RNRyan Nedd

Ryan Nedd

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ryan Nedd has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Artificial Intelligence Application in Nonpoint Source Pollution Management: A Status Update

    by Almando Morain, Ryan Nedd, Kevin Poole, Lauren Hawkins, Micala Jones, Brian Washington, Aavudai Anandhi

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly advance the management of nonpoint source pollution (NPSP), a critical environmental issue characterized by diffuse sources and complex transport mechanisms. This study systematically examines current AI applications addressing NPSP through bibliometric and systematic analyses. A total of 124 studies were included after rigorous identification, screening, and eligibility assessments based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. Key findings from the bibliometric analysis include publication trends, regional research contributions, author and journal contributions, and core concepts in NPSP. The systematic analysis further provided: (a) a comprehensive synthesis of NPSP characterization, covering pollution sources, key drivers, pollutants, transport pathways, and environmental impacts; (b) identification of emerging AI technologies such as the Internet of Things, unmanned aerial vehicles, and geographic information systems, and their potential applications in NPSP contexts; (c) a detailed classification of AI models used in NPSP assessment, highlighting predictors, predictands, and performance metrics specifically in water quality prediction and monitoring, groundwater vulnerability mapping, and pollutant-specific modeling; and (d) a critical assessment of knowledge gaps categorized into AI model development and validation, data constraints, governance and policy challenges, and system integration, alongside proposed targeted future research directions emphasizing adaptive governance, transparent AI modeling, and interdisciplinary collaboration. The findings from this study provide essential insights for researchers, policymakers, environmental managers, and communities aiming to implement AI-driven strategies to mitigate NPSP.


  • Open Access

    Land Use Changes in the Southeastern United States: Quantitative Changes, Drivers, and Expected Environmental Impacts

    by Ryan Nedd, Aavudai Anandhi

    Land use change analysis provides valuable information for landscape monitoring, managing, and prioritizing large area conservation practices. There has been significant interest in the southeastern United States (SEUS) due to substantial land change from various economic activities since the 1940s. This study uses quantitative data from the Economic Research Service (ERS) for landscape change analysis, addressing land change among five major land types for twelve states in the SEUS from 1945 to 2012. The study also conducted a literature review using the PSALSAR framework to identify significant drivers related to land type changes from research articles within the region. The analysis showed how each land type changed over the period for each state in the time period and the percentage change for the primary drivers related to land use change. The literature review identified significant drivers of land use and land cover change (LULCC) within the SEUS. The associated drivers were categorized into natural and artificial drivers, then further subdivided into eight categories related to land type changes in the region. A schematic diagram was developed to show land type changes that impacted environmental changes from various studies in the SEUS. The results concluded that Forest land accounted for 12% change and agricultural land for 20%; population growth in the region is an average of 2.59% annually. It also concluded that the need for research to understand past land use trends, direction and magnitude of land cover changes is essential. Significant drivers such as urban expansion and agriculture are critical to the impending use of land in the region; their impacts are attributed to environmental changes in the region and must be monitored.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    A Synthesis of Land Use/Land Cover Studies: Definitions, Classification Systems, Meta-Studies, Challenges and Knowledge Gaps on a Global Landscape

    by Ryan Nedd, Katie Light, Marcia Owens, Neil James, Elijah Johnson, Aavudai Anandhi

    Land is a natural resource that humans have utilized for life and various activities. Land use/land cover change (LULCC) has been of great concern to many countries over the years. Some of the main reasons behind LULCC are rapid population growth, migration, and the conversion of rural to urban areas. LULC has a considerable impact on the land-atmosphere/climate interactions. Over the past two decades, numerous studies conducted in LULC have investigated various areas of the field of LULC. However, the assemblage of information is missing for some aspects. Therefore, to provide coherent guidance, a literature review to scrutinize and evaluate many studies in particular topical areas is employed. This research study collected approximately four hundred research articles and investigated five (5) areas of interest, including (1) LULC definitions; (2) classification systems used to classify LULC globally; (3) direct and indirect changes of meta-studies associated with LULC; (4) challenges associated with LULC; and (5) LULC knowledge gaps. The synthesis revealed that LULC definitions carried vital terms, and classification systems for LULC are at the national, regional, and global scales. Most meta-studies for LULC were in the categories of direct and indirect land changes. Additionally, the analysis showed significant areas of LULC challenges were data consistency and quality. The knowledge gaps highlighted a fall in the categories of ecosystem services, forestry, and data/image modeling in LULC. Core findings exhibit common patterns, discrepancies, and relationships from the multiple studies. While literature review as a tool showed similarities among various research studies, our results recommend researchers endeavor to perform further synthesis in the field of LULC to promote our overall understanding, since research investigations will continue in LULC.