Sun-Young Park

Background/Objectives: We aimed to explore whether selected non-invasive three-dimensional (3D) body surface indicators differed between prospectively defined enrollment groups and, in linked post-hoc analyses, to identify candidate indicators associated with expert manual judgment. Methods: At screening (visit 1), 88 participants underwent manual examination and pelvic X-ray assessment. Of these, 60 entered the prospective pilot study and underwent 3D body surface analysis at visit 2. The prespecified prospective comparison used the protocol-defined malalignment group (n = 30) and comparison group (n = 30). Final manual diagnosis served as an expert-judgment reference comparator. For post-hoc exploratory ROC analyses, the same 60 participants were reclassified according to final manual diagnosis alone as manual-positive (n = 40) or manual-negative (n = 20). Results: In the prespecified prospective comparison, neither 3D surface-height asymmetry nor marker-angle outcomes differed significantly between the protocol-defined enrollment groups across postures P1–P4. Among all 88 screened participants, X-ray sensitivity and specificity relative to final manual diagnosis were 88.6% and 34.1%, respectively. In the post-hoc exploratory ROC analyses, IC surface-height difference at P3 showed an apparent AUC of 0.684 (p = 0.015), and the highest individual marker-angle AUC was 0.706 at P2 (p = 0.005). An exploratory five-variable model, developed and evaluated in the same dataset, yielded an apparent in-sample AUC of 0.756. Conclusions: The prespecified 3D comparisons did not distinguish the protocol-defined enrollment groups. Post-hoc analyses of the same 60 participants identified candidate 3D indicators associated with expert manual judgment, but these findings were exploratory and do not establish diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility. Prospective validation using prespecified indicators and thresholds, an appropriate independent or composite reference standard, and formal reliability assessment is required before a clinical role for 3D body surface analysis can be determined.

Background/Objectives: Low-back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder, with a lifetime prevalence reported to be as high as 84%. Chuna manipulative therapy (CMT), a Korean style of manual therapy for correcting joint misalignment, has rarely been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study primarily aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a future large-scale, multicenter RCT comparing thrust and non-thrust CMT; preliminary clinical and safety data were collected as secondary, exploratory objectives. Methods: This multicenter, assessor-blinded pilot RCT randomized 30 participants with non-acute LBP and pelvic deviation into thrust (n = 15) or non-thrust (n = 15) CMT groups for a 4-week treatment. Feasibility outcomes (eligibility, recruitment, adherence, retention, data completeness, and treatment fidelity) were the primary endpoints. Preliminary clinical effects (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) and adverse events were assessed over 24 weeks as exploratory outcomes. Results: Of the 35 screened, 30 (85.7%) were randomized, and the planned 15 per center was achieved at both sites. Twenty-nine (96.7%) received at least the minimum number of sessions and were retained to week 24, with complete outcome data and no protocol deviations in intervention delivery. In exploratory analyses, both groups improved from baseline and between-group differences favored thrust CMT, but as the trial was not powered to compare effectiveness, these findings are preliminary only. Nine mild adverse events resolved spontaneously. Conclusions: A large-scale, multicenter RCT comparing thrust and non-thrust CMT in pelvic deviation is feasible. The observed feasibility outcomes can inform its progression criteria, whereas the exploratory clinical findings require confirmation in an adequately powered definitive trial.

Park SY, et al. World J Mens Health. 2026 Jan;44(1):182-193. https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.240311

