their sequencing, adjuvant therapy, and immunotherapy for patients with stage IB-III disease. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed evidence published since the prior guideline, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant prospective and retrospective studies. Outcomes of interest included overall survival, failure-free or progression-free survival, locoregional and distant disease control, acute and late toxicities, and patient-reported quality of life. Recommendations were developed using the ASCO guideline development process and Expert Panel consensus. RESULTS: The updated evidence supports: IMRT with image guidance and MRI-based target delineation as core components of definitive treatment; selected response-adapted target delineation following induction chemotherapy; elective nodal de-escalation in appropriately selected patients; risk-adapted chemotherapy sequencing according to stage and biologic risk; cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine–cisplatin (GP) or docetaxel–cisplatin–fluorouracil (TPF) as preferred induction regimens; and selected adjuvant chemotherapy options, including metronomic capecitabine for patients with higher residual post-chemoradiotherapy risk. Several randomized trials evaluating PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated improved disease-control outcomes, but overall survival data remain immature. RECOMMENDATIONS: This guideline update provides recommendations on radiotherapy technique, dose, imaging, and target delineation; sequencing of additional chemotherapy with radiotherapy; concurrent chemotherapy options; induction chemotherapy regimens and timing; adjuvant chemotherapy options; and the role of immunotherapy. At present, the Panel makes no recommendation for or against routine addition of immunotherapy to induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy; applicability of the trial evidence, benefits and harms, local approval and access, and patient preferences should guide individualized decisions. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/head-neck-cancer .
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Joint Guideline
PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations on first- and subsequent-line systemic therapy, maintenance therapy, locoregional consolidation, and salvage local therapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened by CSCO and ASCO reviewed evidence from randomized trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies, and clinical experience. The guideline was informed by a systematic literature review and consensus-based interpretation of efficacy, safety, feasibility, and patient-centered outcomes across scenarios. Outcomes included overall and progression-free survival, response and disease control rates, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Evidence supports platinum-based chemotherapy plus a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor as preferred first-line therapy for medically fit patients. Evidence also supports maintenance strategies after disease control, while treatment selection depends on prior treatment, disease extent, patient fitness, resource availability, and preferences. Selected responders may receive locoregional consolidation radiotherapy or oral maintenance chemotherapy. For isolated locoregional recurrence amenable to local therapy, options include salvage surgery and re-irradiation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Chemotherapy plus a PD-1 inhibitor, followed by maintenance PD-1 inhibition for up to 2 years, should be offered first-line to appropriate patients with recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. Chemotherapy alone may be offered when immunotherapy is unsuitable or declined. Selected patients responding to first-line chemotherapy may receive oral maintenance chemotherapy or locoregional consolidation intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Salvage surgery or re-irradiation is recommended for appropriately selected patients with isolated locoregional recurrence. Subsequent-line options include chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Treatment should be individualized according to disease setting, prior therapy, expected toxicities, availability, local drug approvals, and patient preferences. Early supportive and specialist interdisciplinary palliative care, where available, should accompany active anticancer treatment for advanced, incurable disease. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/head-neck-cancer .
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: CSCO and ASCO Joint Guideline
PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based recommendations on first- and subsequent-line systemic therapy, maintenance therapy, locoregional consolidation, and salvage local therapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened by CSCO and ASCO reviewed evidence from randomized trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies, and clinical experience. The guideline was informed by a systematic literature review and consensus-based interpretation of efficacy, safety, feasibility, and patient-centered outcomes across scenarios. Outcomes included overall and progression-free survival, response and disease control rates, toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Evidence supports platinum-based chemotherapy plus a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor as preferred first-line therapy for medically fit patients. Evidence also supports maintenance strategies after disease control, while treatment selection depends on prior treatment, disease extent, patient fitness, resource availability, and preferences. Selected responders may receive locoregional consolidation radiotherapy or oral maintenance chemotherapy. For isolated locoregional recurrence amenable to local therapy, options include salvage surgery and re-irradiation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Chemotherapy plus a PD-1 inhibitor, followed by maintenance PD-1 inhibition for up to 2 years, should be offered first-line to appropriate patients with recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. Chemotherapy alone may be offered when immunotherapy is unsuitable or declined. Selected patients responding to first-line chemotherapy may receive oral maintenance chemotherapy or locoregional consolidation intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Salvage surgery or re-irradiation is recommended for appropriately selected patients with isolated locoregional recurrence. Subsequent-line options include chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Treatment should be individualized according to disease setting, prior therapy, expected toxicities, availability, local drug approvals, and patient preferences. Early supportive and specialist interdisciplinary palliative care, where available, should accompany active anticancer treatment for advanced, incurable disease. Additional information is available at www.ascopubs.org/topics/asco-guidelines/head-neck-cancer .
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Effect of body size parameters and age on total cardiac mitochondria biogenesis activity (tCMA) and cardiac mitochondria biogenesis volume (CMBV).
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Effect of body size parameters and age on total cardiac mitochondria biogenesis activity (tCMA) and cardiac mitochondria biogenesis volume (CMBV).
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S4 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Comparison of SUVmax variability between harmonized and scanner-specific reconstructions for LV and RV across sites.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S4 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Comparison of SUVmax variability between harmonized and scanner-specific reconstructions for LV and RV across sites.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Representativeness of study participants.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Representativeness of study participants.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S7 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Box plot showing the distribution of TBR across sites and lesions, highlighting the wider variability observed in the measurements.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S7 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Box plot showing the distribution of TBR across sites and lesions, highlighting the wider variability observed in the measurements.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S5 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Comparison of SUVmean variability between harmonized and scanner-specific reconstructions for LV and RV across sites.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S5 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Comparison of SUVmean variability between harmonized and scanner-specific reconstructions for LV and RV across sites.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Demographics and cardiac [¹8F]F-AraG uptake parameters before and after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with NSCLC.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Demographics and cardiac [¹8F]F-AraG uptake parameters before and after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with NSCLC.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Flow diagram of the human cohort study.
- 14 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Mitochondrial Imaging Detects Early Cardiac Changes Following Cancer Immunotherapy
Flow diagram of the human cohort study.