Polina Iamshchinina
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Polina Iamshchinina has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Daniel Kaiser
University of York
3 shared publicationsNikolaus Weiskopf
3 shared publicationsRadoslaw Martin Cichy
Freie Universitaet Berlin
3 shared publicationsAlessandro Sciarra
Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Institute for Physics, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
2 shared publicationsDaniel Haenelt
Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
2 shared publications- Daniel Kaiser
Justus Liebig University Giessen
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-26
Modeling short visual events through the BOLD moments video fMRI dataset and metadata
Studying the neural basis of human dynamic visual perception requires extensive experimental data to evaluate the large swathes of functionally diverse brain neural networks driven by perceiving visual events. Here, we introduce the BOLD Moments Dataset (BMD), a repository of whole-brain fMRI responses to over 1000 short (3 s) naturalistic video clips of visual events across ten human subjects. We use the videos’ extensive metadata to show how the brain represents word- and sentence-level descriptions of visual events and identify correlates of video memorability scores extending into the parietal cortex. Furthermore, we reveal a match in hierarchical processing between cortical regions of interest and video-computable deep neural networks, and we showcase that BMD successfully captures temporal dynamics of visual events at second resolution. With its rich metadata, BMD offers new perspectives and accelerates research on the human brain basis of visual event perception.
- 24 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-26
Open AccessModeling short visual events through the BOLD moments video fMRI dataset and metadata
Studying the neural basis of human dynamic visual perception requires extensive experimental data to evaluate the large swathes of functionally diverse brain neural networks driven by perceiving visual events. Here, we introduce the BOLD Moments Dataset (BMD), a repository of whole-brain fMRI responses to over 1000 short (3 s) naturalistic video clips of visual events across ten human subjects. We use the videos’ extensive metadata to show how the brain represents word- and sentence-level descriptions of visual events and identify correlates of video memorability scores extending into the parietal cortex. Furthermore, we reveal a match in hierarchical processing between cortical regions of interest and video-computable deep neural networks, and we showcase that BMD successfully captures temporal dynamics of visual events at second resolution. With its rich metadata, BMD offers new perspectives and accelerates research on the human brain basis of visual event perception.
- Open Access
- 28 August 2023
- Published by Center for Open Science in PsyArXiv
Laminar dissociation of feedforward and feedback signals in high-level ventral visual cortex during imagery and perception
Visual imagery and veridical perception are phenomenologically related, suggesting that they share neural machinery. Previous research confirmed this assumption at the macroscale of human cortical organization in category-selective regions in ventral visual cortex. However, imagery and perception differ fundamentally in the information flow that underlies them: perception is driven by the integration of sensory feedforward and internally-generated feedback information, whereas imagery depends on feedback only. This suggests that while visual imagery and perception may activate common cortical regions, they do so in fundamentally distinctive ways. To investigate, we resolved neural activity during imagery and perception in the ventral visual cortex at the level of laminar organization that anatomically and functionally distinguishes feedforward from feedback information flow. We found distinctive laminar profiles for imagery and perception of scenes and faces in parahippocampal place area (PPA) and fusiform face area (FFA) respectively. Our findings clarify the neural basis of the phenomenology of visual imagery versus perception, and shed new light on how feedforward and feedback information processing in high-level ventral visual cortex orchestrates human object vision.
- 28 August 2023
- Published by Center for Open Science in PsyArXiv
Open AccessLaminar dissociation of feedforward and feedback signals in high-level ventral visual cortex during imagery and perception
Visual imagery and veridical perception are phenomenologically related, suggesting that they share neural machinery. Previous research confirmed this assumption at the macroscale of human cortical organization in category-selective regions in ventral visual cortex. However, imagery and perception differ fundamentally in the information flow that underlies them: perception is driven by the integration of sensory feedforward and internally-generated feedback information, whereas imagery depends on feedback only. This suggests that while visual imagery and perception may activate common cortical regions, they do so in fundamentally distinctive ways. To investigate, we resolved neural activity during imagery and perception in the ventral visual cortex at the level of laminar organization that anatomically and functionally distinguishes feedforward from feedback information flow. We found distinctive laminar profiles for imagery and perception of scenes and faces in parahippocampal place area (PPA) and fusiform face area (FFA) respectively. Our findings clarify the neural basis of the phenomenology of visual imagery versus perception, and shed new light on how feedforward and feedback information processing in high-level ventral visual cortex orchestrates human object vision.