Objectives This study aimed to establish clinical evidence for acupuncture by analysing data from trials that demonstrated the efficacy of acupuncture for whiplash-associated disorder (WAD) with the following research question: Is acupuncture treatment effective for symptom alleviation in patients with WAD compared with other usual care? Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, ScienceOn, KMBASE, Korean Studies Information Service System, Korea Med, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System and Research Information Sharing Service were searched from their inception to 1 October 2023. Eligibility criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using acupuncture on patients with WAD. The outcomes were the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score or numerical rating scale score for neck pain, the range of motion (ROM) of the neck, the Neck Disability Index and safety. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent researchers analysed and extracted data from the selected literatures. The risk of bias and the quality of evidence were assessed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method, respectively. Results A total of 525 patients with WAD from eight RCTs were included in this study. The meta-analysis revealed that the outcomes showed significant differences in the pain VAS score (standard mean difference (SMD): −0.57 (–0.86 to –0.28), pConclusion Acupuncture may have clinical value in pain reduction and increasing the ROM for patients with WAD. High-quality RCTs must be conducted to confirm the efficacy of acupuncture in patients with WAD. Trial registration number PROSPERO CRD42021261595.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Chuna manual therapy combined with usual care to those of usual care alone for treating whiplash injuries. Design: A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, multicenter pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Setting: Three hospitals in Korea. Participants: Overall, 132 participants between 19 and 70 years of age, involved in traffic accidents and treated at three hospitals in Korea, >2 but n = 66) or usual care (n = 66) groups and underwent corresponding treatment for three weeks. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was the number of days to achieve a 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes included areas under the 50% numeric rating scale reduction curve: pain, disability, quality of life, and safety. Results: The Chuna manual therapy + usual care group (23.31 ± 21.36 days; p = 0.01) required significantly fewer days to achieve 50% pain reduction compared to the usual care group (50.41 ± 48.32 days; p = 0.01). Regarding pain severity, functional index, and quality of life index, Chuna manual therapy and usual care were more effective than usual care alone. Safety was acceptable in both groups. Conclusions: In patients with subacute whiplash injury, Chuna manual therapy showed a rapid rate of recovery, high effectiveness, and safety.

In South Korea, car insurance that includes medical coverage of traditional Korean medicine (TKM) has increased exponentially. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) for traffic injuries were established in 2016. We aimed to revise and update de novo CPG and distribute the adapted CPG to TKM practitioners and patients. Clinical key questions from previous CPG were identified and updated regarding the grade of recommendation and level of evidence using additional evidence from the literature obtained through a systematic search and the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The dissemination and implementation of the updated CPG were conducted at the CPG Center of Korean Medicine. Ultimately, 25 recommendations based on 13 clinical key questions were developed: 2 for diagnosis, 22 for TKM treatments, and 1 for prognosis. After recognition by professional societies and certification by the CPG Center of Korean Medicine, leaflets, card news, and infographics for TKM doctors in South Korea were produced and distributed. These are the only TKM CPG for patients who have experienced traffic injuries. They are expected to contribute to standardized and evidence-based treatment using TKM and similar interventions. Moreover, disseminating the adapted CPG will promote treatment reliability and strengthen insurance coverage.

