Louise‐Anne Fillot
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Louise‐Anne Fillot has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Catherine Gauthier
INSA de Lyon, GEMPPM UMR CNRS 5510, Bât Blaise Pascal-5ème étage, 7 av. Jean Capelle, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
2 shared publications- Karine Masenelli-Varlot
INSA Lyon, Universite Lyon 1, CNRS, MATEIS, UMR5510 , 7 Avenue Jean Capelle
2 shared publications Philippe Hajji
INSA de Lyon, GEMPPM UMR CNRS 5510, Bât Blaise Pascal-5ème étage, 7 av. Jean Capelle, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 26 February 2007
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 104 (3) , 2009-2017
Thermomechanical history effects on rigid PVC microstructure and impact properties
- 26 February 2007
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 104 (3) , 2009-2017
Thermomechanical history effects on rigid PVC microstructure and impact properties
- 28 July 2006
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology
- Vol. 12 (3) , 98-107
U‐PVC gelation level assessment, part 1: Comparison of different techniques
Several different gelation assessment methods such as differential scanning calorimetry, capillary rheometry, solvent absorption, wide angle x‐ray scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy were applied to a typical PVC window profile formulation subjected to various thermomechanical histories. Shear applied during the process could be decomposed into two components: (i) a thermal component corresponding to the self‐heating that was generated and (ii) a “mechanical” component associated with a “pure” shearing action deprived of any thermal aspect. Shear sensitivity of the above‐mentioned gelation assessment techniques was evaluated by considering both aspects. Gelation levels established by differential scanning calorimetry and capillary rheometry were especially compared, thus allowing a comparison of the two physical aspects evidenced by each technique, i.e., crystallite melting and macromolecular network development. It appeared that as soon as the PVC particulate structure had been fragmented into micronic entities (primary particles) the gelation process was governed mainly by the thermal aspect, i.e., crystallite melting. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL. 12:98–107, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.
- 28 July 2006
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology
- Vol. 12 (3) , 98-107
U‐PVC gelation level assessment, part 1: Comparison of different techniques
Several different gelation assessment methods such as differential scanning calorimetry, capillary rheometry, solvent absorption, wide angle x‐ray scattering, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy were applied to a typical PVC window profile formulation subjected to various thermomechanical histories. Shear applied during the process could be decomposed into two components: (i) a thermal component corresponding to the self‐heating that was generated and (ii) a “mechanical” component associated with a “pure” shearing action deprived of any thermal aspect. Shear sensitivity of the above‐mentioned gelation assessment techniques was evaluated by considering both aspects. Gelation levels established by differential scanning calorimetry and capillary rheometry were especially compared, thus allowing a comparison of the two physical aspects evidenced by each technique, i.e., crystallite melting and macromolecular network development. It appeared that as soon as the PVC particulate structure had been fragmented into micronic entities (primary particles) the gelation process was governed mainly by the thermal aspect, i.e., crystallite melting. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL. 12:98–107, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.