- Open Access
- 18 May 2022
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 127 (6) , 1622-1628
Resolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization
Humans can effortlessly categorize objects, both when they are conveyed through visual images and spoken words. To resolve the neural correlates of object categorization, studies have so far primarily focused on the visual modality. It is therefore still unclear how the brain extracts categorical information from auditory signals. In the current study, we used EEG (n = 48) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis to investigate 1) the time course with which object category information emerges in the auditory modality and 2) how the representational transition from individual object identification to category representation compares between the auditory modality and the visual modality. Our results show that 1) auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and 2) a similar representational transition occurs in the visual and auditory modalities, where an initial representation at the individual-object level is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects’ category membership. Altogether, our results suggest an analogous hierarchy of information processing across sensory channels. However, there was no convergence toward conceptual modality-independent representations, thus providing no evidence for a shared supramodal code. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Object categorization operates on inputs from different sensory modalities, such as vision and audition. This process was mainly studied in vision. Here, we explore auditory object categorization. We show that auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and, similar to vision, auditory representations initially carry information about individual objects, which is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects’ category membership.
- 18 May 2022
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 127 (6) , 1622-1628
Open AccessResolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization
Humans can effortlessly categorize objects, both when they are conveyed through visual images and spoken words. To resolve the neural correlates of object categorization, studies have so far primarily focused on the visual modality. It is therefore still unclear how the brain extracts categorical information from auditory signals. In the current study, we used EEG (n = 48) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis to investigate 1) the time course with which object category information emerges in the auditory modality and 2) how the representational transition from individual object identification to category representation compares between the auditory modality and the visual modality. Our results show that 1) auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and 2) a similar representational transition occurs in the visual and auditory modalities, where an initial representation at the individual-object level is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects’ category membership. Altogether, our results suggest an analogous hierarchy of information processing across sensory channels. However, there was no convergence toward conceptual modality-independent representations, thus providing no evidence for a shared supramodal code. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Object categorization operates on inputs from different sensory modalities, such as vision and audition. This process was mainly studied in vision. Here, we explore auditory object categorization. We show that auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and, similar to vision, auditory representations initially carry information about individual objects, which is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects’ category membership.
- Open Access
Benchmarking GE-BOLD, SE-BOLD, and SS-SI-VASO sequences for depth-dependent separation of feedforward and feedback signals in high-field MRI
Recent advances in high-field fMRI have allowed differentiating feedforward and feedback information in the grey matter of the human brain. For continued progress in this endeavor, it is critical to understand how MRI data acquisition parameters impact the read-out of information from laminar response profiles. Here, we benchmarked three different MR-sequences at 7T - gradient-echo (GE), spin-echo (SE) and vascular space occupancy imaging (VASO) - in differentiating feedforward and feedback signals in human early visual cortex (V1). The experiment (N=4) consisted of two complementary tasks: a perception task that predominantly evokes feedforward signals and a working memory task that relies on feedback signals. In the perception task, participants saw flickering oriented gratings while detecting orthogonal color-changes. In the working memory task, participants memorized the precise orientation of a grating. We used multivariate pattern analysis to read out the perceived (feedforward) and memorized (feedback) grating orientation from neural signals across cortical depth. Analyses across all the MR-sequences revealed perception signals predominantly in the middle cortical compartment of area V1 and working memory signals in the deep compartment. Despite an overall consistency across sequences, SE-EPI was the only sequence where both feedforward and feedback information were differently pronounced across cortical depth in a statistically robust way. We therefore suggest that in the context of a typical cognitive neuroscience experiment as the one benchmarked here, SE-EPI may provide a favorable trade-off between spatial specificity and signal sensitivity. Highlights: Here, we benchmarked three sequences at high-field fMRI -GE-BOLD, SE-BOLD and VASO - in differentiating feedforward and feedback signals across grey matter depth of area V1. We show that: All the MR-sequences revealed the feedforward and feedback signals at the middle and deep cortical bins, respectively. Such correspondence across the sequences indicates that widely used GE-BOLD is a suitable method for the exploration of signals in cortical depth. Only SE-BOLD yielded statistically reliable differences between the cortical bins carry- ing feedforward and feedback signals.