This is the first cost-effectiveness analysis of Chuna manual therapy (CMT) plus usual Korean traditional medicine for traffic accident victims using a randomized controlled trial. A total of 132 participants were equally allocated to the intervention group receiving 6–11 sessions of CMT plus usual Korean traditional medicine care for three weeks or usual care including acupuncture, cupping, herbal medicine, moxibustion, and traditional physiotherapy at three hospitals. At 12 weeks, from a healthcare perspective, the intervention group had significantly higher costs (mean (SD), $778 (435) vs. $618 (318); difference, $160; 95% CI, $15 to $289; p = 0.005). From a societal perspective, total costs were insignificantly lower in the intervention group (mean (SD), $1077 (1081) vs. $1146 (1485); difference, $−69; 95% CI, $−568 to $377; p = 0.761). The intervention group dominated, with significantly higher QALYs gained at lower overall cost with a 72% chance of being cost-effective. From a societal perspective, the intervention was cost-saving for individuals who had neck pain after car accidents, although it was not cost-effective from the healthcare perspective ($40,038 per QALY gained). Findings support use of CMT as an integrated care treatment for whiplash from a societal perspective. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to determine cost-effectiveness in other cultural contexts.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Heat-sensitive Moxibustion on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Methods: We searched articles from Academic Journals(CAJ) online databases, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS), Searching key words were ‘前列腺增生’, ‘熱敏灸’ and ‘열민구’, ‘전립선비대’. The search range included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Among the articles published to 2020, 10 articles were found. After review the title, abstract and original, 3 articles were selected finally to rule out treatment combined with completely different treatments. Result: The Heat-sensitive moxibustion at acupoints in the treatment of Benign prostatic hyperplasia were significantly superior to control group after treatment in the symptoms of patients, IPSS, QOL, PVR and Qmax(P<0.05). The Heat-sensitive moxibustion can significantly reduce the incidence of temporary urinary incontinence after Transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP) and improve life quality and satisfaction of patients(P<0.05). The individualized desensitization saturated time and amount of Heat-sensitive moxibustion is superior effective to general amount and time of traditional moxibustion in the total effective rate, IPSS, Ru and Qmax(P<0.01) for Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Conclusion: Heat sensitive moxibustion directly transfer heat to the source of a disease. So it can be considered as a good treatment for Benign prostate hypertrophy. It was also shown a better effect on BPH compared to traditional moxibustion, According to the thermo principles of tumor, if the tumor cell's death temperature of 43°C is reached, that can cause tumor degeneration. Therefore I think Heat sensitive moxibustion can be applied to various tumor disease. The results of this study could be applied to clinical treatment of BPH. However, additional large-scale clinical researches should be conducted.

Background: Muscle soreness after exercise, called delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS), may cause significant changes in muscle function and may increase the risk of sports injuries. Therefore, various therapeutic strategies have been studied to help recovery after exercise. Jakyakgamcho-tang (JGT) is a widely prescribed herbal medicine to treat muscle pain and cramps in traditional Eastern medicine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of JGT for reducing pain and improving muscle damage after exercise. Methods: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design clinical trial. A total of 30 healthy male adults will be recruited. Subjects who voluntarily wish to participate in this study will be hospitalized for 4 days. On the first day, the subjects will perform a standardized treadmill exercise for 1 h to induce DOMS. After the exercise, the subjects will take either JGT or a placebo for 3 days. After a more than 1 week wash-out period, the subjects will repeat the same process with the other drug. Pain intensity, calf circumference, and pain threshold will be measured as outcome measures. Blood tests and blood pressure will be measured as safety assessments. In addition, blood tests for muscle damage and inflammation markers, such as creatine kinase, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein, will be analyzed. Discussion: This will be the first trial to assess the effect of JGT on exercise-induced muscle soreness. Our findings will provide valuable data to determine the clinical effects of JGT on DOMS. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Sevice, KCT0003457. Registered on 29 January 2019.

Background: Clinical guidelines can improve health-care delivery, but there are a number of challenges in adopting and implementing the current practice guidelines for depression. The aim of this study was to determine clinical experiences and perceived barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in psychiatric care. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted with 386 psychiatric specialists to inquire about experiences and attitudes related to the depression guidelines and barriers influencing the use of the guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed, and qualitative data were transcribed and coded manually. Results: Almost three quarters of the psychiatrists (74.6%) were aware of the clinical guidelines for depression, and over half of participants (55.7%) had had clinical experiences with the guidelines in practice. The main reported advantages of the guidelines were that they helped in clinical decision making and provided informative resources for the patients and their caregivers. Despite this, some psychiatrists were making treatment decisions that were not in accordance with the depression guidelines. Lack of knowledge was the main obstacle to the implementation of guidelines assessed by the psychiatrists. Other complaints addressed difficulties in accessing the guidelines, lack of support for mental health services, and general attitudes toward guideline necessity. Overall, the responses suggested that adding a summary booklet, providing teaching sessions, and improving guidance delivery systems could be effective tools for increasing depression guideline usage. Conclusion: Individual barriers, such as lack of awareness and lack of familiarity, and external barriers, such as the supplying system, can affect whether physicians’ implement the guidelines for the treatment of depression in Korea. These findings suggest that further medical education to disseminate guidelines contents could improve public health for depression.