OLOliver Lohrberg

Oliver Lohrberg

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Oliver Lohrberg has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Continuous Mixing of Graphite Anode Slurry: Fast-Charge Optimization Through Binder Network Tailoring

    by Paul Guenther, Andreas Huth, Kristian Nikolowski, Oliver Lohrberg, Mareike Partsch, Annegret Potthoff, Alexander Michaelis

    Fast-charging lithium-ion batteries require graphite anodes with low ionic transport resistance, yet systematic links between electrode manufacturing parameters and fast-charge performance remain scarce. This study shows that twin-screw extrusion (TSE) process conditions control electrode tortuosity, the geometric complexity of ionic pathways, by reshaping the binder network architecture without altering active material integrity. A central composite experimental design combined with multi-scale diagnostics identifies pore network tortuosity as the primary transport bottleneck. The optimized mild kneading condition (K4: 60 wt% kneading zone solids, 7% kneading length, gentle screw design) reduces the 8–80% state-of-charge (SOC) charging time by 14.9% relative to the intensive baseline (B1–B3: 70 wt%, 50% kneading length), matching conventional batch mixing. Regression analysis confirms a strong correlation between tortuosity and fast-charge performance (R2=0.86), whereas the correlation with charge-transfer resistance is weaker (R2=0.59). Mechanistically, mild kneading promotes reversible, sterically stabilized carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) networks consistent with extended “loop-tail” polymer conformations. Intensive kneading is consistent with the formation of bridging gels that fail to arrest binder migration during drying and clog surface pores. A Pore-Homogeneity Index (PHI), derived from mercury porosimetry, quantifies the resulting microstructural heterogeneity, correlates with tortuosity (R2=0.76), and characterizes pore network uniformity. The results identify local stress intensity as a primary factor influencing binder network formation and support tortuosity as an adjustable design parameter in continuous anode processing.


  • Open Access

    Benchmarking and Critical Design Considerations of Zero‐Excess Li‐Metal Batteries

    by Oliver Lohrberg, Karsten Voigt, Sebastian Maletti, Henry Auer, Kristian Nikolowski, Christian Heubner, Alexander Michaelis

    Zero‐excess Li metal batteries (ZELMBs), in which a Li‐anode is formed in situ during charging, have received much attention in recent years. ZELMBs bear great potential to increase energy density and facilitate battery production, thereby reducing cost as well as material and energy consumption. Practical application of ZELMBs has so far been limited by challenges related to the non‐uniform deposition behavior of Li, leading to inadequate performance and safety concerns. To address these issues, promising approaches have been developed in recent years, including modifications of the current collector, electrolyte, and cycling protocols. While these approaches improve the long‐term stability of ZELMB, they also reduce the energy density by introducing inactive materials into the cell. Herein, critical design criteria for the various optimization approaches in ZELMB research are established. Nominal volumetric and gravimetric energy densities are determined based on the degree of modification. Thresholds are determined for each of the strategies at which the energy density gain of ZELMB vanishes compared to other cell configurations. These findings are compared to literature results to provide guidance for the further development of ZELMB.


  • Open Access

    Understanding Li Plating and Stripping Behavior in Zero-Excess Li Metal Batteries Using Operando Dilatometry

    by Oliver Lohrberg, Sebastian Maletti, Christian Heubner, Michael Schneider, Alexander Michaelis

    Zero-excess Li metal batteries (ZELMB), in which the Li-metal anode is plated in situ on the anode current collector during initial charging, have received considerable attention in recent years. Such batteries hold enormous potential for increasing energy density and simplifying battery production, thus reducing costs, material, and energy requirements. However, transfer into application has so far been limited by challenges related to the non-uniform deposition behavior of lithium, which leads to inadequate performance and safety concerns. To meet these challenges, the electrochemical deposition behavior of lithium must be very well understood to derive and evaluate knowledge-based optimization approaches. For this purpose, advanced characterization methods are urgently needed. Herein the use of operando electrochemical dilatometry (OED) to study Li deposition and dissolution in ZELMB is demonstrated. We show how OED not only provides information on thickness changes during Li deposition and stripping, but also allows insights regarding morphology evolution and quantification of dead Li. The present work is intended to serve as an example to demonstrate the valuable insights that can be gained with OED and to encourage the scientific community to use it to support the development of advanced Li-, Na-, or K-metal batteries.


  • Open Access

    From Lithium‐Metal toward Anode‐Free Solid‐State Batteries: Current Developments, Issues, and Challenges

    by Christian Heubner, Sebastian Maletti, Henry Auer, Juliane Hüttl, Karsten Voigt, Oliver Lohrberg, Kristian Nikolowski, Mareike Partsch, Alexander Michaelis

    The development of rechargeable batteries with high‐energy density is critical for future decarbonization of transportation. Anode‐free Li‐ion batteries, using a bare current collector at the anode side without any excess of Li, provide the highest volumetric energy density (>1500 Wh L−1) among all possible cell configurations. Furthermore, elimination of the anode material coating reduces material consumption and greatly simplifies cell production, which in turn lowers costs. Although significant progress has been made recently by the application of modified current collectors, optimized cycling parameters and improved liquid electrolytes, insufficient efficiencies, and dendritic growth during lithium plating lead to poor cycle life of typically less than 100 cycles as well as safety issues. Alternatively, very recent studies have demonstrated anode‐free solid‐state batteries that combine the benefits of high energy anode‐free cell configuration and solid‐state systems with high safety, exceeding 1000 cycles. This review provides an overview of recent developments toward anode‐free solid‐state batteries and highlights the current issues and challenges in this nascent field. It is concluded that, although major challenges remain at the present, the lessons learned in the fields of liquid electrolytes and solid‐state lithium metal batteries can accelerate the development of anode‐free solid‐state batteries of practical relevance.