PMPauline Mocquot

Pauline Mocquot

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Pauline Mocquot has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Charlotte Icard

    Department of Medical and Clinic Pharmacology, CHU de Toulouse, France

    1 shared publication
  • Fabien Despas

    Department of Medical and Clinic Pharmacology, CHU de Toulouse, France

    1 shared publication
  • Fabien Despas

    Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31000, Toulouse, France.

    1 shared publication
  • Fanny Pineau

    Département d'Hématologie et de Médecine Interne Institut Universitaire du Cancer‐Oncopole, CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

    1 shared publication
  • Jean-Claude Nogaro

    Department of Hematology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Oncopole, France

    1 shared publication
  • Léopoldine Lapierre

    Département d'Hématologie et de Médecine Interne Institut Universitaire du Cancer‐Oncopole, CHU de Toulouse Toulouse France

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The pharmacology of blinatumomab: state of the art on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, adverse drug reactions and evaluation in clinical trials

    by Pauline Mocquot, Yasmine Mossazadeh, Léopoldine Lapierre, Fanny Pineau, Fabien Despas

    Bispecific drugs (BDs) belong to the family of immunotherapies along with checkpoint inhibitors and CAR‐T cells. In the field of oncology, BDs are designed to simultaneously bind a tumour antigen on the one side and an antigen present on the surface of effector cells on the other. This review summarizes the information available to date on the first marketed BiTE‐format bispecific antibody, blinatumomab BLINCYTO® in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database by including studies published in English using the term blinatumomab. Furthermore, bibliographies of selected references were also evaluated for relevant articles. Clinical trial (CT) data were retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov (ongoing trials, adverse events [AEs]) and global pharmacovigilance data were retrieved from VigiBase®. Blinatumomab is a fusion protein which consists of two single‐chain variable fragments arranged in tandem: the first binds the CD19 surface antigen of all B cells and the second targets the CD3 antigen of T cells. Binding of blinatumomab to B and T cells induces apoptosis of B cells after secretion of granzymes and perforins by T cells. T‐cell activation results in secretion of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and upregulation of activation markers and adhesion molecules on the surface of T cells. The major CTs that led to an indication show increased overall survival with blinatumomab with better efficacy in patients in haematological remission with minimal residual disease ≥10−3. The major AEs are cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity and hypogammaglobulinemia. The three most frequent system organ classes in CTs are haematological, gastrointestinal and general disorders. These results are also found in VigiBase® but neurological disorders and infections appear more frequently in real life. This review summarizes the current knowledge of blinatumomab in the literature. The subject of many CTs is to improve the route of administration and expand the indications for treatment.


  • Lenalidomide-induced arthritis: A case report and review of literature and pharmacovigilance databases

    by Charlotte Icard, Pauline Mocquot, Jean-Claude Nogaro, Fabien Despas, Martin Gauthier

    Introduction: Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with multiple mechanisms of action, and treatment with lenalidomide is associated with adverse events such as thrombosis and abdominal pain; nonetheless, other rarer adverse events do exist, with few knowledge from physicians and pharmacists. For such adverse events, pharmacovigilance databases are of great interest. Case report: A 71-year-old patient with no rheumatologic history, in complete remission of a mantle-cell lymphoma following rituximab, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone induction, received a maintenance treatment with rituximab and lenalidomide. After each course of lenalidomide and with no other new medication, the patient presented with fever and high inflammatory markers level, and a scapular-belt arthritis. Management and outcome: The patient was managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colchicine, with symptomatology and inflammation improvement. After discontinuation of lenalidomide, he had no arthritis relapse; it was then concluded that the patient had a lenalidomide-induced arthritis. We interrogated the national and international (VigiBase®) pharmacovigilance databases and found that arthritis in the context of lenalidomide exposure is a rare finding, with only three reported cases in France; 0.13% of adverse events reported with lenalidomide in the international database VigiBase® were arthritis. Discussion: Our case then reports an uncommon finding, of which both pharmacists and physicians should be aware due to the wide and increasing use of lenalidomide.