Adriana Valente
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Adriana Valente has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Valentina Tudisca
Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies of the National Research Council of Italy
2 shared publications - Andrea Pelliccia
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, CNR‐IRPPS) Rome Italy
1 shared publication - Arja R. Aro
Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
1 shared publication - Ien van de Goor
Tranzo, Tilburg University
1 shared publication - Loredana Cerbara
Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, National Research Council of Italy, 00185 Rome, Italy
1 shared publication - Maja Bertram
Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 12 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 79-94
Representation of Migrant Women in Textbooks—Insights from the Italian Context
- 12 November 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 79-94
Representation of Migrant Women in Textbooks—Insights from the Italian Context
- Open Access
- 6 October 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
- Vol. 21 (3) , 411-427
Comparing Liberal and Conservative Newspapers: Diverging Narratives in Representing Migrants?
This paper investigates migrant representation patterns according to media political orientation, analyzing the coverage of key-events by liberal/conservative online newspapers of France, Greece, Italy, UK. From our textual and visual analysis, it is possible to recognize slight specificities between liberals and conservatives, but not indicative of a deep change of narratives. In both, we registered a prevalence of the “acceptance frame”, an infrequent use of negative tones in texts and aesthetic topic in images, among the “topics of suffering” by Boltanski. Moreover, a domesticity approach limiting the possibility of new narratives of Europe and the rest of the world emerges.
- 6 October 2021
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies
- Vol. 21 (3) , 411-427
Open AccessComparing Liberal and Conservative Newspapers: Diverging Narratives in Representing Migrants?
This paper investigates migrant representation patterns according to media political orientation, analyzing the coverage of key-events by liberal/conservative online newspapers of France, Greece, Italy, UK. From our textual and visual analysis, it is possible to recognize slight specificities between liberals and conservatives, but not indicative of a deep change of narratives. In both, we registered a prevalence of the “acceptance frame”, an infrequent use of negative tones in texts and aesthetic topic in images, among the “topics of suffering” by Boltanski. Moreover, a domesticity approach limiting the possibility of new narratives of Europe and the rest of the world emerges.
- Open Access
- 10 February 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Promotion International
- Vol. 31 (2) , 430-439
Integrating research evidence and physical activity policy making—REPOPA project
Evidence shows that regular physical activity is enhanced by supporting environment. Studies are needed to integrate research evidence into health enhancing, cross-sector physical activity (HEPA) policy making. This article presents the rationale, study design, measurement procedures and the initial results of the first phase of six European countries in a five-year research project (2011–2016), REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA). REPOPA is programmatic research; it consists of linked studies; the first phase studied the use of evidence in 21 policies in implementation to learn more in depth from the policy making process and carried out 86 qualitative stakeholder interviews. The second, ongoing phase builds on the central findings of the first phase in each country; it consists of two sets of interventions: game simulations to study cross-sector collaboration and organizational change processes in the use of evidence and locally tailored interventions to increase knowledge integration. The results of the first two study phases will be tested and validated among policy makers and other stakeholders in the third phase using a Delphi process. Initial results from the first project phase showed the lack of explicit evidence use in HEPA policy making. Facilitators and barriers of the evidence use were the availability of institutional resources and support but also networking between researchers and policy makers. REPOPA will increase understanding use of research evidence in different contexts; develop guidance and tools and establish sustainable structures such as networks and platforms between academics and policy makers across relevant sectors.
- 10 February 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Promotion International
- Vol. 31 (2) , 430-439
Open AccessIntegrating research evidence and physical activity policy making—REPOPA project
Evidence shows that regular physical activity is enhanced by supporting environment. Studies are needed to integrate research evidence into health enhancing, cross-sector physical activity (HEPA) policy making. This article presents the rationale, study design, measurement procedures and the initial results of the first phase of six European countries in a five-year research project (2011–2016), REsearch into POlicy to enhance Physical Activity (REPOPA). REPOPA is programmatic research; it consists of linked studies; the first phase studied the use of evidence in 21 policies in implementation to learn more in depth from the policy making process and carried out 86 qualitative stakeholder interviews. The second, ongoing phase builds on the central findings of the first phase in each country; it consists of two sets of interventions: game simulations to study cross-sector collaboration and organizational change processes in the use of evidence and locally tailored interventions to increase knowledge integration. The results of the first two study phases will be tested and validated among policy makers and other stakeholders in the third phase using a Delphi process. Initial results from the first project phase showed the lack of explicit evidence use in HEPA policy making. Facilitators and barriers of the evidence use were the availability of institutional resources and support but also networking between researchers and policy makers. REPOPA will increase understanding use of research evidence in different contexts; develop guidance and tools and establish sustainable structures such as networks and platforms between academics and policy makers across relevant sectors.