Open AccessBenchmarking GE-BOLD, SE-BOLD, and SS-SI-VASO sequences for depth-dependent separation of feedforward and feedback signals in high-field MRI
Recent advances in high-field fMRI have allowed differentiating feedforward and feedback information in the grey matter of the human brain. For continued progress in this endeavor, it is critical to understand how MRI data acquisition parameters impact the read-out of information from laminar response profiles. Here, we benchmarked three different MR-sequences at 7T - gradient-echo (GE), spin-echo (SE) and vascular space occupancy imaging (VASO) - in differentiating feedforward and feedback signals in human early visual cortex (V1). The experiment (N=4) consisted of two complementary tasks: a perception task that predominantly evokes feedforward signals and a working memory task that relies on feedback signals. In the perception task, participants saw flickering oriented gratings while detecting orthogonal color-changes. In the working memory task, participants memorized the precise orientation of a grating. We used multivariate pattern analysis to read out the perceived (feedforward) and memorized (feedback) grating orientation from neural signals across cortical depth. Analyses across all the MR-sequences revealed perception signals predominantly in the middle cortical compartment of area V1 and working memory signals in the deep compartment. Despite an overall consistency across sequences, SE-EPI was the only sequence where both feedforward and feedback information were differently pronounced across cortical depth in a statistically robust way. We therefore suggest that in the context of a typical cognitive neuroscience experiment as the one benchmarked here, SE-EPI may provide a favorable trade-off between spatial specificity and signal sensitivity. Highlights: Here, we benchmarked three sequences at high-field fMRI -GE-BOLD, SE-BOLD and VASO - in differentiating feedforward and feedback signals across grey matter depth of area V1. We show that: All the MR-sequences revealed the feedforward and feedback signals at the middle and deep cortical bins, respectively. Such correspondence across the sequences indicates that widely used GE-BOLD is a suitable method for the exploration of signals in cortical depth. Only SE-BOLD yielded statistically reliable differences between the cortical bins carry- ing feedforward and feedback signals.
- Open Access
Resolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization
Humans can effortlessly categorize objects, both when they are conveyed through visual images and spoken words. To resolve the neural correlates of object categorization, studies have so far primarily focused on the visual modality. It is therefore still unclear how the brain extracts categorical information from auditory signals. In the current study we used EEG (N=47) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis to investigate (1) the time course with which object category information emerges in the auditory modality and (2) how the representational transition from individual object identification to category representation compares between the auditory modality and the visual modality. Our results show that (1) that auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and (2) a similar representational transition occurs in the visual and auditory modalities, where an initial representation at the individual-object level is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects‘ category membership. Altogether, our results suggest an analogous hierarchy of information processing across sensory channels. However, we did not find evidence for a shared supra-modal code, suggesting that the contents of the different sensory hierarchies are ultimately modality-unique.
Open AccessResolving the time course of visual and auditory object categorization
Humans can effortlessly categorize objects, both when they are conveyed through visual images and spoken words. To resolve the neural correlates of object categorization, studies have so far primarily focused on the visual modality. It is therefore still unclear how the brain extracts categorical information from auditory signals. In the current study we used EEG (N=47) and time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis to investigate (1) the time course with which object category information emerges in the auditory modality and (2) how the representational transition from individual object identification to category representation compares between the auditory modality and the visual modality. Our results show that (1) that auditory object category representations can be reliably extracted from EEG signals and (2) a similar representational transition occurs in the visual and auditory modalities, where an initial representation at the individual-object level is followed by a subsequent representation of the objects‘ category membership. Altogether, our results suggest an analogous hierarchy of information processing across sensory channels. However, we did not find evidence for a shared supra-modal code, suggesting that the contents of the different sensory hierarchies are ultimately modality-unique.
