Patrick O. Perche

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, immune‐mediated condition characterized by inflammation of the intertriginous sites and skin folds, resulting in a range of disease including abscesses, draining tracts, and fibrotic scarring. Patients with HS often experience pain, malodorous drainage from the lesions, and disfigurement, resulting in negative impact on quality of life. Objectives: This study seeks to further explore how HS impacts elements such as family relationships, daily life, productivity, environment, education and career decisions, and health care resource use. Methods: In‐depth cross‐sectional interviews were conducted with 40 patients diagnosed with HS over a 4‐month period, followed by thematic analysis. Data analysis was conducted until reaching saturation, and no novel themes were presented. Results: Analysis of their narratives revealed five major concepts: choices, prevalent negative emotions, companionship, life being ‘on hold’ because of flares, and financial considerations. HS affected patients' decision‐making regarding education, social interactions, treatment options, clothing choices, and living environment. Patients dealt with fear, anxiety, depression, decreased productivity, and various financial burdens due to insurance costs. Patients expressed feelings of both social support and isolation regarding their diagnosis. A limitation includes that this is a single center study. Conclusions: Hearing directly from patients with HS about their adversity may promote greater awareness of the serious consequences this dermatologic condition has on patients.

Social media (SM) use has accelerated at an unprecedented pace and dermatology literature evaluating SM use is primarily centered on the quality and quantity of dermatologic content, with minimal research on how adolescent patients experience such content. We recruited 15 patients between the ages of 13–18 years from the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Department of Dermatology to interview regarding their experience with dermatologic content on SM. Despite most participants' insightful comments on SM use and the relative lack of dermatologic content validation on SM, many participants adopted skin care advice from SM. Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to social influence and it is important dermatologists understand how pervasive skin‐related content is on these platforms.

Acne vulgaris is the most common reason for pediatric patients and third most common reason for adult patients to seek care from a dermatologist in the US. However, referring providers may be reluctant to initiate patients on acne treatment or certain prescriptions. We assessed over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription acne (antibiotic and non-antibiotic) treatment rates to characterize differences by patient demographics and provider specialty. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) was analyzed for all acne therapies prescribed for at least 10 unweighted visits between 1993 and 2016 (most recent years available). Prescription rates varied by age, with younger patients more likely to receive a prescription; insurance status, with privately insured patients more likely to receive a prescription; and across and within specialties, with dermatologists more likely to recommend a prescription medication than family medicine and pediatric providers. Among all forms of antibiotics for acne vulgaris, oral minocycline was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic by dermatologists, followed by oral doxycycline. Oral minocycline was also the most common antibiotic prescribed by family physicians, followed by oral doxycycline and oral clindamycin, respectively. Pediatricians appeared to be less likely to prescribe oral antibiotics for acne. The OTC topical antimicrobial benzoyl peroxide was the most utilized drug for acne among pediatricians, and it was also the most commonly recommended OTC drug for acne among dermatologists, family physicians, and pediatricians.

Background: In the last several years, oral tofacitinib has become an increasingly utilized off-label treatment option for immune-mediated skin conditions such as alopecia areata (AA), vitiligo, plaque psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis. Few case reports exist of patients with concomitant AA and vitiligo treated with tofacitinib. Methods: Photographs of the patient's affected disease areas were obtained at initiation of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) and subsequent return visits over two years of treatment. A PubMed search for case reports and other relevant literature was performed using the keywords: alopecia areata, vitiligo, and tofacitinib. Results: Two case reports in the literature describe patients with concomitant AA and vitiligo who were treated with tofacitinib. Both cases use adjuvant therapy or continued therapy, in addition to oral tofacitinib. Our patient was treated with low-dose tofacitinib monotherapy and had marked improvement in her AA and vitiligo, with moderate re-pigmentation of her hands and regrowth of the scalp and eyebrows within several months of treatment. Treatment effects continued to improve over two years without noted adverse effects. Conclusion: Tofacitinib 5 mg BID monotherapy was an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for a patient with refractory alopecia areata and vitiligo. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(12):1366-1368. doi:10.36849/JDD.6826Refractory Alopecia Areata, Vitiligo, Tofacitinib Monotherapy