- Open Access
- 14 September 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Biology
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-8
Perceived and mentally rotated contents are differentially represented in cortical depth of V1
Primary visual cortex (V1) in humans is known to represent both veridically perceived external input and internally-generated contents underlying imagery and mental rotation. However, it is unknown how the brain keeps these contents separate thus avoiding a mixture of the perceived and the imagined which could lead to potentially detrimental consequences. Inspired by neuroanatomical studies showing that feedforward and feedback connections in V1 terminate in different cortical layers, we hypothesized that this anatomical compartmentalization underlies functional segregation of external and internally-generated visual contents, respectively. We used high-resolution layer-specific fMRI to test this hypothesis in a mental rotation task. We found that rotated contents were predominant at outer cortical depth bins (i.e. superficial and deep). At the same time perceived contents were represented stronger at the middle cortical bin. These results identify how through cortical depth compartmentalization V1 functionally segregates rather than confuses external from internally-generated visual contents. These results indicate that feedforward and feedback manifest in distinct subdivisions of the early visual cortex, thereby reflecting a general strategy for implementing multiple cognitive functions within a single brain region.
- 14 September 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Communications Biology
- Vol. 4 (1) , 1-8
Open AccessPerceived and mentally rotated contents are differentially represented in cortical depth of V1
Primary visual cortex (V1) in humans is known to represent both veridically perceived external input and internally-generated contents underlying imagery and mental rotation. However, it is unknown how the brain keeps these contents separate thus avoiding a mixture of the perceived and the imagined which could lead to potentially detrimental consequences. Inspired by neuroanatomical studies showing that feedforward and feedback connections in V1 terminate in different cortical layers, we hypothesized that this anatomical compartmentalization underlies functional segregation of external and internally-generated visual contents, respectively. We used high-resolution layer-specific fMRI to test this hypothesis in a mental rotation task. We found that rotated contents were predominant at outer cortical depth bins (i.e. superficial and deep). At the same time perceived contents were represented stronger at the middle cortical bin. These results identify how through cortical depth compartmentalization V1 functionally segregates rather than confuses external from internally-generated visual contents. These results indicate that feedforward and feedback manifest in distinct subdivisions of the early visual cortex, thereby reflecting a general strategy for implementing multiple cognitive functions within a single brain region.
- Open Access
Perceived and mentally rotated contents are differentially represented in cortical depth of V1
Primary visual cortex (V1) in humans is known to represent both veridically perceived external input and internally-generated contents underlying imagery and mental rotation. However, it is unknown how the brain keeps these contents separate thus avoiding a mixture of the perceived and the imagined which could lead to potentially detrimental consequences. Inspired by neuroanatomical studies showing that feedforward and feedback connections in V1 terminate in different cortical layers, we hypothesized that this anatomical compartmentalization underlies functional segregation of external and internally-generated visual contents, respectively. We used high-resolution layer-specific fMRI to test this hypothesis in a mental rotation task. We found that rotated contents were predominant at outer cortical depth bins (i.e. superficial and deep). At the same time perceived contents were represented stronger at the middle cortical bin. These results identify how through cortical depth compartmentalization V1 functionally segregates rather than confuses external from internally-generated visual contents. These results indicate that feedforward and feedback manifest in distinct subdivisions of the early visual cortex, thereby reflecting a general strategy for implementing multiple cognitive functions within a single brain region.
Open AccessPerceived and mentally rotated contents are differentially represented in cortical depth of V1
Primary visual cortex (V1) in humans is known to represent both veridically perceived external input and internally-generated contents underlying imagery and mental rotation. However, it is unknown how the brain keeps these contents separate thus avoiding a mixture of the perceived and the imagined which could lead to potentially detrimental consequences. Inspired by neuroanatomical studies showing that feedforward and feedback connections in V1 terminate in different cortical layers, we hypothesized that this anatomical compartmentalization underlies functional segregation of external and internally-generated visual contents, respectively. We used high-resolution layer-specific fMRI to test this hypothesis in a mental rotation task. We found that rotated contents were predominant at outer cortical depth bins (i.e. superficial and deep). At the same time perceived contents were represented stronger at the middle cortical bin. These results identify how through cortical depth compartmentalization V1 functionally segregates rather than confuses external from internally-generated visual contents. These results indicate that feedforward and feedback manifest in distinct subdivisions of the early visual cortex, thereby reflecting a general strategy for implementing multiple cognitive functions within a single brain region.