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common relapsing inflammatory skin condition associated with a high economic burden due to its chronicity and multitude of direct and indirect treatment costs. AD disproportionately impacts children and minority populations, and treatment choices are cost-prohibitive for many patients. Our objective was to describe the treatment and management of AD from a cost-conscious perspective. A review of the literature was conducted with PubMed using the following keywords: AD, cost, medications, treatment, management, efficacy, adherence, education, and prophylactic. The use of moisturizers prophylactically in high-risk infants who have yet to develop AD may reduce incidence of disease and associated costs. Increasing patient medication adherence and moisturizing between flares also reduces costs in AD. The use of corticosteroids as the first-line treatment is efficacious and cost-effective for mild cases of AD, however, in severe cases of AD corticosteroids alone are not sufficient. Systemic biologics are necessary in some patients with severe cases of AD; however, they are associated with high costs. Phototherapy, through portable home units, tanning beds, and natural sunlight are cost-effective alternatives. Effective management of AD improves with education programs for both the patient and their family, reducing long-term costs in the management of this disease. Reducing AD treatment costs requires consideration of prophylactic therapies, patient education, and should differ based on the severity of disease. A multifaceted approach to AD treatment reduces costs and health-care barriers.

The associated direct and indirect costs of acquiring acne vulgaris (acne) treatment from a clinician may prohibit some patients from doing so. Barriers to care may also influence patient preferences for treatment, and while both over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription acne treatments are efficacious, preferences for OTC or prescription acne medications are not well established. We recruited 529 adult subjects from the United States through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), and subjects were surveyed about acne, their acne treatment preferences, and any barriers to care. A total of 450 subjects passed the attention check and were included in the analysis. Of respondents who had tried both OTC and prescription treatments (n=223), more respondents reported that they preferred prescription treatments (130/223, 58.3%), compared with OTC treatments (64/223, 28.7%); or no preference (29/223, 13.0%; P=0.00001). Almost half of all respondents also stated that they experienced barriers to accessing medical care for acne treatment (192/450 42.7%); cost and transportation were the top 2 factors. Considering how common barriers are, and their everchanging nature, some patients may benefit from a discussion of alternative non-prescription acne treatments, serving as a bridge to therapy or while patients are unable to reach a medical provider. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(11):1191-1195. doi:10.36849/JDD.6940Acne Vulgaris Treatment

Full-body skin examinations (FBSEs) involve examination of the patient’s skin from head to toe, and may be uncomfortable for some patients. While many patients prefer same-sex providers for pelvic, genital and rectal exams, desire for same-sex providers for FBSEs is not well characterized. This may be further magnified when FBSE is performed by medical trainees. We surveyed 566 subjects using Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT), an online crowdsourcing platform, to assess the public’s willingness to receive FBSEs based on the sex and/or gender and the level of training of the healthcare provider (HCP). The overall willingness by all respondents to undergo FBSE performed by a dermatologist, dermatology resident and medical student was 84.3%, 77.5% and 65.7%, respectively, if the HCP was the same sex/gender, compared with 60.6%, 54.8% and 45.7% if the HCP was a different sex/gender (P < 0.001). In our cohort, unwillingness for FBSEs was greater if the patient was female, if the HCP was a different gender/sex from the patient and if the HCP was a medical student.

The chronicity of acne and its prolonged treatment regimen may contribute to poor treatment adherence and persistence. Previous studies reported | POSTER

Objective: The objective of this article is to review abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Data Sources: A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was performed for articles from inception through end-March 2022 using the following search terms: atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib, PF-04965842, methotrexate, cyclosporine, dupilumab, ruxolitinib, and JAK-STAT pathway. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English articles relating to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of abrocitinib, and other conventional systemic medications for AD, were included. Data Synthesis: Across phase IIb and phase III clinical trials, abrocitinib was efficacious with an average of 47.5% patients on 200 mg abrocitinib and 32.0% on 100 mg abrocitinib achieving an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 at 12 weeks. In comparison with dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneously every other week, patients on abrocitinib 200 mg once daily had improved disease severity and itch response. The majority of adverse events were not severe and self-limited. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of abrocitinib, prednisone was the only FDA-approved oral medication for AD. Although biologics such as dupilumab have revolutionized care, some patients prefer oral medications. Compared with clinical trials of conventional AD treatments, abrocitinib appears more effective. Conclusions: Abrocitinib is an efficacious oral JAK 1 inhibitor recently FDA-approved for patients ≥ 18 years old with moderate-to-severe AD who have not responded to systemic medications or when contraindicated otherwise.